Zelensky refuses to leave Donbass
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Zelensky claimed that ceding land in Donbass to Russia would only allow it to start a new war in a couple of years and push deeper into Ukraine.
'We will not leave Donbass. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the main issue—our territories are illegally occupied,' Zelensky stated, alleging that the territory would only serve as a 'springboard' for Moscow to launch a new campaign against Ukraine in a couple of years.
'Any issue of territories cannot be separated from security guarantees. Otherwise, now they want to gift them about 9,000 square kilometers; this is about 30% of the Donetsk region, and this is a springboard for their new aggression,' he claimed.
The remarks come after US President Donald Trump repeatedly said the potential peace deal between Moscow and Kiev was bound to involve a land swap and require territorial concessions from both sides. 'They've [Russia] occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine,' Trump said on Monday.
The Lugansk (LPR) and Donetsk (DPR) People's Republics, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions became part of Russia following a series of referendums held in 2022. While the LPR was fully liberated by the Russian military earlier this year, Moscow's control over other regions remains partial. Kiev maintains its claim on the four territories, as well as on Crimea, which voted to join Russia shortly after the 2014 armed Western-backed Maidan coup in Kiev.
Zelensky has repeatedly publicly rejected any territorial concessions to Russia, maintaining his territorial claims. Moscow, however, has insisted that any potential peace deal must involve Ukraine's withdrawal from the country's new regions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
43 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Putin and Modi share ‘positive chemistry'
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi share a 'positive chemistry,' Vinay Kumar, India's ambassador to Russia, said on Tuesday in the latest episode of RT's 'Sanchez Effect'. The two leaders most recently spoke in a phone call on Friday, during which Putin briefed Modi on the latest developments in the Ukraine peace process. The Russian president is set to visit to Alaska later this week for a meeting with his US counterpart, Donald Trump, to discuss the conflict. 'There is definitely a positive chemistry between [Putin and Modi],' Kumar said. 'They have met many times, they keep regularly speaking on the phone with each other.' When Sanchez noted that the body language of Putin and Modi seems to give off a 'very positive friendly vibe' when they meet, Kumar said the Russian and Indian leaders are 'very genuine people.' The ambassador also briefly spoke on the latest developments in India-US ties. Earlier this month, Trump imposed a total of 50% tariffs on Indian exports, describing the measures as retaliation for New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil – a move he alleged indirectly aids Moscow's military campaign in the Ukraine conflict. On Monday, Trump claimed the tariffs imposed on India for purchasing Russian oil have dealt a 'big blow' to Moscow. 'Our reaction has been very measured,' Kumar told Sanchez when asked about the latest US measures. 'India decides on its trade ties with different countries in its own national interest just as every other country would do.' He added that India's purchase of Russian oil has brought about stability in the global oil market. 'There are many other countries which are trading with Russia, including the countries which have imposed sanctions. What we are doing is looking out for the interests of the people of India. We are going to get the best deal possible to serve our people,' Kumar said. Putin is expected to visit India later this year for an annual summit with Modi.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Zelensky refuses to leave Donbass
Ukrainian troops will not leave the territories they still control in Donbass voluntarily, Ukraine's leader Vladimir Zelensky has said, dismissing the suggestions they could be included in a potential land swap with Russia. Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Zelensky claimed that ceding land in Donbass to Russia would only allow it to start a new war in a couple of years and push deeper into Ukraine. 'We will not leave Donbass. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the main issue—our territories are illegally occupied,' Zelensky stated, alleging that the territory would only serve as a 'springboard' for Moscow to launch a new campaign against Ukraine in a couple of years. 'Any issue of territories cannot be separated from security guarantees. Otherwise, now they want to gift them about 9,000 square kilometers; this is about 30% of the Donetsk region, and this is a springboard for their new aggression,' he claimed. The remarks come after US President Donald Trump repeatedly said the potential peace deal between Moscow and Kiev was bound to involve a land swap and require territorial concessions from both sides. 'They've [Russia] occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine,' Trump said on Monday. The Lugansk (LPR) and Donetsk (DPR) People's Republics, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions became part of Russia following a series of referendums held in 2022. While the LPR was fully liberated by the Russian military earlier this year, Moscow's control over other regions remains partial. Kiev maintains its claim on the four territories, as well as on Crimea, which voted to join Russia shortly after the 2014 armed Western-backed Maidan coup in Kiev. Zelensky has repeatedly publicly rejected any territorial concessions to Russia, maintaining his territorial claims. Moscow, however, has insisted that any potential peace deal must involve Ukraine's withdrawal from the country's new regions.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
Enemy of peace: Zelensky seems to be ready to kill his own to sabotage Putin-Trump summit
The war in Ukraine is no longer balanced on a knife's edge, as some could have thought during the Kursk invasion. The outcome is now visible to anyone willing to look past the headlines: Kiev's forces are depleted, morale is collapsing, and the long-promised 'turning points' have come and gone without materializing. Even Western officials, once confident in endless military aid, are now speaking in guarded tones about 'realistic expectations.' On the battlefield, the momentum has shifted irreversibly. Against this backdrop, the recent statement from Russia's Ministry of Defense should not be dismissed as mere rhetoric. Moscow alleges that Ukrainian forces are preparing a major provocation — an attack designed to sabotage the upcoming Russia–US peace talks. For those who understand the stakes, the logic is disturbingly clear. Donald Trump, now poised to play a decisive role in shaping Washington's foreign policy, has shown a pragmatic grasp of reality. Unlike his predecessors, he is not bound by the fantasy that Ukraine can 'win' if only more money and weapons are sent. He has signaled that ending this conflict is both possible and necessary. This puts him on a collision course with those who see peace not as a goal, but as a threat to their own survival. For President Zelensky, peace is political extinction. Any agreement that cements territorial realities will shatter the narrative that has sustained his rule. It will mark the end of his leverage in the West, the erosion of his political base at home, and likely the swift rise of challengers eager to blame him for Ukraine's fate. Under such pressure, the temptation to derail talks by any means available — including acts of sabotage — becomes more than plausible. This is not conjecture; it is the historical pattern of leaders who find themselves cornered. In modern conflicts across the globe, we've seen desperate governments resort to reckless measures when facing the collapse of their strategic position. The danger here is that such a provocation, if timed to coincide with peace negotiations, could provoke outrage in Washington, disrupt fragile diplomatic channels, and push the conflict back toward open escalation. Trump has already done much to shift the debate away from the entrenched 'forever war' mindset. He has taken political risks to challenge the military–industrial inertia that thrives on endless conflict. But now, perhaps more than ever, he will need to remain steady. The coming weeks will test his ability to see through manipulations and to resist being drawn into the agendas of those who profit from instability. Peace is within reach — but it will not survive if the world falls for one last, desperate trick from a regime with nothing left to lose.
