logo
Would you recycle more if every bottle gave you a chance to win $1,000?

Would you recycle more if every bottle gave you a chance to win $1,000?

Fast Company25-06-2025
If you live in one of the 10 U.S. states with a bottle deposit program, you're probably familiar with the idea of feeding your empty plastic bottles or aluminum cans into a machine and getting a few cents back for your effort. But what if instead of earning a nickel or a dime, you could be entered in a lottery for a chance to win a bigger prize with each bottle you return?
That option actually motivates people to recycle more bottles, researchers discovered when they tested it out on a small scale. Not only did people recycle more often, but they actually felt a little happier after doing so (compared with when getting a regular 10-cent return). And, it turns out, Norway already offers this incentive and also has one of the highest rates of recycling for plastic bottles in the world, at about 97%.
This idea that people prefer a small chance at a bigger prize to a small reward is a common one in behavioral economics, says Jiaying Zhao, a professor of psychology and sustainability at the University of British Columbia and one of the authors of this study, which was recently published in the journal Waste Management. She wanted to see if the same principal could help spur sustainable behavior changes.
Bottle deposits already help increase recycling rates. In the U.S., beverage containers (including plastic and glass bottles and aluminum cans) that are eligible for a bottle deposit have an average recycling rate of 64%, but beverage containers that aren't eligible for a refund have a recycling rate of just 24%. That latter figure includes all the bottles in states without deposit laws, and containers that are exempt from deposit laws—like in Massachusetts, for example, where regular plastic water bottles aren't eligible for a deposit.
Offering a chance at a bigger prize could increase recycling rates even more. The researchers set up bottle return locations in British Columbia and Alberta in Canada, offering people the option of a 10-cent return or a 0.01% chance at a $1,000 prize. With that lottery option on the table, people brought 47% more bottles to recycle. The researchers also surveyed people on their happiness levels after returning the bottles, and they found that the people who chose the lottery option were slightly happier, even when they didn't win.
The same people even came back multiple times to return bottles, says Jade Radke, a PhD student at UBC and the study's coauthor. In Alberta, the researchers set up their bottle return at a rib festival, and people were even 'walking around to collect cans on the tables and try again,' she says. (The bottle return in British Columbia through this study was located at a food court and set up for two months.)
The potential impact of increasing recycling rates this way is huge. 'Creating new bottles comes with a lot of carbon emissions, and not recycling bottles also comes with a lot of pollution, so it can be a meaningful way to decrease all of those things,' Radke says.
If we could scale the results from the study to the entire U.S., that would mean an additional 2.1 million tons of containers recycled here. That would also save carbon emission—more than 4 million tons, or about the same as taking 1 million cars off the road per year. And for any legislators that may be concerned a lottery system would cost more money to run, the researchers say it ends up being the same average payout as per-bottle deposit systems.
When the researchers set out to test this incentive, they didn't know it was already available in Norway. Now they see it as further proof of a recycling solution. Norway began offering a bottle recycling lottery in 2009 (a bottle lottery has also been available in Finland since 2011), and now, 97% of all plastic beverage bottles there are returned.
In Norway, people can use a 'reverse vending machine to either choose between the guaranteed refund, or the chance to win 5, 10, 100, or 100,000 euros. The system also doesn't encourage gambling, its creators say, because there's no way to enter with cash and there are no 'near misses,' like with other kinds of gambling.
The Norway bottle lottery has another twist: Some of the lottery's proceeds go to the Norwegian Red Cross. This chance to donate to a charity through bottle returns could be another motivator. 'Instead of 10 cents back to you, what if the proceeds go to a food bank or charity?' Zhao says. Her team actually tested the effectiveness of this option as well, with results soon to be published. The researchers also plan to test how the lottery incentive impacts people who bring giant bags of bottles to big bottle depots, in order to see if the incentive increases their recycling rates as well.
It's important that municipalities that may want to offer a bottle lottery still give people the option of the regular 5- or 10-cent return, Zhao says. In cities across the U.S. and Canada, people known as canners or binners actually rely on bottle returns for part of their income to get by. 'We don't want to take the short gain option away,' she says. 'Instead, we want to give people the option to choose.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Healthy Living Helps the Aging Brain
Healthy Living Helps the Aging Brain

Bloomberg

time39 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Healthy Living Helps the Aging Brain

A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association makes a compelling case that a healthy lifestyle does an aging brain good. That might sound obvious. Eat well, exercise, challenge yourself mentally, have an active social life and you'll be better off for it. Yet researchers are just starting to offer concrete data to support the theory that making conscientious lifestyle changes can lower the risk of dementia, which is estimated to affect some 6 million Americans.

