Axing Labor's free Tafe would mean fewer builders and higher house prices, experts warn
Australia's construction worker shortage – and prospects for affordable housing – would worsen if Peter Dutton scraps Labor's free Tafe program, experts warn, pushing housing prices even further out of reach of prospective buyers.
After a video emerged of Liberal frontbencher Sarah Henderson saying the fee-free Tafe policy was 'just not working', the opposition leader was asked on Tuesday if he would cut the scheme – designed to encourage people to work in priority industries like the construction sector.
He replied that the Liberal party had said it was 'not supportive of the government's policy in relation to Tafe'.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Labor's bill to legislate its $1.5bn fee-free Tafe program, which the opposition voted against, passed in March.
It directs ongoing funding to states and territories from 2027 for at least 100,000 fee-free course places a year, prioritising equity cohorts including First Nations people, women, youth, people out of work or receiving income support, unpaid carers and people with disability and areas of 'high workforce demand' such as housing, care, early childhood education and defence.
The Coalition said it had consistently opposed the scheme because it was 'badly designed and poorly targeted'.
Roy Green, special innovation adviser at the University of Technology Sydney, said fewer homes would be built if the program ended.
'If you don't have the skills, you won't get the resulting supply of houses, and will continue to have housing shortages and high prices and high rent,' Green said.
Australia's construction industry suffers from a shortage of workers, with 83,000 more skilled tradespeople needed for the country to build the 1.2m new homes planned by the Albanese government, according to the Housing Industry Association (HIA).
Close to 40,000 people had enrolled in construction courses at Tafe with free tuition since 2023, with nearly a further 530,000 enrolling in other subsidised qualifications, the federal government said in January.
The fee-free program had helped people into vocational training who might otherwise have stayed away or were from disadvantaged backgrounds, said Melinda Hildebrandt, a policy fellow at the Mitchell Institute.
'We're dealing with a pretty crazy cost-of-living crisis right now, so it does actually help,' she said.
The construction sector has persistent problems attracting new trainees and in September 2024 hit its lowest level of new apprentices since 2020, according to the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
But industry bodies have also drawn attention to the sector's struggle to retain trainees. More than half of those starting construction courses in 2019 have since withdrawn from the courses, NCVER found.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
An unknown number of trainees have dropped out of the free Tafe courses, which a Coalition spokesperson highlighted when asked about whether the opposition would remove free Tafe and offer a new program.
'We can do better than Labor's free Tafe program and under a Dutton Coalition government we will do better,' the spokesperson said, without outlining alternatives.
The major parties announced their competing housing plans this week, in an election focused on cost-of-living policies, particularly housing affordability.
Both major parties plan to pay to keep trainees in the construction sector, with Labor offering wage subsidies and $10,000 incentives for apprentices staying on, while the Coalition would give some businesses up to $12,000 for taking on new apprentices.
HIA said rewarding employers and students for completions would be more effective than free Tafe.
But Nathan Quinn, Carpentry Australia's head of development, said removing free Tafe entirely would deter people from taking up construction courses.
'You would see a huge drop off and a huge lost opportunity to really meet that workforce demand of the future,' he said.
More supports could help free Tafe get the outcomes the sector needs, he said.
