
Foldable iPhone would intrigue despite Samsung's head start
A lot of the analysis pegs the new iPhone Fold coming in 2026, meaning we've got just over a year to wait – but given we've had foldable phones from brands like Samsung, Oppo and Google for a few years now, why would 2026 be the year Apple goes flexible with its phones?
Recommended Videos
For me, it's all about the screen – and that's where history might be repeating itself.
The key rumors so far
While far from substantiated, here's what the current rumor mill is predicting for a potential folding Phone:
Why does this matter? When considering why Apple hasn't entered the foldable market so far, it's important to consider its form here.
It only introduced OLED display technology to its smartphones in 2017, with the iPhone X, despite them being reviewed as some of the best-looking screens for years.
I remember reviewing one of the first handsets to use OLED screens: the Samsung Wave in 2010, a 'smartphone' that pre-dated the Galaxy S, Samsung's first Android phone.
I was blown away by the color reproduction, the inky blacks, and the overall look and feel, and can still remember the excitement over watching content on that display.
However, despite looking vivid, colorful and having amazing contrast ratios, OLED screens also had a few issues compared to LCD – namely, lower brightness, higher difficulty for manufacture (and therefore cost) and potentially screen 'burn in', where a static image can become permanently scarred onto the phone's screen.
The DT Viewpoint: it's all coming together
So it makes sense that Apple will have waited roughly the same amount of time if it does, indeed, launch a foldable phone next year, especially as component manufacturers will need time to tool things up to achieve the level of flexible glass and integrated touch sensors that Apple would want.
Issues around the cost of manufacture mean that getting the level of sharpness needed would be too expensive, but as production processes have improved, it seems likely that the cost threshold for making a viable product is getting closer.
There's been a lot of news recently about greater investment from foldable display component suppliers like Fine M-Tec improving their processes to allow for crease-free displays, which seems like another standard that Apple wouldn't be willing to compromise on.
The resolution rumor of 428PPI for the inside screen is something that gives me pause – that's very high resolution for a foldable, with an iPad mini coming in at around 330PPI and even the latest Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 only offering ~370PPI.
Apple isn't in the business of competing only on spec, so it's either waited this long so it can claim the sharpest foldable display around, or this is something that's a little wide of the mark.
Another spec rumor that I'm waiting to evolve with some intrigue: the front screen of the device coming in at only 5.5-inches. That's iPhone 12 Mini level, and that's a screen size that Apple canned in favor of larger devices.
While I still speak to many people who wish smartphones were a little smaller, it's an interesting idea that Apple would basically model the new iPhone Fold on a size format that didn't perform as well – surely this will end up being a little larger?
Speaking of confusing rumors, I can't see that under-screen selfie camera coming true any time soon though – the latest Samsung Galaxy Fold 7 smartphone doesn't have one (despite its predecessor using the technology) as it seeks to offer the best quality.
Apple hasn't caved to pressure to drop the Dynamic Island on its smartphones (which house the front-facing sensors and cameras). These could be placed under the screen and give it a clean-looking finish, but the result would be lower-quality than with the cut-out.
So what's next? Well, if the iPhone Fold (or whatever it will be called) does emerge in 2026, then we'll start seeing production of the device ramp up in the early part of the year, meaning more leaks will potentially begin to emerge.
There are still several things that haven't emerged yet – likely because, if this timeline is correct, there are still many decisions to be made – such as screen refresh rate or how the software would work. Would it be a hybrid, where the outer screen uses iOS 27 and the inner display working on iPad OS 27?
The answers to these questions will be fascinating, as the foldable phone feels like one of the last smartphone design shifts left to happen, so eventually all brands will join the party – so what will Apple do to stand out?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
YouTube's misinformation tools are applied inconsistently throughout Europe, report warns
Two of Google's major tools to fight misinformation on YouTube only work sometimes, and only in certain European languages, a new study has found. When users watch a YouTube video on a topic that is often embroiled in misinformation, such as COVID-19 vaccines or climate change, a label should pop up to direct them to third-party sources with more information on the issue, for example Wikipedia. The information panel is also meant to appear in users' search results in their operating language. However AI Forensics, a Europe-based nonprofit that investigates major tech companies, found that this is often not the case. The researchers built a web crawler to test the panels, and found that across the 83 languages on the video platform, the information panels are applied inconsistently to 12 topics on Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories as well as four types of publisher labels. All of the panels are available in English. In German, videos on all but one topic – the Armenian genocide – have these labels. Meanwhile, very few panels are available in Icelandic or Lithuanian. Related Denmark seeks to make spread of deepfake images illegal, citing misinformation concerns AI Forensics said the tests show YouTube pays 'disproportionate attention towards Western languages' and 'neglects' regional languages like Basque, Catalan, and Galician. YouTube's content disclaimers go beyond misinformation-prone topics. It also includes labels for news sources and fact-checkers that explain whether they are partially or fully funded by government sources, as a way to 'help you better understand the sources of news content,' the company says. But public funding was flagged in some countries and not others, the AI Forensics report found. Euronews, for example, receives some funding from the European Union. YouTube flagged this in some countries, but not in Denmark, Greece, Norway, Iceland, Finland, or Portugal. 'We are scared … there might be some group of people that have differential access to safety' measures to fight misinformation on the platform, Salvatore Romano, head of research at AI Forensics, told Euronews Next. 'Instead of increasing [the] trust of users on the platform, it is undermining [it],' Romano added. Unclear whether YouTube will address discrepancies YouTube's website notes that 'information panels may not be available in all countries/regions and languages,' and that the company is working to expand their reach. The AI Forensics team said they have met with YouTube to present their research. During those meetings, YouTube allegedly indicated that the discrepancies between languages were not supposed to happen, and that it didn't have a way to systematically check how the panels are deployed across Europe. AI Forensics said YouTube agreed to address these discrepancies but did not go into detail. Related Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children under age 16 YouTube did not respond to a Euronews Next request for clarity on the alleged meetings or the measures it plans to take. YouTube, under parent company Google, is a signatory to the European Commission's Code of Practice on Disinformation, a voluntary agreement that sets standards for tech companies to fight disinformation. In March, YouTube said that as part of its commitment, it will 'assess and update the topics prone to misinformation that receive additional context from information panels'. But Romano believes the haphazard content labeling could be even more extensive than the AI Forensics researchers found, given the report says it shows only a 'partial view' with a small sample of panels. Commission could put 'pressure on YouTube' over inconsistencies: AI Forensics Romano said he's hoping YouTube will correct the discrepancies. If it doesn't, he said he will call on the European Commission, the EU's executive body, to investigate a potential breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission could, for example, request more information from YouTube about how it administers its panels, which is the first step of any DSA investigation, he said. 'The EU Commission could put pressure on YouTube to show them that this type of inconsistency is unacceptable across platforms and across products,' he said, noting that it creates 'second-rate markets' throughout Europe where standards meant to protect against misinformation are not being met. Related Russia fines Google more than the world's total GDP over YouTube bans Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to confirm whether it would be asking for more information from YouTube but did not receive an immediate reply. Romano, at least, will be watching. He said his team built a tool to track how regularly YouTube's information labels come up in various languages. Through the publicly available tracker, people can see which topics have content labels in their language. It will also allow researchers to identify any changes to the information panels, Romano said.


