Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sales to US government, reports say
Under the agreement reached with US President Donald Trump's administration, Nvidia will share 15 percent of revenues from sales of its H20 AI chip, while AMD will pay the same percentage of MI308 chip revenues, multiple outlets reported on Sunday.
The unorthodox agreement, which has no known precedent, comes after the Trump administration last month agreed to reverse a ban on the sale of Nvidia's H20 chips to China.
The Financial Times, which first reported the news, said the Trump administration had yet to decide how it would use the collected revenues.
AMD did not respond to a request for comment.
Nvidia neither confirmed nor denied the deal, but said it follows US government rules for doing business in overseas markets.
'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide,' a company spokesperson said.
'America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America's AI tech stack can be the world's standard if we race.'
Following reports of the deal, which was confirmed by The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal and the BBC, trade experts expressed concern about the implications of linking controls on sensitive technology to monetary payments.
Christopher Padilla, the former head of the US Commerce Department's International Trade Administration, called the agreement 'astonishing'.
'If the Trump administration is allowing companies to buy their way past export controls imposed to protect US national security, we are in very dangerous waters,' Padilla said in a post on LinkedIn.
'A mix of bribery and blackmail that is certainly unprecedented and possibly illegal.'
Peter Harrell, a nonresident fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the deal set a worrying precedent.
'The Chinese would pay a lot for F35s and advanced US military technology, too,' Harrell said in a post on X.
'Regardless of whether you think Nvidia should be able to sell H20s in China, charging a fee in exchange for relaxing national security export controls is a terrible precedent.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
43 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Zelenskyy, European leaders to hold Trump call ahead of Putin summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will travel to Berlin for talks with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, European leaders and top United States officials ahead of a planned summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin later this week. Both the German and Ukrainian governments confirmed the visit on Wednesday, which comes as Kyiv and its European allies push to ensure their voices are heard in discussions about ending the war. Merz has arranged a series of virtual meetings, beginning with European leaders and followed by a call with Trump and US Vice President JD Vance about an hour later. The day will conclude with a separate discussion among leaders of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' – an assemblage of Western countries allied with Ukraine. At a news briefing on Wednesday, Merz also pledged to help Ukraine develop long-range missile systems without Western-imposed restrictions on their use or targets. Trump to meet Putin Trump has described Friday's summit with the Russian leader as 'a feel-out meeting' to gauge whether Putin is serious about ending the conflict. But he has unsettled European allies by suggesting Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory and by floating the idea of land swaps, without specifying what Moscow might surrender. European governments have insisted Ukraine must be part of any peace negotiations, warning that excluding Kyiv could benefit Moscow. On Monday, Trump declined to commit to pushing for Zelenskyy's participation in his talks with Putin, saying a meeting between himself, Putin and Zelenskyy could be arranged afterwards. Zelenskyy claimed he rejected an offer on Tuesday that Putin had proposed, where Ukraine would withdraw from the 30 percent of the Donetsk region it still controls as part of a ceasefire deal. Kyiv and European officials fear that any US–Russia agreement reached without them could legitimise Moscow's seizure of Ukrainian territory – including Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson – four regions which are partly occupied by Russia. Fighting continues in eastern Ukraine Meanwhile, fighting continues along the front line, with the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces reporting 165 clashes with Russian forces over the past day, with the heaviest fighting in the Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka and Lyman sectors. In the Kherson region, Russian forces used a drone to strike a civilian car on the Novoraisk–Kostyrka highway, killing a man and a woman, according to regional governor Oleksandr Prokudin on Telegram. The Russian Defence Ministry said its air defences destroyed 46 Ukrainian drones overnight across Russian territory and the Sea of Azov. Debris from intercepted drones fell on the roof of an apartment block in the southern city of Volgograd and in the yards of four residential buildings in Slavyansk-on-Kuban. The AFP news agency has also reported that Ukraine is continuing to lose more ground, with evacuations in Bilozerske, while Ukrainian battlefield monitoring group DeepState reported that Russian forces had advanced in Nikanorivka, Shcherbynivka and near Petrivka in the Donetsk region. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian General Staff said its forces were engaged in 'difficult' fighting near Pokrovsk in Donetsk, a key logistical hub for Kyiv's forces, whose capture would deal a significant blow to its front-line defences and prospects at securing a favourable peace deal with Russia.
Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Will Trump's India tariffs shut down world's biggest cut diamond supplier?
