logo
US inflation remains sticky as June CPI comes in at 2.7% YoY, MoM readings rise

US inflation remains sticky as June CPI comes in at 2.7% YoY, MoM readings rise

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on July 15, 2025, 18:16 IST
The US consumer price index (CPI) data for June 2025 suggests that inflationary pressures remain elevated, with year-over-year and month-over-month readings both reflecting ongoing price increases.
According to the data released on Tuesday, the headline CPI rose 2.7% YoY, matching expectations and higher than the previous month's 2.4%. The Core CPI YoY, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, came in at 2.9%, slightly below the forecast of 3.0% but higher than the previous 2.8%.
On a month-over-month basis, the headline CPI rose 0.3%, exceeding both expectations and the previous reading of 0.1%. Similarly, the Core CPI MoM rose 0.2%, below the 0.3% forecast but unchanged from the prior month.
These figures indicate that while annual inflation is aligning with forecasts, the month-to-month increases have picked up pace, hinting at persistent underlying inflation. The Federal Reserve's 2% target remains elusive, especially with core inflation continuing to hover well above that level.
Markets and policymakers will be closely watching subsequent inflation prints to gauge the trajectory of price pressures and to assess the need for further monetary policy action.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Applied Materials (AMAT) Stock Is Down Today
Why Applied Materials (AMAT) Stock Is Down Today

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Applied Materials (AMAT) Stock Is Down Today

What Happened? Shares of semiconductor machinery manufacturer Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) fell 3.8% in the morning session after a warning from European peer ASML (ASML) about potential growth uncertainty in 2026 due to U.S. tariff policies. The news from ASML, a key supplier to the semiconductor industry, sparked concerns across the sector, leading to a sell-off in related stocks. Applied Materials, along with other U.S. semiconductor equipment makers like Lam Research and KLA Corp, saw jejich shares decline in pre-market trading. The cautious sentiment reflects investor anxiety over how ongoing trade tensions and tariff policies could impact the global supply chain and future corporate earnings for companies that are heavily reliant on international markets. This macro-level uncertainty appeared to overshadow company-specific fundamentals for the day. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Applied Materials? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. What Is The Market Telling Us Applied Materials's shares are very volatile and have had 23 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The biggest move we wrote about over the last year was 8 months ago when the stock dropped 9.2% on the news that the company reported weak third-quarter (Fiscal Q4 2024) results. Its revenue guidance for the next quarter slightly missed. Sales growth was also underwhelming during the quarter as revenue beat by a narrow margin. The company attributed some of the weakness to headwinds which impacted sales in China. Although key operating segments exceeded analysts' estimates by small margins, underlying weaknesses became more apparent when data was aggregated by product categories. Specifically, DRAM sales fell below Wall Street's estimates, declining by 10% year-on-year, given tough comparisons amid elevated purchases from China in the previous year. Zooming out, we think this is a challenging quarter for the company. Following the results, Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore lowered his price target from $185 to $179, calling out uncertainty around export controls. Moore added, "Consistent with our outlook that 2025 may not be as good as one expected 6 months ago, expectations for foundry orders from Intel and Samsung have receded, ICAPS ex-China appears to be going through a prolonged correction, and NAND has yet to recover from a very low base." Applied Materials is up 16.4% since the beginning of the year, but at $190.67 per share, it is still trading 22.4% below its 52-week high of $245.84 from July 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Applied Materials's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $3,059. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten

Trump says 'not planning' fire Fed Chair Powell after reports suggest Powell ouster coming 'soon'
Trump says 'not planning' fire Fed Chair Powell after reports suggest Powell ouster coming 'soon'

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says 'not planning' fire Fed Chair Powell after reports suggest Powell ouster coming 'soon'

President Trump on Wednesday tempered reports from earlier in the day that suggested he planned imminently to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, the latest twist in the ongoing saga regarding Trump's displeasure with the central bank head. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office late Wednesday morning, Trump said he is "not planning" to fire Powell, though reiterated his view that rates should be lower and the Fed chair is doing a "terrible job." Trump's comments came just about an hour after a slew of reports suggested the president was inching closer to firing Powell. Bloomberg reported that the president was likely to remove Powell "soon," quoting a White House official, and CBS News reported that Trump indicated to lawmakers he would do so while polling House GOP members Tuesday night about whether he should go through with it. The New York Times reported that Trump even showed those lawmakers a draft of a Powell firing letter in the Oval Office Tuesday night. But Bloomberg and The New York Times also both noted in their reports that Trump has not made a final decision. Following Trump's comments on Wednesday, markets erased some of the losses suffered after the initial reports Trump would fire Powell in short order. Trump also said Wednesday he had not drafted a letter regarding Powell's firing. These signals of a possible firing come after Trump on Tuesday told reporters that Powell's handling of a $2.5 billion renovation of the Federal Reserve headquarters 'sort of is' a fireable offense. Any final move by the president to oust the Fed chair could lead to a legal war with Powell, who has argued he can't be removed by law. The president also appeared in his latest comments to narrow his choices to replace Powell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is an "option," but not the top choice, 'because I like the job he is doing,' he said. The Washington Post and Bloomberg reported this week that National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett is rising as an early front-runner in the race to replace Powell, although former Fed governor Kevin Warsh is also under consideration. Fed governor Christopher Waller is another possibility. Bessent, though, is 'probably not that much of an option," Trump said Tuesday, citing what he views as his good performance as Treasury secretary. "He's a very soothing force." Trump has been hammering Powell for months over what Trump viewed as a refusal to ease monetary policy for political and personal reasons, referring to Powell publicly as 'dumb,' a numbskull,' a 'stubborn mule,' 'stupid,' a 'moron,' and a 'fool.' Trump nominated Powell for the Fed chair seat during his first administration, and his current term is scheduled to run until May of 2026. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Trump's allies in recent weeks have used another tactic to turn up the pressure on Powell: They have invoked a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters as a way to question the chair's management of the institution and whether he told Congress the truth about the project during testimony in June. Trump said Tuesday that "the one thing I wouldn't have guessed is he would be spending two and a half million dollars to build a little extension onto the Fed." When asked if it was a fireable offense, Trump said, "I think it sort of is, because if you look at his testimony ... he's not talking about the problem. It's a big problem." One House Republican, Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, posted on X Tuesday night: "Hearing Jerome Powell is getting fired! From a very serious source" and later added: "I'm 99% sure firing is imminent." CBS also reported that some members of the House Financial Services Committee, which acts as oversight for the Fed, were planning to meet with Powell on Wednesday night, and that some want to reinforce his independence. Top administration officials have sent mixed signals about how far Trump would go with Powell. Hassett said Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does." But Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Tuesday that the president "said numerous times he's not going to fire Jay Powell" and compared Trump's public pressure to former college basketball coach Bobby Knight "working the refs." "President Trump seems to prefer the Bobby Knight school," he said. Bessent also said Tuesday, "there's a formal process that's already starting" to find Powell's replacement. He also hopes Powell decides to leave the Fed board when his term as chair is up. His seat on the Fed Board of Governors is not up until 2028. Trump, too, has sent mixed signals in recent months about whether he would seek to remove Powell, musing about it publicly before assuring he wouldn't do it. Wall Street is paying close attention to the drama unfolding in Washington, D.C. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said Tuesday that the independence of the Federal Reserve is "absolutely critical" and warned that "playing around with the Fed can often have adverse consequences." A firing by Trump could potentially open a new legal war with Powell, who has argued that his removal is 'not permitted by law.' The only language in law pertaining specifically to the removal of Fed board members can be found in Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act. The law states that each member of the board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President." The statute doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors, nor does it detail what exactly constitutes "for cause." The term has been interpreted in legal rulings to mean "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance." But Powell and the Fed could still have the backing of the Supreme Court, which made it clear in a May decision it might protect the central bank even as it allowed Trump to fire the board members of two other independent agencies: the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board. The central bank, the court said, 'is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.' What Trump is trying to challenge is a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent limiting the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance. If that precedent eventually falls, a Powell firing may be easier to legally justify at the Fed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store