logo
Jamaat-e-Islami leaders divided after new political alliance

Jamaat-e-Islami leaders divided after new political alliance

Hindustan Times9 hours ago
Leaders of banned Jamaat-e-Islami appear divided after Justice Development Front, a new political front of banned Jamaat--Justice and Development Front (JDF), decided to become part of a new political amalgam - People's Alliance for Change (PAC). Earlier, PC chairman Sajad Lone had said that the decision to form the alliance came after months of consultations and promised this alliance will change the two party system in Kashmir. (File)
This new alliance was announced by People's Conference(PC) led by Sajad Lone, Jamaat-e-Islami affiliated JDF, which fought recent assembly elections, and People's Democratic Front (PDF) led by Hakeem Yaseen. They had called this an electoral alliance for the future.
However, after the formation of the new alliance, two former Jamaat-e-Islami leaders, who once served as head of Jamaat, came out publicly saying that the alliance has nothing to do with Jamaat cadres as the party has been banned. They said that they might approach the Supreme Court to end the ban.
'I am surprised how people are saying the new alliance is backed by Jamaat-e-Islami. Everyone knows Jamaat is banned,' said former chief Amir Mohammad Abdullah Wani in a video message being circulated on social media.
Wani termed it as a big injustice. 'I want to make it clear Jamaat doesn't back any party, front or alliance. This is a ploy to create confusion. We had made a panel to convince the government that Jamaat is a peaceful organisation. Unfortunately the panel failed and it has no value now. So we are all staying silent.'
Another former chief of Jamaat, Ghulam Mohammad Bhat, also said the four member panel which was constituted has failed. 'Whatever the panel is doing now it's against Jamaat and its activities. We have nothing to do with them and their way of constitution is completely against the 85 years of Jamaat-e-Islami in Kashmir.'
However, the Jamaat panel, which is backing Justice Development Front, in a press conference on Friday said the panel will work till the ban on Jamaat-e-Islami isn't lifted. 'We have created the front to convey a message that we are peace loving people ready to work under the Constitution of India and under existing laws...We do admit we failed to remove the ban but our struggle will continue,' said panel head Ghulam Qadir Wani. He said that they aren't forcing any Jamaat-e-Islami worker to become part of front. 'We can't sit idle at home and get things resolved. We won't force anyone to be part of this front.'
He termed the new alliance as the need of the day. 'We will make not only the JDF strong but also will work for a stronger alliance,' Wani said while acknowledging they made people vote in the last assembly and Parliament elections.
Earlier, PC chairman Sajad Lone had said that the decision to form the alliance came after months of consultations and promised this alliance will change the two party system in Kashmir.
Though PC and JDF contested last assembly elections separately, however, Sajjad could win one seat while on four other seats his candidates emerged as runner up. JDF got good votes in Kulgam losing a seat with thin margin. However, together there are chances of it becoming a formidable group which can be problematic for the traditional parties in the political arithmetic of Kashmir.
Justice and Development Front (JDF) was launched by Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) affiliated candidates early this year after the central government imposed a five-year ban on the Jamaat-e-Islami, Jammu and Kashmir, in 2019, citing the outfit's alleged ties with militant groups. Last year, some 10 such candidates participated in the elections as Independents, including the prominent Sayyar Ahmad Reshi and Talat Majid in south Kashmir with no success on any seat, though Reshi managed to gather a formidable vote percentage in south Kashmir.
People's Democratic Front (PDF) led by Hakeem Yaseen has a good following in Khansahib area of central Kashmir, though he lost the elections in 2024 after being its MLA for three consecutive terms.
Jamaat-e-Islami has been participating in elections till 1987 and it was part of the Muslim United Front. After the start of militancy, Jamaat-e-Islami didn't participate in elections, however many of its cadres preferred to vote for People's Democratic Party.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From 'jihadi gathering' to ‘no real brotherhood': BJP on Uddhav-Raj Thackeray reunion
From 'jihadi gathering' to ‘no real brotherhood': BJP on Uddhav-Raj Thackeray reunion