Warning — Next Week's Perseid Meteor Shower To Be ‘Severely Compromised'
Warning — Next Week's Perseid Meteor Shower To Be ‘Severely Compromised'

Forbes

time39 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Warning — Next Week's Perseid Meteor Shower To Be ‘Severely Compromised'

The Perseid meteor shower, the most popular "shooting star" display of the year, will be far from its best because of the presence of a near-full moon in the sky, experts have warned. When Is The Perseid Meteor Shower? The most prolific meteor shower of the year under ideal conditions, the Perseids are active right now, having started on July 14. The show will extend through Sept. 1, but come to a narrow peak overnight on Tuesday-Wednesday, Aug. 12-13. However, although the sturgeon moon will turn full on Saturday, Aug. 9, it will still be very bright come the Perseids peak — and rise into the sky just as it gets dark. The Truth About The Perseid Meteor Shower In 2025 According to the American Meteor Society, this is interrupting the Perseids' 'strong maximum' and playing havoc with the 50-75 'shooting stars' per hour normally expected to be seen on the peak night. 'In 2025, the waning gibbous moon will severely compromise this shower at the time of maximum activity,' says the AMS. 'Such conditions will reduce activity by at least 75 percent as only the brighter meteors will be visible.' That means a maximum of only about 12-18 'shooting stars' per hour will likely be seen on the peak night of the Perseids this year. What NASA Says About The Perseid Meteor Shower NASA agrees that one of the best annual meteor showers, the Perseids, will this year disappoint. 'Unfortunately, this year the moon is nearly full on the peak night, and its glare will wash out all but the brightest meteors,' states NASA in its latest skywatching tips for August 2025. However, there is some positive news. 'While that's not so great for Perseid watchers, the good news is that another favorite annual meteor shower, the Geminids, is poised for Moon-free viewing in December,' writes NASA. When Is The Geminids Meteor Shower? Of all the major meteor showers in 2025, it's the Geminids that are poised to be the most impressive. Active from Dec. 1-21, the Geminid meteor shower can produce up to 150 'shooting stars' per hour during the peak — at least, in theory — with the peak overnight on Saturday/Sunday, Dec. 13/14. This time, the moon will not get in the way until a few hours after midnight, rising as a crescent in the eastern sky as the peak comes to an end. So while 2025's Perseids peak may be a letdown, the December's Geminids promise to deliver a dazzling consolation prize under much darker skies later this year. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.

Low-dose X-ray treatment is being used for arthritis, plantar fasciitis and other benign conditions
Low-dose X-ray treatment is being used for arthritis, plantar fasciitis and other benign conditions

Washington Post

time39 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Low-dose X-ray treatment is being used for arthritis, plantar fasciitis and other benign conditions