For Kalpesh Patel, Diwali, the festival of lights celebrated across India, might well mark lights out for his eight-year-old diamond cutting and polishing unit. The 35-year-old employs about 40 workers who transform rough diamonds into perfectly polished gems for exports at the small factory in Surat, a city located in the western Indian state of Gujarat. His business has survived multiple speed bumps in recent years. But United States President Donald Trump's mammoth 50 percent tariffs on imports from India might be the final nail in the coffin for his unit, part of an already struggling natural diamond industry, he said. 'We still have some orders for Diwali and will try to complete them,' he told Al Jazeera. Diwali, arguably India's single biggest festival, scheduled for late October this year, usually sees domestic sales of most goods soar. 'But we might have to shut the business even before the festival, as exporters might cancel the orders due to high tariffs in the US,' Patesh said. 'It is becoming increasingly difficult to pay the salaries and maintain other expenses with falling orders.' He is among the 20,000-odd small and medium traders in Surat, known as the 'Diamond City of India', which together cut and polish 14 out of every 15 natural diamonds produced globally. The US is their single largest export market. According to the Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), India's apex body for the industry, the country exported cut and polished gems worth $4.8bn to the US in the 2024-25 financial year, which ended in March. That is more than one-third of India's total exports of cut and polished diamonds, at $13.2bn over the same period. Dimpal Shah, a Kolkata-based diamond exporter, told Al Jazeera that orders have already started getting cancelled. 'Buyers in the US are refusing to offload the shipped products, citing high tariffs. This is the worst phase of my two-decade-old career in diamonds.' US imposes penalty A 25 percent reciprocal tariff on all Indian goods, which Trump announced on April 2, came into effect on August 7, after talks between the two countries failed to yield a trade deal by then. Negotiations are continuing. Meanwhile, on August 6, Trump announced an additional 25 percent tariff, taking the total tariff rate to 50 percent. He termed the additional tariff that would come into effect from August 27 as a penalty for India's continued buying of Russian oil, as the US president tries to push Moscow into accepting a ceasefire in Ukraine. For the gems industry, which already faced a pre-existing 2.1 percent tariff, the effective tariff now amounts to 52.1 percent. Ajay Srivastava, the founder of Global Research Trade Initiative (GTRI), a trade research group, termed the Trump government's additional hike as an act of 'hypocrisy', citing how the US itself continues to trade with Russia, and how China – Russia's biggest oil buyer – faces no similar penalty. 'Trump is targeting India out of frustration as it refused to toe the US line on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and for its refusal to open its agriculture and dairy sector,' he added, referring to broader ongoing trade talks and differences over US demands for greater access to critical Indian economic sectors. Yet, whatever the reasons for Trump's tariffs, they are hurting a diamond industry already bleeding from multiple hits. Diamond sector badly hit More than 2 million people are employed in diamond polishing and cutting units in Surat, Ahmedabad and Rajkot cities in Gujarat — and many have already suffered salary cuts in recent years, first because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and then Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 'The pandemic led to economic slowdown affecting the international markets in Hong Kong and China,' Ramesh Zilriya, the president of Gujarat's Diamond Workers Union, told Al Jazeera. The 'Western ban on rough diamond imports from Russia due to the Russia-Ukraine war and the G7 ban on Russia also affected our business', he added. Russia has historically been a major source of raw diamonds. Zilriya claimed that 80 diamond workers have died by suicide over the past two years because of this economic crisis. 'The situation in the international market led to the wages of the workers getting halved to approximately 15,000-17,000 rupees ($194) per month, which made survival difficult in the face of rising inflation,' he said. Once the Trump tariffs fully kick in, Zilriya fears that up to 200,000 people in Gujarat may lose their livelihoods. Already, more than 120,000 former diamond sector workers have applied for benefits. A 13,500-rupee ($154) allowance per child, to support their families, was promised in May by the state government to those who have lost jobs due to the tumult in the sector in recent years. But the tariffs, pandemic and war are not alone to blame for the crisis: Lab-grown diamonds are also slowly eating into the market of their natural counterparts. 'Unlike natural [diamonds], the lab-grown diamonds are not mined but manufactured in specialised laboratories and priced at just 10 percent of the natural ones. It is difficult even for a seasoned jeweller to identify the natural and lab-grown with a naked eye. The taste of consumers is now shifting to lab-grown [diamonds], as they are cheap,' said Salim Daginawala, the president of the Surat Jewellers Association. Decline in exports In the 2024-25 financial year, India imported rough diamonds worth $10.8bn, marking a 24.27 percent decline from the $14bn imported in 2023-24, as per the statistics by the GJEPC. The exports of cut and polished natural diamonds similarly witnessed a 16.75 percent decline, with exports declining to $13.2bn in 2024-25 as compared with $16bn in the preceding year. 