Conservative Bots on X Post Mixed Messages As MAGA Divide Over Epstein Case Deepens
That confusion has been clearly evident in a previously unreported network of hundreds of accounts on X that use artificial intelligence to automatically reply to conservatives with positive messages about people in the Trump administration.
What once consisted of a network of 400 identified bot accounts sharing a positive chain of messages and support to the Trump administration has now turned into a mix of posts calling for Attorney General Pam Bondi to be held accountable for her involvement in the case, reflecting the MAGA base's own confusion with the matter.
The network was tracked for NBC News by both the social media analytics company Alethea and researchers at Clemson University. While the study identified 400 accounts, the actual amount of bots in the network could be much larger. The accounts used to offer consistent praise for Trump and key figures in his administration, particularly support for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
While the researchers did not provide specifics on how they identified the accounts, they noted a number of distinct trends. All were created, seemingly in batches, around three specific days last year. They frequently punctuate their posts with hashtags, often ones that are irrelevant to the conversation. They post almost exclusively by replying to other users, often to people who pay X for verification and by repeating similarly worded sentiments over and over in short succession. At times, they will respond to someone's post by repeating it back to them verbatim.
Since last year, the bots have shown consistent support for Trump , including in the lead-up to the election, and then afterward as he was preparing to take office. But earlier this month, when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced she would not release additional Epstein files, the accounts' messaging has become split, with some accounts telling different users opposite opinions almost concurrently.
For instance, one account wrote on July 15, "retweet if you believe Pam Bondi should be held accountable for her actions relating to Epstein's case and the FBI rollout. Let's bring justice! #PamBondi #Epstein #FBI #MAGA."
An hour later, the same account replied to a post in support of the Trump administration, writing, "Epstein and Maxwell went to prison, proving that our justice system works. Those videos mentioned by Pam Bondi were not blackmail material but rather Epstein's private collection. #FactCheck #JusticeSystem"
Another account declared that when Bondi said she would not release additional files, she "comes out clean as the DOJ confirms no Epstein client list found, while reaffirming his death by suicide." Since then, it has told multiple people on X that they should engage in full revolt against the Trump administration.
"Retweet if you believe that Trump and his cronies are lying to the public and treating us like we're stupid. We won't be fooled by their games," it posted Friday.
It's unknown who is behind this network, or what the accounts' prompts are. However, they appear to be trained on real MAGA social media accounts, whose messages tend to be more unified, said C. Sharn Eib, Alethea's head of investigations.
"This split reaction mimics the organic reaction among supporters of Trump's second administration," Eib told NBC News. "it's possible that the behavior of these automated accounts is influenced by content posted from prominent influencers, and this shift is reflective of the general change in tenor among many of Trump's supporters."
Originally published on Latin Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Are Donald Trump's tariffs the new sanctions? – DW – 07/22/2025
Donald Trump is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions. But does the threat of rising US inflation and retaliation make sanctions a safer choice? US President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs rather than sanctions has been described as both the "world's worst bet" and "a powerful proven source of leverage" to protect the national interests of the United States. While tariffs essentially are taxes on imports to protect domestic industries, sanctions are penalties imposed on other countries to punish or influence their governments. Sanctions typically restrict trade or finance. Since his return to the White House in January, Trump's tariff threats against dozens of countries have created great uncertainty among US businesses and global trading partners. What's become known as "tariff tango" — bold pledges of steep duties on foreign goods, followed by abrupt reversals — suits Trump's shifting political or economic goals. Yet, financial markets remain on edge, not knowing how or when the president may deploy tariffs next. The tariff on China, the biggest economic and military rival to the US, reached historic highs in April, soaring to 145% before being significantly cut the following month after trade talks in London. Trump's sudden increase and later rollback of tariffs show how he uses them as a flexible way to fix what he sees as unfair trade, based on past trade disputes. "What shapes the president's views is the rapid rise of Japan in the 1980s and the feeling that the Japanese were out-competing the iconic American car industry because the US has been too generous in its trade terms," Jennifer Burns, associate professor of history at Stanford University, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tariffs are Trump's preferred weapon to tackle the massive US trade deficit, particularly with China, which amounted to $295 billion (€253 billion) in 2024, according to the US Census Bureau. They also align with his "America