Can Energy Fuels Deliver on Its Low-Cost Uranium Strategy?
This is expected to deliver exceptional cost advantages. Average mining and transportation costs to the White Mesa Mill are estimated at $10-$14 per pound of recovered uranium and milling costs at $13-$16 per pound. This will take the total weighted average cost of goods sold between $23 and $30 per pound of uranium recovered, among the lowest in the world.
Initially, the high-grade Pinyon Plain ores will be blended and processed with the lower-grade, higher-cost La Sal/Pandora ores through early 2026. After this, Energy Fuels will have the flexibility to process Pinyon Plain ores alone to maximize margins, or continue to blend with other sources.
As of June 30, 2025, the company's finished uranium inventories carried a weighted average cost of $53 per pound, reflecting historic production and purchases. With the integration of lower-cost Pinyon Plain output, the cost of goods sold for uranium sales is projected to fall to $50–$55 per pound through late 2025 and decline to $30–$40 per pound in early 2026.
This steady reduction in costs, coupled with stable uranium pricing, is expected to significantly enhance Energy Fuels' gross margins, reinforcing its competitive advantage in the North American market.
Energy Fuels' gross margin was 3.3% in the second quarter, mainly weighed down by a 52% plunge in revenues on lower uranium sales, even though costs applicable to revenues were down 0.7%.
UUUU's gross margin was lower than the industry average of 35.76%. Meanwhile, peer Centrus Energy LEU reported a gross margin of 36% in the second quarter. Cameco Corp.'s CCJ gross margin was 35.51% in the second quarter.
UUUU's Price Performance, Valuation & Estimates
Energy Fuels shares have gained 101.6% so far this year compared with the industry's 3.2% growth. During this time, the Basic Materials sector has risen 14.8%, while the S&P 500 has gained 9.6%. Cameco and Centrus Energy shares have gained 167% year to date.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
UUUU is trading at a forward 12-month price/sales multiple of 24.93X, a significant premium to the industry's 2.74X. Cameco and Centrus Energy shares are trading at 13.17X and 6.68X, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Energy Fuels' 2025 loss is pegged at 33 cents per share. The bottom-line estimate for 2026 is pegged at earnings of one cent per share. Here is how the EPS estimates for 2025 and 2026 have been revised over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Energy Fuels Inc (UUUU) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P 500 Q4 Rally Looms: 4.1% Avg Return Since 1950. Don't Miss Fed Rate Cuts & Weak Yen/Franc Driving Gains
A strong S&P 500 stock market lifts American citizens by boosting wealth, confidence, and economic opportunities. Higher stock prices increase the value of retirement accounts, investments, and pensions, giving people more financial security and spending power. Companies benefit too, as rising stock values make it easier to raise capital for growth, which can lead to more jobs and innovation. If prices keep climbing, we can expect stronger consumer spending, improved business investment, and a more robust economy. Will the upcoming bullish seasonal pattern set the stage for this continued growth? More News from Barchart Trade the Warren Buffett Rally in UnitedHealth Stock With This High-Reward, Low-Risk Options Strategy Apple Expects $1.1 Billion Tariff Hit in 4th Quarter After $800 Million Q3 Hit; CEO Tim Cook Warns 'Many Factors That Could Change' Cathie Wood Is Buying BLSH Stock After the Bullish IPO. Should You? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Interest Rates The Federal Reserve is expected to initiate a lower interest rate cycle in the last quarter of 2025, with market data indicating a Fed Funds rate of 3.75-4.00% by year's end, currently at 4.25-4.50%. Lower rates reduce business borrowing costs, enabling expansion and hiring, which supports corporate earnings and stock prices. The S&P 500 has historically risen in response to rate cuts. Source: CME Group Exchange This environment fosters optimism among investors, driving capital into equities, particularly in sectors like financials, industrials, and energy, which have outperformed during past rate-cutting periods. This signals a potential opportunity for professional traders to increase exposure to U.S. equities, especially in growth-sensitive sectors, as lower rates stimulate economic activity and boost market confidence. Historically Strong Period The fourth quarter has historically been strong for the U.S. stock market, with the S&P 500 averaging a 4.1% return from October to December since 1950. Seasonal factors like holiday spending, corporate earnings releases, year-end capital inflows, and portfolio rebalancing contribute to this strength. Less Demand for Safe-Haven Currencies Seasonally, the last quarter usually sees safe-haven currencies being out of favor, characterized by a seasonal pattern of weakness in the Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc, with historical data showing the Yen declining by an average of 2.3% and the Franc by 1.8% against the U.S. dollar from October to December (2000–2020). This seasonal weakness suggests investors are less likely to seek these currencies as safe havens, reducing the typical flight-to-quality demand. Instead, market dynamics may favor U.S. assets, as traders anticipate continued equity strength, particularly in the S&P 500. As professional traders lean into U.S. equities, there could be opportunities while monitoring Yen and Franc movements for currency strategies. Source: Moore Research Center, Inc. (MRCI) Source: MRCI MRCI research reveals a 15-year seasonal pattern (blue line) that sees weaker prices for both currencies in the last quarter of the calendar year. Technical Source: Barchart The S&P 500 has had a significant rally from the April 2025 lows. As the seasonal buy window approaches in late August, the S&P 500 may experience some sideways to down correction activity. During this seasonal buy window, traders may find the January 2025 previous all-time high area (green line) as potential support. Seasonal Pattern Source: MRCI The