Villagers are battling a billionaire over creating a big $37K-a-night venue on their porch — do they stand a chance?
The initial application to fix up the farm described plans for a "rural retreat" which Lorraine Brennan, a village resident, fully approved of.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
A near-record number of Americans are grappling with $1,000 car payments and many drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to stay ahead
Protect your retirement savings with these 5 essential money moves — most of which you can complete in just minutes
'We thought the idea of a rural retreat would be a really good thing for the village," she told New York Post.
The only problem is, things did not quite go as planned.
"In December 2024, we were told they want to turn it into an entertainment center. It will be larger than our village,' Brennan said.
The new proposed venue would be a $37,000 per night wedding venue, which villagers are concerned would create many issues in the small area.
The big question now is, can they stop the development — and can others who are facing similar challenges with developers fight to protect the character of their villages and towns in the United States?
Huntingfield residents have a lot of concerns about the proposed entertainment venue, and rightfully so.
The new development, which would be called Blyth Barn, is being developed by a luxury holiday firm called Wilderness Reserve. It's slated to include professional chefs and a spa, a swimming pool, a hot tub and a party room. It also recently received a license to serve alcohol 24 hours per day.
Village residents are upset that they have already experienced four years of construction noise during the initial development phase and they believe things are only likely to get worse once the project is completed and the doors to the venue open.
Their concerns include the traffic that the facility will bring in, the potential for illegal drugs and drunkenness — especially with the 24-hour liquor license — and the noise that will be created by the party room. They also worry about guests coming into the village itself and visiting their small local pub, as well as the wildlife being displaced and the light pollution the facility will create.
"Guests are picked up in Land Rover taxis and helicopters pick them up and land all over the village,' Nina Roe, another resident said. 'These aren't noiseless vehicles. We've been misled.'
Residents have expressed their dissatisfaction to the local Parish Council, but their objections have so far gone unheeded, leaving the residents fearing they're fighting a battle they can't win.
Read more: Home prices in America could fly through the roof in 2025 — here's the big reason why and how to take full advantage (with as little as $10)
The village facing the challenges mentioned above is in the UK, but things like this happen throughout the U.S. as well.
Developers who don't understand the character of communities may propose projects that have local residents up in arms, and fighting against these planned projects can be a challenge if cash-strapped local governments are often eager for the added revenue these new facilities can bring.
If you are facing a similar issue where you live, your best bet is to understand the local rezoning and development laws and the details of the proposal.
If the existing zoning rules allow for the type of development that's taking place, it could be very difficult or impossible to stop it because it would most likely be a by-right development that may not be open to opposition, according to Equine Land Conservation Resource (ELCR).
If the project would require rezoning or an exception to current rules, though, you may have a much greater chance of stopping it if a formal public input process takes place. The process varies from state to state or even county to county, according to Planetizen, but a zoning board usually gets involved to review the proposed plan.
If developers are asking for a deviation from normal rules, you'll need to contact your local planning office, find out when hearings will be held on the issue and come up with a way to have your stance resonate.
You'll want to organize opposition in your community by talking with neighbors and reaching out to the local press, and you'll want to prepare an organized, logical explanation for your objections, says the ELCR.
You can share your concerns not only in public hearings but also on social media and by reaching out to local officials — in a polite, professional way. State rational reasons for your objections, ideally backed up by data and research, and consider proposing alternatives that would provide the developer with options that are less disruptive to your community.
Ultimately, there's no guarantee of success when these conflicts arise, but the more you can get the public on your side — and pressure local politicians to listen to your concerns — the better your chances of preserving the character of your local area.
Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
One dozen eggs in America now costs $4.15 — and $14.35 for a pound of sirloin steak. Both record highs. 3 simple ways to protect your wealth in 2025
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
GM's quarterly results illustrate the folly of tariffs
General Motors, a cornerstone of American industry, is suffering the consequences of President Trump's unconstitutional 25 percent tariffs on imported vehicles and auto parts. In the second quarter of 2025, GM suffered a $1.1 billion tariff blow to its operating income, slashing the company's profit margin from a healthy 9 percent to just 6.1 percent. Net income plunged by 36.1 percent from the prior quarter and by a staggering 40.7 percent compared to a year ago. Although the estimated tariff impact for the full year of $4 billion to $5 billion is less than 3 percent of GM's overall revenue, that cost represents more than half of the typical annual income for the company over the past decade. The consequences extend far beyond GM's balance sheet. Tariffs, paid by importers to the federal government, are partly absorbed by companies and partly passed to consumers. We've especially seen this in import-sensitive sectors including furnishings, appliances, clothes and toys. Men's shirts and sweaters, for instance, rose 4.9 percent in June alone. When businesses 'eat' the cost, as GM tried to do last quarter, the fallout is no less severe. Diminished earnings mean less capital for investment in better technology or expanded operations, slowing broader economic growth, fewer resources for pay raises or new jobs — hardly the boon for workers that tariff advocates promise. The data confirms this. Nationwide, 14,000 manufacturing jobs disappeared in the past two months, erasing all gains in 2025. In June, real average weekly earnings dropped by 0.4 percent, an annualized loss of nearly 5 percent. Shareholders are also feeling the pinch. Stock valuations track a company's expected future earnings. Since 2012, GM's stock price increased by more than 200 percent. GM's price-to-earnings ratio today stands at 6.83, almost identical to 2012 levels. Stock prices increased alongside earnings. A sustained $5 billion annual hit, wiping out over half of GM's annual net income, could erase more than $20 billion in market capitalization if valuations adjust. With tariffs eroding profits, is it any wonder that GM's stock has slid 8 percent since its post-2024 election peak and now languishes 13 percent off its 2021 highs? This affects millions of middle-class Americans and retirees with pensions and savings invested. More broadly, lower dividends and diminished returns discourage investment, starving companies of the capital needed to expand. The result: slower growth, fewer jobs and weaker wage gains. GM, to its credit, is fighting to offset 30 percent of this burden by boosting U.S. production, cutting costs and increasing domestic content to comply with the USMCA trade agreement's labyrinthine rules. Yet even if successful, the net impact of $2.8 billion to $3.5 billion will devour a significant slice of GM's already thin margins. Profit margins at GM — as in most other sectors — are far less than conventional wisdom. GM's net profit margin over the past decade has averaged less than 5 percent. In other words, a $30,000 vehicle yields less than $1,500 in profit. GM's plans to shift some production to U.S. plants and rework supply chains is a testament to private enterprise's resilience. But make no mistake: These shifts sacrifice efficiency for compliance. Restructuring operations in a free market in pursuit of efficiency yields more profit, consumer benefit and economic growth. Doing so under duress to escape arbitrary tariffs may result in survival, but without these benefits. Resources that could have fueled innovation or lowered prices are now squandered on navigating artificial trade barriers. As an important sidenote, roughly half the tariff's cost stems from GM's South Korean operations, a stark reminder of the folly of taxing trade with allies. Rather than strengthening ties with democratic partners through bold free-trade agreements, these tariffs risk pushing nations like South Korea toward China, America's chief adversary. Far from economic strategy, it is geopolitical shortsightedness. Politicians sometimes prefer tariffs to other forms of taxation because they are less visible than taxes on income or sales. This makes it easier to dodge accountability by blaming 'greedy' corporations. For this reason, Trump called Jeff Bezos to deter Amazon from listing tariff costs on purchases. The White House press secretary labeled this a 'hostile and political act by Amazon.' Regardless, protectionism is not cost-free. Sustained tariffs will raise prices, shrink profits, erode real wages and slow economic growth. GM's quarterly results are a warning.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Want to beat the next big Coinbase listing? Here's how savvy traders do it
The New York Post may receive revenue from affiliate/advertising partnerships for sharing this content and/or if you click or make a purchase. Every time Coinbase adds a new coin to its platform, the crypto world pays attention — and so do the markets. For investors trying to identify the next breakout asset, a Coinbase listing can serve as both a credibility stamp and a catalyst for price movement. But if you're only watching the official announcement pages, you're probably already too late. That's where tools like Best Wallet come in. The non-custodial app has become a go-to for crypto users looking to track potential listings, monitor token momentum, and stay ahead of the news cycle. With features like real-time price alerts, scam filters, and an integrated token scanner, Best Wallet doesn't just react to trends — it helps you see them forming. Advertisement Coinbase is the largest U.S. crypto exchange and among the most widely used worldwide. REUTERS So how does Coinbase decide what to list, and how can everyday investors get ahead of the curve? Download Best Wallet from App Store or Google Play (no KYC needed). Open the Trending Tokens or Launchpad section to see coins gaining exchange momentum. Tap any token for in-depth research: whitepaper, team, tokenomics, hype metrics, recent exchange listings, and smart contract security. Set up custom notifications for listing announcements or sudden volume surges. Store and track the new coin in your secure, private portfolio. Advertisement Coinbase is the largest U.S.