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

From 'jihadi gathering' to ‘no real brotherhood': BJP on Uddhav-Raj Thackeray reunion

Political opponents' reactions to cousins Uddhav and Raj Thackeray's reunion ranged from allegations of it being 'anti-Hindu' to a 'desperate attempt to stay relevant' after their joint rally in Mumbai on Saturday. BJP's Nitesh Rane at a recent public interaction in Mumbai.(PTI File) Maharashtra minister Nitesh Rane had among the most caustic reactions, terming it a 'jihadi" gathering. "We are Hindus and also proud Marathi. The way jihadis attempt to divide our society, these people are doing the same," he alleged, as per an ANI report. Mumbai BJP president Ashish Shelar termed the rally an "appeasement" campaign for elections 'rather than an event organised for language'. In his X post, Shelar wrote: 'With the municipal elections approaching, the panicked Ubatha Sena (a mocking term for Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena) has suddenly remembered 'brotherhood'... and they've never truly cared for it anyway!" Another BJP leader, former minister Sudhir Mungantiwar, however, had a rather conciliatory tone. "The two brothers should unite and stay united. If necessary, their parties should even consider merging… If they are coming together, it's a good thing. They have our best wishes." he said, according to the news agency. At the central level, union minister Chirag Paswan that Uddhav and Raj were coming together 'not for language, but for their selfish motives and to recover their lost base'. Paswan's LJP, an ally of the BJP, is from Bihar, one of the Hindi-speaking states that Raj Thackeray mentioned were 'lagging behind Maharashtra'. 'The Constitution of India permits us to live in any corner of the country and speak any language,' Pawan stressed, 'I support and respect every language... But how a few selfish political parties promote politics of discrimination – be it over caste, religion, region and now language – I do not support this at all." (With inputs from agencies)

They are coming together with intention to recover their lost base: Union Minister Chirag Paswan on joint rally of Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray
They are coming together with intention to recover their lost base: Union Minister Chirag Paswan on joint rally of Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray

India Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • India Gazette

They are coming together with intention to recover their lost base: Union Minister Chirag Paswan on joint rally of Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray

Patna (Bihar) [India], July 5 (ANI): Following Shiv Sena (UBT) Chief Uddhav Thackeray and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray addressing a joint rally at Worli Dome in Mumbai on Saturday, Union Minister Chirag Paswan said that they were not coming together for language, but for their selfish motives and to recover their lost base. Chirag Paswan said, 'They are not coming together for language, but for their selfish motives. They are coming together to recover their lost base. Both brothers saw that staying apart not only reduced their strength but also finished it...I'm not sure whether they have resolved their differences...I believe they have come together just for their political benefits. I don't think their hearts would have connected so soon, and political differences would have ended.' He said that the country can progress under Unity in Diversity only if each other's languages are respected. He further said, 'I support and respect every language. It is the beauty of Indian languages that different languages are spoken in different states. Our dialect changes every few kilometres. I consider languages as friends; they have grown together happily. But how a few selfish political parties promote politics of discrimination - be it over caste, religion, region and now language. I do not support this at all. Constitution of India permits us to live in any corner of the country and speak any language...I respect all languages, but you respect our language as much as we respect yours.' Earlier, MNS chief Raj Thackeray launched a veiled attack on Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and said that the Chief Minister did what could not be possible for Balasaheb Thackeray, as he brought the two estranged brothers of the Thackeray family together. Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray shared a hug at the Worli Dome in Mumbai as they held a joint rally after the Maharashtra government scrapped two Government Resolutions (GRs) to introduce Hindi as the third language. Thackeray brothers garlanded the statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj at the joint rally of their parties, Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) at Worli Dome in Mumbai. Addressing the gathering, Raj Thackeray said, 'I had said in one of my interviews that my Maharashtra is bigger than any politics and fight. Today, after 20 years, Uddhav and I have come together. What Balasaheb could not do, Devendra Fadnavis did it... The work of bringing both of us together.' 'Minister Dada Bhuse came to me and requested me to listen to his point. I asked him what the third language would be for Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Rajasthan. All the Hindi-speaking states are behind us, and we are ahead of all Hindi-speaking states; still, we are being forced to learn Hindi. Why?. I don't have anything against Hindi; no language is bad. It takes a lot of effort to build a language. We Marathi people ruled over a lot of states during the Maratha Empire, but we never enforced Marathi on those parts. They started with the experiment of imposing Hindi over us and were trying to test if we would not have opposed it, they would have gone up to making Mumbai separate from Maharashtra,' he added. He further asked if anyone would raise a question about his pride in Marathi. He further said, 'They say that our children have learnt in English medium schools. So what? Dada Bhuse studied in Marathi schools and became a minister. Devendra Fadnavis studied in an English-medium school and became the Maharashtra CM. So what? I would tell you that I studied in a Marathi school, but my father, Shrikant Thackeray, and uncle, Balasaheb Thackeray, studied in an English medium school. Can anyone raise a question about their love for Marathi? Tomorrow, I will learn Hebrew also. Will anyone raise a question about my pride in Marathi?' 'Be it Gujarati or anyone else here, must know Marathi, but there is no need to beat people for that if they don't speak Marathi. But if someone shows useless drama, you must hit below their eardrums. I tell you one more thing: if you beat someone, don't make a video of the incident. Let the person beaten up tell that he has been beaten up, you don't need to tell everyone that you have beaten someone,' he added. Recently, the Maharashtra government withdrew its April 16 orders on the implementation of the three-language policy that made Hindi a 'mandatory' third language for school students in Classes 1 to 5 studying in English and Marathi medium schools. (ANI)

