
Comparing Public and Private Investment Performance
In recent market discussions, experts have highlighted the advantages of private investment vehicles over traditional public market options such as the S&P 500. The analysis explains how private equity and...
This story originally appeared on Due
In recent market discussions, experts have highlighted the advantages of private investment vehicles over traditional public market options such as the S&P 500. The analysis explains how private equity and credit can improve returns while lowering investors' risk exposure. By comparing historical performances and risk metrics, the discussion offers insight into evolving market dynamics in which fewer companies choose the public route.
Shifting Trends In The Market
One key observation is that there are far fewer publicly traded stocks today than in past decades. Around the year 1997, the public market contained many more listings. However, as the economy has expanded over time, many companies have chosen to remain private. This shift allows these companies to focus on long-term growth rather than being pressured by short-term quarterly reports.
Investors now see distinct advantages in this change. With fewer stocks on the public market, the S&P 500 delivers competitive returns while keeping risk in check. Compared to a diverse portfolio of public companies, private entities benefit from a management approach prioritizing gradual growth over immediate earnings figures.
View this post on Instagram
Private Equity And Its Performance
The conversation on investments has turned toward private equity funds as a means to potentially outperform the widely followed S&P 500 index. A private equity fund has shown impressive gains since its inception, reportedly delivering returns three times greater than the S&P 500 in similar time frames.
Over the last three years, this fund has achieved returns 73% higher than the benchmark index. Such strong performance is not without its context. The analysis reveals that losses would have been limited even if an investor were to buy at a low point and sell at a low point. For instance, in the worst-case scenario, the private equity fund would have dropped by 4.5%, while the S&P 500 fell by 24.5% during the same period.
Even in unfavorable market conditions, the fund demonstrated resilience with lesser losses compared to the S&P 500.
These figures are presented net of fees, emphasizing the effective performance in terms of both gains and risk management. Investors considering private equity can capture these benefits while distancing themselves from some of the volatility seen in public markets.
Private Bonds And Risk Management
Private credit, often called private bonds for clarity, is another area that has garnered interest. One fund focused on private credit has shown an annual return 4% higher than similar standard market options since its inception.
A key point in this discussion is how investors measure risk. Standard deviation remains a widely accepted metric for risk. In this instance, the private credit fund has shown a figure that is 93% lower in standard deviation compared to the S&P 500. This indicates much lower volatility and points to a smoother performance over time.
The reduced risk in these private credit funds suggests that investors may be better protected against sharp market fluctuations in turbulent times. Many are hoping to ensure a more secure growth trajectory by opting for investments with more stable risk metrics.
Core Findings And Insights
The analysis rests on several critical findings that shed light on today's investment options:
The S&P 500 is praised for its consistent performance and lower risk relative to many other public investments.
The number of publicly traded stocks has decreased significantly over the past few decades. This is due in part to more firms opting to stay private to prioritize long-term goals.
Private equity funds have demonstrated higher returns, where one sample fund noted returns three times that of the S&P 500 since its inception.
Even on the worst trading days, the decline in private equity investments was considerably less severe compared to the public market index.
Private credit funds show stable performance with an annual return increase of about 4% and drastically lower fluctuations, as indicated by a 93% lower standard deviation than the S&P 500.
These points highlight a trend among investors seeking more stable and rewarding alternatives to the traditional public markets.
Evaluating The Risk And Return Balance
Risk and return are the two sides of every investment decision. Investors are often drawn to the high returns of private equity and credit funds. However, they also prioritize the stability that comes with reduced risk.
The discussion emphasizes that investment choices made in private markets can result in higher returns and lower negative impacts during market downturns. In specific numbers, a potential decline of only 4.5% in private equity funds during low periods contrasts sharply with a 24.5% plunge experienced by the S&P 500 in similar situations.
Investors also note that presenting performance figures net of fees makes for a fairer assessment. Considering the actual returns that investors take home after expenses, the superiority of some private funds becomes evident.
The Strategic Value Of Private Investments
The trend of companies choosing to remain private plays a significant role in shaping investment strategies. Without the constant pressure of quarterly earnings reports, businesses can evolve with a focus on strategic, long-term performance. This change benefits the companies themselves and yields attractive opportunities for investors.
Private investments allow fund managers to take a longer view on growth. They are less likely to be swayed by short-term market disturbances or fleeting trends. This long-term stability often provides a more secure foundation for continuous value creation.
Investors looking for ways to diversify their portfolios have begun including options from private markets. The data shows attractive performance numbers from private equity and credit funds, offering a blend of elevated returns and significantly less risk.
Looking To Future Investment Strategies
The insights provided suggest that traditional investments such as the S&P 500 continue to have their merits. Yet, as companies increasingly opt for remaining private, alternative funds are seeing improved returns and better control over risk. Evaluating both performance and stability can help investors make more informed decisions.
With a market that has transformed dramatically since the late 1990s, today's investors have a wider range of options. Many now believe that private equity and private credit funds offer substantial value, particularly when considering the long-term growth model many private companies adopt.
The shift in business structures and strategies that favor private investments creates new avenues for potentially enhanced financial performance. These findings urge investors to re-examine traditional investment approaches and explore alternatives that might generate a steadier return.
