PM's Europe ‘reset' has delivered change in French tactics on small boats: No 10
A spokesman said: 'We welcome action from French law enforcement to take action in shallow waters, and what you have seen in recent weeks is a toughening of their approach.'
The Government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore, including changing existing rules to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water.
Those changes have not yet come into effect, but reports on Friday suggested tougher action was already being taken.
French rules have previously prevented police officers from intervening when people attempt to board small boats in the Channel (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she welcomed the reports, adding she had been 'working very closely with the French interior minister' to ensure the rules were changed 'as swiftly as possible'.
Downing Street attributed the change in stance from French law enforcement was thanks to the Prime Minister's 'reset' in relations with Europe, as he has looked to heal the wounds caused by the Brexit years.
The spokesman said: 'No government has been able to get this level of co-operation with the French. That is important.
'We are looking to see France change its maritime tactics, and that is down to the Prime Minister's efforts to reset our relationship across Europe.'
But a charity operating in northern France told the PA news agency that French police had already been intervening in crossing attempts in shallow waters despite the new rules not yet being in place.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she had been working closely with her French counterpart, Bruno Retailleau, to change French rules 'as swiftly as possible' (Henry Nicholls/PA)
Kate O'Neill, advocacy coordinator at Project Play, said: 'This is not a new tactic … it's something that has been happening for a long time in Calais and surrounding areas.'
She also warned it was a 'dangerous' tactic as children were 'often in the middle of the boats'.
In its manifesto last year, Labour promised to 'smash the gangs' smuggling people across the Channel in small boats.
But a year into Sir Keir's premiership, the number of people making the journey has increased to record levels.
Some 20,600 people have made the journey so far this year, up 52% on the same period in 2024.
Downing Street acknowledged that the numbers 'must come down', but could not guarantee that they would in the next year.
On Friday, Ms Cooper said part of the reason for the increase in crossings was a rise in the number of people being crammed onto each boat.
She suggested that all migrants who arrive on an overcrowded boat where a child has died should face prosecution.
Ms Cooper told the BBC's Today programme it was 'totally appalling' that children were being 'crushed to death on these overcrowded boats, and yet the boat still continues to the UK'.
Mr Macron is to visit the UK (Suzanne Plunkett/PA)
The Government has already included a new offence of 'endangering life at sea' in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill currently making its way through Parliament.
Ms Cooper has previously said this would allow the authorities to act against people 'involved in behaviour that puts others at risk of serious injury or death, such as physical aggression, intimidation, or rejecting rescue attempts'.
But on Friday, she appeared to go further by suggesting even getting on an overcrowded boat could result in prosecution.
She said: 'If you've got a boat where we've seen all of those people all climb on board that boat, they are putting everybody else's lives at risk.'
Some 15 children are reported to have died while attempting the crossing in 2024, and Ms O'Neill told PA police tactics were making the situation more dangerous.
During a series of broadcast interviews, Ms Cooper also declined to confirm reports the UK was looking at a 'one in, one out' policy that would see people who had crossed the Channel returned to Europe in exchange for asylum seekers with connections to Britain.
Asked about the policy, she would only tell Sky News that ministers were 'looking at a range of different issues' and 'different ways of doing returns'.
