Under Fire Act, inmate firefighters could have a new pipeline to employment
When Andony Corleto first joined California's Conservation Fire Camp Program as a prison inmate, he knew his criminal history barred him from working for any city, county or state fire department upon release.
'Thousands of people like me have had their trial by fire, only to be released and been told that it's worth nothing,' said Corleto, who now works with Vera Institute of Justice, a national organization focused on criminal justice reform. 'We cannot throw them away. We cannot deny them protections and fair wages while they work to keep us safe, especially with the persistent shortage of firefighters and with record making fires every year.'
Now, with the Fire Act, this could all change.
Introduced by California Democratic Reps. Sydney Kamlager-Dove and Judy Chu, the new act would help fund job training, workplace and mentoring opportunities to ensure long-term employment for former inmate firefighters. In addition to creating a pipeline for these workers, it would also start a pathway for expunging the criminal records of those who have successfully completed probation and reentry.
At the beginning of the year, more than 1,000 inmates in the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation helped fight the Palisades and Eaton fires. During a news conference Tuesday afternoon, Judy Chu, who represents Pasadena and Altadena, honored their acts of bravery and spoke about their unfair low wages.
'The fire could've been worse,' said Chu. "Our area is a very densely populated area, so even more damage could have been done. But it was stopped before it could burn more communities in my district, but they fought days on end to put out those fires.'
Outside the L.A. County Stentorians office, an association for African American firefighters, the Democratic representatives gathered with local advocates in front of a cluster of television news cameras to share the details of the newly introduced act. Corleto, who was released from custody around five years ago, and Royal Ramey, nonprofit Forestry and Fire Recruitment Program chief executive, both shared firsthand experiences of living and working in a fire camp. They hope this act, if passed, will bring a new sense of hope to those currently working in the fire camp program.
Historically, incarcerated firefighters make up around 30% of California's wildfire crews. Depending on skill level, they can currently earn between $5.80 to $10.24 a day plus $1 an hour from Cal Fire during active emergencies, according to the department's website.
The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's Conservation has 35 fire camps in California where over 1,800 inmates live and train. When they aren't fighting fires or responding to other disasters, they help with state park upkeep. By joining a fire crew, they get the opportunity to reduce their sentences, earning one or two days of credit for every day they work.
The bill introduced in Congress, officially known as the Fairness, Inclusion, Rehabilitation, and Expungement for Incarcerated Firefighters Act, would offer incentives for other states to start their own versions of fire camps. The act would expand occupational safety coverage, recognize incarcerated firefighters as employees entitled to wage protections and provide $20 million annually for states to adopt safety and wage compliance.
'The reality is that there are so many states that are battling with natural disasters, including fires. So, why not do the humane thing and make sure that everyone has protection? After all, these are human beings who wake up every day and make the conscious decision to get up and to learn to fight fires,' said Kamlager-Dove, who represents a district in Los Angeles. 'I want to connect California stories to the rest of the country.'
Kamlager-Dove is 'hopeful' that the legislation will succeed despite the federal budget cuts being considered in the Republican-led Congress.
'This is an administration that believes in second, third and fourth chances. It believes in redemption,' said Kamlager-Dove of the Trump Administration. 'So we're simply saying, expand the lens of who you think is worthy for redemption. I submit that folks who put their lives on the line every single day, fighting fires deserve that same kind of attention.'
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Yvette Clarke endorses Adrienne Adams for New York City mayor
NEW YORK — Rep. Yvette Clarke is endorsing Adrienne Adams as her top choice for New York City mayor, lending the City Council speaker a much-needed boost as she seeks traction in the final weeks of the campaign, POLITICO reports exclusively. Clarke and her powerbroker mother Una Clarke are influential among Caribbean New Yorkers. They're also closely allied with New York Attorney General Letitia James, who recruited and endorsed Adams in a contentious primary that Andrew Cuomo is dominating. Adams is a late entry into the race. She qualified only last week for public matching funds. And she's been polling behind Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani, the surging Democratic socialist who's closing the gap with the former governor. 'Working families in Brooklyn and across this city deserve a mayor who puts people first — someone who leads with both strength and compassion, and who has the experience to make government work for everyone,' Clarke said in a statement. 'Speaker Adrienne Adams is ready on day one to partner with me and my colleagues in protecting New Yorkers from the harmful policies coming out of the White House.' Clarke, who chairs the Congressional Black Caucus, said she will make Adams her No. 1 pick in the ranked choice primary June 24. Rep. Nydia Velázquez, another Brooklyn Democrat, also endorsed Adams but additionally backed Mamdani and progressive city Comptroller Brad Lander in April as a part of her slate. The incumbent mayor, Eric Adams, is forgoing the Democratic primary and will run in the general election as an independent candidate. Clarke's nod comes as her political club, the Progressive Democrats Political Association, plans to endorse an unranked slate of candidates that includes Cuomo, though many members wanted to make Adrienne Adams their top choice, three people familiar with the decision told POLITICO. The Brooklyn club, founded by Una Clarke, considered backing Adams first, followed by Lander, Cuomo, club member Zellnor Myrie and Mamdani — in that order. But amid deliberations about whether to rank the candidates and pressure from Cuomo's allies within the club, members instead plan to release a five-candidate slate that shows no preferential order, according to two people familiar with the process who were granted anonymity to speak freely. Clarke's endorsement is one of the last from New York congressional delegation members in the primary. She endorsed Maya Wiley in the 2021 primary for mayor. The chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Rep. Adriano Espaillat of Manhattan and the Bronx, endorsed Cuomo last month. And the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus chair, Rep. Grace Meng of Queens, has yet to make her pick in the crowded primary. The prized congressional endorsement among the primary's progressives is Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has yet to announce her choices.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuomo — and attacks against ex-gov — takes center stage in rowdy NYC Democratic mayoral debate
Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo was at the center of a pile-on during a rowdy mayoral debate Wednesday night — as flailing Democratic candidates seized their first chance to attack the primary's frontrunner in a public forum. Cuomo literally stood mid-stage between the other eight candidates, who repeatedly pelted the thrice-elected Democrat — with COVID nursing home deaths and his checkered record leading the Empire State hijacking much of the NBC-Politico debate. 'The people who don't feel safe are young women, mothers and grandmothers around Andrew Cuomo,' shot the Rev. Michael Blake, a former Obama administration official, who scathingly evoked the sexual harassment accusations that led to the former governor's resignation. 'That's the greatest threat to public safety in New York City.' An often-heated Cuomo responded to the attacks, as well as pointed questions by debate moderators, with barbs of his own and conspicuous dodges for the chaotic more than two hours. He directed fire of his own at the candidates closest to him in the polls: Democratic socialist Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and City Comptroller Brad Lander. Cuomo, 67, cast Mamdani's plan to offer $10 billion of freebies for hardworking New Yorkers as not rooted in 'reality.' He also argued that Mamdani, a 33-year-old who was elected to the state Legislature in 2021, lacked the experience to stand up to a hostile President Trump, if elected mayor. 'Donald Trump would go through Mr. Mamdani like a hot knife through butter,' Cuomo said. 'He has been in government for 27 minutes' Mamdani, who is rising to within single digits of Cuomo in the polls, hammered the longtime politician as not being on the side of working-class New Yorkers. The Democratic Socialists of America lawmaker skewered Cuomo's super PAC, Fix The City, for cashing in on a $1 million donation from the popular app DoorDash — for which the former governor's top-ranking aide Melissa DeRosa's father works as a lobbyist. He landed some big haymakers against Cuomo, but also peppered his answers with little jabs. When asked his biggest regret, Mamdani was harsh — and stayed on point with attacking Cuomo. 'As a Democrat, one of my regrets is having trusted the leaders within our own party leaders like Andrew Cuomo, because what we've seen is that kind of leadership has delivered us to this point where we are under attack by an affordability crisis on the inside and a Trump administration,' he said. Cuomo at one point quipped that Trump 'gets sued 10 times before he gets out of bed in the morning.' 