-based crypto exchange and one of the most widely used platforms globally. For many investors, it serves as a 'safe zone' — a vetted space in a market still largely unregulated. That kind of gatekeeping power has spawned what many call the 'Coinbase Effect.' Assets that land on the platform often see immediate price action. A 2021 report by crypto research firm Messari found that coins listed on Coinbase gained an average of 91% over the five days after announcement — although that number drops to 29% when you remove extreme outliers. Still, that kind of volatility cuts both ways. While some coins skyrocket, others drop. Best Wallet helps users navigate this by providing curated insights and customizable watchlists so you're not just blindly buying into the hype. Coinbase doesn't release long lists of upcoming listings — and for good reason. Most additions are kept under wraps until the company is ready to make them public. That said, there are breadcrumbs worth following. Advertisement Trading volume, trends, community demand and presale momentum can help determine contenders for upcoming listings. Zinsmute – 'The short answer is no. You can certainly base some clues in partnerships being pursued or marketing activity associated with certain tokens,' said Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor at the University of Tennessee at Martin. 'For the most part, listings are kept confidential.' Julia Cartwright, senior fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research, echoed that warning. 'The official channels are the most accurate. Of course there is a lot of online speculation but that is not reliable.' Advertisement Coinbase advises investors to monitor its X accounts — @Coinbase and @CoinbaseAssets — along with its blog and Exchange Status page. But for those who don't want to bounce between browser tabs and Twitter threads, Best Wallet streamlines that process. The app's token discovery dashboard aggregates these signals — and more — into one place. Sites like Coinspeaker and 99Bitcoins have published lists of tokens they believe could be next in line for Coinbase. Some of the recent names include: Best Wallet Token Bitcoin Hyper TOKEN6900 Snorter Bot Kaspa Toncoin Bittensor Jupiter Exchange World Liberty Financial But again, headlines move fast. Best Wallet lets users add these tokens to custom watchlists and enables smart alerts for price movements, wallet-holder surges, and sentiment shifts — all in real time. Coinbase posts about new listings on its social media accounts. REUTERS Coinbase says it 'adheres to thorough processes and standards for all asset listings.' This includes evaluation by the Digital Asset Support Group (DASG), also known as the Digital Asset Listing Group, which reviews legal, compliance, and security metrics before approving a token. 'Exchanges generally are not in the business of deciding whether an investment is good or not…there needs to be some standards that it's not an outright fraud,' said Dave Weisberger, co-founder of CoinRoutes. Advertisement 'The reason they [Coinbase] seem more authoritative is because their chief legal officer…has always insisted that it be a defendable process and I think they've done a pretty good job with it.' 'Look at the whitepaper, the team involved, its use case, and its economics,' Cartwright said. 'The crypto market can be highly emotional, with prices swinging wildly. It's easy to get caught up in the hype, but making decisions based on fear or FOMO often leads to poor outcomes.' Best Wallet makes this easier by flagging potential scams, analyzing token metrics, and allowing users to scan for early wallet-holder growth — a metric often associated with momentum ahead of a listing. Coinbase said it 'adheres to thorough processes and standards for all asset listings.' Galeno – Advertisement Here's a surprise: It doesn't. Coinbase says it does not charge listing, application, or prerequisite marketing fees. The platform emphasizes a level playing field and prioritizes compliance over commercial advantage. For crypto teams looking to be considered, Coinbase offers a submission portal called Asset Hub. If an asset passes an initial screening, the DASG might request further due diligence. A Coinbase listing can boost a token's visibility and value — but by the time most people see the news, it's already old. Advertisement Best Wallet users aren't waiting around. They're tracking pre-listing chatter, monitoring whale wallets, and flagging sudden volume spikes — all within a single app. In a market where minutes matter, Best Wallet offers something no X thread or press release can: a head start.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump stuns Wall Street, Washington with controversial BLS nominee
President Trump's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is breaking the mold of his predecessors and causing alarm among economists of all stripes Commissioners of the BLS are usually academics or career civil servants with decades of experience in statistics and economics. But EJ Antoni, who Trump nominated to lead the agency after firing former BLS chief Erika McEntarfer on the heels of a disappointing jobs report earlier this month, has more bona fides as a pundit and conservative advocate than he does as a statistician. The choice of Antoni to lead a statistical division whose data is scrutinized by businesses and governments all over the world is getting major backlash from the economics profession and sparking concerns about the politicization of bedrock-level economic data. 'E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner,' Harvard University economist Jason Furman, who worked for the Obama administration, wrote on social media. 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant experience.' Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, echoed Furman's words. 