logo
Colonics or Cleanses? The Biggest Wellness Myth People Fall For

Colonics or Cleanses? The Biggest Wellness Myth People Fall For

Yahoo08-08-2025
Remember the days when 'wellness' merely conjured up images of green juice-drinking influencers? Now the idea of wellness is so much bigger than the occasional cleanse. The Global Wellness Institute posits that it will be a $9 trillion industry by 2028, making it an even bigger industry than 'Big Pharma.' That includes everything from spas and mineral springs to mental health, personal care, and beauty. Your gym membership is considered part of the wellness industry. Even your religious beliefs could ladder up into wellness.
But is all this focus on well-being truly making us feel better — physically or mentally? In her latest book, How to Be Well, journalist Amy Larocca, who spent 20 years at New York magazine in various roles, including fashion director, analyzes the increasing fixation with 'health' and dismantles the lies we've been told piece by piece. We spoke to Larocca about the biggest wellness myths you might still be following, what's fueling the MAHA movement, and more.
Katie Couric Media: What was it like writing this book before RFK Jr. became Health Secretary? Was MAHA on your mind during the process?
Amy Larocca: I worked on this book during Covid, and it definitely changed a lot of my thinking about wellness. I remember the day Trump made his offhand comment about drinking bleach and thinking, 'Oh yeah. We're in really uncharted waters here,' and then as the data started coming in about who was getting sick and who was dying from the virus, thinking, 'This is exactly what's so dangerous about treating health as a luxury product, marketing it like a handbag or a pair of shoes.' I had already finished the book and sent it off to the press by the time RFK got his job and MAHA took root, but it seemed like we were facing the scariest possible version of what I'd been thinking and writing about, like the worst-case scenario.
I repeatedly encountered situations while researching this book where people were completely aware that they were falling for practices that were dubious at best, but opting in anyway.
You write that debunking a wellness myth often has the opposite effect in terms of how much people believe in it. It can just make it more popular. So how can we help people understand when they're falling for misinformation or disinformation?
I repeatedly encountered situations while researching this book where people were completely aware that they were falling for practices that were dubious at best, but opting in anyway. One super clear example was with juice cleanses in the early 2000s. I interviewed the founders of the Blueprint juice cleanse, which was one of the early pioneers in that space, and they told me that they were always worried after an article would appear in a big, reputable publication disputing the safety and efficacy of juice cleansing. These articles would feature doctors from Ivy League medical schools just absolutely bashing juice cleansing, and Blueprint would brace for a slow week, but in fact, it just increased demand.
You could say there's no such thing as bad press, but I think it's more than that. On one very simple level, I think there's a very disturbing drive to lose weight in our culture, because you see a similar phenomenon with colonics — no doctor will endorse them. Yet, they remain very popular in certain wellness circles. Another reason is that there seems to be a drive to have a secret, to know more than everyone else, that is endemic in wellness. Also, our traditional channels of information and who can be trusted are corrupted right now, and it can be difficult to know who to trust and who to believe.
Do you see any connections to the information crisis in the news? Throughout history, there have been periods where mistrust of authorities is high. Do you think where we are right now is another iteration of that cycle, or something deeper?
I think this is absolutely another iteration of that cycle, this time on steroids, because of the diverse methods of news distribution — people are getting their news from social media, and what qualifies someone as an authority is unclear. Looking great in a bikini and having a lot of followers doesn't necessarily mean you know the first thing about health or medicine, but people will do what you say.
Do you think the Ozempic craze ties into your observation of beauty being rebranded as wellness? If so, do you see any issues with that?
I worry that Ozempic — which I'm totally in favor of when it's needed — undoes some of the progress that was being made in body positivity and acceptance. I just worry that we were maybe making some microscopic steps in the direction of being OK with the idea that not all bodies need to fit a certain size, and that we're now getting back to the idea that thin, thin, thin is the only way to go.
As you write in the book, people often turn to sham alternatives out of desperation and being dismissed by medical professionals. How do you think the medical community should tackle this problem? Do you think any strides are being made?
I think we need to really listen to and research the medical concerns of communities who have been previously ignored and underserved — like women and minorities. I think doctors need to really listen to patients and be given the resources to do that. But I worry that this administration's policies are undoing progress that has been made recently.
What do you think is the biggest wellness myth people buy into right now?
Supplements! Please stop buying supplements! If you are diagnosed with a deficiency, by all means, treat it with a supplement, but otherwise, please stop. Also, please stop following diets that eliminate entire food groups.
Speaking of myths, you went to the Goop wellness summit, which is famous for being overpriced, woo-woo, and over-hyped. What was the wildest thing you saw there?
Funnily enough, what struck me at first was how un-wild a lot of it was. Like how much 'eat your salmon and blueberries and spinach' there was, how much boring wellness 101 was going on. Like, I paid $1000 to be told that olive oil is good for you? And then there was just so much blatant B.S. — like an aura reader telling me I was purple, that kind of thing. That was silly, but kind of banal. And then some of it was outright enraging, like Caroline Myss, the 'intuitive' who attributed disease to mental states, saying that people with thyroid conditions really needed to look at their anger rather than taking Synthroid. My daughter was born with a tumor that required the removal of her thyroid, and listening to this woman, I was so angry I practically levitated.
The post Colonics or Cleanses? The Biggest Wellness Myth People Fall For appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI in Life Sciences
AI in Life Sciences

