Navigating Shifts In Government Policy
Recently, we have frequently heard announcements regarding government policies, particularly those related to taxation and subsidies. The latest among these is the expansion of the Sales and Services Tax (SST) scope, scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2025. Additionally, the government plans to implement fuel subsidy rationalisation for RON95 petrol in the second half of 2025. Furthermore, a new base electricity tariff will be introduced from July 1, 2025, until December 2027. This includes implementing the Automatic Fuel Adjustment mechanism, which is intended to bring greater transparency in determining electricity tariffs.
However, such policy changes are often met with a negative public reception. For instance, the expansion of SST is widely viewed as a move that will increase business costs, compelling entrepreneurs to raise the prices of goods and services. Each time the government attempts to introduce reforms aimed at improving its financial position, resistance tends to arise from various quarters, particularly from associations representing specific interest groups. It is undeniable that these reforms may lead to higher operating costs and the compression of profit margins.
Nevertheless, the issue of fiscal consolidation is far from new. In the context of Malaysia, particularly since the change of administration in 2018, economic reform, especially those pertaining to public finances, has remained a core ideological pursuit. This narrative has continued, even as the political landscape has grown increasingly dynamic and complex. It is, therefore, crucial to discuss how fiscal consolidation measures should be viewed from the perspective of ordinary citizens, especially those who are not directly involved in economic policymaking.
The change in the service tax rate from 6% to 8% in March 2024 drove a 30.3% YoY increase in SST collection
To truly appreciate the significance of fiscal consolidation and its broader impact on society, we must turn to data. For instance, in the first quarter of 2025 (1Q25), Malaysia's federal fiscal deficit stood at RM21.9 billion, or 4.5% of GDP, compared to RM26.4 billion, or 5.7% of GDP, in 1Q24. Two primary factors contributed to this improvement: Higher SST collections and reduced subsidy expenditures.
On March 1, 2024, the service tax rate was increased from 6% to 8%. This change alone drove a 30.3% year-on-year (YoY) rise in SST collections to RM12.9 billion in 1Q25. Then, on June 10, 2024, the diesel subsidy rationalisation was rolled out, resulting in a 19.4% reduction in spending on subsidies and social assistance in the same period.
These figures help explain how the government was able to raise allocations for direct cash assistance programmes, such as Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah and Sumbangan Asas Rahmah, from RM10 billion in 2024 to RM13 billion in 2025. This increase is expected to benefit over nine million Malaysians this year. The aid distributed through these programmes is likely to be spent by households, thereby stimulating retail demand and indirectly benefiting businesses through increased sales.
Hence, fiscal consolidation should be viewed through a broader and more forward-looking lens. While it is often associated with reduced government spending or increased taxation, its deeper objective is to realign public finances in a way that enhances long-term economic resilience. As the government gradually strengthens its financial position, the positive spillovers will inevitably benefit the rakyat, whether through better-targeted social assistance, improved infrastructure or stronger public services.
Digitalisation and e-commerce platforms have empowered buyers with greater price transparency, broader product choices and real-time access to competing offers
Admittedly, the transition phase may involve temporary trade-offs. Among these are the potential rise in prices and business costs as subsidies are rationalised or tax structures adjusted. Yet it is critical to understand that Malaysia's economy today operates within an increasingly open, digital and competitive environment. Unlike in the past, consumers are no longer passive recipients of prices set by businesses. Digitalisation and e-commerce platforms have empowered buyers with greater price transparency, broader product choices and real-time access to competing offers.
In this context, businesses face a far more discerning and informed consumer base. Arbitrary price increases are no longer viable, especially when customers can switch to alternative suppliers with just a few taps on their phones. This phenomenon creates what economists refer to as market discipline, where competition, not regulation alone, acts as a natural check on inflationary behaviour.
In other words, the threat of losing customers to more competitively priced providers forces businesses to be more efficient, innovative and customer-focused, rather than simply passing on costs.
Moreover, technological advancements in logistics, inventory management and digital payments have also helped reduce transaction costs and improved supply chain efficiency. This, in turn, mitigates some of the price pressures that might otherwise arise from fiscal adjustments.
Therefore, while price fluctuations may occur in the short term, the broader economic architecture, including competition, consumer empowerment and digital innovation, serves as a stabilising force. Over time, these mechanisms will support a more sustainable, responsive and inclusive market environment where both consumers and businesses can thrive, even amid evolving policy landscapes.