In March 2024, radiation oncologist Sanjay Mehta had been dealing with painful Achilles tendinitis on his left ankle for over a year. He'd tried steroid injections and PRP (platelet-rich plasma) injections, which Mehta said eventually did the trick. But when his right Achilles started hurting three months later, he opted for a different approach. He had recently started offering low-dose radiation therapy to treat some patients suffering from inflammatory conditions and thought: Why not try it himself? After six self-administered low-dose X-rays, covered by insurance, he found he was pain-free — and he began offering the therapy to more patients with similar noncancerous conditions. 'The main surprise was … why didn't I think of this earlier?' he said. Mehta is part of a growing trend among U.S. radiation specialists, who have begun offering low-dose X-ray therapy for benign conditions such as arthritis, plantar fasciitis, Peyronie's disease and thick raised scars, or keloids. After the American Society for Radiation Oncology discussed the use of low-dose radiation therapy for nonmalignant conditions in its spring 2024 quarterly newsletter, its use began to pick up steam, Mehta said. Unlike radiation therapy for cancer, LDRT, as its name suggests, uses low doses to suppress inflammatory cells. Mehta said six LDRT treatments expose the patient to about the same amount of radiation as in one cancer treatment or what someone might get from 'a few' CT scans. Low-dose radiation treatments almost date back to when X-rays were first discovered in 1895, Mehta said. They eventually fell out of favor in part due to new treatment options, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but also because of radiation fears, he said. Gopal Bajaj, the musculoskeletal lead for the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force on non-oncologic disease, said LDRT remained popular in Europe. The German Society for Radiation Oncology published national guidelines for its use in nonmalignant diseases in 2000. In the United States, 'it's within the last decade or so that there's been a slow reemergence of interest into exploring radiotherapy for conditions other than cancer,' Bajaj said. Bajaj first encountered it as a therapy about a decade ago when an interested patient with Dupuytren's contracture — a condition that involves thickening of the skin on the palm of the hand, often causing fingers to curl under — asked for it. He started delving into the scientific literature, which was primarily German, and decided it was worth a try. It worked, halting the progression of her condition, which Bajaj said is the goal of the treatment. Since then, Bajaj has seen around 800 people with the disease who fly in from all over the country. 'Most patients we see with Dupuytren's are actively progressing when they begin treatment, and after radiation therapy, fewer than 5 to 8 percent continue to worsen,' Bajaj said. When it comes to inflammatory conditions like osteoarthritis, tendinopathy or plantar fasciitis, Bajaj said, 60 to 80 percent of his patients report some symptom improvement. A Department of Veterans Affairs survey last year of 48 studies on the effectiveness of LDRT for a variety of conditions, some several decades old, found mixed evidence to make conclusions about its effectiveness, but it said there was no reason not to try it 'after conventional therapy fails.' Bajaj and Mehta said they believe the research is still catching up to what doctors are seeing in the clinical setting. Whenever there's trauma (from a surgery or an injury), macrophages, white blood cells that modulate inflammation, begin to secrete chemicals that promote inflammation. The X-rays suppress the macrophages, which 'stops this inflammatory cascade from taking hold and, therefore, the pain and the swelling goes away,' Mehta said. LDRT can work for injuries or conditions where there's inflammation, Mehta said, such as tendinitis, osteoarthritis and plantar fasciitis. In some cases, LDRT seems to provide immediate relief, while others can take longer. In Mehta's case, it took six to eight weeks before his Achilles felt better. A cortisone shot may work faster, he said, but judging from his and his patients' experiences, the LDRT results seem to last longer. He said it may also be more beneficial to the long-term health of the joints because cortisone shots can weaken the tendon and the fibers of the connective tissue, which can up the risk for tendon ruptures with repeated injections. There is a 'sweet spot' for LDRT, Bajaj said. If a patient's condition is too advanced, such as if their arthritis has led to a bone-on-bone (without cartilage or fluid to pad it) situation, or there's an autoimmune component to it, such as with ankylosing spondylitis, it probably won't work, he said. Not all radiation specialists are on board with low-dose X-ray treatment for benign conditions. At Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida, for instance, when Jose Penagaricano, a radiation oncologist who has been treating patients with malignant conditions for six years, started treating osteoarthritis and Dupuytren contracture about a year ago, he got some pushback from colleagues worried that LDRT would take machine time away from ill cancer patients, he said. By limiting consultations for LDRT cases, though, he said the impact has been minimal. The bigger concern that those using LDRT have heard from colleagues and patients is radiation exposure. Even low-dose exposure over a lifetime has the potential to cause a small increase in the risk of cancer, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. David Brenner, director of the Center for Radiological Research at the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, said that, in general, the long-term health concerns related to radiation exposure are specific to organs that 'have a lot of dividing cells,' such as the gastrointestinal system. Hands, feet and knees — frequent sites for LDRT — would be of less concern, he said. A 2015 study in the British Journal of Radiology suggests that the risks of cancer following low-dose radiation therapy for benign disease tend to be small, especially in older patients. But because 'exposure to radiation has the potential to cause a radiation-induced cancer many years after treatment,' it may be an issue for younger adults, adolescents and children, the study said. Concerns about lifetime accumulation of radiation is why radiation doctors typically use this treatment only on patients over 40, Mehta said. 'The major thing people are worried about with radiation is radiation itself causing cancer, [but] it takes, even in higher-dose cancer patients, literally decades for a second cancer to develop,' he said. 'With these low doses of radiation that we use for arthritis and tendinitis, there's been nothing described in the literature for over a hundred years.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store