Biden robocall producer found not guilty of criminal charges
The charges against Steve Kramer included voter suppression and impersonating a presidential candidate.
AG vows to keep working on voter integrity after target found not guilty
Attorney General John Formella said his office will keep working on efforts to protect voter integrity after a judge found Steven Kramer not guilty of state felonies for making a robocall that mimicked the voice of former President Joe Biden that urged Democrats not to vote in New Hampshire's 2024 primary. On Feb. 6, he identified two Texas companies and one business owner as having placed those robocalls.
After the verdict in Belknap Superior Court, Attorney General John Formella noted that the Federal Communications Commission had already fined Kramer $6 million and two telecommunication companies another $1 million for violations of federal anti-robocall regulations.
Kramer had been paid $150 by a political consultant working for Democratic presidential candidate Dean Phillips to produce the audio used to call roughly 25,000 likely voters two days before the Jan. 23, 2024 primary.
Judge Elizabeth Leonard allowed Kramer's defense team to claim he didn't commit a crime because New Hampshire's primary was a 'straw poll' as it wasn't sanctioned by the Democratic National Committee.
'That, ladies and gentlemen, was a brazen attack on your primary,' Kramer's lawyer Tom Reid told the jury, referring to the DNC's actions. 'And it wasn't done by Steve Kramer.
'He didn't see it as a real election, because it wasn't,' Reid said.
Kramer's lawyers also argued the use of deepfake technology was protected speech rather than voter suppression.
If convicted, Kramer would have faced decades in prison, with each felony carrying a prison term of up to seven years. He also faced 11 misdemeanor charges that each carried up to a year in jail.
Kramer's lawyers argued he didn't impersonate a candidate because the message didn't include Biden's name and the former president wasn't on the primary ballot.
Former Democratic Party chair testified at recent robocall trial
Former Democratic Party Chairman Kathy Sullivan testified in the criminal trial of Steven Kramer who was found innocent of multiple charges regarding his manufacture of a robocall that mimicked the voice of former President Joe Biden to urge New Hampshire Democrats not to vote in the 2024 primary. All of those calls urged anyone with questions to call Sullivan's home telephone number.
Biden honored the DNC calendar and refused to file to run or campaign in New Hampshire; he won the primary easily with a record write-in vote.
All the calls left the telephone number of former Democratic Party Chair Kathy Sullivan.
During the trial, Sullivan testified that her belief was that Kramer's goal was to suppress the vote.
Kramer was paid $259,946 by Phillips's campaign to help the long-shot presidential candidate get on the ballot in New York and Pennsylvania.
The campaign told media outlets that that work included production and distribution of a robocall that used Phillips's voice.
But the Phillips campaign denied any knowledge of the Biden robocall.
Kramer testified during the trial that he had no regrets even though his actions led to AI regulations in multiple states including New Hampshire.
He said he came up with the stunt as a warning for how AI can be misused. He chose to use it in New Hampshire believing it would have the most impact.
In a statement Friday, Formella said the state 'will continue to work diligently to address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to protect the integrity of our elections.'
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Auctioneer and the Treasury Chief: How Billy Long Fell Short at the I.R.S.
