Latest news with #BarCouncilofIndiaRules


Time of India
11-08-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Law course admissions: Karnataka high court suggests review of language rule for Industrial Training Institute students
Bengaluru: Karnataka high court has suggested that the education department should reassess the lack of language subjects in job-oriented Industrial Training Institute (ITI) courses and issue appropriate instructions in view of its notification making language study mandatory for admission to law courses. Currently, ITI courses don't include any language subjects and are considered equivalent to the two-year pre-university (PU) course. The state govt, on March 12, 2025, issued a notification mandating that law candidates must have studied a language. Applications of ITI graduates aiming to join the three-year Bachelor of Laws (LLB) programme get rejected as they haven't studied a language during their ITI course, unlike applicants from the PUC pathway. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Adjudicating a petition filed by Shamasundar, a student from Ilkal town in Bagalkot district, Justice Suraj Govindaraj pointed out this anomaly in the system — on one hand, not teaching languages in job-oriented ITI courses, and on the other, making language mandatory for LLB courses. Shamasundar, who had completed a job-oriented ITI course in 2015 and subsequently was awarded a Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree from Rani Channamma University, Belagavi, moved the high court after his application for admission to the three-year LLB course at Karnataka State Law University (KSLU) and its affiliated law colleges wasn't accepted because of the govt notification. The petitioner argued that in the Rakesh Shetty case, which was similar to his situation, the high court had ruled that for a three-year LLB course, a degree such as Bachelor of Commerce (BCom) obtained after ITI could be considered for admission under Rule 5 of the Bar Council of India Rules. The govt advocate, however, defended the notification, asserting that language or subject experience is necessary for enrolment in the law degree programme Justice Govindaraj agreed with the petitioner's plea that the Rakesh Shetty judgment was applicable to his case. Since ITI courses don't include language studies, imposing a requirement for students to have studied a language within the ITI curriculum is unfounded and indicates a lack of consideration by the state govt, he added. The judge permitted the petition and directed that the state law university issue an eligibility certificate based on the petitioner's BA qualification. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Time of India
07-08-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Advertising of legal services on social media under lens
New Delhi: Bar Council of Delhi in a recent notice, has 'cautioned' lawyers advertising legal services on social media, stating that such methods constitute unethical canvassing, infringing upon professional ethics and the dignity of legal practice. "Bar Council of Delhi has observed that many lawyers are indulging in posting content and videos to solicit work by way of advertisement, either directly or indirectly, through circulars advertising personal interactions, interviews and producing their photographs to publish in connection with the cases, etc.," read the BCD notice issued on Aug 4. Outlining the rapid growth of legal influencers who do not possess appropriate credentials and are spreading misinformation on critical legal issues, the notice stated that such activities were prohibited under section 36 of Bar Council of India Rules. This section, titled 'Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette to be Observed by Advocates,' prohibits lawyers from soliciting work or advertising, directly or indirectly. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi In the age of digital media, there has been a rise in self-styled legal influencers, said the notice. The notice warned that any violation of the said rule amounts to serious misconduct and an advocate can be held guilty to be proceeded against under section 35 (disciplinary proceedings against advocates for professional or other misconduct) of the Advocates Act, which can lead to suspension or cancellation of the licence to practice as an advocate. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 9 Heart-Melting Images of Animals That Are Perfect for Hugging whophone Undo "It is therefore directed that all such advocates who are active on social media in this regard, as mentioned above, may remove their content, or otherwise, action shall be initiated on individual cases under Section 35 of the Advocates Act," the notice stated. Advocate Sanjay Sharma pointed out that BCD notice has stressed upon the long-forgotten rules of Bar Council of India, in which rule 36, strictly prohibits advocates from advertising, directly or indirectly. "Advertising could shift the focus from justice to profit. Soliciting work like commercial vendors can reduce public respect for the legal profession," he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.


Indian Express
07-08-2025
- Indian Express
Lawyers using social media to seek clients? Bar Council of Delhi issues warning
The Bar Council of Delhi (BCD), in a recent notice, has 'cautioned' lawyers advertising their legal services on social media. 'The Bar Council of Delhi has observed that many lawyers are indulging in posting content and videos to solicit work by way of advertisement either directly or indirectly through circulars advertising personal interactions, interviews, producing their photographs to publish in connection with the cases,' read the notice dated August 4. The notice added that advertising to solicit work using social media constituted unethical canvassing and infringed upon professional ethics and the dignity of the legal practice. 'In the age of the internet and digital media, there has been a steep rise in self-styled legal influencers, which has, in fact, compounded the issue. The Bar Council of Delhi notes with serious concern the rapid growth of legal influencers who do not even possess appropriate credentials and are spreading misinformation on critical legal issues,' the notice stated. The BCD also said that resorting to advertising in such a manner was prohibited as per Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Rule 36 states: 'An Advocate shall not solicit work or advertise, either directly or indirectly, whether by circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communications, interviews not warranted by personal relations, furnishing or inspiring newspaper comments or producing his photographs to be published in connection with cases in which he has been engaged or concerned.' 'Any violation of the aforesaid Rule amounts to serious misconduct and an Advocate can be held guilty to be proceeded against under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, which can lead to suspension or cancellation of licence to practice as an Advocate,' the notice said. It also warned advocates who were active on social media to remove their content or face action under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is titled 'punishment of advocates for misconduct'.