'He's utterly unqualified and as partisan as it gets,' he told the Washington Post. Who is EJ Antoni? Antoni has been the chief economist of the Heritage Foundation's center on the federal budget for the past four months. The Heritage Foundation is a right-wing think tank that produced the wide-ranging Project 2025 policy agenda. Project 2025 took aim at the 'permanent political class' in Washington, and many of its budget-cutting recommendations have been carried out by the Trump administration. He held two research fellowships at Heritage prior to his current position and two other fellowships at the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, a conservative advocacy group led by billionaire Steve Forbes. Antoni submitted his doctoral dissertation in 2020, in which he defends positions associated with 'supply-side economics,' a conservative policy doctrine that became popular in the 1980s. Besides stints as an adjunct at a community college and as an instructor at his alma mater of Northern Illinois University, he's held no other academic posts. By comparison, McEntarfer worked for 20 years as an economist with the Census Bureau. Her predecessor William Beach was the chief economist for the Senate Budget Committee, and his predecessor Erica Groshen spent 20 years as an economist at the New York Federal Reserve and referees for about a dozen academic journals. Antoni is a frequent guest on a number of conservative media outlets. While BLS makes it a point to produce — rather than interpret — economic data, Antoni has been hitting talking points on recent BLS releases in media appearances, a stark contrast with the agency's typical cut-and-dry communications. Discussing the dismal July jobs report, he emphasized job growth among native-born Americans on former Trump adviser Steven Bannon's internet podcast. 'There was some good news in the report, too, that we should definitely highlight,' he said. 'All of the net job growth over the last 12 months has gone to native-born Americans.' The Heritage Foundation did not respond to a request for an interview with Antoni. Backlash from economists Economists aren't mincing their words about Antoni's credentials. One economist at the University of Wisconsin refuted one of Antoni's recent papers, showing it contained basic statistical mistakes and finding that it wasn't possible to replicate its results — an academic kiss of death. Alan Cole, an economist with the conservative Tax Foundation think tank, described the errors in the paper as 'stunning.' 'Stunning errors in a tweet are bad, but worse to do it in long form, where there's more time and effort involved,' he wrote on social media. Conservative economists have also been blasting the firing of McEntarfer after the July jobs report showed that a meager 106,000 jobs have been added to the economy since May. Trump accused the agency — without any evidence — of producing 'rigged' data, which many economists have said is poppycock. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer … sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' William Beach, a Trump appointee who preceded McEntarfer as head of the BLS, wrote online. Warnings to senators Antoni is expected to be easily confirmed by the GOP-controlled Senate after he appears before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, which will also need to approve his nomination. Antoni's critics are waging a long-shot effort to turn GOP members of the committee against the nominee ahead of his likely confirmation. Friends of the BLS, a group that advocates for the agency and that's chaired by Beach and his predecessor Erica Groshen, called out Antoni in a statement Wednesday, describing the debate about his nomination as 'contentious.' 'BLS now … faces the additional challenge of a contentious debate over the nominee for the next Commissioner, Dr. EJ Antoni,' they said. Groshen told The Hill they hope the nomination process will be 'very thorough.' 'The responsibility of the Senate HELP committee … is particularly important at this time,' she added. The Hill reached out to all Republican members of the committee about Antoni's qualifications, most of whom didn't respond. A representative for Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she wouldn't be commenting on the nomination prior to the hearing. What would politicized labor data look like? Antoni has already floated some massive changes to BLS data releases, including canceling regular monthly reports in favor of quarterly releases — a change that would alter the entire cadence of economic data output and affect nearly every private and public sector model of the U.S. economy. He told Fox News before his nomination that 'the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly jobs reports, but keep publishing more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' since BLS data is often subject to revision. Former BLS chiefs told The Hill they're keeping an eye on a regulatory standard known as OMB Directive No. 3, which governs the rules of BLS releases, for any sign that agency data could become politicized. 'Violations of that would be very unusual, and therefore indicative of something unusual underneath it,' Groshen said. Antoni has delivered some conflicting remarks on BLS data revisions, attributing them to 'incompetent' leadership under McEntarfer during his appearance on Bannon's podcast and then noting later that the problems pre-dated her time as agency commissioner. 'I think that's part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems,' he said before adding that 'this is not a problem unique to the Trump administration.' Real problems with BLS data In fact, the downward revisions in the July jobs report that prompted Trump's firing of McEntarfer were due to the late reporting of educational employment figures by state and local governments, along with the more pronounced seasonal effects in that sector since teachers don't work in the summer. That's fairly typical for the agency, current and former employees of the BLS told The Hill. Political narratives aside, the BLS has seen a substantial drop in survey response rates in the aftermath of the pandemic, a decline that has made the data less reliable, but that has affected statistical agencies in a number of countries beyond the U.S. 'This is not a failure of the BLS … This is a phenomenon that is worldwide,' Erica Groshen told The Hill. 'This is a slow-moving train wreck,' she added, exhorting CEOs across the economy to make a priority of the surveys. 'There is no silver bullet. Believe me – people have been looking for it for a long time.' Economists have been lamenting the survey response rates for years. 'Like Orwellian newspeak, [the U.S. employment report] can often mean the reverse of what it says it means. The household and establishment surveys portray contrasting pictures of employment (and both have shocking response rates),' UBS economist Paul Donovan wrote earlier this month, having noted declines since 2023.