seasonal window (yellow box) opens in August, while the September mini-S&P is still the front month. However, by the end of the seasonal window, December will be the front-month contract. The seasonal window will open, but the price does not go straight up. Some years, the pattern has been sideways to higher until the end of September. This allows traders to build long positions or wait for an established uptrend. Source: MRCI Through extensive research, MRCI has found that the December mini-S&P contract has closed higher on about November 28 than on August 22 for 13 of the past 15 years, an 87% occurrence rate. The hypothetical winning trades averaged 107 points, $5,383. As a crucial reminder, while seasonal patterns can provide valuable insights, they should not be the basis for trading decisions. Traders must consider various technical and fundamental indicators, risk management strategies, and market conditions to make informed and balanced trading decisions. Markets to participate in this opportunity Equity traders may use the exchange-traded fund (ETF) SPY to participate in this opportunity. At the same time, futures traders could use the mini-contract ES or the micro-contract ET. There are many more vehicles to trade the S&P 500, but these are among the more popular. Also, the S&P 500 is the most liquid index market to trade, allowing for safer executions of your trades. In closing…. The final months of 2025 offer traders a chance to capitalize on a historically strong S&P 500, which has delivered a 4.1% average return in the fourth quarter since 1950, fueled by holiday spending, earnings releases, and portfolio rebalancing. With the Federal Reserve poised to lower rates to 3.75-4.00% by year-end, per CME Group exchange, and seasonal weakness in the Yen and Franc reducing safe-haven demand, U.S. equities could see sustained momentum, particularly in financial sectors. The December mini-S&P contract has closed higher by late November in 13 of the last 15 years, per MRCI data. Still, early consolidation could push prices down to the former January 2025 all-time highs, offering an opportunity for buying lower. Use SPY, ES, or ET to position for this opportunity, but integrate technicals, fundamentals, and risk management—can you navigate the volatility to capture this potential? On the date of publication, Don Dawson did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Business Insider
44 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Tumble on Alarming AI Report as Momentum Fades
Both the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) finished Tuesday's trading session in negative territory following a report from MIT that cast doubt on the sustainability of AI. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The report estimates that U.S. companies have invested between $35 and $40 billion in AI, though the returns have been underwhelming. 'Just 5% of integrated AI pilots are extracting millions in value, while the vast majority remain stuck with no measurable [profit and loss] impact,' said MIT. The report surveyed hundreds of leaders and employees and collected data from 300 public AI announcements. Over the weekend, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said that he believes the AI industry is experiencing a bubble, reported The Verge. 'I do think some investors are likely to lose a lot of money, and I don't want to minimize that, that sucks,' Altman said. 'There will be periods of irrational exuberance.' Meanwhile, the White House announced that President Trump is working to set up a bilateral meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin in an attempt to secure a ceasefire or truce. Trump added that he was open to attending the meeting. Furthermore, Trump has pledged air support for Ukraine as part of a security guarantee package while insisting that U.S. troops would not set foot on Ukrainian territory. Discussions surrounding these guarantees between the U.S., Ukraine, and several other European nations are set to begin in the coming days. Trump's efforts to broker peace between several nations haven't exactly improved his ratings. According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll ended August 18, Trump's approval rating is still at a term-low of 40%, remaining unchanged from late July. 54% of the respondents worried that Trump was too closely aligned with Russia. Trump met with Putin last week in Anchorage, Alaska to try and resolve the Russia-Ukraine war. To end on a positive note, S&P Global affirmed the U.S. long-term credit rating of AA+, citing elevated tariff revenue that is expected to offset the tax breaks and spending measures from The One Big Beautiful Bill. 'Amid the rise in effective tariff rates, we expect meaningful tariff revenue to generally offset weaker fiscal outcomes that might otherwise be associated with the recent fiscal legislation, which contains both cuts and increases in tax and spending,' said S&P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be It
Key Points Amazon and its management team are experienced with trying new things. Every success or failure, however, is a learning experience. History has shown that companies that foster innovation and don't punish failure tend to thrive, while those that fear it or are unwilling to adapt often struggle. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Investors can own as many individual stocks as they want and can afford. Sometimes, though, hypothetically imagining that you're limited to just one can be enlightening. That thought experiment forces you to rate and rank the strengths and flaws of every investment candidate on your radar. This process can -- in a good way -- really help you narrow down your list to a small handful of top options. Or one. And I know exactly which one that would be for me. If I could only buy and hold a single stock, it would be Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN). Here's why. What Amazon really is You very likely already know the company. Amazon is, of course, the king of North American e-commerce, accounting for nearly 40% of the market's total revenue, according to research by Digital Commerce 360. It's doing alright overseas, too. Then there's its cloud computing arm, Amazon Web Services, which provides a relatively small portion of its revenue, but is responsible for nearly 60% of the company's operating profits. However, these numbers still don't even come close to telling the whole story. Amazon also manages an on-demand video platform (Prime), owns grocery store chain Whole Foods Markets, does delivery work for other online retailers, and sells prescription pharmaceuticals through its Pillpack arm. It also monetizes its online mall by allowing its sellers to pay for more prominent promotion, creating an advertising business that generated $15.7 billion in revenue last quarter alone, by the way. On top of all that, it owns websites and Twitch, and is the parent to camera-doorbell brand Ring. There's a method to the madness behind these seemingly disparate lines of business, though. While most companies focus on doing one or two things extremely well, Amazon has orchestrated several different lines of business, each of which fuels another, and each of which is fueled by another. The result is a mesh of different profit centers that ultimately funnels consumers and corporations into Amazon's ecosystem. Yes, it's complicated, but yes, Amazon can handle it. That's not quite the only reason I'd be willing to make Amazon my one and only stock holding, though. Jeff Bezos started it Companies founded or grown by bigger-than-life leaders can make for potentially problematic investments. It's just difficult to determine if it's the company that's something special, or the person. If it's the person, what happens when that individual is no longer at the helm? Case in point: General Electric was never quite the same after Jack Welch stepped down as CEO in 2001. Steve Jobs was also nearly synonymous with Apple until he passed the torch to Tim Cook in 2011. While Cook has been a solid successor, he's arguably not quite as captivating or magical as his predecessor. Neither is Apple under him. Still, most high-profile chief executives -- and founders in particular -- manage to leave their mark on their company's culture. That imprint remains part of the organization's ethos even in their absence. While current Amazon CEO Andy Jassy is no Jeff Bezos, for instance, Bezos' philosophy remains. Take, for example, the company's willingness to experiment. As Bezos noted in his 2016 letter to Amazon's shareholders, "Most large organizations embrace the idea of invention, but are not willing to suffer the string of failed experiments necessary to get there." That does not describe Amazon, though. Bezos made a point of fostering a "fail fast, fail often" work culture that did end up producing some failures, such as the Fire smartphone. Such experiments, however, also led to the creation of Amazon Web Services and Amazon Prime, the latter of which has been a massive growth driver for the company. Now Jassy is blending his own mindset with Bezos'. As he said while discussing the company's core 16 leadership principles, "At Amazon, you are not just empowered to speak up if you think we're doing something wrong for customers of the business. You're expected to do so, regardless of level." It works. Amazon is an even bigger company now than it was when Bezos stepped down as CEO. Don't underestimate the power of a willingness to innovate Many investors will point out that a healthy corporate culture doesn't pay the bills. I agree. At some point, to thrive, every company must sell its products or services profitably. Amazon is no exception. History has shown, however, that companies with corporate cultures that encourage innovation and don't punish failure tend to prosper while organizations that are cautiously and defensively managed often struggle. Compare Alphabet today to post-Welch GE, for instance. The manufacturing conglomerate ultimately hit a wall after years of obscuring the true depth of its insurance arm's liabilities from a management team that might have been able to fix them (although the company didn't exactly embrace the advent of the digital age either). Or compare Blockbuster to Netflix. The once-giant video rental chain infamously had a chance to buy the latter for a mere $50 million back in 2000. At the time, Blockbuster was doing on the order of $4 billion worth of business per year, and could have easily purchased Netflix, if only to take its budding competitor out of the market. But it didn't. In its defense, Blockbuster's decision at the time wasn't quite the obvious misstep it seems in retrospect. Remember, Netflix wasn't yet streaming then. It was still only renting DVDs by mail. Given Blockbuster's dominance of the brick-and-mortar movie rental business back in 2000, the logistics behind this new kind of movie rental business model understandably didn't make sense to the now-defunct company. In many regards, though, that story underscores the underlying theme here in an even more effective way. Even if Blockbuster didn't want Netflix, Blockbuster certainly could have leveraged its own powerful brand to become a streaming powerhouse. Likewise, if not Netflix, some other enterprising outfit would have eventually launched the streaming-video business. Netflix was simply the outfit that tried the idea out first, knowing when it did so that it might end in failure. So for my money, I'll bet on a company that is experienced with managing experiments' successes as well as failures -- and learning from both -- to evolve and thrive. That said, it certainly doesn't hurt the bullish argument that Amazon has the financial flexibility to experiment. With its $2.5 trillion market cap, it does more than $600 billion worth of business per year, and turns about $60 billion of that into net income. Meanwhile, it's only sitting on a little over $80 billion in long-term debt. It's much easier not to fear failure when you can actually afford to take big swings, miss, and try again. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 James Brumley has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Netflix. The Motley Fool recommends GE Aerospace. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. If I Could Only Buy and Hold a Single Stock, This Would Be It was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
