Marines will begin withdrawing from Los Angeles
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Democratic leaders in California have accused the Trump administration of provoking the protests by sending masked federal agents to car washes and other sites to detain immigrants, and then using the subsequent public outrage over the raids as a pretext for military action.
Advertisement
Since June, the troops have stood guard outside federal office buildings and have accompanied agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Border Patrol and other agencies during immigration raids. Pentagon officials estimated that the cost of deploying the Marines and National Guard soldiers would run to about $134 million.
Advertisement
California officials say the deployment violates federal law prohibiting the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement, but an early attempt to halt the deployment through a court order was blocked by a federal appeals court. That appellate court ruled in June that the president had broad, though not 'unreviewable,' authority to send the U.S. military into American cities.
A federal trial to determine whether the National Guard and Marines were used illegally in California is scheduled for next month.
Federal authorities have called the deployment a response to the so-called sanctuary law in California, enacted during the first Trump administration. The law limits the role of local sheriffs' deputies and police officers in immigration enforcement, so that fear of deportation would not deter immigrants from reporting crimes.
The law includes extensive exceptions that allow local law enforcement authorities to turn over noncitizens who have committed serious crimes to be deported by federal authorities. But the Trump administration has contended that California still places too many limits on cooperation between local law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities. The U.S. Department of Justice recently asked sheriffs across California to provide it with lists of inmates in state jails who are not U.S. citizens; doing so could potentially be a violation of the state's sanctuary law.
At a congressional hearing last month, Democratic lawmakers grilled Hegseth about the troop deployment, calling it unlawful and excessive.
'The president's decision to call the National Guard troops to Los Angeles was premature, and the decision to deploy active-duty Marines as well is downright escalatory,' Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., told Hegseth.
Advertisement
Hegseth defended the deployment, telling lawmakers, 'We ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country.'
Those debates have loomed large over the military presence in Los Angeles. Critics of the deployment have noted, among other things, that the Marines and the National Guard — who are trained to shoot to kill on the battlefield — do not receive the extensive training in de-escalation techniques, crowd control and use of force that are core parts of local law enforcement training. Within the U.S. military, concerns about the optics of armed troops rolling into American cities have also limited what the deployment could accomplish.
As a result, the use of the troops in the Los Angeles area has been heavily scrutinized and fraught with potential constitutional constraints. National Guard contingents were seen this month facing protesters in a field outside a cannabis farm in Ventura County as gunfire erupted. And they were observed sitting in trucks in an immigrant-heavy neighborhood of Los Angeles while immigration agents marched through an all-but-vacated MacArthur Park, to prove that they could do so.
In interviews with The New York Times, members of the California National Guard said that morale has been low during the deployment, reenlistment rates were plummeting and more than 100 troops had sought counseling in a period of a few weeks. Six soldiers spoke on condition of anonymity because their federal orders forbade them from talking to the news media.
In the tent city that was built to house the Guard troops on a small base in Los Alamitos, a suburb, soldiers said that several troops had been reassigned because they raised objections to the mission, and that few of the troops there had been sent off the base on assignments.
Advertisement
National Guard officials said that only about 400 of the 3,882 deployed Guard members had actually been sent on assignments away from the base. The military's Northern Command said this month that the troops overall had participated in slightly more than 200 operations in support of federal law enforcement agencies.
'We wake up to go to sleep,' one Guard member told the Times.
The Marines, who have been based at a separate military facility nearby, have been used sparingly as well.
Early in the deployment, on June 13, Marines briefly detained an Army veteran who was running an errand and was trying to enter a Veterans Affairs office at a federal building in Los Angeles. The veteran said the detention was brief and he was not bothered by it. Federal troops are rarely seen detaining U.S. civilians on American soil, even temporarily.
Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles has compared the deployment to an 'armed occupation,' and Gov. Gavin Newsom has condemned it as 'a solution right now in search of a problem.' Both have called for the removal of all the deployed troops.
