
New Report Illustrates Tax System Failures
The report focuses on the transparency of public funding in the aged residential care sector, and shows how our tax system allows multi-national providers to avoid paying the taxes that the public would expect them to pay, demonstrating this through …
Tax reform advocacy group Tax Justice Aotearoa is calling on the Government and opposition parties to remedy the failures in our taxation system illustrated by a new report from the Centre of International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, which looks at transparency and corporate tax issues in the heavily public-funded aged care sector.
'Instead of talking about the possibility of reducing our corporate tax rate of 28 per cent, the Government should be finding ways to increase financial transparency, and ensuring that multinational corporates pay their fair share of current corporate tax by reviewing the thin capitalisation rules,' says Glenn Barclay, Chairperson of Tax Justice Aotearoa.
'This is particularly urgent where public funds are paid to multi-national corporations delivering services on behalf of the government.'
The report focuses on the transparency of public funding in the aged residential care sector, and shows how our tax system allows multi-national providers to avoid paying the taxes that the public would expect them to pay, demonstrating this through the example of UK-owned BUPA.
BUPA had an average effective corporate tax rate over the past decade of only 4 per cent, much lower than the headline rate of 28 per cent, driven largely by tax-free capital gains.
In addition, the company appears to have used inter-company interest payments on a substantial loan to an Australian-incorporated BUPA company, which may have reduced taxable income by around $151m over the decade, trimming tax revenue by as much as $27 million over that period.
'This ability of multi-nationals to set up loans between subsidiary companies in different countries and then claim tax deductibility on the interest from those loans is a major issue,' says Glenn Barclay.
'While entirely legal, this 'thin capitalisation' is an approach that most members of the public would find questionable. It also gives multi-national players an advantage over wholly New Zealand-owned companies in competitive markets.'
'New Zealand does have thin capitalisation rules that are supposed to prevent this kind of activity, but this example shows that they are simply not strong enough,' says Glenn Barclay.
'We note that Australia and the UK have introduced a 'fixed ratio' test for interest payments on related party debt which limits allowable interest deductions in any one year to 30 per cent of gross earnings and this is the kind of measure that we should also seriously consider.'
'On a related matter, we note that IRD is looking at relaxing the existing thin capitalisation rules for infrastructure projects as part of its work programme agreement with the Minister of Revenue.
This could well be in the Budget and would be a big step in the wrong direction,' says Glenn Barclay. 'We urge the Government not to go down this route, but instead look at tightening this provision across the economy.'
The report questions the tax exemptions in the sector for capital gains arising from revaluations of assets, which is significant given the amount of real estate that companies in the sector own.
'It seems that aged residential care providers are intentionally using the capital gains they make from selling both rights to occupy properties to new residents, and sometimes the properties themselves, as part of their income streams,' says Glenn Barclay.
'If this is true, then the current law, which says that capital gains on sales made intentionally for that purpose are taxable, should be enforced. If, for some reason, it is not enforceable, then the law should be clarified. A comprehensive tax on capital gains would resolve these issues in a much clearer way.'
The report also raises questions about the level of funding for the aged care sector and the extent to which unaccountable multi-national and other private providers should be involved in service delivery.
