BCD warns advocates against online, YouTube solicitation
The regulatory body has flagged the increasing trend of lawyers and self-proclaimed 'legal influencers' posting promotional videos, client interactions, and other content online, which it deemed unethical and in violation of Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules.
While issuing a notice, BCD Chairman Surya Prakash Khatri emphasised the seriousness of the matter and stated that such conduct undermines the dignity and sanctity of the legal profession and poses a risk of spreading misinformation, particularly when done by individuals who lack proper legal qualifications or licensing.
The Council's notice directs all advocates currently engaged in such activities to take down their content with immediate effect.
Failure to comply, it warned, could invite disciplinary action under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, including suspension or cancellation of their license to practice law.
The Bar Council reaffirmed its commitment to upholding the ethical standards of the legal profession and cautioned members of the Bar to refrain from indulging in direct or indirect forms of advertisement or self-promotion that could erode public trust in the legal system.
UNI SNG SS
'What is legal and constitutional is moral': Justice Abhay Oka's powerful call for judicial integrity and constitutional morality
06 Aug 2025 | 11:24 PM
By Sangeeta Sharma
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) 'Traditional morality is shaped by popular opinion. But judges are bound only by the Constitution.' In a thought-provoking keynote address that struck at the heart of judicial ethics, Justice Abhay S. Oka, former judge of the Supreme Court of India, delivered a scathing and insightful critique of the misuse of personal moral convictions in legal decision-making.
see more..
'One human pulling another is inhuman': Supreme Court bans hand-pulled rickshaws in Matheran
06 Aug 2025 | 11:08 PM
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court today condemned the continued use of hand-pulled rickshaws, calling the practice inhuman and violative of the right to dignity guaranteed by the Constitution. The Court held that such manual labor, which involves a human being pulling another, must be abolished immediately, especially after 78 years of Independence and 75 years of the Constitution.
see more..
PM Modi expected to visit China for SCO Summit, in another thaw in bilateral ties
06 Aug 2025 | 10:12 PM
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China to attend the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, to be held in Tianjin, from August 31 to September 1.
see more..
06 Aug 2025 | 8:58 PM
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) As US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on India, taking the total to a high of 50 percent, India termed the move as unfair, unjustified and unreasonable, and reiterated that it will take all actions necessary to protect its national interest.
see more..
06 Aug 2025 | 8:47 PM
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) India and Russia today reaffirmed their Strategic Partnership and shared commitment to deepen bilateral industrial and economic cooperation.
see more..
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
HC pauses Punjab's land pooling policy; govt. to file reply within 4 weeks
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Thursday granted an interim stay on the operation of the Punjab government's Land Pooling Policy, 2025 and directed the State to file a reply within four weeks. The court's order came on a writ petition challenging the policy, which was introduced in June to promote planned and sustainable development by involving landowners, promoters, and companies as stakeholders in the development process. A Division Bench of Justice Anupinder Grewal and Justice Deepak Manchanda expressed concern over the lack of provisions in the policy for the rehabilitation of landless labourers and others who do not own land but are dependent on it for their sustenance. The court questioned the government over not conducting a Social Impact Assessment. The petitioner, Gurdeep Singh Gill, had challenged the policy, arguing that it was notified without carrying out the necessary environment and social impact assessments, which are essential for the acquisition of land under Sections 4 to 8 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013. Mr. Gill's counsel, Gurjeet Singh, told reporters that the court had granted an interim stay on the policy and directed the government to file a reply within four weeks. The petitioner had sought directions for quashing the State government's notification and the policy as 'ultra vires, arbitrary, and violative of the Constitution'. 'Looting scheme' The Punjab government had introduced the policy to increase interest in land pooling among landowners, with the promise of providing 1,000 square yards of residential plot and 200 square yards of commercial plot in fully developed land in lieu of one acre of land. However, the Opposition parties and farmer bodies in the State have been opposing the policy, dubbing it a 'looting' scheme to 'rob' farmers of their fertile land. Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) chief Sukhbir Singh Badal on Thursday called the policy a 'land-grabbing' scheme. He said the party would start a protest against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government from September 1 in Mohali, which would continue until the policy is withdrawn. He alleged that AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal had done an 'underhand deal' with Delhi builders to 'hand over' farmers' land to them. The SAD chief claimed that the State government and Mr. Kejriwal were attacking farmers and the poor, and that they wanted to raise money for the party by looting Punjab. Meanwhile, AAP hit out at the Opposition parties, alleging that they are spreading misleading propaganda against the State government's policy. Party leaders described the policy as 'farmer-friendly'.