Bilawal Bhutto Says Pakistan Has No Objection To Extraditing 'Individuals Of Concern' To India
Bilawal Bhutto Says Pakistan Has No Objection To Extraditing 'Individuals Of Concern' To India

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

Bilawal Bhutto Says Pakistan Has No Objection To Extraditing 'Individuals Of Concern' To India

Last Updated: Bilawal Bhutto said Pakistan would be willing to arrest any "individual of concern" if India is willing to participate in the process and present evidence of the same. Former Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari said his country had no objection to extraditing 'individuals of concern" to India as a confidence-building measure, as long as India shows willingness to cooperate with its neighbour. In an interview with Al Jazeera on Friday, Bilawal responded to a question about extraditing Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) chief Hafiz Saeed and Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) chief Masood Azhar as possible concessions and good-faith gestures to India. 'As part of a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where terrorism is one of the issues that we discuss, I am sure Pakistan would not be opposed to any of these things," he said, while accusing India of not complying with Pakistan to stop cross-border terrorism. 'If India Cooperates…' 'India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements that require that conviction to take place. It's important … to present evidence within these courts, for people to come over from India to testify, to put up with whatever the counter-accusations will be," said Bilawal. 'If India is willing to be cooperative in that process, I am sure there will be no hurdle in extraditing any individual of concern." Masood Azhar, who has been linked to a string of terror attacks in India- including the 2001 Parliament attack, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, the 2016 Pathankot airbase assault and the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing- was designated a UN global terrorist in 2019. Meanwhile, Saeed – the mastermind of the 26/11 attack – is currently serving a 33-year sentence for terror financing. Bilawal also stressed that Pakistan had no knowledge of the location of Azhar and said he would be arrested if New Delhi provides credible evidence that he is on Pakistani soil. The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairman also suggested that Azhar may be in Afghanistan. 'New Abnormal' Furthermore, Bilawal expressed concern about India's renewed policy to pursue terrorists, saying it does not serve the interests of either country and termed it a 'new abnormal". India said any further discussions with Pakistan would only be on terrorism and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), after ties deteriorated sharply following a terror attack by Lashkar-linked terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22. India and Pakistan exchanged four days of hostilities after New Delhi launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror camps in the neighbouring country. The two countries reached an 'understanding" on May 10. (with agency inputs) First Published: July 05, 2025, 16:42 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store