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Gifford fire burns 30,000 acres in Los Padres National Forest
The Gifford fire has scorched more than 30,000 acres in less than two days in Los Padres National Forest as firefighters struggle to quell the blaze in the Sierra Madre mountains. Wildland firefighters were continuing to battle the blaze Saturday along Highway 166 in rural Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties, about 20 miles east of Santa Maria, according to the U.S. Forest Service and Cal Fire. But fire crews were faced with challenging conditions such as high temperatures, dry vegetation and rugged terrain. As of Saturday evening, the fire was 5% contained and continuing to chew through the tall, dry grass and chaparral that covers the steep hills and mountains. Evacuation orders and warnings were issued for agricultural lands near the unincorporated community of Garey. Although the fire is on federally managed land, Cal Fire crews joined the response to assist with more ground personnel and firefighting aircraft. Criticized on the social media platform X for the fire's explosive growth, Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office reiterated that the fire was not on state land. 'The #GiffordFire started on Trump's federally managed land in the Los Padres NATIONAL Forest,' read the post. 'While Trump just gutted wildfire funding, @CAL_FIRE is now stepping in to clean up what federal mismanagement helped fuel.' Newsom has criticized President Trump for cutting funding for forest management, including activities such as prescribed burning, a process that reduces the risk of explosive fires by proactively burning vegetation in a controlled environment. As of Saturday evening, a California Interagency Incident Management Team — composed of federal, state and county firefighters from various agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, National Park Service, Cal Fire, the state's Office of Emergency Services and county-level fire departments — was tasked with taking command of the incident. The fire was first reported about 2 p.m. Friday near Los Padres National Forest's Gifford trailhead, not far from the perimeter of the recently extinguished Madre fire. According to Cal Fire, the blaze had multiple start points along Highway 166. The cause of the fire remains under investigation.
Wall Street Journal
28 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's ‘Slap in the Face' Puts Neutral Switzerland in Trade-War Crossfire
MEZZOVICO-VIRA, Switzerland—When Nicola Tettamanti looked at his phone Friday morning, his first reaction was disbelief: Overnight, President Trump had slapped Switzerland with close to the highest tariffs of any country in the world. Tettamanti is the chief executive of a 55-year-old precision toolmaking business nestled in this mountain-hugged town. He had planned in the near future to expand further into the U.S. by opening an office in Indiana.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Growing number of Jewish American groups speak out over Gaza famine
As global outrage intensifies over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, a growing number of prominent Jewish American organizations, including some traditional defenders of Israel, are speaking out and imploring the country to ensure that humanitarian aid is allowed into Gaza. This week, a UN-backed food security group warned that a 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza and health authorities there report dozens of deaths from starvation. On Sunday, the American Jewish Committee, a prominent Jewish advocacy organization, released a statement affirming that it stands with Israel in what it described as 'its justified war to eliminate the threat posed by Hamas and secure the release of the remaining hostages'. At the same time, the group called for Israel to take steps to alleviate civilian suffering. 'We feel immense sorrow for the grave toll this war has taken on Palestinian civilians, and we are deeply concerned about worsening food insecurity in Gaza,' the statement read. 'We urge Israel, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the UN, and all responsible parties involved in aid distribution to increase cooperation and coordination in order to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches Palestinian civilians in Gaza.' The GHF is an Israel- and US-backed aid group that has attracted condemnation for the killings of hundreds of civilians seeking food at the hands of Israeli forces and private contractors. The AJC statement reflected a cautious critique of Israel's aid blockade echoed by other groups noteworthy for their typically staunch support of the country, even as their statements condemned Hamas for refusing to release the Israeli hostages it continues to hold. The Reform movement in North America, which represents the largest Jewish denomination in the US, also issued a lengthy statement: 'Neither escalating military pressure nor restricting humanitarian aid has brought Israel closer to securing a hostage deal or ending the war,' it read. 