FIR Against Ex-TMC Leader Sheikh Shahjahan In 2019 Sandeshkhali Case As CBI Takes Over Probe
The case, which was initially investigated by the West Bengal Police, has now been handed over to the CBI after an order from the Calcutta High Court.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed an FIR against ex-Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Sheikh Shahjahan in connection with a 2019 post-poll violence case in Sandeshkhali. The FIR also includes the names of 24 others along with Sheikh.
The case pertains to the killing of three BJP workers—Pradeep Mondal, Devdas Mondal, and Sukanta Mondal—during post-election violence in 2019.
Pradeep Mondal, Devdas Mondal, and Sukanta Mondal were found dead after an alleged attack on their village in Sandeshkhali, allegedly by a mob led by Sheikh.
West Bengal Police was initially investigating the case, but later the family of victims approached the Calcutta High Court seeking a CBI probe.
Justice Joy Sengupta has ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to constitute a special investigation team (SIT) to probe the case with 'utmost seriousness". The court said the investigation should be supervised by a joint director.
'In the present case too, which has even more serious charges, I find that the police failed to take action against the prime accused at different stages, leading to a gross miscarriage of justice. It would, thus, not be in the interest of justice to again give the reins of investigation to them," Justice Sengupta noted while handing over the probe to the CBI.
Sheikh Shahjahan is currently in judicial custody in connection with other Sandeshkhali-related cases.
The police had arrested Sheikh on January 5, 2024, in a case of alleged attack on Enforcement Directorate officers during a raid at his Sandeshkhali home.
view comments
First Published:
July 07, 2025, 09:41 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Suneetha Narreddy writes open letter seeking reopening of probe into her father's murder
Suneetha Narreddy, daughter of slain former MP Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, wrote an open letter to all Members of Parliament and MLCs and MLAs in Andhra Pradesh seeking their support for reopening the murder case and its speedy completion, while noting that her father's soul is still crying for justice more than six years after he was killed. She said in the letter, written on August 10 on the occasion of Rakshabandhan, that Vivekananda Reddy was brutally murdered at his residence in Pulivendula in Kadapa district in March 2019 and the perpetrators of the crime were caught but the conspirators remained untouched. On March 15, 2019, Sakshi TV, which is managed by Y.S. Bharati Reddy, wife of Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, broadcast a news that Mr. Vivekananda Reddy died of a heart attack and several YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) leaders repeated that claim on the same channel. Ms. Suneetha Narreddy said she found her father's body with wounds that were covered with bandages. The Sakshi newspaper carried a full-page story the next day alleging that Telugu Desam Party (TDP) leaders were responsible for the murder. Mr. Jagan Mohan Reddy even filed a writ petition in the High Court seeking a CBI probe. During the 2019 State Assembly elections, Vivekananda Reddy's murder became a political weapon against the TDP. The YSRCP won and Mr. Jagan Mohan Reddy became the Chief Minister. He personally assured Ms. Suneetha Narreddy that the killers would be caught, saying that failure (to apprehend the culprits) would be an insult to him. The SIT formed by the YSRCP government was reconstituted just as it neared a breakthrough, after which Mr. Jagan Mohan Reddy told Ms. Suneetha Narreddy that a CBI probe was 'not an option' as it might cause MP Y.S. Avinash Reddy to defect to another party. She approached the A.P. High Court and it transferred the case to the CBI on March 11, 2020 but Mr. Jagan Mohan Reddy withdrew his own petition for a CBI probe. Noting the influence of the accused and State interference, the Supreme Court transferred the trial to Telangana on November 29, 2022, while observing that there was a larger conspiracy that required further CBI investigation. Yet, this has not happened. Ms. Suneetha Narreddy expressed agony that, in her pursuit of justice, she knocked on every door and was harassed, falsely prosecuted and targeted by the government which her father once helped build. 'Justice is still elusive as the killers are rich and powerful. This is not only my family's tragedy but it is a national failure, where criminals hijacked democracy itself. If we, as citizens and leaders, do not act, we will one day find our freedom, our Constitution, and our values in their hands', she added, hoping that the elected representatives would do the needful treating her as their sister.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Fake Amazon call centre busted at Igatpuri resort: CBI arrests 5 in Nashik; Rs 1.2 crore in cash, 500g gold, and luxury cars seized
MUMBAI: CBI busted an illegal call centre racket operating from a rented premise at a resort in Igatpuri on Friday, arresting five Mumbai-based individuals and recovering Rs 1.2 crore in unaccounted cash, 500g of gold and seven luxury cars collectively worth Rs 1 crore. The accused duped their victims by introducing themselves as representatives of a customer care centre of an e-commerce website. The arrested individuals - Vishal Yadav, Shebaz, Durgesh, Abhay Raj alias Raja, and Sameer alias Kalia-Sohail, targeted US and Canadian citizens by posing as policemen and committing cyber fraud . They had recruited 62 people to work in the call centre. During the search, CBI recovered 44 laptops, 71 mobile phones and other incriminating digital evidence for examination and found transactions amounting to around 5,000 USDT cryptocurrency (Rs 5 lakh) and 2,000 Canadian dollar worth gift vouchers (Rs 1.3 lakh). You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai CBI registered a fraud case against the accused individuals, alleging that they committed financial fraud by impersonation and making phishing calls posing as illegal Amazon Support Services Call Centre. CBI stated the accused were cheating foreign citizens and fraudulently obtaining proceeds of crime via gift cards and cryptocurrency. The accused persons had recruited operators comprising of diallers, verifiers and closers for running the illegal call centre. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo In a similar fraud last month, CBI dismantled a cyber fraud network operating from Pune and Mumbai that targeted US citizens by impersonating govt officials. Three individuals were arrested, and the network was reportedly generating approximately Rs 4 crore per month through fraudulent activities and laundering the proceeds via fake accounts established with the assistance of bank officials. CBI investigated the group's US-based associates who allegedly supplied personal details of US victims to facilitate the scam. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
How homebuyers can protect themselves from being scammed by builder-bank nexus when buying under-construction houses
Devil in the details Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Games builders play A cosy club Builder stops paying EMIs. Bank holds buyer liable (since the loan is in buyer's name). Buyer must start paying EMI, even if... — The house is not delivered. — The builder is insolvent or absconding. If staying on rent, buyer pays EMI + rent. lCredit score gets damaged due to missed payments. What should homebuyers do? Ensure the project is registered with RERA and check its status online. Avoid schemes that lack escrow accounts. Demand clear documentation of payment schedules and possession timelines. Seek independent legal and financial advice before committing. Prefer projects backed by reputed banks that conduct thorough due diligence. It was an offer homebuyers could not resist. Buy a pricey apartment for a small upfront payment of 5-10%. Borrow the rest from a lender with an added sweetener: your EMI payments are deferred until you get possession of the flat. The developer agrees to bear the interest burden until the buyer receives the keys to the house. What could go wrong? A lot, as it turns widespread defaults by cashstrapped developers on their commitments, banks have been demanding repayment from purchasers, despite homes remaining undelivered. Following petitions from thousands of aggrieved homebuyers, the Supreme Court this year directed a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into a housing scam by builders and banks. The CBI in July filed multiple cases against various Delhi/NCR-based builders, as well as banks, for duping homebuyers. This may be just the tip of the iceberg. The rot runs deeper. Real estate developers have, over the years, employed a wide array of tactics to attract buyers. Beyond freebies, discounts and creative sales pitches, builders have also offered convenient financing options promising 'no EMI till possession' subvention schemes and deferred payment plans linked to construction progress. Akhil Rathi, Head, Financial Advisory at 1 Finance, says, 'Subvention and deferred payment schemes aim to reduce the initial financial burden for homebuyers, especially those currently paying rent, by offering lower upfront costs and delayed EMIs .'However, there is often a devil residing within the fine print. In a subvention scheme , a tri-party agreement is executed among the homebuyer, the builder and the lender. The builder agrees to pay the pre-EMIs till possession. Even so, the actual borrower remains the homebuyer. So if the builder defaults on the interest payments, it is the homebuyer who is exposed. If he can't repay the loan, the buyer's credit rating the offer clearly specifies a timeline for this arrangement. Some developers promise to cover the interest cost only for the initial 18 to 24 months. 'Subvention plans are always timed. The builder offers to pay interest only for a specified number of years,' indicates Adhil Shetty, CEO, Beyond this period, the buyer is obligated to make EMI payments even if the project is not completed. Rathi adds, 'Builders also charge a much higher price for houses if bought through a subvention scheme. This hidden cost defeats its purpose.'As many buyers have discovered, delays in under-construction houses are a common occurrence in India. Thousands of homebuyers across Delhi/NCR, Mumbai and Pune have fallen victims to this. Data analytics firm PropEquity found in 2024 that one in five under-construction houses, totalling over 5 lakh units, remained undelivered as 1,981 projects across 44 cities were stalled in the preceding eight the remaining four under-construction houses were delivered after a substantial delay of 3-4 years. 'Construction delays are a standard feature of Indian realty for several reasons. This means that the subvention plan leaves borrowers high and dry in case of a serious project delay,' remarks be sure, the RBI had banned banks from entering into such arrangements. It had also barred lenders from making upfront disbursements to builders in underconstruction projects. Loans must be disbursed in tranches linked to construction progress. However, several NBFCs and fintech platforms continue to tie up with builders to offer variants of such construction-linked plan (CLP), a staple offering among builders, has proven to be a mirage. Under this arrangement, the buyer pays in tranches, linked to construction milestones. The builder receives payment only when the work is completed, supposedly reducing the risk for buyers. Surely, it is in the builder's interest to execute the project on time?Not quite. Experts point to a critical flaw in construction-linked plans. These are often not aligned with the builder's cash flow. 