Cryptocurrency Threatens Future of Argentine President
Milei late on Friday posted on X recommending the little-known crypto coin $LIBRA, which soon after shot up to nearly $5 apiece.
Just hours later, the cryptocurrency plummeted to under $1, according to Reuters.
The impeachment drive against Milei is gaining serious momentum in Congress, with lawmakers demanding to know who profited from the token's rise and fall.
Argentina's fintech chamber acknowledged that the case could potentially be a 'rug pull,' in which the developers of a crypto token draw legitimate investments, pumping up the value, only to later dump their stake.
'This scandal, which embarrasses us on an international scale, requires us to launch an impeachment request against the president,' said lawmaker Leandro Santoro, a member of the opposition coalition.
Santoro said that Milei's endorsement created a financial trap, even if he was not directly involved.
The President's political opponents say the scandal had devastated investors as thousands who trusted him lost millions, while many made fortunes due to privileged information.
Later, Milei deleted the post on X, with local media saying the post had been up for a few hours on Friday night.
He later said he took down his post after becoming aware of the circumstances, and that he had no relation to the cryptocurrency.
'I was not aware of the details of the project and once I found out, I decided to not continue giving it publicity,' he said.
KIP Protocol, the company behind $LIBRA, affirmed that Javier was never involved in the project.
The company, which is backed by Animoca Ventures in Hong Kong, insisted that $LIBRA was a private enterprise with no ties to the Argentine government.
'President Milei was not and is not involved in the development of this project,' KIP Protocol said on X.
Just hours later, KIP revised its statement, saying that the launch and market-making were fully managed by Kelsier Ventures, a company led by Hayden Davis.
KIP denied controlling any tokens and claimed their role was strictly post-launch, providing tech infrastructure for AI-based projects.
The company also said their team had received threats after the scandal erupted.
Official Investigation to Try to Contain Crisis
Meanwhile, the Argentine presidency has announced an official investigation into LIBRA, as Milei desperately attempts to distance himself from the controversy.
In a statement released via X on Saturday night, the Office of the President confirmed that Milei met with KIP Protocol officials Mauricio Novelli and Julian Peh on October 19, 2024, where they presented their blockchain-based initiative, dubbed 'Viva la Libertad.'
According to the recorded meeting, the company's plan was to finance private ventures in Argentina using blockchain technology. Also present at the meeting was presidential spokesman Manuel Adorni.
On January 30, Javier met with Hayden Mark Davis at Casa Rosada, Argentina's presidential palace.
The statement clarified that Davis had no official connection to the Argentine government and was introduced by KIP Protocol as the project's technology provider.
Javier defended his endorsement of KIP Protocol, saying 'The President shared a post on his personal accounts announcing the launch of the KIP Protocol project, just as he does daily with many entrepreneurs who want to launch a project in Argentina to create jobs and get investments.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
12 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Cityscape Global 2025 in Riyadh to Showcase the Potential of AI and Real Estate Technology
Cityscape Global 2025 has announced that the events program will spotlight the pivotal role of AI and emerging technologies in shaping the future of the real estate sector. The exhibition is sponsored by the Saudi Ministry of Municipalities and Housing in partnership with the Real Estate General Authority (REGA) and the Housing Program, Vision 2030 initiative. It is organized by Tahaluf, and a joint venture between the Saudi Federation for Cybersecurity, Programming and Drones (SAFCSP), the Events Investment Fund (EIF), and Informa. Hosted by the Kingdom for the third consecutive year, Cityscape Global 2025 will take place in Riyadh from November 17 to 20. Cityscape Global will serve as a vital platform that unites leaders from the real estate sector to explore business opportunities enabled by AI technologies. In 2024, the global real estate technology market exceeded $36.55 billion, with projections suggesting it will double to around $88.37 billion by 2032. Meanwhile, AI technologies have revolutionized all stages of the real estate value chain, as showcased at the Future of Living Summit, the flagship event of Cityscape Global. The lineup of prominent speakers set to shape the future of property technology and AI includes several ministers, global real estate leaders, CEOs, and investors from leading companies. The Cityscape organizing committee has officially opened registration for the 2025 Innovation Challenge, inviting startups to showcase their innovative solutions in the real estate and construction sectors. The Innovation Challenge will award two prizes totaling $100,000, along with speaking opportunities at the 2025 conference, complimentary exhibition pavilions, and a range of additional benefits.
