Woodside aspiring to global market with US gas project
The $US17.5 billion ($A27.2 billion) development in the state of Louisiana is expected to produce 16.5 million tonnes of LNG per year, taking the company's annual LNG delivery to 24 million tonnes next decade - around five per cent of global supply.
"Louisiana LNG is a game-changer for Woodside, set to position our company as a global LNG powerhouse and enable us to deliver enduring shareholder returns," Woodside chief executive Meg O'Neill said in a statement.
"We have secured quality partners and are now ready to take a final investment decision."
US investment firm Stonepeak will provide $US5.7 billion of the total cost.
The project would connect Woodside to low-cost US gas resources and promises an asset life-span of more than 40 years with an aim of first output in 2029, the company said.
"This supply can target strong and sustained demand for LNG expected in both Asia and Europe, as those markets pursue energy security and decarbonisation aspirations," Ms O'Neill said.
Woodside claimed its greenhouse gas emissions targets would be unchanged by the project, drawing the ire of environmental groups.
According to Market Forces chief executive Will van de Pol, the project would release emissions equivalent to running Australia's largest coal-fired power plant for another 120 years.
"Our analysis shows Woodside's decision to bulldoze ahead with its risky Louisiana LNG project will add 1.6 billion tonnes of climate emissions over its 40-year lifetime," he said.
"Woodside has committed $US11.8 billion to a project that would export harmful gas until the 2070s."
Mr van der Pol said the gas expansion strategy was consistent with reaching a catastrophic level of global warming, which was ultimately enabled by major shareholders including Australia's largest superannuation funds.
"Big investors like AustralianSuper and HESTA can't wash their hands of these massive new emissions committed on their watch, and they must escalate pressure by voting against directors at Woodside's AGM next week."
AustralianSuper and HESTA have been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
30 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Markets plummet as Trump issues more steep tariffs
US President Donald Trump's latest wave of tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners sent global stock markets tumbling and countries and companies scrambling to seek ways to strike better deals. As Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy with the highest tariff rates since the early 1930s, Switzerland, "stunned" by 39 per cent tariffs, sought more talks, as did India, hit with a 25 per cent rate. New tariffs announced on Friday also included a 35 per cent duty on many goods from Canada, 50 per cent for Brazil, 20 per cent for Taiwan, which said its rate was "temporary" and it expected to reach a lower figure. The presidential order listed higher import duty rates of 10 per cent to 41 per cent starting in a week's time for 69 trading partners, taking the US effective tariff rate to about 18 per cent, from 2.3 per cent last year, according to analysts at Capital Economics. US stocks took a hit. By afternoon on Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had dropped 1.46 per cent to 43,486.45, the S&P 500 1.8 per cent to 6,225.55 and the Nasdaq Composite 2.42 per cent to 20,610.91. Markets were also reacting to a disappointing jobs report. Data showed US job growth slowed more than expected in July while the prior month's data was revised sharply lower, pointing to a slowdown in the labour market. Global shares stumbled, with Europe's STOXX 600 tumbling 1.89 per cent on the day. Trump's new tariffs have created yet more uncertainty, with many details unclear. They are set to take effect on August 7, a White House official said. Trump administration officials defended the president's approach saying the uncertainty was "critical" for him to be able to leverage a better deal. "The trade deals we've seen over the last few weeks... have been nothing short of monumental," Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran said on CNBC. Trump's tariff rollout also comes amid evidence they have begun driving up prices of home furnishings and household equipment. Australian products could become more competitive in the US market, helping businesses boost exports, Trade Minister Don Farrell said, after Trump kept the minimum tariff rate of 10 per cent for Australia. The European Union, which struck a framework deal with Trump on Sunday, is still awaiting more Trump orders to deliver on agreed carve-outs, including on cars and aircraft, EU officials said, saying the latest executive orders did not cover that. Switzerland said it would push for a "negotiated solution" with the US, with industry insiders saying they were "stunned" by the 39 per cent tariffs. South Africa's Trade Minister Parks Tau said he was seeking "real, practical interventions" to defend jobs and the economy against the 30 per cent US tariff it faces. Southeast Asian countries largely breathed a sigh of relief after the US tariffs on their exports that were lower than threatened and leveled the playing field with a rate of about 19 per cent across the region's biggest economies. Thailand's finance minister said a reduction from 36 per cent to 19 per cent would help his country's economy. While India is in talks after being slapped with a 25 per cent tariff, which could impact about $US40 billion ($A62 billion) worth of its exports. Trump issued a separate order for Canada that raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35 per cent, from 25 per cent previously, saying Canada had "failed to cooperate" in curbing illicit narcotics flows into the US. This is contrast to his decision to allow Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs to allow time to negotiate. Businesses and analysts said the impact of Trump's new trade regime would not be positive for economic growth. "No real winners in trade conflicts," said Thomas Rupf, co-head Singapore and CIO Asia at VP Bank. "Despite some countries securing better terms, the overall impact is negative."
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