First" agenda to protect domestic industries and boost US job creation. The White House has defended the president's approach, insisting that tariffs can be quickly deployed and, unlike sanctions, don't completely shut foreign markets to US firms. "[Trump] can add this pressure when he wants and then bring it back when markets start to freak out or it stops serving his purpose," Sophia Busch, associate director of the Geoeconomic Centre at the Atlantic Council think tank, told DW. "This is much easier with tariffs than with sanctions." Although tariffs have been widely criticized for their potential to stoke inflation, they do raise revenue for the US Treasury, unlike sanctions. US tariff revenues are up 110% to $97.3 billion (€83.2 billion) in the first half of the year compared to the same period last year. Tariffs are expected to raise $360 billion next year, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Tariffs give Trump direct, unilateral control, using executive orders without needing approval from the US Congress. Sanctions, on the other hand, often require complex legal frameworks and cooperation with international partners, like the European Union. The preference for tariffs over sanctions reflects Trump's aim for rapid, visible economic leverage, but raises concerns about the destabilizing effects of such policies on global trade and peace. "The reason [tariffs] have such a bad reputation is because they're linked to these episodes of de-globalization, and in the 20th century, they were linked to armed conflict," said Burns. "If low tariffs and open markets knit countries together in a way that forestalls armed conflict, does it mean that we might be moving away from that?" "Sanctions are more about punishing countries for violating international norms," Stanford's Jennifer Burns told DW. "They're in response to specific actions, and if those actions cease, the sanctions can be undone." Trump's second-term policies suggest he is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions, such as pressuring countries like Canada, Mexico and China on nontrade issues like immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures or threats, which have intensified global trade tensions. Similarly, Colombia was threatened with tariffs after it rejected US deportation flights, while threatened levies on the European Union were partly announced as a response to EU privacy and climate regulations. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil, which were framed as retaliation for the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally. The far-right politician faces trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss, including plans to assassinate political rivals. Noting how the uncertainty around Trump's tariff policy had left US firms and global trade partners reeling, Burns warned that "years of tariff uncertainty" may cause a "serious economic slowdown, as businesses and investors wait for a more predictable landscape." Previous US administrations have preferred sanctions over tariffs as a punitive tool to bring rogue countries into line. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US has imposed more than 2,500 sanctions on Russia, targeting individuals, entities, shipping and aircraft. The US has also imposed sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and North Korea. "These economies are not crucial trading partners for the US," the Atlantic Council's Busch said, adding that Trump's tariffs on the "top US trading partners" were "more of an economic threat domestically." Trump has recently expressed more openness to deploying sanctions. Referring to a bill proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham for additional penalties on Russia if it fails to negotiate a peace deal in good faith with Ukraine, Trump said he was "very strongly" considering fresh sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video If passed, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 will target key Russian officials and oligarchs, financial institutions and the energy sector, aiming to curb Russia's ability to export oil and gas. The bill, which has bipartisan support, also proposes secondary sanctions on third countries and foreign companies, which Trump has termed "secondary tariffs" of up to 500% on countries importing Russian energy. Trump's similar "secondary tariffs" of 25% on buyers of Venezuelan oil, which took effect in March, were also designed to pressure energy importers to align with US foreign policy, a role typically reserved for sanctions. Secondary sanctions usually include blacklisting individuals and entities, asset freezes and banking restrictions. The threat of US criminal charges and travel bans is also often used.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Stocks Mixed With Trade And Earnings In Focus; Tokyo Reopens With Gains
Asian markets were mixed Thursday as traders kept an eye on earnings from Wall Street titans this week while tracking US trade talks just over a week before the deadline for a deal. Japanese stocks edged up and the yen held gains after Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he will stay in power despite the weekend election debacle. Investors took a more cautious path after a largely positive day on Wall Street, where the S&P ended above 6,300 points for the first time and the Nasdaq chalked up yet another record. Equities continue to rally on expectations key trading partners will strike agreements with Washington before August 1 to avoid Donald Trump's sky-high tariffs, with the US president saying several deals were close. Just three have been struck so far. His press secretary Karoline Leavitt said more could be reached before next Friday but