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
Tech leaders should focus on job creation, not displacement
When ChatGPT stormed onto the scene in late 2022, the alarm bells rang loud. Philosophers and futurists demanded new rules to prevent humanity from sliding into chaos, wars and disorder. Since then, a string of large language models and apps — Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, Meta AI — have caused fresh anxieties. Two years on, true artificial general intelligence is still a distant goal but the mixed results of widespread adoption of AI are already plain to see. Change that was happening gradually is now happening swiftly. As veteran Wall Street Journal commentator Peggy Noonan wrote in a recent column, 'The story is no longer 'AI in coming decades will take a lot of jobs' or 'AI will take jobs sooner than we think.' It is 'AI is here and a quiet havoc has begun.' Yet, for America's AI titans, the motivation today seems less about building tools that create new jobs and more about accelerating human displacement while envisioning a vast social safety net as compensation. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal titled 'What Musk, Altman and Others Say About AI-Funded 'Universal Basic Income'' stated: 'Suddenly, an idea once seen as a socialist policy that would reward idleness is one of the AI boom's hottest acronyms.' According to the article, the consensus in Silicon Valley is that automation driven by AI is going to replace a lot of factory jobs and white-collar roles while generating billions in profits for AI companies. What tech leaders and gurus seem divided over is whether AI-funded universal basic income is the answer to the challenge of mass unemployment. Of course, as the popular 1956 Doris Day song 'Que Sera, Sera (Whatever Will Be, Will Be)' reminds us: 'The future's not ours to see … what will be, will be.' Perhaps there is no need to worry excessively, as many a bleak prophecy in the past (for example, 'The Population Bomb,' a book by Paul R. Ehrlich about the looming danger of overpopulation) failed to come to pass. High-quality jobs give young people a reason to get up in the morning, a sense of fulfillment and a feeling of progress in their lives. We risk losing the essence of this in an idle society with universal basic income. Arnab Neil Sengupta Perhaps the 'quiet havoc' of which Noonan spoke is a temporary phenomenon and US employment numbers will pick up, similar to the way in which the development of mainframe computers in the 1950s created entirely new occupations. In any case, AI tycoons such as Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Marc Benioff ought to be thinking of ways in which AI can be used to create plentiful, professionally rewarding jobs instead of touting the introduction of universal basic income as inevitable. Not only would such income for Americans made redundant by AI be of little use to the rest of the world, it could be a recipe for trouble in the long term. Jobs do not just pay wages, as the Silicon Valley titans surely know. Jobs circulate money throughout the economy, creating demand for goods and services, generating tax revenues and nurturing communities. A purely passive income scheme will not generate the same level of productive economic activity. For many people, especially young adults, meaningful work is a core part of their identity. For young people in the Arab world, it is not an exaggeration to say a job equals purpose, self-worth and hope. Employment in challenging roles builds skills, creativity and problem-solving capacities that are essential for adapting to future changes. High-quality jobs in particular give educated young people a sense of fulfillment and progress in their lives. This satisfaction would be at risk of being lost in an idle society. The workplace is a powerful training ground. Before the advent of remote working, conversation and competition made busy offices incubators of great ideas. In his memoir 'City Room,' Arthur Gelb, the late American journalist, described the New York Times newsroom of the 1940s this way: 'There was an overwhelming sense of purpose, fire and life: the clacking rhythm of typewriters, the throbbing of great machines in the composing room on the floor above, reporters shouting for copy boys to pick up their stories.' Employment creates networks, encourages teamwork and accountability, and strengthens civic engagement. On the other hand, large-scale joblessness, especially among young people, produces social drift, weakens bonds, increases division, feeds unrest and erodes hope. AI tycoons such as Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Marc Benioff ought to be thinking of ways in which AI can be used to generate plentiful, professionally rewarding jobs instead of touting the introduction of universal basic income as inevitable. Arnab Neil Sengupta No matter what term tech tycoons choose to apply to it — 'universal extreme wealth,' 'universal high income' or 'universal basic income' — the dangers of financially rewarding idleness can scarcely be overstated. In addition to the erosion of motivation and the work ethic, a guaranteed income without the expectation of contribution might lead to disconnection from skills-building and long-term planning. There is also the risk of social fragmentation and alienation. Without shared daily activities like work, people living off AI profits could become more isolated, lose touch with community norms, and fall into destructive habits or radicalized echo chambers. None of this is an argument for a Luddite agenda resisting the adoption of a technology whose time has come. Even California socialists do not advocate turning back the clock — although, ultimately, robots rather than American workers might end up doing the heavy lifting of President Trump's planned manufacturing renaissance. If the technological displacement of human workers proves unstoppable, the pace and scale of AI-driven automation will undoubtedly make job creation in some sectors unviable. A universal basic income could at least ensure that people's basic needs are met in a fully automated economy. A guaranteed supplemental income could also reduce some of the economic insecurity and stress. It could provide a safety net that allows people to take entrepreneurial risks, retrain or transition to new industries without fear of destitution, potentially prompting innovation from the ground up. In theory, the recipients of universal basic income would have the freedom to pursue non-market value creation. Thus, with their basic needs covered, people could focus on care-giving, volunteering, education, the creative arts or environmental projects that existing markets do not adequately reward, even though the wider society still benefits from them. If the pros and cons of an AI-funded 'universal high income' make it sound like a quixotic experiment in wealth generation — lowering costs for companies and then handing out part of the profits in a post-work future — that is because it indeed would be if tried. Job-loss fears are real, but the remedy should not be worse than the disease. Ultimately, the responsibility of tech leaders is not to make mass idleness the new normal, but to harness AI in ways that expand human opportunity. • Arnab Neil Sengupta is a senior editor at Arab News.
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Meta probed over AI chatbot exchanges with children
A US senator announced Friday that he is investigating whether Meta's AI chatbots were allowed to engage in potentially harmful online conversations with children. Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, posted a letter to Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg demanding all documents and communications related to reports that the company's AI chatbots engaged in 'romantic' and 'sensual' exchanges with minors. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors,' a Meta spokesperson told AFP in response to an inquiry. Hawley said the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, which he chairs, will investigate whether Meta's generative AI tools 'enable exploitation, deception, or other criminal harms to children.' Meta has been instructed to preserve all relevant records and provide them to Congress by September 19. Hawley cited one reported example in which a Meta AI chatbot allegedly described an eight-year-old child's body as 'a work of art' and 'a treasure I cherish deeply.'
