
US experts fear all vaccines at risk as Trump officials target mRNA jabs
As top US health officials turn against some mRNA vaccines, experts fear for the country's preparedness for the next pandemic and worry that other vaccines will be targeted next.
Donald Trump's administration recently canceled a $766m award to Moderna on the research and development of H5N1 bird flu vaccines, and officials have announced new restrictions and regulations for Covid mRNA vaccines – actions that signal a move away from the breakthrough technology.
These changes add to other vaccine-related shakeups at health agencies, including layoffs and resignations of top vaccine officials and the abrupt termination of HIV vaccine research.
On Monday, Robert F Kennedy Jr, secretary of health and human services, announced he was disbanding the independent advisory committee on vaccines for the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
'I think mRNA vaccines are particularly at risk, although I think all vaccines are at risk,' said Paul Offit, professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
'I think that this administration will do everything it can to make vaccines less available, less affordable and more feared.'
Messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines heralded a major breakthrough in battling the Covid pandemic, building on three decades of scientific work and earning a Nobel prize.
The Covid vaccines, some of which were co-developed by US government scientists, were taken by millions of people around the globe, and international scientists and officials closely monitored their side effects and effectiveness.
mRNA vaccines and therapeutics show promise for treating or preventing certain cancers, rare conditions and infectious diseases – including, potentially, the next pandemic, experts said.
'We don't know what the next pandemic virus is going to be,' said Jennifer Nuzzo, professor of epidemiology and director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health.
With mRNA, she said, 'you can pivot faster when you find a new virus to make a vaccine that's tailored to that virus'.
The mRNA vaccines also don't need to be incubated in eggs, which is time-consuming and potentially difficult if there are egg shortages from bird flu outbreaks.
In 2009, the US didn't have enough vaccines to battle the swine flu pandemic, Nuzzo said. 'It seems like we're determined to repeat those mistakes.'
Despite their promise, mRNA vaccines have been plagued by misinformation.
Some skeptics believe the vaccines affect fertility or cause birth defects, though research shows no link – and, in fact, studies show that the vaccines reduce these risks by preventing infections with Covid, which can be especially dangerous to pregnant people and newborns.
Because mRNA sounds similar to DNA, some people mistakenly think it interferes with their genes. Conspiracy theorists also claim the vaccine causes people to die suddenly, or that the shots implant microchips or impart 5G connectivity.
Meghan McCain recently endorsed, in a now-deleted social media post, an unregulated supplement company's 'spike detox' for those who 'regret' getting vaccinated.
Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, called the mRNA Covid shots the 'deadliest vaccine ever made,' incorrectly claiming the vaccines cause more illnesses and deaths than they prevent.
Kennedy rose to greater prominence through the pandemic as previously fringe conspiracies about vaccines began dominating more mainstream narratives.
'Anti-vaccine sentiment goes back to the first days of vaccines in the 1700 and 1800s,' said John Moore, professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medical College.
'It's been a perpetual theme in society for 200-plus years, but it has been turbocharged by the Covid pandemic.'
Some states are now considering laws against mRNA vaccines, and US health officials have taken several steps to limit Covid shots in recent weeks.
Officials with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced plans to limit boosters to older people and those with certain health conditions, as well as plans to conduct placebo-controlled clinical trials again.
The CDC removed the vaccination recommendation for pregnant people and softened the recommendation for children's shots.
About 165,000 Americans were hospitalized and 40,000 died in the previous year because of Covid, the CDC said at an April meeting.
About 6,700 of those hospitalizations were among children, especially young children, and 152 children died from Covid in that time, the data showed.
About 5% of children under five are vaccinated against Covid – rates much lower than other age groups.
'That's why, if you look at the numbers of hospitalizations and deaths for children now, especially young children less than four years old, it's really not much different than the beginning of this pandemic,' Offit said.
There's also 'extensive evidence' for benefits to pregnant people and their babies, he said.
While the FDA recently approved Moderna's 'next generation' Covid vaccine, which was even more effective that their current shot in clinical trials, the agency limited the new shot only for older adults and for people aged 12 to 64 with health conditions putting them at higher risk.
The FDA also announced new requirements for mRNA Covid vaccine makers to add additional warnings about the risks of myocarditis, or heart inflammation, based on data the FDA has not made public.
During the Biden administration, Moderna received two awards totaling $766m to develop potential bird flu vaccines.
Despite the changeover in administrations, Moderna's work continued as normal – until February, when health officials said in an article that the funding was being reviewed. Moderna hadn't received any notification of this review, which recently culminated in having the funding cancelled.
Halting the H5N1 vaccine research, which was in phase 3 trials, leaves the US vulnerable in a potential flu pandemic, Nuzzo said. It also means other countries could build upon US investments to procure the vaccines for themselves.
mRNA has shown promise in treating pancreatic cancer and other cancers, as well as rare conditions and hard-to-treat infectious diseases.
Moderna, for instance, is working on vaccines for melanoma, lung cancer, norovirus, flu, and CMV, or cytomegalovirus, a fairly common infection that can cause lasting health problems for infants. The company also has an RSV vaccine, currently approved for older adults, that could be expanded for other age groups.
But those efforts could be hampered by the administration's moves against mRNA and terminations of vaccine scientists and independent advisors who offer vaccine recommendations.
'We don't want to see kids kicked out of school because a 12-year-old girl is not getting her fifth Covid booster shot,' Marty Makary, head of the FDA, said in a recent interview. Yet no states require Covid vaccination for school attendance.
Pushing back against mandates is a common tactic from anti-vaccine activists working to dismantle all vaccine mandates, Offit said.
In addition to claiming the Covid vaccines are deadly, Kennedy has 'also said no vaccine is beneficial', he said.
Kennedy recently unveiled a sweeping and controversial $50m research project on autism, including an autism research database.
If that effort somehow links autism to vaccines – despite decades of studies showing no connection – it could open lawmakers up to lawsuits, Offit said.
'He could manipulate the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,' Offit said. If Kennedy adds autism to the compensable list of injuries, 'it would break the program'.
That would mean the people who experience very rare severe side effects from vaccines may then face challenges getting compensated.
And it could prompt vaccine makers to stop producing routine childhood immunizations because of legal liability. 'It's a fragile market,' Offit said.
Kennedy 'is an anti-vaccine activist, science denialist and conspiracy theorist', he continued. 'I think that he will continue this onslaught against vaccines.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
NHS faces paying more for US drugs to avoid future Trump tariffs
Britain faces paying more for US drugs as part of a deal to avoid future tariffs from Donald Trump. The NHS will review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president', according to documents released after a trade agreement was signed earlier this year. White House sources said it expected the NHS to pay higher prices for American drugs in an attempt to boost the interests of corporate America. A Westminster source said: 'There's an understanding that we would look at the drug pricing issue in the concerns of the president.' The disclosure is likely to increase concerns about American interference in the British health service, which has long been regarded as a flashpoint in trade talks. It comes after Rachel Reeves announced a record £29 billion investment in the NHS in last week's spending review. The Chancellor's plans will drive spending on the health service up towards 50 per cent of all taxpayer expenditure by the mid-2030s, according to economists at the Resolution Foundation. The Telegraph has also learnt that under the terms of the trade deal with America, the UK has agreed to take fewer Chinese drugs, in a clause similar to the 'veto' given to Mr Trump over Chinese investment in Britain. The White House has asked the UK for assurances that steel and pharmaceutical products exported to the US do not originate in China, amid fears the deal could be used to 'circumvent' Mr Trump's punishing tariffs on Beijing. Mr Trump is enraged by how much more America pays for drugs compared with other countries and considers it to be the same issue as he has raised on defence spending. Just as the US president has heaped pressure on European nations to increase the GDP share they allocate to defence, he thinks they should spend more on drug development. An industry source said: 'The way we've been thinking about it and many in the administration have been thinking about it, it's more like the model in Nato, where countries contribute some share of their GDP.' Britain and the US 'intend to promptly negotiate significantly preferential treatment outcomes on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients', the trade deal reads. Pharmaceutical companies are also pushing for reductions in the revenue sales rebates they pay to the NHS under the voluntary scheme for branded medicines pricing, access and growth (VPAG) – a mechanism that the UK uses to make sure the NHS does not overpay. Non-US countries are 'free-riding' Last week, Albert Bourla, Pfizer's chief executive, said non-US countries were 'free-riding' and called for a US government-led push to make other nations increase their proportionate spend on innovative medicines. He said White House officials were discussing drug prices in trade negotiations with other countries. 