US-Philippines trade talks yield modest tariff shift after Trump-Marcos meeting, Money News
The new tariff rate is just below the 20 per cent threatened by Trump earlier this month, but still above the 17 per cent rate set in April when Trump announced what he called reciprocal tariff rates for dozens of countries. It matches the 19 per cent rate announced for Indonesia and bests Vietnam's slightly higher rate of 20 per cent.
Trump posted the news on his Truth Social media platform after meeting with Marcos in the Oval Office, where he had earlier signaled a deal could be reached during the visit.
"It was a beautiful visit, and we concluded our Trade Deal, whereby The Philippines is going OPEN MARKET with the United States, and ZERO Tariffs. The Philippines will pay a 19 per cent Tariff," Trump said, calling Marcos a "very good and tough negotiator."
Trump said the two Pacific allies, who will celebrate 80 years of diplomatic relations next year, would also work together militarily but gave no details.
Marcos, the first Southeast Asian leader to meet Trump in his second term, told reporters at the start of the meeting that the United States was his country's "strongest, closest, most reliable ally."
He had no comment after Trump's post on the new tariff rate.
Philippine Ambassador to the United States Jose Manuel Romualdez said it represents "an evolving good deal for both countries that could be further improved over time."
Trump said the "very big numbers" in the trade agreement would only grow larger. The US had a deficit of nearly US$5 billion (S$6.39 billion) with the Philippines last year on bilateral goods trade of US$23.5 billion.
Trump has upended global trade flows with tariffs on nearly every trading partner, with almost all countries facing a 10 per cent tariff that took effect in April and many facing steep additional tariffs from Aug 1.
Gregory Poling, a Southeast Asia expert at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, said it was too early to say much about the Philippines trade deal since no details had been released, as was the case with similar pacts with Indonesia and Vietnam.
"At the end of the day, I don't think the Philippine government is sweating the final number so long as it keeps Philippine-made goods competitive with those of its neighbours, which this does," Poling said.
The White House announced further details of a framework for a US-Indonesia trade agreement on Tuesday, saying negotiators were due to finalize the terms in coming weeks.
During the Oval Office event, Trump said he may visit China for a landmark trip "in the not-too-distant future" and noted the Philippines had distanced itself from Beijing after his election last November.
"The country was maybe tilting toward China, but we un-tilted it very, very quickly," Trump said.
Philippine officials had said Marcos planned to stress that Manila must become economically stronger if it is to serve as a truly robust US partner in the Indo-Pacific.
Protesters gathered near the White House as Marcos arrived, demanding the Philippine leader address pleas of Filipino Americans and migrant workers who have made multiple requests for support amid federal immigration raids.
[[nid:720500]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Media regulator calls on lawmakers to protect British public service TV in age of YouTube
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Britain's public broadcasters risk becoming an 'endangered species' in an age of video streaming websites such as YouTube, says the country's media regulator, Ofcom. LONDON – Britain's media regulator has called for fresh legislation to protect the nation's established public broadcasters such as the BBC from online video streaming services owned mainly by foreign companies. 'Public service media has a long and proud tradition in the UK. It delivers duly impartial and trusted news and original programmes which reflect British culture and bring the country together,' stated a July 21 report issued by Britain's media regulator, the Office of Communications, or Ofcom. But according to Ofcom, the country's public broadcasters risk becoming an 'endangered species' in an age of video streaming websites such as YouTube. The answer, the regulator claims, is to compel global streaming companies to give higher prominence to content produced by British public broadcasters, so that such material can be more easily accessible to British audiences. Ofcom's proposal for a set of new measures including fresh legislation has taken many media specialists in London by surprise, and it is far from certain that the measures will find favour with the British government. Still, the proposals are broadly in keeping with efforts undertaken by many countries, including Singapore, to ensure that their national public media providers can survive in a global information landscape increasingly dominated by a handful of often US-owned video streaming companies. YouTube is a subsidiary of Alphabet, which is also the parent company of Google. Public service broadcasters in the UK comprise the tax-funded BBC – the oldest global broadcaster, affectionately referred to by the British as 'Auntie' – as well as five other ad-funded networks that hold broadcasting licences. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes World In landmark opinion, World Court says countries must address climate change threat Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him In 2024, the BBC's revenues totalled £5.9 billion (S$10.2 billion), primarily derived from the £174.50 compulsory licence fee it collects from all UK households, as well as the royalties earned from selling its content to other global broadcasters. ITV, the biggest of the ad-supported British public networks, netted revenues of £4.1 billion in 2024. These are large sums, but the obligations on British public broadcasters are equally significant. Their output must be accessible nationwide without additional payment. They are also required to commission a large quantity of British-related drama and documentary material, encourage the growth of local talent, promote national media industries, offer special programmes for children, the elderly, and various ethnic minorities, and provide a continuous and comprehensive news service. This last task is both hugely expensive and unattractive to advertisers and commercial sponsors. Yet, no such obligations apply to major global streaming companies, such as Netflix, Disney+, or Amazon's Prime Video, which can concentrate their resources on producing only content that is profitable or stands to increase their fee-paying audiences. In its latest report, Ofcom acknowledged that global streaming companies can also 'contribute substantially to British culture and public debate'. The regulator singled out Netflix's Adolescence, a 2025 hit drama series about crime in a small British town, which prompted a national debate about juvenile delinquency and the relationships between teenage boys and girls. Nonetheless, the Ofcom report pointed out that such media gems are rare. Most of the global streaming companies' material has little reference to the UK, is not explicitly produced for UK audiences and remains behind paywalls. All British public broadcasters have launched their streaming services, either through their own specifically designed platforms, such as the BBC's iPlayer, or in association with other streaming providers. However, these are increasingly marginalised by the sheer power of foreign-owned streaming platforms, which not only take away audiences but also eat into the advertising markets that sustained many public broadcasters. Ofcom has long followed these developments with growing concern. Initially, the regulator's attention focused on ensuring that new streaming devices entering the market do not exclude the streaming platforms of British public broadcasters. A new Media Act came into effect in 2024, designed to ensure that the apps of public broadcasters are automatically included in all the smart TV devices sold in Britain; these are TV sets with integrated web connections. However, this legislation does not extend to video-sharing platforms, a sector dominated by YouTube. And this omission is now considered critical by Ofcom. According to research conducted by the regulator, 43 per cent of children aged four to 17 watch YouTube weekly, far more than those turning to any British public broadcaster. And less than a fifth of the material available on YouTube is made in the UK, Ofcom claimed. The watchdog suggested British broadcasters should 'work urgently with YouTube' to make sure their content is 'prominent and easy to find' on the video sharer's website. It also wants YouTube to offer more news and children's programming from British public broadcasters. The regulator added there is 'a strong case' for the government to consider a law to make that happen. 'If children do not turn to public service media content as they get older, the future of (this media) is at risk,' Ofcom's report concluded. British media bosses welcomed the initiative. But the reaction of the British government was more muted. 'We welcome Ofcom's Public Service Media Review and we will now consider its recommendations,' a spokesperson for Britain's Department for Culture, Media and Sport said on July 22. One reason for this cautious response is that after the introduction of the 2024 Media Act, there has been little official appetite for further legislation. However, a more powerful consideration is the potential reaction of US President Donald Trump to any measure that imposes further obligations on American companies providing digital services. Mr Trump is already angered by plans of many European governments to tax the profits of US-owned digital platforms. And with 'The Donald' scheduled to arrive in the UK at the end of this week for a round of golf, the last thing anyone wants is a further row over the treatment of YouTube.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Migrant Abrego wins release from US jail as he faces smuggling charges
FILE PHOTO: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who lived in the U.S. legally with a work permit and was erroneously deported to El Salvador, is seen wearing a Chicago Bulls hat, in this handout image obtained by Reuters on April 9, 2025. Abrego Garcia Family/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT./File Photo WASHINGTON - Kilmar Abrego, the migrant who was wrongly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration and brought back to the U.S. to face criminal charges, on Wednesday won release from jail and a temporary block on any effort to deport him again. U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Nashville upheld a magistrate judge's ruling that prosecutors had not shown sufficient evidence that Abrego posed a public safety threat or was a flight risk to justify his continued detention ahead of trial on human smuggling charges. President Donald Trump's administration had previously said if Abrego is freed from criminal custody, he will immediately be taken into immigration detention and face a second deportation to a country other than El Salvador. In a simultaneous ruling, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is overseeing a civil lawsuit brought by Abrego, put a three-day pause on any further attempt by the Trump administration to deport Abrego to give his lawyers the chance to contest his removal. Neither the Justice Department nor the Department of Homeland Security immediately responded to requests for comment. Abrego, 29, a Salvadoran migrant who had been living in Maryland, was deported and imprisoned in El Salvador in March despite a 2019 judicial ruling that he could not be sent there because of a risk of gang persecution. Abrego's case has drawn widespread attention as the Trump administration moves aggressively to deport millions living illegally in the U.S., prompting criticism that the government is infringing on legal rights. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes World In landmark opinion, World Court says countries must address climate change threat Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him The Trump administration brought Abrego back to the U.S. in June after securing an indictment accusing him of taking part in a smuggling ring as part of the MS-13 gang to transport migrants living in the country illegally. Abrego has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers have accused the Trump administration of bringing the charges to cover up violations of his rights. He has denied any gang ties. Federal prosecutors sought to convince two different judges to order Abrego be detained while awaiting a trial. They alleged that Abrego used children as cover during smuggling trips, faced complaints that he mistreated female passengers and lied about his activities when stopped by police in 2022. Lawyers for Abrego have argued that alleged co-conspirators cooperating with prosecutors cannot be trusted because they are seeking relief from their own criminal charges and deportations. The defense has argued that witnesses gave inconsistent statements to investigators, including about the government's core allegation that Abrego is a member of the MS-13 gang. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US judge orders deported migrant Abrego released ahead of trial
FILE PHOTO: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who lived in the U.S. legally with a work permit and was erroneously deported to El Salvador, is seen wearing a Chicago Bulls hat, in this handout image obtained by Reuters on April 9, 2025. Abrego Garcia Family/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT./File Photo WASHINGTON - A U.S. judge ordered on Wednesday that Kilmar Abrego be released on bail while awaiting trial on human smuggling charges, a legal victory for the migrant who was wrongly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration, but one that likely sets the stage for him to be detained again by immigration authorities. U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Nashville upheld a magistrate judge's ruling that prosecutors had not shown sufficient evidence that Abrego posed a public safety threat or was a flight risk. Simultaneously on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is overseeing a civil lawsuit brought by Abrego, put a 72-hour pause on any further attempt by the Trump administration to deport Abrego. The ruling will likely not lead to Abrego's release from U.S. government custody and will trigger a renewed legal battle over whether he can be deported again. Abrego's lawyers have asked for the ruling to be paused for 30 days, keeping him in criminal detention as they weigh their next moves. President Donald Trump's administration has previously said if Abrego is freed from criminal custody, he will immediately be taken into immigration detention and face a second deportation to a country other than El Salvador. The immigration proceedings will begin immediately and could lead to Abrego's removal from the U.S. before a criminal trial, officials have said, despite the Trump administration's previous vow that Abrego would face justice in an American courtroom. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes World In landmark opinion, World Court says countries must address climate change threat Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him Abrego, 29, a Salvadoran migrant who had been living in Maryland, was deported and imprisoned in El Salvador in March despite a 2019 judicial ruling that he could not be sent there because of a risk of gang persecution. Abrego's case has drawn widespread attention as the Trump administration moves aggressively to deport millions living illegally in the U.S., prompting criticism that the government is infringing on legal rights. The Trump administration brought Abrego back to the U.S. in June after securing an indictment accusing him of taking part in a smuggling ring as part of the MS-13 gang to transport migrants living in the country illegally. Abrego has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers have accused the Trump administration of bringing the charges to cover up violations of his rights. He has denied any gang ties. Federal prosecutors sought to convince two different judges to order Abrego be detained while awaiting a trial. They alleged that Abrego used children as cover during smuggling trips, faced complaints that he mistreated female passengers and lied about his activities when stopped by police in 2022. Lawyers for Abrego have argued that alleged co-conspirators cooperating with prosecutors cannot be trusted because they are seeking relief from their own criminal charges and deportations. The defense has argued that witnesses gave inconsistent statements to investigators, including about the government's core allegation that Abrego is a member of the MS-13 gang. REUTERS
