
‘We'll Cross That Bridge': Jaishankar Flags India's Concerns Over US' Russia Sanctions Bill
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has addressed concerns surrounding a new Russia sanctions bill introduced in the US Congress, stating that India is aware of its potential implications and is actively engaging with American lawmakers. Responding to a question on the proposed legislation by Senator Lindsey Graham — which seeks to intensify sanctions against Russia and could affect countries maintaining ties with Moscow — Jaishankar said, 'We'll cross that bridge when we come to it," indicating a wait-and-watch approach while underscoring that India's strategic interests have already been communicated.
'We've been in touch with Senator Lindsey Graham. The embassy, the ambassador — they have been in contact. Our concerns and interests, particularly on energy and security, have been made known to him," Jaishankar said during a press interaction, adding that while developments in the US Congress are always of interest, India would evaluate the bill's impact if and when it becomes actionable.
South China Sea a Shared Concern for Quad
In the same briefing, Jaishankar also flagged the South China Sea as an issue of 'great concern" for all Quad members — India, the United States, Japan, and Australia. Emphasising the importance of the maritime region, he noted, 'The Quad members all have a shared interest because for us it's a very important international waterway."
'There was some discussion on the South China Sea. The issue is to find a peaceful resolution to the disputes. Ensuring that it remains calm and free of conflict is a common priority," he said, reflecting the bloc's continued focus on maintaining regional stability in the face of growing Chinese assertiveness.
'We remain seriously concerned about the situation in the East China Sea and South China Sea. We reiterate our strong opposition to any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion. We express our serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions, including interference with offshore resource development, the repeated obstruction of the freedoms of navigation and overflight, and the dangerous manoeuvres by military aircraft and coast guard and maritime militia vessels, especially the unsafe use of water cannons and ramming or blocking actions in the South China Sea," the statement read.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
39 minutes ago
- First Post
From shaky to robust, 6 months of Donald Trump's second presidency revive his business fortunes
President Donald Trump has profited from the presidency like no one else in American history as the difference between the personal and the professional has ceased to exist. Nearly two-thirds of his $11 billion net worth has come from cryptocurrency ventures in past six months alone. read more US President Donald Trump (left) and US First Lady Melania Trump (right) applaud as they watch the Army 250th Anniversary Parade from the Ellipse in Washington DC on June 14, 2025. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP) US President Donald Trump's net worth is almost impossible to accurately estimate because of a complex web that money travels through in his sprawling family and business ventures. But one thing is as clear as day: he has profited from the presidency like no one else in American history. Consider this: In 2023, Forbes estimated Trump's net worth to be $2.5 billion. In March 2025, it rose to $5.1 billion and it rose to $5.2 billion by July. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since 2023, Trump has floated his own cryptocurrency, invested in cryptocurrency ventures, and launched a range of merchandise that brings him and his family money. While Forbes has shown that his net worth more than doubled between late 2023 early 2025 as he first secured the Republican presidential nomination and then won the election, independent analyses have shown that his real net worth would be much more. Trump's total net worth from cryptocurrencies (as much as $7.1 billion), stocks, bonds, and cash (at least $2.2 billion), and real estate and other business holdings (at least $1.3 billion), and fees and royalties (at least $631 million in 2024) is around $11.23 billion, according to The New York Times. No line between personal and the professional The line between the personal and professional has ceased to exist as Trump's children and friends cut deals by using his name and he secures plush deals for himself from foreign governments, such as the luxury aeroplane from Qatar that's essentially a personal gift to him — not to the US government. Trump has also sold seats for private dinners for millions after assuming the office. There are direct conflicts of interest. For example, cryptocurrency industry figures who have attended such dinners by paying him and his family millions have sought deregulation of industry. There are already signs that they are getting their way. One such guest, Chinese billionaire Justin Sun, paid Trump more than $40 million to become one of the largest holders of his $TRUMP cryptocurrency. He was accused by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2023 of fraud, but the case against him has been put on hold under the Trump administration — an apparent instance of a quid pro quo. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amazon owner Jeff Bezos has announced a film on First Lady Melania Trump that will reportedly pay her as much as $28 million. Trump is also getting a $200 million-worth luxury aeroplane from Qatar. Notably, it is not planned to be a government-to-government deal. The Trump administration plans to donate the aeroplane to the Trump presidential library after the completion of the term which would make it Trump's private property. In simple words, Trump would receive a luxury plane from Qatar as president and then transfer it to him for his personal use as a private citizen. Does public even care about corruption? Trump's brazen use of the presidency for personal enrichment has led many to ask a basic question: does public even care about ethics and corruption? When Hillary Clinton was First Lady, a scandal broke out when it emerged that her investment of $1,000 in 1980s had made her $100,000. Compare that to the money that Melania is making off her husband's name: $28 million. Yet there is barely any outrage. The Trump family is also selling $500,000 membership of a private club in Washington DC, but, again there is barely any outrage. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Either the general public never cared about this or the public did care about it but no longer does, according to Paul Rosenzweig, a senior counsel to Ken Starr's investigation of former President Bill Clinton, and later served in the George W Bush administration. Rosenzweig told The Times that he believes the answer is that '80 per cent, the public never cared' and '20 per cent, we are overwhelmed and exhausted'. 'Outrage hasn't died. It was always just a figment of elite imagination,' said Rosenzweig. As Trump has two other co-equal branches of the government in his pocket as well, the Congress and the Judiciary, there is little scope of his and his family's profiteering facing any scrutiny. Some Democrats are hopeful they could generate public backlash. 'It is unlikely he is going to be held accountable through traditional means. There are going to be no special counsels; there's going to be no DOJ [Department of Justice] action. And so it's really just about public mobilization and politics. If Republicans keep paying a price for the corruption by losing special elections throughout the next year, maybe that causes them to rethink their complicity,' Senate Chris Murphy told The Times. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
China's Alibaba launches ecommerce subsidies of $7 billion in consumption boost
The online retail platform of Chinese tech giant Alibaba announced Wednesday that it will issue USD 7 billion in subsidies for certain purchases, providing a much-needed boost for a country struggling with sluggish spending. Taobao, China's e-commerce champion launched by Alibaba in 2003, said in a WeChat statement that the 50 billion yuan (USD 6.97 billion) would "directly subsidise consumers and merchants" over a 12-month period starting Wednesday. The spending incentives on Taobao's "flash purchase" feature will take the form of "red envelopes" -- a digital form of traditional cash gifts -- as well as discounts on products, deliveries and commissions, the statement said. Taobao said that the subsidies will "provide consumers with preferential and convenient services and experiences, further stimulating consumption vitality". Beijing is battling to stave off deflationary pressure, which has threatened to dampen economic growth even as challenges elsewhere mount. A lengthy property sector crisis and a fierce trade war with the United States this year have exacerbated concerns among Chinese households about making major purchases. Chinese authorities have sought to allay fears, unleashing a series of aggressive policy measures aimed at boosting spending, including key interest rate cuts and various consumer goods trade-in schemes. Results have been mixed, with retail sales in May growing at the fastest clip year-on-year since December 2023, according to official statistics, even as commercial property prices in a group of 70 key cities fell from April. Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday urged efforts to "advance the building of a unified national market" during a high-level meeting on economic policy, state news agency Xinhua said. Leaders at the meeting also called for better management of "low-price disorderly competition" among companies. "As China's economy faces deflation pressures and a weak labour market, the government aims to address these challenges from the supply side," Zhiwei Zhang, President and Chief Economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, wrote in response to Tuesday's meeting. "The top priority seems to be preventing over-competition," he added.

Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Will Cross That Bridge When...' Jaishankar Responds to 500% US Tariff Threat Over Russia Bill
'We Decide, Not Pakistan'- Jaishankar Clarifies on India-US Ties, Rejects Trump's Ceasefire Claims External Affairs Minister Dr. S Jaishankar has strongly rejected former US President Donald Trump's repeated claims that a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after Operation Sindoor was achieved through trade diplomacy. In a sharp statement in Washington DC, Jaishankar clarified that the ceasefire was a military-to-military understanding negotiated solely by the DGMOs of India and Pakistan. 'The record is very clear,' he said, reaffirming that India's decisions are based on its own national interest, not outside mediation. Trump had earlier said trade talks helped "stop the war," but Jaishankar firmly stated that India-US ties stand on their own merit. As Operation Sindoor continues to reshape the geopolitical balance, India's stand against terrorism and its principled diplomacy remain the core of its global engagement. Watch for key insights, reactions, and what this means for India-US-Pakistan dynamics.#jaishankar #trump #operationSindoor #indiapakistan #ceasefire #usindiaties #foreignpolicy #pahalgamattack #terrorism #geopolitics #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews 8.8K views | 3 hours ago