'We represent in UK 0.3pc of their GDP per capita. That's how much they spend on medicine. So yes, they can increase prices,' Mr Bourla said. Industry sources said there was no indication yet on what the White House would consider to be a fair level of spending. Whatever the benchmark, Britain will face one of the biggest step-ups. UK expenditure on new innovative medicines is just 0.28pc of its GDP, roughly a third of America's proportionate spending of 0.78pc of its GDP. Even among other G7 nations, the UK is an anomaly. Germany spends 0.4pc of its GDP while Italy spends 0.5pc. Most large pharmaceutical companies generate between half and three quarters of their profits in the US, despite the fact that America typically makes up less than a fifth of their sales. This is because drug prices outside of the US can cost as little as 30pc of what Americans pay. Yet, pharmaceutical companies rely on higher US prices to fund drug research and development, which the rest of the world benefits from. A month ago, Mr Trump signed an executive order titled 'Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients', which hit out at 'global freeloading' on drug pricing. It stated that 'Americans should not be forced to subsidise low-cost prescription drugs and biologics in other developed countries, and face overcharges for the same products in the United States' and ordered his commerce secretary to 'consider all necessary action regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or precursor material that may be fuelling the global price discrimination'. Trung Huynh, the head of pharma analysis at UBS, said: 'The crux of this issue is Trump thinks that the US is subsidising the rest of the world with drug prices. 'The president has said he wants to equalise pricing between the US and ex-US. And the way he wants to do it is not necessarily to bring down US prices all the way to where ex-US prices are, but he wants to use trade and tariffs as a pressure point to get countries to increase their prices. 'If he can offset some of the price by increasing prices higher ex-US, then the prices in America don't have to go down so much.' Mr Huynh added: 'It's going to be very hard for him to do. Because [in the UK deal] it hinges on the NHS, which we know has got zero money.' Under VPAG, pharmaceutical companies hand back at least 23pc of their revenue from sales of branded medicines back to the NHS, worth £3bn in the past financial year. The industry is pushing for this clawback to be cut to 10pc, which would mean the NHS would have to spend around 1.54bn more on the same medicines on an annual basis. The Government has already committed to reviewing the scheme, a decision which is understood to pre-date US trade negotiations. A government spokesman said: 'This Government is clear that we will only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests and to suggest otherwise would be misleading. 'The UK has well-established and effective mechanisms for managing the costs of medicines and has clear processes in place to mitigate risks to supply.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Be aware of the hidden dangers of your guilty pleasures that could cause cancer, including being busy
A sip of wine, a craving for pizza, having a full calendar may all seem like harmless aspects of life but a scientist has revealed such seemingly innocent actions could be putting you on the brink of developing cancer. University of California's Dr Raphael Cuomo claims chronic stress, fast food, alcohol, and drugs are an almost surefire way to set yourself up for a diagnosis with the disease later in life. In Dr Cuomo's new book Crave: The Hidden Biology Of Addiction And Cancer, he noted that the body's repetitive desire to indulge in junk food and addictive behaviors drove the body to the deadly condition: 'Crave reveals how modern habits like vaping, binge-eating, and daily cannabis use hijack our biology.' The expert added: 'These behaviors quietly damage the body's ability to repair itself. Over time, they open the door to cancer. It is not about genetics or bad luck. It is about the choices we make every day.' Over 600,000 Americans and more than 150,000 Brits die of various cancers every year. After studying 'millions of patient records' from across the University of California hospitals and spending months reviewing studies on cancer biology, Dr Cuomo