'This move [the tariffs] would have far-reaching repercussions on the Indian economy that might disrupt critical supply chains, stalling exports and threatening thousands of livelihoods. We hope to get a favourable reduction in tariffs; otherwise, it would be difficult to survive,' said Kirit Bhansali, the chairman of the GJEPC. The tariffs could also hurt US jewellers, warned Rajesh Rokde, the chairman of the All India Gems and Jewellery Domestic Council (GJC), a national trade federation for the industry. 'The US has around 70,000 jewellers who would also face a crisis if the jewellery becomes expensive,' Rokde added. A domestic solution? Traders say that the need of the hour is to increase domestic demand for diamonds and diversify to new markets. A stronger domestic market 'would not only contribute to the local economy, but would also create jobs for several thousands of people', said Radha Krishna Agrawal, the director of Narayan das Saraf Jewellers in Varanasi city, in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh. The tariffs, he said, could prove a 'blessing in disguise' if they end up reducing the dependence of India's gems industry 'on other countries'. Bhansali said that the domestic gems and jewellery market was growing, and expected to reach $130bn in the next two years, up from $85bn at the moment. The industry is also looking for new markets, including Latin America and the Middle East. Gold already offers an example of a strong domestic market, cushioning the impact of hits on exports, said Amit Korat, the president of the Surat Jewellery Manufacturers Association. But for now, the diamond sector in India has no such shield. It needs to be saved, urgently, said Patel, the Surat business owner on the cusp of shutting down his polishing and cutting unit. Without help, he said, 'the business will lose its shine forever'.
Qatar Tribune
12 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
US inflation unchanged in July, though core prices tick up
Agencies Consumer inflation in the U.S. held steady in July, the government data showed Tuesday, but underlying price increases picked up as President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs ripple through the world's biggest economy. The consumer price index (CPI) rose 2.7% from a year ago in July, unchanged from the rate in June, said the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), as worries over the reliability of data intensify and central bank officials gauge the effects of Trump's fresh levies this year. The consumer price index rose 0.2% last month after gaining 0.3% in June. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the CPI rising 0.2% and increasing 2.8% year-on-year. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, the CPI rose 0.3%, the biggest gain since January, after climbing 0.2% in June. The so-called core CPI increased 3.1% year-on-year in July after advancing 2.9% in June. The Federal Reserve (Fed) tracks different inflation measures for its 2% target. Before the CPI data, financial markets expected the U.S. central bank would resume cutting interest rates in September after July's weak employment report and sharp downward revisions to the nonfarm payrolls counts for May and June. The Fed left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range last month for the fifth straight time since December. The CPI report was published amid mounting concerns over the quality of inflation and employment reports following cuts in budget and staffing that have led to the suspension of data collection for portions of the CPI basket in some areas across the country. Those worries were amplified after Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the head of the BLS, earlier this month, after stall-speed job growth in July, reinforced by sharp downward revisions to the May and June nonfarm payrolls collection suspension The suspension of data collection followed years of what economists described as the underfunding of the BLS under both Republican and Democratic administrations. The situation has been exacerbated by the Trump White House's unprecedented campaign to reshape the government through deep spending cuts and mass layoffs of public workers. Citing the need to 'align survey workload with resource levels,' the BLS suspended CPI data collection completely in one city in Nebraska, Utah and New York. It has also suspended collection on 15% of the sample in the other 72 areas, on average. This affected both the commodity and services pricing survey as well as the housing survey, which the BLS said resulted in the number of collected prices and the number of collected rents used to calculate the CPI being temporarily reduced. That has led to the BLS using imputations to fill in the missing information. The share of different cell imputations in the CPI data jumped to 35% in June from 30% in May. Different cell imputation, which the BLS uses when all prices are unavailable in the home cell, maintains the item category but expands geography. The home cell method, considered by economists as higher quality, uses the average price of the same item in the same location as the missing product's price. The use of different cell imputation has grown from a share of only 8% in June 2024.
