Will Trump's threats be enough to pull Putin to the table for peace talks?
After a day in the office he tells her he had a nice chat with Vladimir but then when she puts the TV on, she says 'Oh really, he's bombed a nursing home', which upsets the President.
How's that for a glimpse of geo-politics Chez Trump?
As a result of too many chats followed by too many strikes President Trump, who just a few weeks ago suspended military aid to the Ukrainians, not for the first time, has decided he's going to arm them.
Quite how many Patriots is, in true Trump style not entirely clear, but they will get some. In further Trump style, with America First, Nato members will pay for them.
If that's not enough to get Russia to the table, and in reality it's probably not, he's proposing further tariffs and other financial penalties in 50 days.
The target of extra tariffs would be on countries doing business with Russia, but it's doubtful it will be all those countries, some of which are allies of the US - and also doubtful how firmly they will be enforced if they even come into play at all.
On a balmy Saturday in May, in Kyiv, I listened to the British, French and German leaders demand Russia sign up to an unconditional ceasefire with huge financial penalties if said ceasefire didn't materialise by Monday. It was a proposal apparently backed by Donald Trump.
A few hours later President Putin offered unconditional talks -but ignored the ceasefire demand and the talks have been pretty pointless.
Ukraine is now under aerial bombardment as never before and the number of civilian deaths and injures in June is at a record high. There's nothing to say there won't be a similar move this time.
It is going to take more than the threat of more financial sanctions to really shift this war.
There is of course, relief in Kyiv that President Trump seems to have mellowed in his position towards Ukraine, however there is no sense of security in that.
After he humiliated President Zelenskyy's in the Oval Office, nothing is for certain anymore, and there's no belief that even when he's playing nice, the US leader can be relied on.
Within a few hours of the President's threats, the missiles were hitting civilians again. In one of their last calls Putin warned he would escalate over the next 60 days.
That's one presidential promise the Ukrainians can be sure of.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
WSJ journalist admits Trump is winning the trade war
The Wall Street Journal's chief economics correspondent has delivered a surprise assessment of President Donald Trump 's trade policies while criticizing the cruel nickname assigned to him after he 'chickened out' of imposing extreme tariffs. Greg Ip published his latest take on Trump's tariff wars in the publication on Tuesday, sensationally noting Trump is ' winning' on trade policy. 'Trump has, by his own definition of success, already won his trade war,' Ip wrote, 'even without [the] deals' he vowed to reach with foreign allies. Trump faced harsh criticism for backing down on his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, earning him the moniker 'TACO' for 'Trump Always Chickens Out .' After threatening extraordinary reciprocal tariffs on most countries, markets crashed and doomsday economists feared a recession was inevitable. In the midst of the backlash, Trump walked back on the tariffs, instead offering countries 90 days to reach new agreements with his administration . Some within his inner circle were boasting of the possibility of achieving 90 deals in 90 days. That deadline has since passed, and Trump has inked one deal with the UK, and two more are on track with Vietnam and Indonesia. But Ip (pictured) notes this is not necessarily a negative for Trump. To the contrary, Ip said Trump's behavior leading to this point suggests he was never particularly keen on making such deals to begin with. 'This narrative misconstrues Trump's goals, overstates the importance of deals and breeds complacency about his willingness to raise tariffs,' Ip wrote. When Trump backed down on his steep tariffs, markets rallied and economists breathed a sigh of relief. But he never removed the 10 percent baseline tariff, which he had initially imposed on all goods coming into the United States. On the campaign trail, Ip notes, a 10 percent tariff seemed like worst-case scenario for markets. Now, in the face of Trump's brash actions and threats of tariffs as high as 145 percent (on China), the 10 percent tariff appears to have flown under the radar, now considered the best-case outcome for nations coming to the negotiating table . In June alone, Treasury pocketed $27 billion in customs revenue - $20 billion more than it did in the same month last year. With higher tariffs on steel and aluminum, the average tariff for all goods coming into the United States as of July 2 was 13.4 percent. Last year, it was 2.3 percent. Ip argues in his piece that Trump has no major need to forge new trade deals, because doing so would imply backing down or compromising on something he wants - which isn't often the Trump way . But while he said Trump is winning the trade war he created, Ip noted local manufacturing has not skyrocketed as Trump had hoped it would. Consumers in America are also increasingly feeling the pinch as businesses up their prices to accommodate the tariffs they're now paying on imported goods. Ip concluded: 'Trump might emerge a winner from his trade wars; it remains to be seen if the U.S. will as well.' Ip's assessment of Trump's trade policy may ruffle feathers at the publication, which has drawn Trump's ire a number of times during this administration. In May, he gave a reporter from the publication a verbal lashing after asking a question on board Air Force 1. 'Boy, you people treat us so badly,' he said of the paper Murdoch acquired in 2007. 'Wall Street Journal has truly gone to hell... Rotten newspaper. You hear me? What I said? It's a rotten newspaper.' Months earlier, he panned it as a 'globalist' rag and 'polluted' after it criticized his tariffs. In March, the paper sensationally suggested 'someone should sue' over the tariffs and said: 'He's treating the North American economy as a personal plaything, as markets gyrate with each presidential whim.'