revealed what he says are the top habits most likely to cause the destructive illness. Fast food Dr Cuomo called eating fast food 'slow poison', and noted that its effects could not be seen immediately but might cause long-term damage. Earlier this year, researchers tested more than 300 foods sold at restaurant chains and in grocery stores across America for two microscopic toxins that have been linked to cancer, infertility, and autism. They found that of all fast-food restaurants, the salad chain Sweetgreen and coffeehouse Starbucks scored poorest. Sweetgreen's Chicken Pesto Parm Salad and Starbucks' Matcha Latte was found to contain the highest amount of phthalates, a group of chemicals used to make plastics more flexible and transparent. Studies showed that phthalates, commonly used in food packaging material, imitate the body's hormones and interfere with the production of and response to natural hormones like estrogen and testosterone. Some phthalates were linked to certain cancers, particularly breast cancer and lymphoma. However, Dr Cuomo pointed towards fiber consumption as a critical part of reversing damage as it would help improve gut bacteria, reduce inflammation, and keep cells healthy. Smoking and drinking Smoking causes about 30 per cent of overall cancer deaths in the U.S. and is a leading cause of lung, brain, neck, and bladder cancer. Alcohol consumption's been linked to an increased risk of several types of cancer, including breast, colon, liver, and esophageal cancer. About 20,000 people die of booze-related cancers, annually. Researchers in Germany found that a combination of drinking and smoking significantly raised the risk of colon cancer in young Americans. Researchers analyzed two dozen studies, comparing regular drinkers and smokers with people who abstained from both. Just 100 cigarettes in a person's lifetime - the equivalent of one per week for two years - was linked to a 59 per cent higher risk of colon cancer compared to people who never smoked. They also found drinking alcohol every day raised the risk of developing early onset colon cancer by 39 per cent, even if it's just one or two drinks per day. Alcohol and smoking have both been linked to cancer in the past, as they release chemicals that destroy DNA and cause cells to mutate. Also, each daily can of beer or glass of wine further increased the chance by an additional two per cent. In his book, Dr Cuomo noted that deep sleep is the 'most underestimated tool' to improve damage caused by addictions, such as smoking and drinking. He explained that during consistent deep sleep, the body performs critical tasks such as repairing tissues, regulating hormones, consolidating memory, and clearing metabolic waste. Stress A 2024 study presented at the United European Gastroenterology congress by a group of Chinese researchers noted that a combination of chronic stress and anxiety has been linked to colorectal cancer in young people. They explained when a body is under frequent stress, a number of healthy bacteria that live in the gut start dying off, making it easier for cancer to move in. When the bacteria die off, tumors grow more quickly, leading to more aggressive, rapidly growing colorectal cancers. Research from Trinity College in Ireland suggested these bacteria support the body's immune system, can protect against virus and bacteria, and prevent damage in gut cells. Apart from this, chronic stress can lead to increased levels of cortisol and other stress hormones in the body that can promote cancer growth and its spread to various parts of the body. A constant state of stress can also weaken the immune system's ability to effectively fight off cancer cells. However, Dr Cuomo believes that there are ways to break free from all addictions and prevent cancer development in the body. He said: 'The real threat is not a single cocktail or slice of cake. It is the craving that drives you back again and again. 'That craving is what wears down your body's defenses. I tell people to test their control. Start with one week of abstention. Not forever. Just seven days. That short reset reveals a lot. 'You learn what your body depends on. During that time, focus on physical recovery. Sleep deeply. Move your body. Eat real food. 'Spend time with people you trust. Addiction thrives in isolation. Recovery begins with reconnection.' Additionally, Dr Cuomo suggested replacing the habit by engaging in some form of movement, such as taking regular walks.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labor MP Dan Repacholi on masculinity, men's health and why he was ‘embarrassed' to visit his doctor