The above commentary was contributed by Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
7 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Strait of Hormuz closure threatens Malaysia's food supply, economist forecasts price hikes
SHAH ALAM – A sharp increase in the prices of imported food is expected to be among the most significant direct consequences Malaysia may face if a full-scale war erupts following the United States' involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict. Malaysia University of Science and Technology (Must) economist, Professor Emeritus Dr Barjoyai Bardai, stated that the conflict, which has entered a new phase, could lead to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical trade route for the country. According to him, imported foods such as fruits and vegetables are among the goods likely to experience a significant price surge if tensions in the region worsen. 'Malaysia, as an open economy that imports more than RM90 billion worth of food, will certainly be affected by this conflict. "It can be said that the food sector will be one of the hardest hit," he said. He stated that the upcoming expansion of the Sales and Service Tax (SST) on July 1, which includes imported fruits and vegetables, could worsen the impact. 'So, the impact will be even greater. Prices of imported goods will rise, then domestic taxes in Malaysia will also increase and inevitably this situation will have a major impact on food items. 'Given the increasingly volatile developments, we can expect the prices of imported food-based items such as vegetables and fruits to go up. "We also anticipate a knock-on effect on cooked food, and prices at restaurants are also expected to rise,' he told Sinar. Dr Barjoyai added that all parties must prepare to face widespread impacts due to the conflict, as it would affect not only imported goods but also locally produced products.
BusinessToday
9 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Navigating Shifts In Government Policy
Recently, we have frequently heard announcements regarding government policies, particularly those related to taxation and subsidies. The latest among these is the expansion of the Sales and Services Tax (SST) scope, scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2025. Additionally, the government plans to implement fuel subsidy rationalisation for RON95 petrol in the second half of 2025. Furthermore, a new base electricity tariff will be introduced from July 1, 2025, until December 2027. This includes implementing the Automatic Fuel Adjustment mechanism, which is intended to bring greater transparency in determining electricity tariffs. However, such policy changes are often met with a negative public reception. For instance, the expansion of SST is widely viewed as a move that will increase business costs, compelling entrepreneurs to raise the prices of goods and services. Each time the government attempts to introduce reforms aimed at improving its financial position, resistance tends to arise from various quarters, particularly from associations representing specific interest groups. It is undeniable that these reforms may lead to higher operating costs and the compression of profit margins. Nevertheless, the issue of fiscal consolidation is far from new. In the context of Malaysia, particularly since the change of administration in 2018, economic reform, especially those pertaining to public finances, has remained a core ideological pursuit. This narrative has continued, even as the political landscape has grown increasingly dynamic and complex. It is, therefore, crucial to discuss how fiscal consolidation measures should be viewed from the perspective of ordinary citizens, especially those who are not directly involved in economic policymaking. The change in the service tax rate from 6% to 8% in March 2024 drove a 30.3% YoY increase in SST collection To truly appreciate the significance of fiscal consolidation and its broader impact on society, we must turn to data. For instance, in the first quarter of 2025 (1Q25), Malaysia's federal fiscal deficit stood at RM21.9 billion, or 4.5% of GDP, compared to RM26.4 billion, or 5.7% of GDP, in 1Q24. Two primary factors contributed to this improvement: Higher SST collections and reduced subsidy expenditures. On March 1, 2024, the service tax rate was increased from 6% to 8%. This change alone drove a 30.3% year-on-year (YoY) rise in SST collections to RM12.9 billion in 1Q25. Then, on June 10, 2024, the diesel subsidy rationalisation was rolled out, resulting in a 19.4% reduction in spending on subsidies and social assistance in the same period. These figures help explain how the government was able to raise allocations for direct cash assistance programmes, such as Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah and Sumbangan Asas Rahmah, from RM10 billion in 2024 to RM13 billion in 2025. This increase is expected to benefit over nine million Malaysians this year. The aid distributed through these programmes is likely to be spent by households, thereby stimulating retail demand and indirectly benefiting businesses through increased sales. Hence, fiscal consolidation should be viewed through a broader and more forward-looking lens. While it is often associated with reduced government spending or increased taxation, its deeper objective is to realign public finances in a way that enhances long-term economic resilience. As the government gradually strengthens its financial position, the positive spillovers will inevitably benefit the rakyat, whether through better-targeted social assistance, improved infrastructure or stronger public services. Digitalisation and e-commerce platforms have empowered buyers with greater price transparency, broader product choices and real-time access to competing offers Admittedly, the transition phase may involve temporary