also warned the president could unveil fresh unilateral tolls in that time. While Trump's initial tariff bombshell on April 2 rattled global markets before he delayed introducing the measures twice, they have seen more muted reactions to successive threats as traders expect him to eventually row back again. That optimism has been helped by data indicating the US economy remained healthy despite the imposition of other levies that are beginning to be felt on Main Street. And SPI Asset Management's Stephen Innes warned traders could be in for a shock next week. "The new tariff regime isn't being priced -- full stop," he wrote. "Markets have seen this movie before: tough talk, last-minute extensions, and deal-making in overtime. But this time, Trump isn't bluffing. He's already posted 'No extensions will be granted'. "The new rates -- 30 percent on the EU, 35 percent on Canada, 50 percent on Brazil -- are politically loaded and economically radioactive. If they go live, there's no soft landing." Hong Kong has been the standout in Asia this year, piling on around a quarter thanks to a rally in Chinese tech firms and a fresh flow of cash from mainland investors. And the Hang Seng Index continued its advance Tuesday, with Shanghai, Sydney and Taipei also up. There were losses in Singapore, Seoul, Wellington and Manila. Tokyo rose as investors returned from a long weekend to news that Ishiba would remain in power even after his ruling coalition lost its majority in Japan's lower house elections Sunday, months after it suffered a similar fate in the upper house. His refusal to leave helped the yen push higher against the dollar and other peers, though observers warned the government's tenure remained fragile and investors remained nervous. The yen strengthened to 147.08 Tuesday before paring some of the gains. That compares with 148.80 Friday. But Franklin Templeton Institute's Christy Tan said that "Ishiba now faces heightened political headwinds, including pressure over inflation, taxes, and US trade talks". Focus also turns this week to earnings from some of the world's biggest names, including Tesla, Google-parent Alphabet, General Motors, Intel and Coca-Cola. While there will be plenty of attention given to the results, the firms' guidance will be key as investors try to gauge companies' pulses in light of Trump's trade war. Tokyo - Nikkei 225: UP 0.2 percent at 39,892.81 (break) Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: UP 0.3 percent at 25,074.15 Shanghai - Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 3,563.59 Dollar/yen: UP at 147.50 yen from 147.42 yen on Monday Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1690 from $1.1688 Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3484 from $1.3485 Euro/pound: UP at 86.69 pence from 86.68 pence West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.7 percent at $66.70 per barrel Brent North Sea Crude: DOWN 0.9 percent at $68.62 per barrel New York - Dow: FLAT at 44,323.07 (close) London - FTSE 100: UP 0.2 percent at 9,012.99 (close)
DW
5 hours ago
- DW
US ex-officer sentenced to prison over Breonna Taylor raid – DW – 07/22/2025
Breonna Taylor was shot dead by police when they arrived at her home around midnight with a no-knock warrant. The killing of a Black woman in Kentucky sparked a wave of protests across the US. A former Kentucky police officer was sentenced to 33 months in prison on Monday for violating Breonna Taylor's rights during the raid in which she was shot and killed five years ago. Kentucky police officers shot and killed Taylor, a Black woman, in March 2020 after they used a controversial no-knock warrant at her home. Taylor's death, along with the murder of George Floyd in Minnesota in May 2020 by a white police officer, sparked racial justice protests across the US and internationally. Civil rights attorneys for Taylor's family welcomed prison time but had hoped for a tougher sentence. "While today's sentence is not what we had hoped for — nor does it fully reflect the severity of the harm caused — it is more than what the Department of Justice sought," they said. "That, in itself, is a statement." The court heard that Taylor and her boyfriend were sleeping when they heard a noise at the door around midnight. Her boyfriend, believing it to be an intruder, fired his legally-owned gun, wounding a police officer. Police officers then opened fire, killing Taylor. 'A piece of me was taken from me that day," Taylor's mother Tanika Palmer told the court. Brett Hankison is the only officer to be convicted in connection with the incident. He fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone. US District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings said she was "startled" there weren't more people injured during the raid from Hankison's blind shots. In addition to almost three years in prison, Hankison was also sentenced to three years of supervised release afterwards. The charges against him carried a maximum sentence of life in prison. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Trump administration's Justice Department had recommended that Hankison be given no additional prison time beyond the one day he spent in jail at the time of his arrest. "Hankison did not shoot Ms Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death," Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, wrote in a rare memo to the judge. "Hankison did not wound her or anyone else at the scene that day, although he did discharge his duty weapon ten times blindly into Ms Taylor's home." However, Jennings said this recommendation treated the shooting as "an inconsequential crime" and would minimize the jury's verdict from November, which found Hankison guilty of using excessive force.