'Kind of like you,' Mamdani shot back. Lander, for his part, subtly swiped Cuomo in nearly every answer — calling him as corrupt as Trump. Cuomo went scorched earth at Lander, who is polling at third place. He accused Lander of corruptly approving $500,000 in contracts associated with his wife — a charge the comptroller called a lie. Cuomo managed to attack all of his opponents in one fell swoop by calling out their past support for the 'Defund the Police' movement. 'We wouldn't need more police if we didn't defund them in the first place,' Cuomo said. But when it came time to answer for his own record, Cuomo seemingly couldn't find the words. Asked about the controversial state bail reforms that he signed into law in 2019, Cuomo chose to use his 30 seconds to attack Lander — prompting the moderators to warn him he was running out of time to answer. He also got heated — and raised his voice — as he insisted nursing home deaths were not undercounted in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic, though they were. 'It's very, it's very clear that's the Trump line, the MAGA line,' claimed Cuomo, who is facing a Department of Justice probe for allegedly lying to Congress about his handling of COVID nursing home deaths. The crowded dais provided little oxygen to the struggling candidates, who for months now have struggled to topple Cuomo atop the polls or match the momentum of the socialist Mamdani. Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and state Sen. Zellnor Myrie were two of the few able to cut through the often chaotic barrage of attacks on the ex-governor, with Big Apple politicos saying the pair came across as authentic politicians with concrete agendas. Hedge fund manager and longshot candidate Whitney Tilson went after Mamdani several times, dredging up a past X post that called the NYPD 'wicked & corrupt.' Political consultant and lobbyist Yvette Buckner said voters will likely be left wanting to hear more. 'There were some missed opportunities on the top issues of public safety and affordability and the question of the 'biggest regret' for candidates, which is something New Yorkers would want to hear more about, especially from the front runner,' she added. But Blake, a former state Assembly member, proved to be the breakout star of what will be his first and final debate, repeatedly hitting Cuomo — including over a racially tinged comment from decades ago. Democratic operative Ken Frydman, though, dashed Blake's hopes, saying, 'Cuomo will get more of the black vote than he will.' 'No one knows who he is.' — Additional reporting by Carl Campanile
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California's successful virtual power plant program faces big budget cuts
California's biggest virtual power plant is facing over $100 million in funding cuts due to the state's ongoing budget crisis, threatening the long-term viability of a program that can act as a crucial release valve for the state's overburdened power grid. The Demand Side Grid Support program pays electric customers who reduce their energy use or who provide power to the larger grid during extreme events that stress the system, like heat waves or wildfires. Going into this summer, the program has hundreds of thousands of smart thermostats, batteries, grid-responsive EV chargers, and other distributed energy resources that participating companies can control remotely with software. It can provide hundreds of megawatts of grid relief to help the state avoid rolling blackouts on the hottest days of the year, when air conditioning use pushes the power system to its limit. The companies paying customers to commit to making their devices available for this grid service insist DSGS is a good deal for the money — about $17 million in incentives paid to date, and roughly $82 million remaining for future spending, according to Olivine, the energy services company managing the program. It's certainly a more cost- and climate-friendly approach to mitigating grid emergencies than the billions of dollars the state has spent on fossil-fueled power plants and backup generators over the past few years, they say. But the program's future is now uncertain as legislators search for ways to alleviate California's multi-billion-dollar budget shortfall. The DSGS program already saw much of its state funding cut back last year due to similar budget issues — and now it's back on the chopping block. Late last week, state legislative committees approved cuts to DSGS, proposed in Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's 'May Revise' budget plan. The proposal would take away future funding promised in 2024, including $75 million from the state's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and $46.6 million from the climate bond passed late last year. Newsom's plan would also pull $18 million from DSGS's existing budget. The state Legislature must pass a budget bill by June 15. If left in place in that final budget, these cuts and clawbacks would leave DSGS with about $64 million for the fiscal year that starts in July, according to Olivine. That won't kill the program immediately: 'Staff anticipate having sufficient funding for the 2025 program season,' which runs from May through October, Olivine states on its DSGS web page. But Edson Perez, who leads trade group Advanced Energy United's legislative and political engagement in California, says funding cuts will severely cloud the outlook for a virtual power plant program that has been a rare success in the state. For the past decade, California has largely