Financial advisors and market analysts point out that a diversified approach may incorporate both public and private investments. This balanced model allows investors to harness the reliable nature of the S&P 500 while tapping into the unique growth potential of private-focused funds.
Final Considerations
The analysis illuminates the need to adopt a broader perspective when managing investment portfolios. While the S&P 500 remains a strong indicator of market performance, private equity and credit have shown they can achieve superior returns with decreased risk. The question is how best to blend different investment types for a resilient and balanced portfolio.
Investors may find that including private investments in their strategies helps them navigate market fluctuations more effectively. The demonstrated results from these funds offer a compelling case for considering private equity and credit as viable alternatives. With improved returns and lower drawdowns during market stress, these options deserve further exploration.
Looking ahead, potential investors are encouraged to assess their risk tolerance and goals. A thorough understanding of market changes and performance metrics is essential for developing strategies that can lead to long-term success.
The post Comparing Public and Private Investment Performance appeared first on Due.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar General Stock Just Popped, but Is the Worst Really Behind It?
Dollar General is starting to benefit from more affluent customers trading down on their shopping choices. However, its core customer base remains under pressure. The stock, meanwhile, is no longer in the bargain bin after a strong rally. 10 stocks we like better than Dollar General › Dollar General (NYSE: DG) has struggled in recent years, as inflationary pressures hurt its lower-income consumer base. However, the stock staged a strong rally following its fiscal first-quarter earnings report. As of this writing, it is up 50% in 2025. Let's take a closer look at its most recent earnings report and commentary to see whether this rally is sustainable or if the worst is not really behind it just yet. On the surface, tariffs would seem to be a big negative for a company like Dollar General. After all, the retailer's core customer base was already feeling pressure from higher prices due to inflation, and it looked like it was losing share to big-box price leader Walmart (NYSE: WMT). However, the company has begun to see more higher-income consumers frequent its stores in search of value. The retailer said it plans to minimize the impact of tariffs on its gross margins as much as possible without raising prices, although it could increase prices as a last resort. It plans to do this by working with vendors to cut costs, moving some manufacturing to other countries, and tweaking its product lineup by making changes or swapping out certain items. It noted that a mid- to high-single-digit percentage of its overall purchases are directly imported from China, but about double that percentage comes indirectly from the country. The inroads with higher-income consumers contributed to a 2.4% increase in same-store sales in the quarter. While traffic fell by 0.3%, its average checkout ticket rose by 2.7%. Growth came from gains in the food, seasonal, and home & apparel categories. Same-store sales is a very important metric for Dollar General, as it has said in the past that it needs to grow its comparable-store sales by around 3% for it to leverage its expenses and grow its earnings. However, the composition matters, and growth from high-margin areas, such as seasonal items, helped power its earnings higher. This appears to be largely a reflection of higher-income consumers shopping at its locations, as well as its efforts to improve the customer experience and offer better merchandising in categories such as seasonal decor and home items. The company also said that its newer pOpshelf store concept -- which is meant to provide a fun and affordable shopping experience with a focus on home goods, seasonal decor, and party supplies -- performed well, exceeding expectations. Overall, Dollar General's revenue rose 5% year over year to $10.4 billion, while its earnings per share (EPS) jumped 8% to $1.78. That was well ahead of the analyst consensus of $10.3 billion in revenue and adjusted EPS of $1.48. Gross margin increased 78 basis points to 31%, helped by lower shrink and higher inventory markups. Shrink is the amount of merchandise that gets lost, damaged, spoiled, stolen, or just generally can't be sold, and the company has been working hard to improve this metric. Looking ahead, Dollar General raised its full-year guidance. It now expects revenue to grow between 3.7% and 4.7%, with same-store sales increasing between 1.5% and 2.5%. That's up from a prior outlook of revenue growth of 3.4% to 4.4% on comparable-store growth of 1.2% to 2.2%. Meanwhile, it raised the low end of its full-year EPS guidance to a range of $5.20 to $5.80, up from a previous forecast of between $5.10 and $5.80. It said that the guidance assumes that current tariff rates remain in place. Metric Prior Guidance Current Guidance Revenue growth 3.4% to 4.4% 3.7% and 4.7% Same-store sales growth 1.2% to 2.2% 1.5% and 2.5% Earnings per share $5.10 to $5.80 $5.20 to $5.80 Source: Dollar General. The company is also looking to add 575 new store openings in the U.S. this year and up to 15 in Mexico. Dollar General appears to be benefiting from the trade-down effect this year. This is something Walmart has been experiencing for a while, but something dollar stores like Dollar General had previously been missing out on. It was only last year that these companies were talking about how the current environment was one of the most difficult periods in their histories. And for dollar stores' core customer bases, things may actually be worse now with tariffs than they were last year. As such, whether Dollar General can continue to turn the corner likely depends largely on whether it can keep the higher-income customers that have begun to visit its stores and continue to attract new ones. Right now, the company is seeing these new customers visit more often and spend more money per visit. Its remodeling efforts, along with initiatives like its mobile app and own same-day delivery service and partnership with DoorDash, are also likely helping attract more affluent consumers. From a valuation perspective, the retailer now trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 20 based on analyst estimates for fiscal year 2025 (ending January 2026). That valuation shows the stock is no longer in the bargain bin. While Dollar General has made a lot of progress -- with its core consumer still very stressed -- I don't want to chase this rally at its current valuation. Before you buy stock in Dollar General, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Dollar General wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends DoorDash and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Dollar General Stock Just Popped, but Is the Worst Really Behind It? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes in Franklin County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Newly released data from for March shows that potential buyers and sellers in Franklin County saw higher home sale prices than the previous month's median of $259,000. The median home sold for $265,000, an analysis of data from shows. That means March, the most recent month for which figures are available, was up 2.3% from February. Compared to March 2024, the median home sales price was up 4.4% compared to $253,750. sources sales data from real estate deeds, resulting in a few months' delay in the data. The statistics don't include homes currently listed for sale and aren't directly comparable to listings data. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Here is a breakdown on median sale prices: Looking only at single-family homes, the $263,000 median selling price in Franklin County was down 3.7% in March from $273,000 the month prior. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes was up 2% from a median of $257, single family homes sold for $1 million or more during the month, compared to zero recorded transactions of at least $1 million in March 2024. Condominiums and townhomes increased by 26.8% in sales price during March to a median of $265,000 from $209,000 in February. Compared to March 2024, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes was up 28.5% from $206,300. No condominiums or townhomes sold for $1 million or more during March. In March, the number of recorded sales in Franklin County rose by 25.8% since March 2024 — from 128 to 161. All residential home sales totaled $61 million. Across Pennsylvania, homes sold at a median of $265,000 during March, up 1.9% from $259,998 in February. There were 9,945 recorded sales across the state during March, down 3.3% from 10,287 recorded sales in March 2024. Here's a breakdown for the full state: The total value of recorded residential home sales in Pennsylvania increased by 18.7% from $2.7 billion in February to $3.2 billion this March. Out of all residential home sales in Pennsylvania, 2.33% of homes sold for at least $1 million in March, up from 2.29% in March 2024. Sales prices of single-family homes across Pennsylvania increased by 1.9% from a median of $260,000 in February to $265,000 in March. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes across the state was up 6% from $250,000. Across the state, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes rose 2% from a median of $255,916 in February to $261,000 during March. The median sales price of condominiums and townhomes is up 6.1% from the median of $245,892 in March 2024. The median home sales price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. The median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average sales price, which would mean taking the sum of all sales prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high sale. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on Waynesboro Record Herald: Homes in Franklin County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here

Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes in Washington County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here
Newly released data from for March shows that potential buyers and sellers in Washington County saw higher home sale prices than the previous month's median of $299,500. The median home sold for $324,900, an analysis of data from shows. That means March, the most recent month for which figures are available, was up 8.5% from February. Compared to March 2024, the median home sales price was up 8.5% compared to $299,500. sources sales data from real estate deeds, resulting in a few months' delay in the data. The statistics don't include homes currently listed for sale and aren't directly comparable to listings data. Information on your local housing market, along with other useful community data, is available at Here is a breakdown on median sale prices: Looking only at single-family homes, the $342,500 median selling price in Washington County was up 12.3% in March from $305,000 the month prior. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes was up 2.2% from a median of $335, single-family homes sold for $1 million or more during the month. Condominiums and townhomes decreased by 10.2% in sales price during March to a median of $247,000 from $274,999 in February. Compared to March 2024, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes was down 2.8% from $254,000. No condominiums or townhomes sold for $1 million or more during March. In March, the number of recorded sales in Washington County rose by 26.1% since March 2024 — from 142 to 179. All residential home sales totaled $59.9 million. Across Maryland, homes sold at a median of $398,894 during March, up 2.4% from $389,423 in February. There were 6,417 recorded sales across the state during March, down 1.8% from 6,534 recorded sales in March 2024. Here's a breakdown for the full state: The total value of recorded residential home sales in Maryland increased by 22.8% from $2.9 billion in February to $3.6 billion this March. Out of all residential home sales in Maryland, 7.14% of homes sold for at least $1 million in March, down from 7.73% in March 2024. Sales prices of single-family homes across Maryland increased by 4.5% from a median of $440,000 in February to $460,000 in March. Since March 2024, the sales price of single-family homes across the state was slightly up from $457,600. Across the state, the sales price of condominiums and townhomes is at a median of $325,000, the same as February. The median sales price of condominiums and townhomes is down 1.6% from the median of $330,333 in March 2024. The median home sales price used in this report represents the midway point of all the houses or units listed over the given period of time. The median offers a more accurate view of what's happening in a market than the average sales price, which would mean taking the sum of all sales prices then dividing by the number of homes sold. The average can be skewed by one particularly low or high sale. The USA TODAY Network is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from Please leave any feedback or corrections for this story here. This story was written by Ozge Terzioglu. Our News Automation and AI team would like to hear from you. Take this survey and share your thoughts with us. This article originally appeared on The Herald-Mail: Homes in Washington County sold for higher prices recently: See how much here