Sir Keir is expected to hold a summit with French President Emmanuel Macron, at which efforts to tackle small boat crossings are likely to be high on the agenda.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
26 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
High Court judge refuses to temporarily block Palestine Action terror ban
Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is set to come into force at midnight after a High Court judge refused Ms Ammori's bid for a temporary block. Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Lawyers for Ms Ammori were also refused permission to appeal and were told to go to the Court of Appeal itself. Shortly after the decision was handed down, Ms Ammori said that she would be 'seeking an urgent appeal to try to prevent a dystopian nightmare of the Government's making'. She added: 'The Home Secretary is rushing through the implementation of the proscription at midnight tonight despite the fact that our legal challenge is ongoing and that she has been completely unclear about how it will be enforced, leaving the public in the dark about their rights to free speech and expression after midnight tonight when this proscription comes into effect. 'Hundreds of thousands of people across the country have expressed support for Palestine Action by joining our mailing list, following and sharing our social media content and signing petitions, and many, including iconic figures like Sally Rooney, say they will continue to declare 'we are all Palestine Action' and speak out against this preposterous proscription, demonstrating how utterly unworkable it will be.' In a 26-page judgment, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that 'some of the consequences feared by the claimant and others who have given evidence are overstated'. He continued: 'It will remain lawful for the claimant and other persons who were members of Palestine Action prior to proscription to continue to express their opposition to Israel's actions in Gaza and elsewhere, including by drawing attention to what they regard as Israel's genocide and other serious violations of international law. 'They will remain legally entitled to do so in private conversations, in print, on social media and at protests.' He added: 'That said, there is no doubt that there will be serious consequences if the order comes into effect immediately and interim relief is refused.' The proposal was approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. At a hearing on Friday, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, asked the court to suspend the 'ill-considered' and 'authoritarian abuse of statutory power' until a hearing due around July 21. Mr Husain told the London court: 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' The barrister said that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes, to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that there was no 'express provision' to protect lawyers representing her in the potential legal challenge from criminal consequences if the ban came into effect. She also said that if the ban came into effect the harm would be 'far-reaching', could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh later named Normal People author Sally Rooney, who lives abroad and 'fears the ramifications for her, for her work, for her books, for her programmes' if she shows support for Palestine Action. 'Is the Prime Minister going to denounce her, an Irish artist, as a supporter of a proscribed organisation?' 'Will that have ramifications for her with the BBC, etc?' Ms Ni Ghralaigh asked. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Four people were charged in connection with the incident.
Glasgow Times
39 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Judgment due in Palestine Action court bid for temporary block on terror ban
Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, is asking the court to temporarily block the Government from banning the group as a terrorist organisation before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. The move is to come into force at midnight after being approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords earlier this week, and would make membership and support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The Home Office is opposing bids to delay the ban from becoming law, and the potential launch of a legal challenge against the decision. Protesters outside the Royal Courts of Justice in central London (Lucy North/PA) At the end of a hearing on Friday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said he 'realistically' planned to give his decision after 5.30pm. Lawyers for Ms Ammori said that if the temporary block was not granted, a bid to appeal against that decision could be made on Friday evening. During the hearing, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the London court that this would be the first time a 'direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists'. He added that his client had been 'inspired' by a long history of direct action in the UK, 'from the suffragettes to anti-apartheid activists, to Iraq war activists'. Quoting Ms Ammori, the barrister said that the group had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all' and that its goal 'is to put ourselves in the way of the military machine'. He continued: 'We ask you, in the first instance, to suspend until July 21 what we say is an ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power which is alien to the basic tradition of the common law and is contrary to the Human Rights Act.' The hearing later in July is expected to deal with whether Ms Ammori can bring a High Court challenge over the planned proscription. Mr Husain later said that to proscribe an organisation, the Home Secretary 'has got to believe that the organisation is concerned in terrorism'. Demonstrators banged drums outside the court (Lucy North/PA) Some 81 organisations are already proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Hamas, al Qaida and National Action. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that if the ban came into effect the harm would be 'far-reaching', could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. The barrister named Normal People author Sally Rooney, who lives abroad and 'fears the ramifications for her, for her work, for her books, for her programmes' if she shows support for Palestine Action. 'Is the Prime Minister going to denounce her, an Irish artist, as a supporter of a proscribed organisation?' 'Will that have ramifications for her with the BBC, etc?' Ms Ni Ghralaigh asked. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court there was an 'insuperable hurdle' in the bid to temporarily block the ban of Palestine Action. The barrister also said that if a temporary block was granted, it would be a 'serious disfigurement of the statutory regime'. He said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Friday's hearing comes after an estimated £7 million worth of damage was caused to two Voyager planes at RAF Brize Norton on June 20, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Four people were charged in connection with the incident.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
New DB Cooper files shed light on hunt for world's most elusive plane hijacker – including mystery suspect in wheelchair
Most of the suspects named in the files were up until now unknown to the public INTO THIN AIR New DB Cooper files shed light on hunt for world's most elusive plane hijacker – including mystery suspect in wheelchair Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NEW FBI files shed light on one of the longest-running unsolved hijacking cases in US history. A 398-page document compiles decades of tips on DB Cooper - the mysterious man who hijacked a plane in 1971 and parachuted away with $200,000. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Sketches of DB Cooper, the man who hijacked a plane in 1971 and parachuted out with the ransom money Credit: FBI 6 Cooper sat in the last row of the plane and ordered a bourbon and 7UP Credit: FBI 6 The crew of the Northwest Airlines jet after the hijacking Credit: AP Dan "DB" Cooper is the alias of the man who hijacked Northwest Flight 305 over Portland, Oregon, in November 1971, en route to Seattle. Described as a dark-haired man in his mid-40s, Cooper passed a flight attendant a note claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase - which he showed to contain wires and red sticks. After the Boeing landed in Seattle, Cooper released 36 passengers in exchange for $200,000 in cash and four parachutes. The plane then took off with several crew members, heading towards Mexico City under Cooper's orders. Somewhere between Seattle and Reno, Nevada, at around 10,000 feet, Cooper parachuted from the back of the jet with the ransom money - never to be seen again. The document, released by the FBI on Tuesday, reveals that despite interviewing hundreds of suspects, the agency remains at a dead end. One suspect was even a man in a wheelchair, with the report concluding: 'A man confined to a wheel chair [sic] did not hijack the plane in this case.' While multiple suspects are named in the files, further investigation - including showing photos to witnesses - often led agents to mark their files with a handwritten 'eliminated'. The files include the well-known claim by Donald Sylvester Murphy that he was DB Cooper. Murphy made this claim to a former Newsweek editor, but it was later revealed to be part of an extortion scheme. New DB Cooper 'suspect' and DNA unearthed as pressure piles on FBI to act now and identify skyjacker to solve mystery The elaborate plot saw Murphy posing for photographs 'wearing a wig and glasses and otherwise appearing much like the widely circulated 'artist's conception' of 'D.B. Cooper,'' according to a court document included in the files. Murphy and a conspirator were sentenced to prison for the fraud, according to a 1973 report by The New York Times. Notably, Richard McCoy Jr., whose children claimed he was DB Cooper last year, does not appear in the files. In fact, most suspects remain unknown to the public. 6 The hijacked Northwest Airlines jetliner is seen in this file photo Credit: AP They range from an Alabama man who died of cancer just months after the hijacking, to airline pilots, parachutists and Boeing employees. The Sun previously reported on independent investigator Eric Ulis' probe into the DB Cooper case. In August last year, Eric identified Vince Petersen, a deceased metallurgist from Pennsylvania, as his leading suspect - a theory he has pursued since 2022. Eric and forensic expert Tom Kaye discovered dozens of rare titanium particles on a clip-on tie left behind by the hijacker. Tracing the particles led them to the now-defunct Crucible Steel plant in Midland, Pennsylvania, where Petersen worked for several years. Meanwhile, the memories of those aboard the hijacked flight paint a portrait of DB Cooper himself. Michael Cooper, then a 31-year-old teacher traveling home for Thanksgiving, told The Sun he remembered the hijacker as a suave and level-headed man who exuded quiet authority. "He was probably in his 40s, and he was wearing a jacket and a tie and he was just real quiet," Michael, who is now 84, said. 6 Cooper's tie is one of the only items of evidence Credit: FBI