'We've got part of the puzzle, right? We just need their surrounding pieces to be in the right place.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labor reveals plan to deliver 1.2million new homes
Breaking ground on delivering 1.2million homes starts by untangling the maze of bureaucratic approvals, the federal government says. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has signalled a second-term Labor administration will move quickly to boost construction. 'We've just been elected with a really clear mandate to improve our housing system in this country,' she told reporters on Saturday. 'We've got big reforms to implement, and not a day to waste in getting on with them.' The minister vowed to simplify local, state and federal planning regulations by leading a council of planning ministers. 'If we are going to address the housing needs of Australians, it is going to require the three levels of government to work together in new ways,' she said. She will work with the building sector to implement innovative technologies to move past time consuming and costly methods of construction. Her comments come after an interview with ABC on Friday where she said 'builders face a ridiculous thicket of red tape that is preventing them building the homes we need.' Master Builders Australia CEO Denita Wawn said the cost of building a home had skyrocketed by 40 per cent over the past five years while construction times had ballooned by 80 per cent over the past decade. 'It is critical that we remove the red tape that is hampering our capacity to build homes,' she said. Ms Wawn was hopeful the ambitious goal of 1.2million homes coming onto the market would be achieved, but said the group's projections showed there could be a slight drop-off. She argued that along with the focus on reducing red tape, there was an urgent need to apprenticeships and fast-tracking migration for skilled people. 'For the first time, the federal government is leaning in and trying to ensure that there is a focused attention on housing,' she said. But opposition housing spokesman Andrew Bragg said the government's plans were a 'joke' and described Labor as 'red tape champions.' 'Labor's signature housing policy, the Housing Australia Future Fund has built zero new homes in three years,' Senator Bragg said. 'Approvals are way down under their watch and their 1.2million new home target is a dead duck.' The Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development warned Australia on Tuesday to boost housing supply and address falling affordability. The OECD said easing zoning restrictions would strengthen competition and productivity, as well as raise housing investment to 'reverse the long-standing decline in housing affordability'.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
US jobs market slows down as businesses cope with Trump trade war uncertainty
The US economy added 139,000 jobs in May, a slowdown compared with last month as American businesses cope with uncertainty around Donald Trump's continuing trade war. After signs of a strong labor market in April – which was largely seen as resiliency against teetering trade policy from the White House – May saw a drop in new jobs added to the labor market, according to new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate remained steady at 4.2%, unchanged from last month. Economists expected a downward slump after data earlier in the week suggested a cooling job market. Payroll firm ADP reported that private-sector payrolls increased by just 37,000 in May, the lowest gain in more than two years. 'After a strong start to the year, hiring is losing momentum,' said Nela Richardson, chief economist at ADP, in a statement. The Institute for Supply Management also released its latest purchasing mangers' index figure, which measures the general landscape for manufacturers and showed a reading of 49.9 in April – the lowest since June 2024. In the most recent results of the University of Michigan's survey of consumers, released at the end of May, consumer sentiment had stayed relatively stable from April to May, with the caveat that April's reading was the lowest drop in consumer sentiment since 1990. The impact of Trump's trade war has yet to be seen in inflation readings. In April, the annual inflation rate was at 2.3%, a slight decrease from March, though economists said that the impact of Trump's tariffs will be gradual and likely will not impact data until the summer. Investors are paying close attention to ongoing trade talks between the Chinese president Xi Jinping and Trump, after the White House and Beijing said that trade talks between the two countries had broken down. On Thursday, Trump told reporters that he had a 'very positive' phone call with Xi. Last month, Trump decreased tariffs on Chinese imports from 145% to 30%, while China decreased its tariffs on American goods from 125% down to 10%. Also last month, a federal trade court briefly blocked Trump's tariffs against China and other countries, including Canada and Mexico, along with his 10% universal baseline tariff, saying that Trump overstepped his executive authority. Less than 24 hours after that ruling, an appeals court overruled the trade court, reinstating Trump's tariffs.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive
Imagine you have $3m in super and have just retired, only to hear that Labor plans to hit you with a new tax. Or perhaps you're worried (dream?) that at some point in the near or distant future you might cross that multi-million-dollar savings threshold. Either way, you might be wondering whether the government's proposal to whack an extra 15% tax on earnings on balances over $3m is going to put a major crimp in your retirement plans. Breathe easy, your annual trips to Europe are safe, as are your smashed avocado brekkies. According to Guardian Australia's analysis, a wealthy Australian retiring with $3m in super today would pay an extra $2,355 in tax. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email And that's from annual retirement income of more than $170,000, based on an estimate from Asic's MoneySmart retirement calculator. In other words, the tax represents barely 1% of your income. If that doesn't make you feel better, then remember that the median full-time salary in Australia is $88,400, according to the ABS, and $72,590 across all employees. So you are making nearly twice the median full-time salary – and those suckers are paying income tax! Well, consider this: The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia reckons that a single person with a paltry $595,000 in savings can generate a 'comfortable' lifestyle in retirement with $51,807 in income a year. You're making more than three times as much, even after paying Labor's damned extra tax! What's that? You only have $800,000 in savings? Gosh, how sad. (If it makes you feel any better, that's still four times the median super balance among 65-69 year-olds, according to the ATO). Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Don't worry, though, you won't be paying the proposed extra 15% tax - remember it only starts kicking in on balances over $3m. And anyway, you can still live pretty well on $67,000 a year, tax-free. That all sounds OK for the small-fry with $3m in super. But what about the serious savers with $5m? How much extra tax will they have to suffer in the name of making the super system 'fairer'? Bad news. They could be paying something like an extra $25,000 in tax under the proposed policy, if they earn the average 7.5% annual return in the year. The good news is that they'll still have nearly $270,000 left over to … wait, can a single retiree even spend that much in a year?