Tom's Guide
20 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Your iPhone's missing volume bar is back — here's how to enable it
Apple removed the volume bar from iPhone lock screens when iOS 16 launched, forcing users to rely solely on physical volume buttons for audio adjustments. While those buttons work fine, they only let you increase or decrease volume in set increments, often leaving you stuck between too loud and too quiet. The good news is that iOS 18 brought back the option to display a volume slider directly on your lock screen, giving you precise control over audio levels without unlocking your device. Whether you're listening to music at the gym, podcasts on your commute, or videos at home, having that familiar volume bar back makes fine-tuning audio much more convenient. Here's how to bring back the volume bar. Tap the Settings app on your iPhone's home screen to get started with bringing back the volume bar. Scroll down until you see "Accessibility" and tap on it to open the accessibility menu. This section contains various features designed to make your iPhone easier to use, including the option to restore the lock screen volume bar. Look for the "Hearing" category within Accessibility settings and you'll see several options listed underneath it. Tap on "Audio & Visual" which contains settings related to how your iPhone handles sound and visual feedback. The "Always Show Volume Control" option is located within this Audio & Visual submenu. Find the "Always Show Volume Control" option in the Audio & Visual menu and you'll see a toggle switch next to it. Tap the toggle to turn it on — it should turn green when enabled. Once enabled, the setting takes effect immediately and will work the next time you adjust volume while your phone is locked. Lock your iPhone and start playing some music or a podcast to test the restored volume bar functionality. Press either volume button on the side of your phone and you should now see the familiar volume slider appear on your lock screen. Try sliding the volume bar with your finger to make precise adjustments rather than being limited to the fixed increments of the physical buttons. The volume bar will now appear on your lock screen every time you're playing audio and adjust the volume using either the physical buttons or by tapping directly on the slider. The volume bar automatically disappears after a few seconds, keeping your lock screen looking clean. Now you've learned how to bring back your iPhone's missing volume bar, why not take a look at some of our other useful guides? If you have the new beta installed, check out iOS 26 Liquid Glass icons — how to get the stunning new look on your iPhone. And for more useful tips, don't miss How to speed up your iPhone by clearing its cache and Your iPhone Notes app has a secret messaging feature — here's how to use it. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Voyager Technologies Stock Crashed Today
Key Points Voyager Technologies missed badly on earnings last night. Losses were more than twice what Wall Street had expected. Voyager's defense business is doing its best to offset losses from the space program, but there are a lot of losses to offset. 10 stocks we like better than Voyager Technologies › It's been a little over a month since I first warned investors about the danger of investing in a new space stock, space station builder Voyager Technologies (NYSE: VOYG). After a smashingly successful IPO, Voyager's stock price flipped head over tail and began falling. And why? Simply put, Voyager has years of costs ahead of it before it gets a space station in orbit, and whether it ever becomes profitable after that "is anyone's guess," as I warned in June. One thing's certain, though: Voyager definitely wasn't profitable in Q2. And now its stock is down another 17.3% (through 1:15 p.m. ET today). Voyager Technologies Q2 earnings Reporting Q2 results last night, Voyager fessed up to a $0.60-per-share loss -- twice what Wall Street feared -- despite generating sales of $45.7 million, ahead of the forecast. Sales came (perhaps obviously) not from the space stations that Voyager hasn't built yet but rather from the company's defense business, which builds missiles for the military, and where sales grew 85%. Losses were in part due to "non-recurring costs associated with the Company's IPO," which is at least somewhat reassuring. Is Voyager stock a sell? Less reassuring is company guidance. Management noted that full-year sales will range from $165 million to $170 million in 2025, which is ahead of analyst forecasts. However, on earnings, management noted only that "adjusted EBITDA" will show a loss, and it said not a word about its likely losses as calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), or about free cash flow, either. Voyager did note that it is "debt-free" and has "total liquidity of $669 million," suggesting the company should be able to burn cash for some time before it runs out. The bad news: It will probably have to. Should you invest $1,000 in Voyager Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Voyager Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Voyager Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $631,505!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,103,313!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,039% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Voyager Technologies Stock Crashed Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio