Anti-racist concerts can stop rise of the UK far right, says veteran activist
Ameen Hadi, an organiser for Stand Up to Racism in Manchester who has been involved in the cause for more than four decades, called for a return of gigs such as Rock Against Racism and its successors.
He also said football clubs should return to working with anti-racism campaigners, including allowing them to leaflet inside the stadium when the new season starts.
'Counter-protesting alone is not going to solve the problem,' he said, when it came to encouraging people to support refugees and asylum seekers. 'We actually have to reach out to schools, to [music-lovers], to other ways that people want to get together to try and then say: 'Actually, these people aren't your enemy.''
Concerts organised in the late 70s and early 80s, and then again in the noughties, were widely considered to shift the dial in terms of public opinion and counteract the growing far-right movement.
Hadi, whose Stand Up to Racism group had been carrying placards and banners bearing anti-racist messages at protests organised by the far right in key locations such as Altrincham and in Manchester, said he had seen firsthand how much difference concerts with top artists could make.
In 2009, at an all-day event at Britannia Stadium in Stoke-on-Trent, artists and speakers urged the public to vote against the far-right British National party (BNP) at the upcoming European elections. He said the party had gained strong ground in the city but the concert ultimately 'stopped' the BNP.
'At that point, they had councillors [on Stoke council] and within a year of that gig, they were all gone,' he said.
It came after a Love Music Hate Racism concert that was widely considered to shift the mood in 2008, where 4,000 people in Rotherham watched headliners Kaiser Chiefs with The Courteeners and Reverend and the Makers, whose band member Jon McClure organised the gig.
In Nuneaton on Saturday, where the far right held an anti-asylum seeker protest, a couple of far-right protesters could be seen wearing 2-tone ska T-shirts, including one featuring The Specials, a group from nearby Coventry famous for their anti-racist songs.
The band played at a Rock Against Racism gig in Potternewton Park in Leeds in 1981, while The Beat, another ska band, helped organise a similar Birmingham gig.
Other concerts across the UK featured The Clash, Buzzcocks, Pete Townshend of the Who, Gang of Four and John Cooper Clarke.
Maintaining this legacy, the naughties spawned Love Music Hate Racism, which began in 2002 with a Burnley gig by the anti-racist Leeds band Chumbawamba, soon followed by a festival in Manchester's Platt Fields Park, headlined by Doves and Ms Dynamite. Later, acts such as Ed Sheeran, Pete Doherty and Stormzy all backed the movement.
Hadi said: 'I got involved in the 70s, I was only 15, 16. I never got involved in the organisation, I literally went to the free music gigs that were put on. I saw some reggae bands and saw some of my favourite music. And then, it was in an atmosphere where I was welcomed for being there. And you felt part of it and, for me, that was even more powerful, because that's thousands [of people].'
He said when tensions flare, especially at places were there are skirmishes between rival protesters, it can be easy to think that physically fighting is the natural escalation for the counter protesters.
'If we get fixated on our side that the only thing we need to do to stop growth of the far right is to take them out, then you end up with people who actually literally do believe that.'
He said a small number of anti-racist protesters had been recently kettled by police in Manchester during a far-right demonstration because they had planned to fight with the fascists who attended.
'It's not just about outnumbering them so you can have a fight with them. It's outnumbering them because you want your side to feel big and powerful, not let them feel powerful.
He said it was about giving people 'confidence so they can go out and challenge people who come out with racist views, and do something in their own community and in their own workplace to make a difference'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minister admits government hasn't tackled small boats crisis as crossings set to hit 50,000
A minister has admitted that the government has so far failed to tackle the small boats crisis, as the number of people who have crossed the Channel since Labour took power looks set to surpass 50,000. Home office minister Baroness Jacqui Smith said the number of people coming to the UK after making the dangerous crossing is 'a problem that, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle' – but insisted that it was the fault of the previous government. 'The last government enabled this hideous criminal activity to really get its roots across Europe', she said, adding that there is now 'really important action being taken to tackle it.' It comes as the government ramps up its efforts to bring down migration amid growing public anger over the issue, announcing on Friday that the new 'one in, one out' returns deal with France was up and running. The Home Office has also expanded its 'deport now, appeal later' scheme, which sees foreign criminals deported before their appeals have been heard. But the government is yet to get a grip on the numbers of people making the dangerous crossing, with the latest Home Office figures showing that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election. It took Rishi Sunak 603 days in office to surpass the 50,000 milestone, while it took Boris Johnson 1,066 days - a figure which spanned over the Covid-19 pandemic. When the figure was put to the home office minister on Sky News, she said: 'This is a problem that has, up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle in terms of the numbers who are coming here. 'But it is a completely legitimate claim to say that is happening is the result of the last government who chose to focus on gimmicks, the Rwanda scheme which returned four volunteers.' She added: 'We're taking responsibility. I don't believe it was our fault that it was enabled to take root in the way in which it has done by a government who failed to do what was necessary.' But asked at what point in Labour's government the numbers of boat crossings would become their fault, Baroness Smith declined to say. 'What I'm pointing out is that we've taken our responsibility to work internationally, to change the law... the last government did none of those things and focused on gimmicks', she said. 'It's because of that that the crime behind this got embedded in the way in which it did and that won't be solved overnight. And we're absolutely clear about that responsibility.' Labour has put a pledge to crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, pressure which is exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government is hoping its latest measures will turn the tide on the numbers of people arriving in the UK after crossing the Channel, amid mounting tensions over the issue in recent days. There have been protests across the UK opposing the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with a number of people arrested. Figures from last month showed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 – the earliest point in a calendar year at which the 25,000 mark has been passed since data on Channel crossings was first reported in 2018.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The demonisation of white working class boys is the real ‘national disgrace'
I was a little surprised to read Bridget Phillipson's description of the underperformance of white working class children at A-level as a 'national disgrace'. Is this the same Education Secretary who pulled the plug on a joint project by Eton and Star Academies to open a chain of free school sixth forms in some of our most deprived Northern cities to address precisely this issue? I'm afraid it is. To be fair to Phillipson, this is a problem she inherited, even if she has frustrated efforts to solve it. The Institute of Fiscal Studies drew attention to it 10 years ago, pointing out that white British pupils in the lowest socio-economic quintile were less likely to go to university than any other ethnic group. According to the Department for Education's latest figures, a lower percentage of white British pupils eligible for free school meals passed English and Maths GCSE at grade 4 or above than any other demographic group, save for 'Gypsy/Roma' and 'Irish traveller'. The causes of this are complex, but poverty isn't the whole of the story. After all, the IFS also found that Chinese pupils in the lowest socio-economic quintile are, on average, more than 10 per cent more likely to go to university than White British pupils in the highest socio-economic quintile. Another factor, as Miriam Cates has pointed out, is that the vast majority of white British children in the bottom socio-economic quintile are being brought up in single-parent households, with only 12 per cent of their parents married and nine per cent cohabiting. But that, too, is an incomplete explanation. According to the Office of National Statistics, a higher percentage of African-Caribbean households in England and Wales are made up of lone parents with dependent children than white British households. Yet black Caribbean children eligible for free school meals outperform their white British counterparts. Perhaps the reason poor white students are struggling is because schools don't celebrate their identity, unlike almost every other ethnic group. Schools plaster the walls with pictures of high-achieving black Britons during Black History Month and bend over backwards to recognise the religious festivals of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs. But most schools don't do anything to mark St George's Day. Indeed, when a school in Warwickshire invited pupils to wear 'traditional cultural dress' to celebrate the 'rich diversity of our community', it was so appalled when a 12 year-old white girl turned up in a Union Jack dress it sent her home. Insofar as schools do acknowledge the ethnicity of white British children, it's to lecture them about 'privilege' and the shameful role their ancestors played in the transatlantic slave trade. The stark figures about the under-achievement of white children in the bottom socio-economic quintile obscure an even bleaker story about the gap between male and female students in this demographic. In England, 40 per cent of white British girls eligible for free school meals got grade 4 or above in maths and English last year, compared to 38 per cent of boys. When it comes to university, just 14.5 per cent of poor white boys started higher education in 2021-22, compared to 24.4 per cent of poor white girls. No doubt that's partly due to the demonisation of white working class boys in schools, with the Netflix series Adolescence being the latest salvo in this constant assault on 'toxic masculinity'. But Bridget Phillipson is part of the problem, not the solution. Last month, the Education Secretary unveiled new Relationship, Sex and Health Education guidance designed to counter 'the scourge of misogyny'. 'Before I was elected to Parliament, I managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence, so I have seen first-hand the devastating impact when we don't foster healthy attitudes from the youngest age,' she said. For 'healthy attitudes' read finger-wagging condemnation of white working class male culture, from football fandom to boxing. So, what's the solution? It isn't the introduction of bursaries for poor white boys. When a former pupil of Winchester and Dulwich College offered them a million pounds to fund scholarships for this demographic, both said no. Apparently, it's perfectly acceptable for Stormzy to set up a bursary for black students to attend Cambridge, but the equivalent for white boys is 'racist'. Perhaps the answer is to de-wokify our schools and – to paraphrase Martin Luther King – judge all children by the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin or the nature of their genitalia. Looking at the data, it's hard not to conclude that white working class boys are victims of the racial and sexual politics that have infected our entire education sector. Its capture by radical progressive ideology is the real 'national disgrace', but don't expect this Government to do anything about that.
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Both left and right agree taxes must rise. Time for Labour to get creative
Paroxysms of glee among Labour's many enemies greeted last week's forecast of a £41.2bn black hole awaiting Rachel Reeves's autumn budget, from influential thinktank the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR). Expect another three months of bone-rattling warnings about imminent tax raids crushing every family. She is in a doom loop; no way out; ha, ha, ha! Voices in the Treasury sound sanguine, pointing out that NIESR has a record of eccentric forecasts. Before the spring statement, it predicted that Reeves needed £57bn just to keep her fiscal rules: actually, it was £4.1bn. For Jeremy Hunt as chancellor in 2023, it generously forecast he had £97.5bn to spend: on the day, that shrunk to £6.5bn. But the truth universally acknowledged (if not publicly by the government) is that taxes must rise. Debt interest costs £100bn a year, growth is nowhere near enough for rising NHS, pensions and welfare costs. Even the right talks of a 'brutally honest conversation with the public': that's from Robert Colvile, the director of the Centre for Policy Studies, daring to come up with solutions that would sink his party at an election: 'No more triple lock. Raising the state pension age … Asking people to pay for their social care out of their housing wealth.' (Quite right, but toxic in Torydom.) Even more surprising, the director of the rightwing Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), Tom Clougherty, advocates a tax rise: ending VAT exemptions to almost double the intake. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) agrees, and has suggested using the billions raised to generously compensate all lower-income households for their extra shopping costs. The IEA would compensate the losers, but spend the rest on cutting income tax. Counterintuitively, the great bulk of these untargeted VAT exemptions reward highest spenders – Waitrose not Iceland shoppers. There is a new honesty about tax and spend among the serious. Hunting for easy money is becoming a national game. The rising clamour for wealth taxes springs from what everyone knows: the rich have gained monstrously from an economy that propels the upward redistribution of wealth. The 50 wealthiest UK families own more than the poorest half of the population, says a report from the Equality Trust. Much billionaire wealth comes from the ownership of property and financial assets, not 'entrepreneurial spirit', inflated deliberately by a decade of quantitative easing. The inheritocracy dominates. Time to reach in and take some back. The Tax Justice Network wants a 2% levy on wealth over £10m, raising £24bn a year, strongly backed by Oxfam, Dale Vince and the Patriotic Millionaires UK campaign. The public agrees, by 75% to 13% against. Naturally, the great wealth-protection machine is in overdrive. The consultancy Henley & Partners claims that 16,500 UK millionaires are fleeing, quoted everywhere as gospel truth, but has been comprehensively questioned in a thorough report by Dan Neidle of Tax Policy Associates. Henley is a company that facilitates citizenship and residency for a wealthy clientele. But the narrative is out there: Labour has caused a tax flight. However, Neidle, no rightwinger, issues warnings about wealth taxes. Wealth is now grotesquely agglomerated among very, very few, so 80% of wealth tax revenue would come from just 5,000 people and 15% from just 10 people. That makes the tax 'uniquely vulnerable' to a handful who are gaming valuations or quitting Britain. Unless every country did it, he warns a regular levy would deter inward investors. The IFS is equally sceptical. The business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, rudely dismisses the whole idea as 'daft'. Does that mean it's dead? Not necessarily, as other Labour figures, talking to the Treasury team, put forward ideas privately that have wind in their sails. An instant retrospective wealth-tax raid to raise money urgently for that 5% GDP pledged for national defence has backing, I hear from those talking to the Treasury. Demanding a one-off whack for the defence of the realm could be popular and practicable. What's more, howls of protest from the wealthy would help rebrand Labour usefully as both socially just and patriotic. There are many ways to skin fat cats, using existing taxes. Here is the list from the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation: the big tax-raisers are £16.7bn from equalising capital gains and income tax rates, treating all income the same. But look how craftily the rich defend themselves: private equity lobbying just won a very quiet reprieve to keep disguising earned income as low-taxed capital gain. Running rings around the taxman, some escape inheritance tax on precious art works by promising to make them accessible to the public and then failing; some have even been sold. At least Labour is hiring 5,000 HMRC staff, cut by the Tories despite collecting many multiples of their salaries. Everyone needs the services that national insurance symbolises: it should be paid on all incomes, for landlords, shareholders and investments. Nor will taxing the rich be enough: income tax can't be taboo, never raised since Denis Healey in 1975, as 'drastic times call for drastic action', writes Paul Johnson, the recently departed IFS director. Property is grossly undertaxed: be brave and reform council tax into a fairer land-value tax. What is certain is that promises will be broken, taxes raised and the faux row will be equally ear-splitting whether Reeves takes a lot or a little. So go for radicalism; the country needs it – for defence, health, old age, decayed infrastructure and green power. Roll the pitch now, prepare the way, and change the moral climate on the tax deniers and avoiders. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
