India's Got Latent row: Comedian Samay Raina appears in SC; court asks him, others to file response
A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked all the influencers to file their responses to the petition within two weeks, cautioning that no further extensions would be granted.
The top court also made it clear that their in-person appearance at the next hearing is mandatory and failure to comply would be "viewed seriously".
An exception was granted to influencer Sonali Thakkar, also known as Sonali Aditya Desai, who was allowed to appear virtually at the next hearing due to a physical condition.
The bench further directed Attorney General R Venkataramani to work on formulating social media guidelines that strike a balance between the right to freedom of speech and expression and the rights and dignity of others.
The court underlined that while freedom of expression is fundamental, it cannot come at the cost of violating others' rights. It also noted the challenge of enforcing such guidelines.
The case stems from a plea filed earlier this year, alleging that the influencers mocked persons suffering from disabilities, particularly those with SMA, during an episode of their online show. On May 5, the Supreme Court had directed them to appear in person or face coercive action.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Firms affected by IPR violations could press criminal charges as victim: SC
The Supreme Court has ruled that a company can be called a 'victim' under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and file an appeal against an acquittal order in criminal cases, including intellectual property rights (IPR) violations. This means that corporate entities affected by IPR violations could now pursue criminal proceedings as the victim. A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Prashant Kumar Mishra was hearing a plea by Asian Paints, which had suffered losses due to the accused selling counterfeit paints. Asian Paints moved the apex court against the Rajasthan High Court's judgment dismissing its appeal against the acquittal of one Ram Babu, who was allegedly found selling counterfeit paint products under the brand name. The High Court had dismissed the appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC, reasoning that an agent of Asian Paints, and not the company, was the "complainant", and therefore the company could not file an appeal against the acquittal. The Supreme Court, while disagreeing with this reasoning, questioned whether the appellant would fall under the definition of 'victim' in terms of Section 2(wa) read with the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC, or whether Section 378 of the CrPC would prevail in the present case. ALSO READ: The proviso to Section 372 grants victims the right to appeal against acquittal of the accused, conviction for a lesser offence, or inadequate compensation. If the court orders insufficient compensation for the victim, the victim can appeal. The apex court bench held that 'Section 2(wa) of the CrPC has thoughtfully accorded an expansive understanding to the term 'victim' and not a narrow and restrictive meaning.' 'In the present case, there cannot be any two opinions that ultimately, it is the Appellant who has suffered due to the counterfeit/fake products being sold or attempted to be sold as having been manufactured by the Appellant. The Appellant would suffer financial loss and reputational injury if such products were bought by the public under the mistaken belief that they belonged to the Appellant's brand,' the apex court judgment said. Asian Paints, a manufacturer in the paint industry for over 73 years, had engaged an IPR consultancy firm, M/s Solution, to track and take action against counterfeiters. During a market investigation in February 2016, the firm found counterfeit products resembling Asian Paints' trademarks at the shop of "Ganpati Traders" in Tunga, Rajasthan, owned by the accused Ram Babu. After a police inspection, 12 buckets of allegedly fake paint were seized. The trial court acquitted Ram Babu, after which Asian Paints challenged the decision in the High Court. The High Court dismissed Asian Paints' appeal, prompting the company to move the Supreme Court. Advocate Ajay Singh and his team from Singh Law Chambers represented Asian Paints (petitioner), while Advocate Thakur Sumit and others appeared for the respondents.
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Comedian Samay Raina appears before NCW, issues written apology over objectionable remarks
New Delhi: Stand-up comedian Samay Raina appeared before the National Commission for Women (NCW) on Tuesday in connection with objectionable and disrespectful remarks made against women in a recent episode of the digital show 'India's Got Latent.' The NCW had taken suo-moto cognisance of the matter and summoned Raina for his comments that were deemed offensive and derogatory to women. The Commission, headed by Chairperson Ms. Vijaya Rahatkar, expressed strong disapproval of the content and reminded Raina of the responsibility that comes with public influence. During the hearing, Samay Raina submitted a written apology to the Commission, expressing regret for his remarks. He assured the NCW that he had no intention to hurt sentiments and would ensure that such incidents are not repeated in the future. Chairperson Vijaya Rahatkar emphasised the importance of maintaining respect and sensitivity towards women, especially on public and digital platforms. She also directed Raina to refrain from making any such comments going forward and advised him to use his platform to promote awareness around women's dignity and rights. Accepting the Commission's directive, Raina gave a verbal and written commitment to create responsible and respectful content in the future. He pledged to work on content that promotes awareness of women's issues and upholds their dignity. The NCW, in its official statement, reiterated that public figures and influencers carry a significant responsibility in shaping societal attitudes. It added that the Commission continues to monitor content across entertainment and digital media to ensure that women are portrayed respectfully and without prejudice. This incident is part of the Commission's broader initiative to hold media and entertainment platforms accountable for their role in reinforcing gender sensitivity and promoting the values of equality and respect for women.
Scroll.in
29 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Undignified' Modi caricature: SC grants interim protection from arrest to Indore cartoonist
An Indore-based cartoonist who was booked for depicting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in an allegedly undignified manner was granted interim protection from arrest by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Live Law reported. However, the bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar cautioned that if the cartoonist, Hemant Malviya, continued to share offensive posts on social media, the Madhya Pradesh government was free to take action against him, PTI reported. The order came after Malviya submitted an apology for his social media post. The court has directed the cartoonist to file the apology in Hindi as an affidavit, Live Law reported. On Monday, the cartoonist agreed to delete the allegedly objectionable post after being criticised by the Supreme Court. Malviya had moved the top court challenging a Madhya Pradesh High Court order that denied him anticipatory bail in the case. The High Court in its July 3 order observed that Malviya had 'clearly overstepped' the limits of free speech and misused his right to expression. The court held that the cartoonist had failed to exercise discretion while publishing the caricature and held that his custodial interrogation was necessary. The case Malviya had published the original cartoon on January 6, 2021, which depicted Modi as a doctor administering an injection to a man dressed in what may have appeared to some as the uniform of the RSS. The RSS is the parent organisation of the Bharatiya Janata Party. It was accompanied with the Hindi caption: 'Why are you worried? Serum's Poonawala has said that the vaccine only has water, you won't die from the side effect of water!' This was a reference to Serum Institute of India's chief executive Adar Poonawalla alleging that many Covid-19 vaccines in the market were only as effective as water. According to the Madhya Pradesh High Court order, a Facebook user had republished the cartoon, but replaced the caption with one in which the man in the purported RSS uniform addresses Modi as an incarnation of the Hindu deity Shiva and asks to be injected with such a strong dose of the caste census in his buttocks so that he forgets the Pahalgam terror attack, the controversial Waqf Act, among other matters. Malviya had shared the amended version of his cartoon on Facebook on May 1, writing that anyone could use any of his cartoons by writing their own names and captions. All his cartoons were for the public, by the public and dedicated to the public, he said. He added that the amended cartoon was shared with him by a friend and that whoever had created the caption had written well. Based on this, a RSS member had filed a complaint, alleging that Malviya had posted objectionable content on Facebook that defamed the Hindutva organisation and hurt religious sentiments. Malviya was booked in May under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups, acts intended to outrage religious feelings, intentional insult and electronically publishing or transmitting material containing sexually explicit acts. Malviya has argued that he was falsely implicated in the case and that his work was merely satire. He also said that the comments about the caricature on Facebook were not his own, and therefore, he could not be held responsible for them.
