Bhoodan land case: Telangana HC questions locus standi of petitioner
The case pertains to survey No 194 and 195 in Nagaram, where allegations have emerged that high-ranking bureaucrats purchased lands allegedly earmarked under the Bhoodan movement — a land donation initiative meant for landless individuals.
Justice K Lakshman, hearing multiple writ petitions, including those filed by Birla Mallesh and Vadthya Ramulu, questioned the legal standing and motive of the petitioners. In particular, the court expressed concern over petitioner Birla Mallesh's locus standi, seeking clarification on how he is directly concerned with survey No 194 of Nagaram village.
Senior counsels representing the IAS and IPS officers, including P Raghuram and Chandrasen Reddy, pointed out that the petitioner's mother, Birla Jangamma, had already filed a similar writ petition in 2024, which was duly disposed of. They contended that the current petition is an attempt to reopen settled issues with mala fide intent and to tarnish the reputation of senior government officials.
They further alleged that Birla Mallesh deliberately suppressed this prior litigation and misled the court to obtain interim orders. Initially, the petitioner claimed that survey No 194 was Bhoodan land but later altered his position, stating it was government land.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
36 minutes ago
- Hans India
SC slams Rahul over remarks against Army
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings in a criminal defamation case against Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remarks against the Indian Army over the 2020 Galwan clash with the Chinese. The top court was hearing Gandhi's appeal challenging the Allahabad High Court judgment refusing to stay the proceedings initiated in a Lucknow trial court against him over his comments that 'Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel'. As per the complainant, Uday Shankar Srivastava, the former director of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO), the comments made on December 16, 2022, during Gandhi's Bharat Jodo Yatra, defamed the Army. Presiding over a two-judge bench, Justice Dipankar Datta told Senior Advocate A M Singhvi, who appeared for the Congress leader, 'We have read the comments… Tells us… How do you get to know that 2000 square kilometres of Indian territory have been occupied by the Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material? Why do you make these statements without having any…?' 'If you are a true Indian, you would not say all these things,' Justice Dutta said. Singhvi said the comments were in 'public interest', and added, 'It is also possible that a true Indian will say look, our 20 Indian soldiers were beaten up and killed. This is also a matter of concern.'
New Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC seeks TN reply on procedure to be followed for appointing new DGP
MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court on Monday sought response from the state on the procedure to be adopted by it for appointing new DGP/head of police force, as incumbent DGP Shankar Jiwal is retiring on August 31. A bench of justices SM Subramaniam and AD Maria Clete gave the direction on a PIL petition filed by K Yasar Arafath of Ramanathapuram, seeking to stop the government from extending Jiwal's tenure or appointing an acting DGP, without taking any steps for empanelling eligible IPS officers and forwarding their names to the UPSC for preparing a panel. Arafath alleged that the government is deliberately doing so to ensure that an officer of its choice leads the police force till the 2026 Assembly poll. He wanted the government to appoint the new DGP through the mandatory process prescribed by the Supreme Court in 2006 Prakash Singh case.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Action on Kaleshwaram report after House debate: Revanth
Hyderabad: The state govt has decided to act on the Justice PC Ghose Commission report, which squarely blamed former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao and his administration for corruption, irregularities and engineering failures in the Kaleshwaram project, particularly sinking of piers in Medigadda, and damages to Annaram and Sundilla barrages. Chief minister A Revanth Reddy on Monday said concrete action would be taken "strictly on the basis of the report," but only after a detailed debate in, both the assembly and council. "This will not be political vendetta. The report is the outcome of an independent judicial inquiry led by Justice Ghose, one of the country's most distinguished jurists," he asserted. The 665-page report was tabled before the cabinet four days after it was submitted to the govt. The cabinet cleared it along with a brief summary prepared by a three-member officials' committee. The CM said opinion of all political parties and independents would be sought before finalising the next course of action. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The assembly and council sessions are expected to be convened shortly to debate the report, after which legal and administrative action will begin against all those held accountable by the Ghose panel. The Ghose commission has held a range of decision-makers — former ministers, senior IAS officers, irrigation engineers, contractors and project agencies — accountable for the massive procedural, technical and financial mess. It traced the project's decline to KCR's 'unilateral decision' to abandon the original Pranahita-Chevella project and redesign it as the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme. "Every crucial decision — from site changes to cost escalation to contract awards — was taken personally by the then chief minister," the report states. Even senior BRS leaders such as former irrigation minister T Harish Rao and former finance minister Eatala Rajender were found culpable. "The commission stated that corruption took place on a massive scale and wrong decisions made for selfish gains caused the present collapse of the barrages," Revanth said. Irrigation minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy, with deputy CM Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka by his side, quoted the report to say that the cabinet approval shown for the Rs 2,591-crore Medigadda barrage was illegal. "The commission conclusively stated that KCR took all decisions on Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla barrages without placing them before the cabinet," he said. According to the report, the entire project was characterised by "rampant and brazen procedural and financial irregularities." The commission listed the faults: Lack of proper planning, inflated estimates, illegal approvals, switch from lumpsum to turnkey contracts, revised estimates with mala fide intent, undue favours to agencies, defective designs (barrages constructed as dams), poor quality control, faulty construction, absence of operation and maintenance systems, missing manuals, illegal completion certificates, premature release of bank guarantees and complete financial mismanagement. The report goes on to say that the Kaleshwaram scheme, once projected as the lifeline of Telangana, has turned into a "colossal waste of public money due to profound failure of governance, technical oversight and financial discipline, driven by individual decisions and undue influence of political leadership."