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump to demand data from collages to prove they're not using race in admissions
US President Donald Trump is expected to sign a memorandum on Thursday directing colleges that receive federal funding to disclose expanded admissions data, the White House said, in a move aimed at ensuring compliance with the Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative action. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced the upcoming directive on X (formerly Twitter), saying the administration will require universities to provide proof that they are not engaging in race-conscious admissions practices. A senior White House official told ABC News the directive will task the Secretary of Education with expanding the admissions data schools are required to report, citing a need for 'transparency' in higher education. According to a fact sheet reviewed by ABC News, 'The lack of available admissions data from universities raises concerns about whether race is actually used in admissions decisions in practice.' The new reporting requirements will include information on applicants' race, test scores, and academic performance. The goal, according to the White House, is to "verify that their admissions do not involve unlawful discrimination." The fact sheet adds that the Department of Education will also be ordered to revamp its website to make admissions data 'more efficient, easily accessible, and intelligibly presented for parents and students.' The directive follows recent settlements with Columbia and Brown universities, which agreed to release detailed admissions data, including racial information, after months of negotiations with the Trump administration over federal funding. Those settlements have sparked a national debate over academic freedom, government oversight, and the role of race in college admissions. This latest move fits into a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. In his first week back in office, Trump signed an executive order requiring all federal departments and agencies to eliminate 'discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs' tied to DEI efforts.
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
Top Court Criticises Allahabad High Court For Ignoring Settled Law On Sentence Suspension
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has once again expressed its displeasure with an order of the Allahabad High Court for failing to apply settled legal principles while rejecting a plea for suspension of sentence in a fixed-term conviction. The observations from the top court came days after it pulled up an Allahabad High Court judge for allowing criminal proceedings in a civil dispute case. In an unprecedented order, a bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on August 4 stripped criminal matters of the roster of a Allahabad High Court judge "till he demits office" after he "erroneously" upheld summons of criminal nature in a civil dispute. The same bench came hard on the high court decision in another case. "The impugned Order is one more from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad with which we are disappointed," it said, adding that this plea arose from an order passed by the High Court on May 29, in a criminal appeal by which the high court declined to suspend the substantive order of sentence passed by the trial court. "We are once again constrained to observe that such errors creep in at the level of the High Court and only because the wellsettled principles of law on the subject are not applied correctly. "It is very important to first look into the subject-matter. Thereafter the court should look into the issue involved. In the last the court should look into the plea of the litigant and then proceed to apply the correct principles of law," Justice Pardiwala said in an order on August 6. The apex court observed that the High Court's order was legally flawed and demonstrated a disregard for established jurisprudence. It was hearing an appeal filed by a convict who had been sentenced to four years of rigorous imprisonment under various provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, Indian Penal Code (IPC), and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The convict had approached the high court with an application under Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking suspension of his sentence. However, the high court rejected the plea solely on the ground that the offence was "heinous", without evaluating the request in light of the settled law. Setting aside the high court's order, bench cited a landmark judgment which mandates that appellate courts should adopt a liberal approach in suspending fixed-term sentences unless exceptional circumstances exist. Emphasizing the need for judicial clarity, the bench said, "It is very important to first look into the subject matter. Thereafter, the court should examine the issues involved, and only then consider the plea of the litigant before applying the correct principles of law." The apex court took particular issue with the high court's failure to analyze the application on legal grounds. "What the high court did was to reiterate the prosecution's case and the oral evidence, without engaging with the legal test for suspension of sentence in a fixed-term conviction," the bench observed. It has now remanded the matter back to the high court for fresh consideration, directing it to pass an appropriate order within 15 days. "The High Court shall keep in mind that the sentence is for a fixed term, that is four years and it is only if there are compelling circumstances indicating that release would not be in public interest, that suspension may be denied," the order clarified.