Harvard Business Review

time21 minutes ago

  • Harvard Business Review

AI in Life Sciences

Download the Report The life sciences industry needs a shot of adrenaline. An aging population and a rise in chronic diseases are fueling the demand for highly accurate medical imaging and diagnostic tools. Pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers are under growing pressure to keep pace with supply and demand for critical medications and medical devices, respectively. Patients, meanwhile, are increasingly demanding personalized health care experiences that cater to their unique needs.

FDA Suggest Walmart Recalls Frozen Shrimp After Radiation Detected At Port
FDA Suggest Walmart Recalls Frozen Shrimp After Radiation Detected At Port

Forbes

time21 minutes ago

  • Forbes

FDA Suggest Walmart Recalls Frozen Shrimp After Radiation Detected At Port

The Food and Drug Administration is warning that some Great Value brand frozen shrimp sold at Walmart could be contaminated with radioactive isotope Cesium-137 after Customs and Border Protection detected the substance in shipping containers at four major American ports and at least one sample of shrimp. Cesium-137 was detected in some frozen shrimp coming from Indonesia—but none that have been sold in stores yet. getty The FDA is investigating the potential contamination and has not 'confirmed the presence of contamination in any product in commerce,' they are still warning consumers to avoid eating shrimp that come from the same Indonesian producer BMS Foods. The FDA is recommending Walmart recall frozen shrimp coming from BMS Foods, and the retailer has not returned a request for comment from Forbes. This is a breaking story and will be updated.

Medical group goes against CDC, recommend COVID shots for young kids
Medical group goes against CDC, recommend COVID shots for young kids

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Medical group goes against CDC, recommend COVID shots for young kids

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer recommends the COVID-19 vaccine for children — but a major medical group is going against that guidance. On Tuesday, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released its latest annual immunization schedule for children — and it includes vaccines for COVID-19, in addition to flu and RSV. "Infants and children 6 through 23 months of age are at the highest risk for severe COVID-19," the AAP states in its release. "Given this, the AAP recommends a COVID-19 vaccine for all children ages 6 through 23 months old to help protect against serious illness." The AAP also recommends a "single dose of age-appropriate COVID-19 vaccine" for kids and teens 2 and older who are at high risk of severe COVID, have never been vaccinated before, and who live with people who are at a high risk of severe disease. "The AAP also recommends the vaccine be available for children aged 2-18 who do not fall into these risk groups, but whose parent or guardian desires them to have the protection of the vaccine," the release states. "Among the reasons we decided to move to a risk-based recommendation for healthy older children is the fact that the hospitalization rate for young children and children with underlying medical conditions remains high, in line with rates for many of the other vaccine-preventable diseases for which we vaccinate," said Sean O'Leary, M.D., chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, in the release. In May 2025, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that COVID-19 vaccines would be removed from the CDC's routine immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women. Instead of a universal recommendation, the CDC's updated guidance calls for "shared clinical decision-making," in which parents and doctors discuss the benefits and risks of vaccination for each individual case. "Where the parent presents with a desire for their child to be vaccinated, children 6 months and older may receive COVID-19 vaccination, informed by the clinical judgment of a healthcare provider and personal preference and circumstances," the CDC's guidance states. In total, the AAP's schedule includes immunizations against 18 diseases, recommended for all children from birth to age 18. The AAP noted in a press release that its vaccine schedule "differs from recent recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC." For more Health articles, visit Other included updates involve the pentavalent meningococcal vaccine, the starting age of the human papilloma virus vaccine, and removal of a hepatitis vaccine that is no longer available, the release states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store