United News of India
06-08-2025
- Politics
- United News of India
BCD warns advocates against online, YouTube solicitation
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) The Bar Council of Delhi has issued a stern notice cautioning advocates against advertising or soliciting legal work through social media platforms. The regulatory body has flagged the increasing trend of lawyers and self-proclaimed 'legal influencers' posting promotional videos, client interactions, and other content online, which it deemed unethical and in violation of Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. While issuing a notice, BCD Chairman Surya Prakash Khatri emphasised the seriousness of the matter and stated that such conduct undermines the dignity and sanctity of the legal profession and poses a risk of spreading misinformation, particularly when done by individuals who lack proper legal qualifications or licensing. The Council's notice directs all advocates currently engaged in such activities to take down their content with immediate effect. Failure to comply, it warned, could invite disciplinary action under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, including suspension or cancellation of their license to practice law. The Bar Council reaffirmed its commitment to upholding the ethical standards of the legal profession and cautioned members of the Bar to refrain from indulging in direct or indirect forms of advertisement or self-promotion that could erode public trust in the legal system. UNI SNG SS 'What is legal and constitutional is moral': Justice Abhay Oka's powerful call for judicial integrity and constitutional morality 06 Aug 2025 | 11:24 PM By Sangeeta Sharma New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) 'Traditional morality is shaped by popular opinion. But judges are bound only by the Constitution.' In a thought-provoking keynote address that struck at the heart of judicial ethics, Justice Abhay S. Oka, former judge of the Supreme Court of India, delivered a scathing and insightful critique of the misuse of personal moral convictions in legal decision-making. see more.. 'One human pulling another is inhuman': Supreme Court bans hand-pulled rickshaws in Matheran 06 Aug 2025 | 11:08 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court today condemned the continued use of hand-pulled rickshaws, calling the practice inhuman and violative of the right to dignity guaranteed by the Constitution. The Court held that such manual labor, which involves a human being pulling another, must be abolished immediately, especially after 78 years of Independence and 75 years of the Constitution. see more.. PM Modi expected to visit China for SCO Summit, in another thaw in bilateral ties 06 Aug 2025 | 10:12 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China to attend the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, to be held in Tianjin, from August 31 to September 1. see more.. 06 Aug 2025 | 8:58 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) As US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on India, taking the total to a high of 50 percent, India termed the move as unfair, unjustified and unreasonable, and reiterated that it will take all actions necessary to protect its national interest. see more.. 06 Aug 2025 | 8:47 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) India and Russia today reaffirmed their Strategic Partnership and shared commitment to deepen bilateral industrial and economic cooperation. see more..


Time of India
18-06-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Don't boycott courts for flimsy reasons, HC tells advocates
Madurai: Advocates should not indulge in boycotts for flimsy reasons since they are officers of the court, and their absence would affect the justice delivery system, Madras high court observed recently. A division bench of justice S M Subramaniam and justice A D Maria Clete observed that lawyers are bound to protect the interest of the litigants and the majesty of the courts. Therefore, boycotting the courts frequently for flimsy reasons or based on certain individual grievances of any lawyer cannot be appreciated under any circumstance. The court was hearing the petition filed by R Jim seeking a direction to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry to initiate disciplinary action against the erring office bearers of the Tirunelveli Bar Association. The petitioner also alleged that the members of the association are involved in boycotts for flimsy reasons, causing inconvenience to the people who are longing to secure justice in the court of law. The judges observed that the petitioner could not establish any wrongdoing against the office bearers of the association. In the absence of any specific complaint regarding misconduct or illegality committed by the office bearers, the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry may not be in a position to initiate appropriate action. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Flexible Phone Plans for Small Biz Undo It is needless to state that a complaint must be specific. The judges took note of the submission of the petitioner, who stated that he is willing to give a specific complaint against the lawyers who are indulged in such illegal activities or misconduct to the Bar Council. In the event of receiving any specific complaint from the petitioner against the office bearers of the association or any practising lawyers, the Bar Council shall initiate all appropriate actions, as contemplated under the Advocates Act, 1961, and the Rules framed thereunder, including the Bar Council of India Rules, the judges directed and disposed of the petition.