'Hamas has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to sacrifice the Palestinian people in its pursuit of Israel's destruction, but Israel must not sacrifice its own moral standing in return. Starving Gazan civilians neither will bring Israel the 'total victory' over Hamas it seeks, nor can it be justified by Jewish values or humanitarian law.' The Rabbinical Assembly, a New York-based association of conservative rabbis, said last week that they were 'increasingly concerned about the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza' and called for 'urgent action to alleviate civilian suffering and ensure aid delivery'. 'Even as we believe Hamas could end this suffering immediately through the release of the hostages and care for its civilian population, the Israeli government must do everything in its power to ensure humanitarian aid reaches those in need,' it added. 'The Jewish tradition calls upon us to ensure the provision of food, water, and medical supplies as a top priority.' Jewish groups associated with the left have been prominent fixtures at protests against Israel's offensive since it began. On Tuesday, 27 rabbis and Jewish clergy affiliated with the group Jews for Food Aid for People in Gaza were arrested at a protest in the Washington office of the Senate majority leader, John Thune. But it appears clear that discomfort has significantly broadened outside the Jewish left. On Monday, eight rabbis were arrested outside the Israeli consulate in New York while protesting against the humanitarian crisis in Gaza – including clergy who had not been so outspoken before. 'The protests we've typically seen at the Israeli consulate in places like that are from the further left of the community,' Phylisa Wisdom, executive director of New York Jewish Agenda, told Gothamist. 'This represents an escalation from rabbis in this political lane.' More than 1,200 rabbis have signed a public letter calling on Israel to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza. 'The Jewish people face a grave moral crisis, threatening the very basis of Judaism as the ethical voice that it has been since the age of Israel's prophets,' reads the letter. 'We cannot remain silent in confronting it.' The developments reflect shifting public support for Israel and the Israeli government within the US, which has accelerated as the war has gone on. A recent Gallup poll reported that support for Israel's military action in Gaza has precipitously declined among US adults, and is now at 32% – the lowest reading since Gallup first asked the question in November 2023. Support for Israel drops further among younger Americans – including US Jews. 'It's a tense time in the Jewish family group chats,' Ezra Klein wrote in a recent New York Times column. 'The consensus that held American Jewry together for generations is breaking down.' While emotional attachment to Israel is widespread among Jewish Americans, polling has consistently found that support for the state's current policies drops with age, a phenomenon perhaps best reflected in the community's support for the New York Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, whom opponents have sought to tar with accusations of antisemitism over his vocal support for Palestinian rights. Despite those accusations, however, a recent poll found him leading with 67% of the votes of American Jewish voters in New York under the age of 44. That figure dropped to 25% of voters over 45. 'Zohran Mamdani's triumph in New York City's Democratic primary for mayor has forced, among many Jews, a reckoning with how far they have drifted from one another,' Klein wrote. Organizers of an action planned for Monday in New York City hope that groups that have not turned out before will do so to protest under the banner 'Jews Say: No More'. 'Our tradition teaches us that if we can protest [against] our people's actions and we don't, we are responsible,' said IfNotNow's executive director, Morriah Kaplan, in a statement to the Guardian. The group is helping organize Monday's action. 'As Jews and as Americans, whose government is funding this atrocity, we all must choose whether we want to bear responsibility for a policy of forced mass starvation.' The shift is also playing out within institutions whose members want their leaders to take a tougher stance on a country many had long reflexively supported. More than 200 alumni from Young Judaea, a Zionist youth group, this week called on the organization in an open letter to depart from its pro-Israel line to speak out against starvation in Gaza and call for a permanent ceasefire, including a release of the hostages. 'We see our families and friends, colleagues and teachers, rabbis and Jewish institutions – in Israel and abroad – join a growing movement to stand courageously in opposition to these policies,' the letter reads. 'Young Judaea cannot remain silent in this moment and maintain any moral credibility.'