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘It was his best friend': Ex-Trump Casino boss reveals president brought Epstein and teen girl to gaming floor
A former executive at Trump's Atlantic City casino claimed that the president once brought Jeffrey Epstein and a 19-year-old girl to the gaming floor. Jack O'Donnell, who was president of the Atlantic City Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino for four years from 1987, told CNN that president 'frequently' visited the New Jersey resort with Epstein to attend 'special events.' On one occasion in the late 80s, Trump and Epstein turned up at the casino with a group of three women, O'Donnell claimed. 'In my mind, it [Epstein] was his best friend, you know, from really the time I was there for four years,' O'Donnell, a frequent Trump critic, told the network Wednesday. The revelation comes as uproar over the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files refuses to die down. Anger from MAGA over the recent Department of Justice memo declaring the case closed has not subsided, while Trump has reportedly raged that his supporters won't 'shut the f*** up' about the saga. During one visit to the Atlantic City resort, O'Donnell claimed inspectors of the state casino commission, which regulates gambling and ensures casinos comply with the law, were waiting for him in his office. 'Donald and Jeffrey had come into the casino in the wee hours of Sunday morning, 1:00, 1:30 in the morning,' O'Donnell told CNN's Erin Burnett. 'You know, two buddies, they had three women with them, and the commission was waiting for me because they had determined that the women that they brought down were underage to be in the casino.' The former casino boss said that he asked the inspectors how they knew the young woman's age. 'One of them was the number three-ranked tennis player in the world,' O'Donnell explained. 'And this guy happened to be a tennis fan and he said, 'Jack, I know she's 19 years old.'' He added: 'To get on a helicopter with a friend and three other people and fly down to Atlantic City, I mean, you can connect those dots. They were pretty good buddies.' It is illegal for anyone under 21 to gamble on the casino floor in New Jersey and doing so comes with strict penalties. O'Donnell said the commission gave Trump 'a break' on this occasion but claimed the commission made him ring the president to reprimand him. 'They made me call him and I had to, believe it or not, read him the Riot Act about this action because they gave him a break,' O'Donnell said. 'I had to call them and say, 'they're giving you a break this time, but if this happens again, the fine is going to be substantial and it's going to be on your head.'' O'Donnell added that he told Trump that turning up with Epstein and the young women was 'not gonna look good.' 'I did tell him in that conversation, 'I don't think you should be hanging out with this guy, just so you know, and you certainly shouldn't be doing that in Atlantic City,'' O'Donnell said he told Trump at the end of the phone call. The president has attempted to distance himself from the disgraced financier, who died by suicide in a New York jail in August 2019. The two were photographed and filmed together on several occasions and in 2002, Trump described Epstein as a 'terrific guy' whom he had known for 15 years in an interview with New York Magazine. He added: 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.'
NBC News
12 minutes ago
- NBC News
What should Trump do about Epstein questions? MAGA has a few ideas
President Donald Trump is facing growing pressure, including from some of his closest allies, for more transparency on the Jeffrey Epstein case. But there are mixed opinions on what steps the administration should take next. Trump has urged his supporters to move on from the case, decrying the story as 'boring' and lashing out at those who have called for more information. Despite this, many people — including allies but also Democrats and critics on the right — have demanded more clarity about the case. Epstein was found dead in a New York jail cell in 2019 while he was awaiting a trial on sex trafficking charges. Conspiracy theories have swirled since then, including baseless claims that he was killed to protect his powerful clients. Epstein's death, ruled a suicide, was rocketed back into the headlines this month after Attorney General Pam Bondi's office released an unsigned joint memo with the FBI saying an "exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating" to the case showed the financier and convicted sex offender had no "incriminating 'client list'" and there was no evidence that would lead to charges against anyone else. The memo infuriated some factions of Trump's MAGA base because both he and Bondi had previously said they would release more documents related to Epstein. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Here's a look at some of the paths forward that are being proposed by Trump's allies: Publish the client list — if it exists Bondi has faced backlash from some of Trump's supporters over comments she made about the existence of Epstein's so-called client list months before the Justice Department memo came out. 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review,' she told Fox News in February. But she clarified this month at a Cabinet meeting that she was speaking more broadly about documents related to Epstein and not a specific list of clients. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said last week in an all-caps post on X that the DOJ should 'release the Epstein client list.' Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told reporters Wednesday that "the attorney general ought to release whatever she thinks is credible and appropriate to release," but that the DOJ finding on the client list was 'kind of hard to believe.' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., one of the president's closest and most prominent allies, told conservative commentator Benny Johnson on Tuesday that Bondi 'needs to come forward and explain' her comments about the client list. "Pam Bondi, I don't know when she originally made the statement, I think she was talking about documents as I understood that they were on her desk," he said. "I don't know that she was specific about a list or whatever, but she needs to come forward and explain that to everybody. I like Pam, I mean, I think she's done a good job. We need the DOJ focusing on the major priorities. So, let's get this thing resolved." Appoint a special counsel Other Trump allies are urging him to appoint a special counsel to review the case. The "best thing that the president can do is appoint a special counsel to handle the Epstein files investigation,' right-wing activist Laura Loomer told Politico, saying she didn't want the controversy to 'consume his presidency.' Former White House adviser Steve Bannon has also voiced support for a special counsel, saying on his show "War Room" that he would "love" to have "a special counsel report directly to the office of the president." Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., said in an interview Tuesday with Benny Johnson that"we need a special counsel," and had a suggestion for who that person would be. "Maybe Matt Gaetz can lead the special counsel,' she added, referring to the former Florida congressman who was Trump's first choice for attorney general. Bannon said Trump is open to the idea, despite his past history with special counsels. Special counsel reports can take months and, in some cases, years to compile. In his interview with Mike Johnson, Benny Johnson asked the House speaker if he would support Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's co-defendant, testifying before Congress or lawmakers subpoenaing the DOJ to get the files. The speaker replied that he hadn't spoken to lawmakers "about that specific subject, but I'm for transparency." Asked Wednesday whether he would support a special prosecutor, Trump said, "I have nothing to do with it. Hold congressional hearings Hawley said he was also open to a hearing on the matter before the Senate Judiciary Committee that could include Maxwell, the only other person who's been convicted in the case. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison term that she's appealing. 'Why not put her under oath?' Hawley said. 'I think that could be good,' he added. Send a congressional message Several House Republicans have signed on to an effort by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to force a vote on calling on the DOJ to release the entirety of its records related to Epstein. "We all deserve to know what's in the Epstein files, who's implicated, and how deep this corruption goes. Americans were promised justice and transparency," Massie wrote Tuesday in a pair of posts on X. The procedural effort would force a vote to release 'all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to Epstein. Massie's discharge petition would take time to move forward. "In 7 days we can start collecting signatures. At 218 signatures, the House must vote on our bill requiring a full release of the Epstein files," wrote Massie, who's repeatedly clashed with the president. A number of Republicans have already signed on to the effort, including Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee, a Trump ally. Burchett told NBC News on Wednesday night that he'd done so because "I'm big on transparency." Fire Bondi Some Trump supporters online, including Loomer, have called for Bondi to resign or be fired. "Someone needs to be fired for this," Loomer said on X, adding that letting Bondi "resign is more than she deserves. Trump should just FIRE her." Trump has vigorously defended Bondi as doing a "great job." Bondi told reporters Tuesday, 'I'm going to be here for as long as the president wants me here, and I believe he's made that crystal clear.' Glenn Beck echoed those sentiments in a video. 'Pam Bondi has created so much doubt and chaos in this whole thing," he said, urging Trump to "fire Pam Bondi." Take it to the courts The president of Judicial Watch, an organization that's been trying to obtain Epstein documents, suggested a different way forward. 'Just give us the records under FOIA,' Tom Fitton said on Bannon's 'War Room' podcast, referring to the Freedom of Information Act. 'Describe what the records are. If they're withholding anything, tell us why. And there's a court process for it. If we don't like it, we can challenge it.' 'But at least it's a transparency that we don't have currently because of the awful memo that was sent out,' he said. Release all the documents Others suggested the simplest path was for the DOJ to just release the files, while protecting information about the victims. "The Epstein files need to be released" and "I'm for releasing it now," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. Boebert also backed the release of the files Wednesday. "The American people deserve and can handle the truth. Let's see the files," she wrote in a post on X. Hawley said he was in favor, as well. 'My view is, make public everything you can make public,' he said. 'Let's make it all public and get it out there.' Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, also joined the calls for more information on Epstein. "I do think that there needs to be more transparency on this, and I think that that will happen,' she told Benny Johnson this week. "I believe that there will probably be more coming on this, and I believe anything that they are able to release that doesn't, you know, damage any witnesses or anyone underage or anything like that, I believe they will probably try to get out sooner rather than later.' North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis — a Republican who has clashed with Trump — was more blunt. 'Just release the damn files,' Tillis said. 'Maybe somebody was wrong. Maybe they embellished a little bit about what was in the contents of the file. Apologize for it. Get this off the table. It's sucking up too much oxygen. And we all should know.' Trump, for his part, has placed some of the onus on Bondi, saying Tuesday that "it's going to be up to her, whatever she thinks is credible, she should release."