'Big Dan' Repacholi is still eating big burgers – but after a major health kick which saw him lose more than 30kg, he's down to one sandwich per sitting, from his previous three. After a period where he admits he was 'embarrassed' to visit his doctor, the affable and popular member for Hunter has been named the federal government's special envoy for men's health, and is on a crusade to get blokes and boys to talk about their problems with health professionals and their families. For the second-term Labor MP, that meant talking to friends and doctors about eating healthier. For other men in Australia, as Repacholi tells Guardian Australia in a revealing and frank interview, it may mean talking about mental health, sexual health or toxic masculinity. 'It's about getting the conversation going between blokes, to go 'I just went and had a heart health checkup today, and you know what? They actually found something,'' he says. 'On the mental health side of things, there are so many, so many men and boys who are struggling. But it also is about teaching boys and young adolescents the right level of masculinity, through schools as well, about what is acceptable and what isn't.' 'Talk to 50 blokes, especially those that are a little bit older, they still think you need to get a finger in the arse to get a prostate check; they don't realise it's a simple little blood test. There's so much that isn't getting out there to the average population and that we need to do better at.' Repacholi, standing over two metres tall with a big bushy beard, came to parliament last term after a life working in the Hunter Valley mining industry and a glittering career in pistol shooting as a former Olympiian and Commonwealth Games champion. Well-liked around Canberra, he's known for producing an annual calendar with photos of him eating large hamburgers around the Hunter region; but he admits he indulged to excess, particularly enjoying KFC and finishing off his family's dinner leftovers. 'I got to 152 kilos,' Repacholi says. 'It's the biggest I've ever been. And I've always been a big guy – I don't remember seeing large [size shirts], I only see Xs in front of it.' 'I was walking down the street in Cessnock, and I saw myself in a window … and I thought, 'Holy fuck, look how fat you are.'' Repacholi says he spoke to two medical doctors in the Labor caucus, Mike Freelander and Gordon Reid, admitting he was looking for 'a quick fix'. Repacholi is open about having used injectable weight management drugs, but he was told to go see his doctor for a weight-loss plan. 'I was embarrassed to go see my doctor, because I'd gotten so big,' he says. 'I didn't tell anyone at first … but then I thought, this is going to be fine, I'll give it a go.' Now having dropped a large amount of weight, aided by a gym workout plan and healthy eating, Repacholi says he wants to share his story in hopes of being an example for other men feeling sheepish about asking for help. 'I thought, we should be having those conversations, and I should be telling people about this, because there might be millions of people like me embarrassed to go see their doctor,' he says. 'If an elected official can't have these conversations, how do you expect George, or Tom or Craig down the street to be able to?' The annual burger calendar though, Repacholi laughs, is safe and will continue. Named to the envoy role last month, working under the health minister, Mark Butler, Repacholi is taking to it with abandon. The past week has been Men's Health Week, and Repacholi – already known for his zany and enthusiastic social media presence – has posted videos about calling Butler for a goodnight check-in and a meme about erectile dysfunction . 'Or as some of us call it: 'the old fella clocking off early',' Repacholi posted, saying men 'should be chatting about it more'. This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'. The MP says his advocacy role will cover all aspects of men's health, physical and mental. He points to Men's Sheds, including virtual ones and Facebook groups, as avenues he thinks work well, but raised concerns about how adolescents learned about relationships. 'Most young boys are finding out about sex through porn. They're not being taught at school. Their first encounters into anything like that is looking at porn online, and that can go down so many different rabbit warrens that you don't want to open it up,' he says. 'It's about teaching them how to respect women, how to respect ladies, how to respect girls, or how to respect any partner that they have.' The social services portfolio, under former minister Amanda Rishworth and new minister Tanya Plibersek, has been working on issues around healthy relationships, domestic violence and masculinity for some time, with particular concern around 'men's rights' influencers on social media perpetuating toxic attitudes towards gender roles and sex. Repacholi says that will be part of his focus, working with social services. 'If we can get these young boys on the right track in school with learning what the right level of healthy masculinity is, we're on to a winner,' he says. 'If they can see that if they do treat somebody like what some of those people [men's right influencers] have been, they don't get any respect. 'It's a hard, hard conversation. There's no doubt about that. And we're always going to have people like that in the world that will say that. 'But hopefully the young boys out there can see that that is not the right way.'