'The report indirectly supports the need for more funding for aged care generally as the population ages and this is yet another example of a demand for services that only a more progressive tax system that properly taxes wealth can address,' says Glenn Barclay.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Techday NZ
15 minutes ago
- Techday NZ
How intelligent observability and FinOps fuel cloud cost optimisation
As costs to run cloud services continue to escalate amid a push to modernise and adopt AI-driven workloads, organisations need to prioritise getting on top of the expenses as a key priority. Gartner expects Australian organisations to spend nearly A$26.6 billion on public cloud services in 2025, an increase of 18.9% from 2024. With 90% of Australian organisations using multiple public clouds, businesses must navigate the complexities of managing diverse cloud platforms, security frameworks, and billing models. Organisations shifting their focus to measure outcomes of engineering decisions must enhance cloud cost forecasting, make informed investment decisions based on data and align cloud spending with strategic business objectives. Gain insight into cloud spend Getting visibility into cloud costs is key to establishing effective cost controls. Setting up a FinOps practice allows organisations to optimise the business benefits of cloud by fostering financial accountability and collaboration. Intelligent observability platforms empower FinOps teams to collect, analyse, and act on cloud cost data in real time. Built around FinOps best practices, these platforms promote collaboration across teams, enhance cost visibility, and drive financial accountability, all of which promote strategic cloud investment decisions. Organisations that adopt intelligent observability effectively shift from reactive cost-cutting to proactive optimisation, enabling accurate forecasting and efficient cloud spending. AI-driven FinOps The future of FinOps will be heavily influenced by advancements in AI and intelligent automation. Integrated platforms will increasingly optimise cloud resource allocation by adapting in real time to shifting usage patterns and evolving business demands. AI will enhance forecasting and decision-making through predictive analytics and conversational interfaces, uncovering more accurate cost projections and savings opportunities. Powered by AI, FinOps will give engineering teams the clarity to weigh the value of services against their cost, leading to smarter decisions around tooling, optimisation, and consolidation. Ultimately, intelligence-led cloud cost management paves the way for balancing performance with spend, enabling tighter financial control over cloud infrastructure without sacrificing efficiency. As cloud cost environments become increasingly complex to manage, real-time data and intelligence are a game-changer for technical and FinOps teams to optimise resources, reduce unnecessary spend, and maintain strong performance. Paired with continuous monitoring and fine-tuning, intelligent observability not only improves application performance and reliability but also leads to streamlined and cost-effective cloud infrastructure. Improve visibility to get ahead of costs Many organisations struggle with real-time visibility into their cloud usage. Distributed teams often work in isolation, provisioning resources as needed without a shared understanding of the financial impact. The constantly shifting nature of the cloud makes it even more challenging to control sprawl, pinpoint cost drivers, and spot anomalies. The lack of visibility across IT ecosystems and data pipelines leads to overspending or spending in the wrong areas, waste, and a lack of predictability in future costs. Without observability, cloud spending decisions are reactive, with the organisation exceeding its budget, receiving a bill, and then scrambling to find quick wins to reduce cloud spend. To help identify inefficiencies and drive down cloud spend, companies should empower engineers to identify and address performance issues earlier in the process by using modern, AI-strengthened observability tools to estimate cost impacts of different services. By applying intelligent observability data from applications and infrastructure in production, organisations can take a more fine-grained approach to optimising spend while monitoring for performance impacts. It also enables organisations to effectively shift from reactive to proactive value-driven decision-making. While cost-cutting remains a priority, engineering teams often grapple with the challenge of maximising the value of delivered services. Observability addresses this by aligning service delivery KPIs, costs, and business value so teams maintain focus on optimising performance.


Techday NZ
15 minutes ago
- Techday NZ
How hybrid access control can smooth your shift to next-generation security solutions
A model that utilises both on-premises and cloud-based functionality works well for organisations looking to upgrade their security infrastructure in stages. Are security uplifts on the agenda for your organisation in the upcoming financial year? If you answered in the affirmative, you're in good company. Replacing legacy systems with modern surveillance technology – think digital camera arrays, facial recognition systems and the like – has become a priority for Australian businesses of all stripes and sizes, from mining ventures with far flung sites to city centre retailers and outer suburban industrial concerns. It's not hard to see why. With incidents and incursions on the rise, fortifying physical premises and the assets and intellectual property they house is the logical risk mitigation strategy. Embracing change steadily But not every organisation has the financial resources to make a wholesale shift to next-generation physical security infrastructure. Gradual modernisation is a more viable option for many. Taking this tack allows businesses to align security improvements with broader business strategy and spread the cost of upgrading over several years. As part of that staggered transformation process, organisations are also having to consider how they'll manage access control – the mechanisms and features that determine who can access specific areas, doors and resources within buildings or facilities. A traditional, on-premises access control system, with its high ICT and server requirements, can be an expensive overhead; something many technology decision makers are seeking to reduce whenever the opportunity arises. Meanwhile, fully