The meeting between Billy Long and President Trump in the gilded Oval Office last month was supposed to mark a victory for both men. For Mr. Trump, the ceremonial swearing-in of Mr. Long to his role as the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service underscored that he at last had a political loyalist and friend, rather than the typical technocrat, at the head of the powerful tax agency. For Mr. Long, a former Republican congressman from Missouri, it signified the completion of a political comeback. After Mr. Long suffered a dismal showing in Missouri's 2022 Republican Senate primary, his unwavering and, at times, over-the-top support for Mr. Trump had finally panned out. As members of his family and close aides from his time in Congress looked on, he was put in charge of one of the federal government's most visible and fundamental agencies, responsible for collecting roughly $5 trillion in tax revenue each year. By all appearances, Mr. Long had the full support of the president, who had also invited him to a private lunch that day and structured the July 18 swearing-in around it. But within days, Mr. Long began to lose his grip on a job that he had held for barely a month. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had already ousted one White House-installed I.R.S. commissioner this year. He would soon orchestrate the removal of another, culminating in the agency having its seventh leader since January. At the center of Mr. Bessent's concerns was the fact that Mr. Long had been trying to put together an independent plan for the I.R.S. without informing the Treasury Department, according to five people familiar with the matter. But Mr. Long's vision for the I.R.S. had at least in part been shaped by Mr. Trump. Over their lunch, Mr. Trump suggested people at the I.R.S. whom Mr. Long should fire, while Mr. Long told the president he wanted to elevate a Treasury staff member brought in as part of the Department of Government Efficiency, Sam Corcos, to become his No. 2. Stephen Miller, Mr. Trump's powerful aide, at one point stopped by the meeting. Soon after the lunch, the working relationship between Mr. Bessent, a multimillionaire former hedge fund manager, and Mr. Long, a former auctioneer without a college degree, began to break down. Mr. Long remarked to colleagues, as well as the president, that he had to ask Mr. Bessent for permission for everything he wanted to do at the I.R.S. Mr. Long said he wondered why he had been asked to do the job in the first place, according to people who heard the remark. Treasury officials, after some public gaffes from Mr. Long, began to doubt that he possessed the basic discipline to do the demanding and heavily scrutinized job. Several people in the president's orbit also questioned whether Mr. Long was up to the task. Over several weeks, Trump administration officials discussed alternative roles for Mr. Long, and eventually, Sergio Gor, the White House personnel director, informed Mr. Long that he would be moving to a new job, two people briefed on the matter said. Last Friday, Mr. Long said he would leave the I.R.S. and be nominated to become the next ambassador to Iceland. Mr. Long ultimately lasted less than two months at the I.R.S., the latest in a chaotic stretch at the tax agency. Mr. Bessent has temporarily taken over the position. In a statement in response to the reporting for this article, a White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, said that Mr. Long was a 'steadfast ally' and that the president was 'surrounded by highly talented patriots united in advancing his historic and successful agenda.' A Treasury spokesperson said Mr. Long's 'enthusiasm and ability to connect with people' had helped morale at the I.R.S. 'We appreciate his efforts to help kick-start the long overdue modernization of the technical systems within I.R.S. and implement President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' the spokesperson said. Mr. Long and the I.R.S. did not respond to requests for comment. This article is based on interviews with more than a dozen current and former officials at the I.R.S., at the Treasury, at the White House and on Capitol Hill who were granted anonymity to discuss the personnel changes. They described a territorial Treasury secretary in Mr. Bessent who has sought total control of the beleaguered I.R.S., a neophyte administrator in Mr. Long who stumbled during his brief tenure and a rudderless tax agency that is scrambling to execute on its mission amid the leadership turmoil and deep staff cuts this year. 'You say you're concerned about the debt and the deficit and at the same time you're creating chaos at the revenue collection agency,' said John Koskinen, who led the I.R.S. during the Obama and first Trump administrations. 'This is a complex system.' 'Upbeat, Friendly and Open' Mr. Long had almost no background in tax policy or running large organizations when he stepped into the I.R.S. job in mid-June after the Senate confirmed him along party lines. What he lacked in experience he seemed to try to make up for in charisma. He traveled to I.R.S. offices around the country and held early-morning office hours in Washington, inviting employees to sign up to meet with him individually for 10 minutes. He sent regular, playful missives to the full I.R.S. staff, telling workers about the books on leadership he was reading and repeatedly sending staff members home early on Friday, or 'FriYay,' as he called it. 'I used to teach a class on UFOs: 'Upbeat, Friendly and Open.' That's the way I plan to operate, and I hope you'll join me,' he wrote in his first email to the staff, which was viewed by The New York Times. For I.R.S. workers, Mr. Long's attitude was in some ways a welcome change. The period since Mr. Trump took office in January had been marked by upheaval and constant turmoil. In addition to the nearly constant reshuffling of the executive suite, the I.R.S. had also lost roughly 25,000 employees, a quarter of its staff, as the Trump administration razed the ranks of the federal work force. Mr. Long told employees that he did not want to even discuss the possibility of further large-scale staff cuts to the agency. There were still doubts among the rank and file, though. The only tax work Mr. Long had ever done was pitching small businesses, nonprofits and friends on a pair of tax credits — one riddled with fraud that the I.R.S. had been trying to close down and another that the agency has said does not exist. Under the handle @auctnr1, he posted on social media constantly, regularly amplifying posts from conservative accounts attacking Democrats and even I.R.S. employees. He had abruptly put on leave two senior I.R.S. officials targeted by conservative, anti-tax activists. His attempts to curry favor with the staff at times caused issues. I.R.S. managers were forced to scramble to schedule the early dismissals. Some employees continued to work overtime as they tried to clear a backlog of international tax returns and correspondence. 'He did not have a very good understanding of the organization or how it operates or the necessary steps to meet the mission,' said Doreen Greenwald, the president of the National Treasury Employees Union. 'So, that was concerning early on, but obviously I.R.S. employees care deeply about the success of the organization. They were willing to work with him.' He also made errors. At a conference of tax professionals in Utah in July, Mr. Long said next year's tax filing season would start later than normal, a sign of potential disarray at the agency that would come with real repercussions. Such a change would delay the ability of millions to receive their annual tax refunds, a vital source of cash for low-income Americans. He also said the agency's Direct File program, which allows Americans to file their taxes online with the I.R.S. for free, was dead. The agency had to walk back both remarks. A Power Struggle Mr. Long's statements in Utah added to frustrations at the Treasury Department, where there were concerns that the commissioner did not properly appreciate that the I.R.S. fell under the umbrella of the Treasury. The I.R.S. is the largest single component of the Treasury Department, making up more than 70 percent of its budget. But in the second Trump administration, officials from around the government have sought to tap into the tax agency's vast powers. The Department of Homeland Security has pushed the I.R.S. to share typically confidential taxpayer records it keeps on undocumented immigrants, a process that began last week after months of legal wrangling. Mr. Trump also called for the I.R.S. to strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status, an attempt to use the agency's auditing powers to put pressure one of the president's political foils. In April, Mr. Bessent had to wrest control of the agency back from Elon Musk, who had Mr. Trump install a temporary commissioner at the I.R.S. without consulting the Treasury secretary. Mr. Bessent protested to Mr. Trump, who ultimately acquiesced, saying Mr. Bessent could fire Mr. Musk's pick, Gary Shapley, after he had led the I.R.S. for just a couple of days. The flap led to a physical confrontation between Mr. Bessent and Mr. Musk in the West Wing, according to multiple people briefed on what took place. Over his short tenure, Mr. Long made clear that he hoped to put his own mark on the job. He wanted to plan his own events, and in July he attended the National Auction Association's annual conference, held outside Chicago. Mr. Long, a member of the association's hall of fame, held a session at the conference, titled 'View From the I.R.S.' At one point, he auctioned off a tie that he had signed, with the proceeds going to charity. 'He's been doing that for as long as I can remember,' said Mike Jones, an auctioneer and friend of Mr. Long's who said he could not recall how much the tie had sold for. Mr. Long had at various points floated to Treasury employees the possibility of running the I.R.S. from his hometown in Springfield, Mo., according to people familiar with the remark. Just days before he would step down from the job last week, a phone call Mr. Long had set up with Representative Richard E. Neal, the top Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee, was abruptly rescheduled. An I.R.S. representative had told Mr. Neal's staff that Mr. Long could not be found in time for the original call. The I.R.S. is in the middle of trying to put in place the new tax law Republicans passed last month, a process that includes ironing out the final details of Mr. Trump's campaign promises to not tax overtime or tips, among others. That work is proceeding without Mr. Long, though plans to post a happy birthday message on the internal I.R.S. website for Mr. Long's 70th birthday on Monday were quietly abandoned. Mr. Long, for his part, has appeared unbothered by the quick end to his time running the I.R.S., writing on social media that he was 'thrilled' to be nominated to become the next ambassador to Iceland. Mr. Long has long celebrated just about everything about Mr. Trump, claiming to have coined the term 'Trump train' and distributing fake $45 bills with the president's face during his first term. 'I was never much of a fighter, but I'm loyal to a fault,' Mr. Long wrote to I.R.S. employees on July 25. 'Loyal to my family, my employees partners and my industry. I will stand up and fight for those I'm loyal to.' Alan Rappeport contributed reporting from Washington.
Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Teacher charged with killing of hikers at Arkansas park pleads not guilty to murder
FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. (AP) — The teacher who authorities say admitted to fatally stabbing two hikers at Devil's Den State Park in Arkansas last month pleaded not guilty Monday to murder charges. Andrew James McGann entered the plea during a brief hearing before a state judge at Washington County's jail Monday morning. Circuit Judge Joanna Taylor scheduled McGann's next hearing for Nov. 14. He's being held without bond. McGann has been charged with two counts of capital murder in the July 26 killing of Clinton David Brink, 43, and Cristen Amanda Brink, 41. The two were hiking with their daughters — ages 7 and 9 years old — and the girls were not injured in the attack. Authorities have not publicly identified a motive for the attack at Devil's Den, a 2,500-acre (1,000-hectare) state park about 140 miles (220 kilometers) northwest of Little Rock. McGann was arrested on July 30 at a barbershop in Springdale, about 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of the park. McGann had not yet started his new job at Springdale Public Schools and had previously worked in Texas and Oklahoma. Authorities have said he did not have a prior criminal record. State Police have said McGann admitted to the killings shortly after his arrest and that investigators matched his DNA to blood found at the crime scene.
Fox News
2 minutes ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Trump takes on Smithsonian's lefty bias and statue-toppling libs melt down
Democrats who cheered the toppling of statues of American heroes such as Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and Teddy Roosevelt in 2020, are suddenly deeply concerned that the Trump administration is seeking to curate the Smithsonian museums to better express American exceptionalism. Please, spare us. Take Tim Walz, governor of Minnesota and self-professed white guy taco connoisseur, who took to X this week. "If you're trying to erase history, you're on the wrong side of it," he wrote. But where was this pious outrage when protesters illegally tore down a 90-year-old Christopher Columbus statue at his state capitol in 2020? That erasure of history was done by an angry mob, with no process. I know, because I read all about it in a 2022 article with the fluffy bubblegum title, "Meet the Indigenous Activist Who Toppled Minnesota's Christopher Columbus Statue." Care to take a guess where that article was published? I swear, I'm not making this up: It was in the Smithsonian Magazine. Here's a gem from the apologia, sympathetically describing the vandalism, "'It's a beautiful thing because we have suffered from what [Columbus] did to us,' said Dorene Day, an Ojibwe woman who brought several of her children and her grandchildren to the protest." I'm sure you will be shocked to know that the Smithsonian article did not quote a single Columbus supporter, or even acknowledge that such a position was remotely possible. It basically lamented that the statue had not come down sooner. This is exactly the kind of one-sided, far-left version of history that President Trump and his administration seek to rectify with their review of the museums' offerings. Don't get me wrong, the Smithsonian is a wonderful institution. But the leftist lean has been clear for a long time, including the initial exclusion of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas from the African American History museum. This speaks to an issue that goes back much farther than the radicalism of 2020. For decades, perhaps half a century, progressives have held hegemonic control over our cultural and historical institutions; Their rule went all but unchallenged. In their version of events, America is always at fault for the oppression of Americans and pretty much everything else that's wrong in the world. One display about Cuban immigration blames U.S. intervention in Latin America and entirely leaves out the name Fidel Castro. This all raises the question of who gets to decide how we tell the story of our nation? In 2020, under the approving gaze of Democrats, it was protesters who illegally made the decisions. And even when statues were removed "officially," it never involved a referendum, rather wokesters just formed little committees and had their way with our history. In their version of events, America is always at fault for the oppression of Americans and pretty much everything else that's wrong in the world. According to a recent poll, only 37% of Democrats do not think there is anything to celebrate as the United States turns 250 years old next year. This is because the elites in the academy and our cultural institutions have instilled this version of events in the "well educated." The story of history changes over time. It was not until the 1950s, for example, that the Crusades began to be looked at as some kind of racist, colonizing enterprise, and today, it is being revisited by some scholars, viewed more as a needed defensive counterattack against Muslim aggression. This is not to say that one version of events, be they about the Crusades or the Civil War, is right or wrong. But what is wrong is to ignore the arguments in favor of American greatness so as to only expose our dark underbelly. Essentially, somewhere along the line, the decision was made that patriotism does not belong in the museum. It is a bizarre stance that flies in the face of the very history of museums, and there is no reason for the Trump administration to let this fester any longer. Walz and the statue-toppling hypocrites really need to sit this one out. They have already proven that they will happily destroy history to suit their agenda, so they have no leg to stand on in denying conservatives a seat at the Smithsonian table. The process to make changes to the Smithsonian under Trump are open, public, and transparent. Finally, this can be a national debate and not just leftists forcing anti-American ideas down our throats. This process is a lot more than we ever got in 2020, when history was simply taken from us. Many Americans, from coast to coast, welcome it.