'The payment plan is designed in a manner that you would have to pay 90% of the apartment price upon 'laying of the top floor of the building'. However, that is not how the project expenses are allocated. By the time the structure is complete, the builder usually has spent approximately 40-50% of the project cost. The rest 60% of the money is needed later,' observed Anurag Singh, Founder, Ansid Capital, in a recent post on X. Once the builder has received a majority of the project cost (via CLP), he slows down construction deliberately. He has already pocketed a sizable chunk of profits, but his costs are yet to materialise or flow out. He stops construction rather than pay for the remaining work. That is why buyers often find projects getting stalled in later stages, not initially. In the meantime, the builder diverts attention to new launches. Money received under CLP for Project A is diverted to buy land or finance construction in Project B or C. If Project A is delayed or abandoned, the builder has still made his in five under-construction houses were undelivered across major cities and towns in are notorious for gaming this arrangement. A builder claims a milestone (say, 10th or 15th slab) is complete even when actual work is pending. If a lender is involved, they may furnish forged completion certificates to get the lender to release the next tranche. This results in front-loaded payments even when the construction activity lenders carry out due diligence while choosing builders? Surely banks would not want any erosion in the value of their collateral. On the contrary, lenders have been lax in this regard. Many banks don't lend to builders (other than grade A) directly, given the risk in the real estate business. Instead, they offer home loans to individual buyers, which indirectly fund the builder. 'Essentially, the consumer is financing the builder in the name of 'construction-linked plan',' observes Singh. 'So a developer, to whom no bank lends money, can actually get easy finance from the buyers at 0% interest, while the borrowers pay the EMIs with interest,' he system has conveniently kept the builders well fed. In many cases, builders and lenders have pre-arranged cosy tieups. Banks sanction loans for new projects without batting an eyelid, even if these are missing clearances from local authorities. Some lenders may skip physical inspection of construction progress entirely, relying on the builder's documents. This lack of hygiene checks is because banks have no real skin in the game, say experts. How so? If the builder falters and the house (collateral) value shrinks, the bank can recover its value through auction and yet hold the homeowner liable for the outstanding builders and lenders have led homebuyers into a storm. 'Builders have often exploited subvention schemes to attract buyers without ensuring timely delivery. In many cases, they were used to mask delays or financial instability. Banks, too, have played a role by approving loans without adequate scrutiny of the project's viability, especially during periods of high market activity,' remarks Ravi Shankar Singh, Managing Director, Residential Transaction Services, Colliers India. 'Builders used these schemes to collect funds early while construction lagged. Banks, aiming to grow home loan portfolios, at times overlooked due diligence,' suggests a tri-party agreement project gets delayed or builder guardrails are now in place through the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA), but these lack sufficient enforcement mechanisms. This encourages builders to play the devil with impunity. 'A law is only as strong as its enforcement. RERA orders have no enforcement power. Even if you win interest penalty for delayed completion, you can take that victory certificate where you want to. The builder is not going to pay anything,' Singh laments in his post. 'We created a system that was designed to finance the extremely low-credit builder and rob the consumer of his lifetime earnings with no recourse to justice,' he unsuspecting homebuyers are now paying a hefty price for pursuing their housing aspirations. The dream abode has turned out to be a millstone around the neck rather than a means for achieving financial freedom. For those looking to buy, vigilance remains the only Pharande, Managing Director of Pharande Spaces, insists, 'Buying a home should be driven by at least as much awareness as sentiment. Homebuyers must always approach a real estate deal in the spirit of caveat emptor—buyer beware.'Verify the builder's track record and financial stability. Ensure the project is registered with RERA and check its status online. Seek independent legal and financial advice before committing. Shetty avers, 'Scrutinise all the documents, approvals, sanctions, etc. It does not matter whether the lender or the builder have done the legal legwork. As a buyer, you are the one investing your and your family's emotional, physical, and financial well-being in the property. So make sure you have a lawyer to make all the checks on your behalf.'Do not take blind comfort in easy financing offers. 'Subvention schemes and deferred payment plans are means by which buyers can pay for their homes in a more flexible manner, based on how far along the construction is. While this makes it easier for them to pay, such schemes are only useful if they are clear and have explicit terms, and if the developer can be relied upon to complete the project as per schedule,' says Pharande. Buyers should clarify who will be responsible if the builder misses interest payments, as such lapses can lead to missed payments that negatively impact the buyer's credit score, even though the disbursed funds were for construction, not personal use, insists the builder's track record and financial IndiaWatch out for front-loaded payment schedules. Paying 70-80% of the flat cost within 18 months while the project is scheduled for completion years later is a red flag. 'Make sure the payment schedule reflects the stages for actual completion of your flat and also till the handing over of all the legal documents like no-objection certificate (NOC) and occupation certificate,' asserts Shetty. You do not want the bank to advance the entire amount even if the entire post-completion paperwork is pending. This change needs to be made in the sale deed before it is signed and registered, he says. Further, insist on third-party verification of construction milestones before any payment. Relying solely on builder statements or certificates increases don't fall for incentives offered by the builder while overlooking crucial aspects of the Shankar Singh of Colliers asserts, 'It's important to focus on the fundamentals, location, builder credibility, legal clearances, and construction quality, rather than flashy incentives.