cloud-based access control solutions may not yet meet the needs of every facility. Bridging the gap between on-premises and cloud access management That's where hybrid cloud access control can shine. As the name suggests, it's a blend of both set-ups, one that enables organisations to maintain existing on-premises access control solutions in some settings while utilising the flexibility and features of cloud-based services in others. For example, critical security devices, such as door controllers and badge readers, might be managed on site, while user management, monitoring, and analytics might be moved to the cloud, where they can be managed remotely, centrally, and efficiently. This 'mix and match' approach allows businesses to extend the lifespan of current investments while availing themselves of the benefits cloud technology can deliver in the settings where upgrades have occurred. Unpacking the benefits And benefits there undoubtedly are. They include simplified set-up, maintenance and troubleshooting tasks that can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for organisations that are managing multiple security systems across multiple locations, and the ability to make real-time updates and manage user permissions remotely. For businesses seeking to contain their overheads – and in today's times few organisations are not – this is a straightforward way to keep a lid on headcount, without compromising on the quality of service delivery. The burden of maintaining compliance with relevant industry standards ceases to be an issue, too, provided businesses choose to work with an industry-leading vendor that's committed to best practices in all the jurisdictions in which its customers are located. Select one that integrates robust security measures into its cloud access management offering – think encryption and real-time threat detection facilities – rather than tacking them on as an afterthought, and you'll reduce the risk of cyber threats and unauthorised access in the bargain. Towards a more secure future for your business Maintaining a robust physical security posture will remain a pressing imperative for Australian businesses into the foreseeable future. Prevention is better than cure, and making a harder target of your premises and worksites will lessen the risk of theft, wilful damage and the disruption of your operations. Modernising legacy infrastructure and systems to ensure your assets remain comprehensively protected may be best accomplished in stages. Pursuing a hybrid-cloud access control model allows you to move forward steadily and safely while continuing to derive maximum utility from the solutions you already have in place. If that's a priority for your business in the upcoming financial year, it's mission critical technology that should sit at the heart of your security stack.

1News
31 minutes ago
- 1News
NCEA leaves Kiwi kids unprepared for future
The NCEA qualification lacks the rigour needed to prepare New Zealand students for competitive universities and workplaces, the chief executive of Crimson Education says. It comes as an announcement from the Government and Education Minister Erica Stanford is expected imminently on the future of the NCEA system. Speaking to Q+A, Crimson Education co-founder Jamie Beaton said NCEA wasn't setting students up well for future success, and lacks international recognition. 'To be honest, it's rough. NCEA is basically not a rigorous curriculum at all, and students graduating with it are often two years behind in core subjects like maths, science as well,' said Beaton. Crimson Education's core business is helping high school students get into universities both in New Zealand and around the world. ADVERTISEMENT Fees for the consulting service can range into the thousands. Crimson itself has previously been valued in the hundreds of millions by investors. From his perspective, Beaton said students who go through NCEA are disadvantaged compared to their peers who go through Cambridge International A Levels, or the International Baccalaureate systems. 'For a student of mine trying to get into medical school at the University of Auckland, if they've gone through the A-Level pathway or IB, they've already learned a lot of that first year course-work in biology and chemistry. "The same NCEA student has to learn that almost from scratch.' He also criticised what he described as a 'movement against testing and standards' in New Zealand, which puts this country behind countries like South Korea and Singapore. 'The system structure should have a requirement to get your homework done, prepare for exams. It teaches you discipline and rigour,' said Beaton, who argued the experience of taking school 'really seriously' helped immensely when it came to managing the pressure of his later entrepreneurial career. ADVERTISEMENT 'If you have an education system that's super chill and relaxed, you create these adults that can't actually function in the workplace, and the economy is competitive, that's the reality.' A holder of numerous degrees, Beaton says he still feels pressure when sitting exams, and that is a good thing for students to experience. 'I've probably sat at this point more than 300 exams across all these random programmes. I still – my heart races. I had one at Cornell a couple of weeks ago in New York, my heart was racing all day before my econometrics exam,' he said. 'Young people today talking about test anxiety like it's like this terrible thing – the real world is kind of stressful and you want to have a bit of exposure when you're younger so you can handle that.' Crimson Education was founded in 2013, with Beaton meeting his fellow teenage co-founders at Model United Nations conferences. The company's advisors include former PM Sir John Key, former leader of the opposition David Cunliffe, and former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. Crimson Education's history has not been without controversy, including several lawsuits. ADVERTISEMENT The company has also faced criticism of being a vehicle for entrenching inequality, by offering services that allow fee-paying families to enhance their children's access to top universities, and the connections that come with studying among the elite. Beaton rejected that suggestion, saying his company operates a 'need-based model, so if you can't afford our fees you can qualify for a full scholarship, or partial scholarship, to cover this.' For the full interview, watch the video above Q+A with Jack Tame is made with the support of New Zealand On Air