trade-offs. Among these are the potential rise in prices and business costs as subsidies are rationalised or tax structures adjusted. Yet it is critical to understand that Malaysia's economy today operates within an increasingly open, digital and competitive environment. Unlike in the past, consumers are no longer passive recipients of prices set by businesses. Digitalisation and e-commerce platforms have empowered buyers with greater price transparency, broader product choices and real-time access to competing offers. In this context, businesses face a far more discerning and informed consumer base. Arbitrary price increases are no longer viable, especially when customers can switch to alternative suppliers with just a few taps on their phones. This phenomenon creates what economists refer to as market discipline, where competition, not regulation alone, acts as a natural check on inflationary behaviour. In other words, the threat of losing customers to more competitively priced providers forces businesses to be more efficient, innovative and customer-focused, rather than simply passing on costs. Moreover, technological advancements in logistics, inventory management and digital payments have also helped reduce transaction costs and improved supply chain efficiency. This, in turn, mitigates some of the price pressures that might otherwise arise from fiscal adjustments. Therefore, while price fluctuations may occur in the short term, the broader economic architecture, including competition, consumer empowerment and digital innovation, serves as a stabilising force. Over time, these mechanisms will support a more sustainable, responsive and inclusive market environment where both consumers and businesses can thrive, even amid evolving policy landscapes. The above commentary was contributed by Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid Related
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
‘No replacing apples with cucumbers'
Sounding the alarm: Low (seated, fourth from right) with Chin (fourth from left) posing for a photograph at the press conference on SST at Wisma MCA in Kuala Lumpur. – AZMAN GHANI/The Star KUALA LUMPUR: Consumers may have to pay much more for imported fruits with the expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) kicking in on July 1, traders said. Kuala Lumpur Fruit Wholesalers' Association president Chin Nyuk Moy said importers faced a double whammy with the 5% SST on imported fruits and 30% increase in freight charges in Port Klang, not to mention the possibility of an electricity tariff hike. She said many imported fruits were already subject to duties ranging from 5% to 30%, depending on their countries of origin and type. 'Fruits from countries like Thailand, South Africa and the United States already incur import taxes. 'With all these layered costs, we can't imagine how much apples, oranges, pears and grapes will cost after July 1,' she told a press conference at Wisma MCA here yesterday. Chin said cold storage costs were also rising sharply, citing her facility's RM60,000 monthly power bill. 'SST applies to transport and electricity tariffs too. That's a huge burden for wholesalers. 'Fruits are not a luxury, they are essentials. Vegetables are exempt from SST, and fruits should be too. You can't replace apples with cucumbers,' she argued. Chin said even once-premium fruits such as avocados were now commonly found in supermarkets. She said it remained unclear how consumers will respond to the SST imposition. 'If people start cutting back, we will be forced to reduce imports. Margins are already razor-thin, and operating costs keep rising,' she said. Chin said while importers looked to source fruits from more affordable countries, global supply remained constrained. 'Fruit farming is challenging. The US has cut back on exports, Australia is producing less, and exchange rates are unfavourable. 'Chinese apples that once cost RM50 to RM60 per box now go for RM100. For oranges, we have turned to Egypt and the Middle East for better value,' she said. Northern Kuala Lumpur Traders Association president Ong Mok Hooi said small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were already buckling under pressure. 'SMEs are the backbone of our economy. Imposing more costs now will only worsen the situation. If business continues to decline, how can we retain our workers?' he asked. Fruit wholesaler Qkhiew Yoon Chin said fruits have already become unaffordable to many. 'We used to buy 3kg of mangoes for RM10. After last year's diesel hike, we get only 2kg. 'With the new 5% SST, it will be worse. Fruits were not taxed under the Goods and Services Tax (GST), but they are under SST,' he said. He said traders are struggling with multiple compliance burdens including income tax, PERKESO payments, rising transport costs and implementing e-invoicing. MCA vice-president Datuk Lawrence Low urged the government to withdraw the 5% tax on imported fruits and hold proper consultations with industry stakeholders. 'Fruits like apples, oranges, pears and grapes are part of the daily staple and are used in religious and cultural rituals too,' he added. Low, who chairs the MCA's economic and SME affairs committee, said the move contradicted the government's policy of promoting healthy living, with many temperate fruits not grown locally. He reiterated MCA's long-standing position that the SST should be replaced with a streamlined GST at a lower rate of 3%-4% to avoid cascading taxes and improve transparency. 'MCA will continue to act as a platform for the rakyat. We stand with those struggling under the rising cost of living and will keep voicing their concerns,' he added. On June 9, the government announced a targeted review of the SST regime, effective July 1. While the sales tax for essential goods remains unchanged, a 5% or 10% rate will apply to non-essential items.