failed to follow through on its stated policy objectives of developing virtual power plant programs, he said. Most of the state's utility-run virtual power plant programs have either stagnated or been canceled. DSGS, by contrast, is 'a very successful program, leading the nation for distributed energy,' Perez said. According to the latest tallies by Advanced Energy United, the program boasts 800 megawatts of capacity ready to participate in reducing peak grid demands this summer, he said, up from more than 500 megawatts enrolled as of last fall. That's an enormous amount of energy flexibility, comparable to the capacity available from a fossil-gas-fired 'peaker' plant. Keeping the program running for the long haul requires having enough money to give participants confidence that it will still exist from one year to the next, Perez said. To be clear, it's very hard to predict exactly how much money is needed to provide that confidence, because DSGS participants are paid for responding to grid emergencies. If weather conditions are mild and power supplies hold up, they could be called on very rarely, if at all, and money could be left over for next year. But if lots of emergencies happen, the funds could be depleted quickly. In that event, participating companies will have to come back in January 2026 to plead for more money to keep it going, with no guarantee the funding will be granted. That's not a sustainable way to do business, Perez said — and it's not a sustainable way to build a resource that the state's grid can truly rely on. California's DSGS program began three years ago not as a virtual power plant but as an experimental response to a grid reliability crisis. The program has grown rapidly since then — largely because the California Energy Commission structured DSGS in a way that avoids the complications of past programs, Perez said. But the growth was also driven by companies that have invested since 2022 to deploy the underlying technologies needed to reliably control thousands of customer-owned devices for up to two hours per day. Those companies have committed to paying customers both up-front incentives and 'performance payments' when they follow through on their promises to allow their devices to reduce power use or push power back to the grid. In some cases, companies have offered discounts on smart thermostats and other devices. All of these commitments are based on the expectation that state funding won't be pulled away, Perez said. 'The companies in this space need certainty,' he said. That's the argument being made by Sunrun, Generac, Renew Home, and other companies working in the DSGS program, along with community energy providers and trade groups. In a June 3 letter to state lawmakers, they asked for existing funding to be preserved to allow companies 'to continue investing in market development and customer onboarding,' and to give customers 'certainty in program length to estimate their returns upon participation.' Sunrun, the country's leading residential solar and battery installer, has had its ups and downs with California's ever-changing virtual power plant policies, said Chris Rauscher, the company's head of grid services and electrification. It has had to restructure projects as regulators and utilities altered program rules. One of Sunrun's large-scale pilot projects with utility Pacific Gas & Electric was discontinued last year. Still, Sunrun has continued to enlist customers in what it calls the 'CalReady' virtual power plant, which now has about 56,000 customers capable of providing 250 megawatts of electricity from their batteries to relieve statewide grid stress for up to two hours at a time, Rauscher said. While Sunrun is participating in other virtual power plant opportunities, it has centered its efforts on preparing to serve the DSGS program. Importantly, DSGS is also one of the few programs in California that doesn't bar solar-charged batteries from injecting their power back into the grid — most others allow them only to reduce a household's grid draw to zero. Allowing the equipment to send power back can roughly double their impact on relieving grid stress. 'You can very easily picture that by 2030, we're operating a nuclear power plant-sized [virtual power plant] in California,' Rauscher said. 'It sure would be a shame if the rug got pulled out from under this clean, reliable, and resilient resource that's providing payments to Californians.' DSGS is also good value for the money, argued Kate Unger, senior policy advisor at the California Solar and Storage Association, a trade group pushing for funding to be restored. 'DSGS is providing energy when otherwise it's going to be at emergency pricing, when it's about the most expensive energy you can possibly buy,' she said. Participants get a small up-front payment in exchange for agreeing to allow companies to dispatch their devices or batteries for up to two hours on days when the day-ahead price of power on the state's wholesale energy market exceeds $200 per megawatt-hour. That's a proxy for days when the state's grid operator has forecasted that demand for power, most often due to air conditioning use during heat waves, will exceed available energy supplies. But importantly, DSGS providers are not paid the wholesale energy market price, Unger said. Instead, the program pays companies and customers lower amounts based on energy or capacity actually delivered. That 'pay-for-performance' structure helps ensure that the state is getting value for the money it's spending, she said. In that sense, DSGS is 'one of the most cost-effective forms of insurance for grid emergencies that you can have,' said Ben Brown, CEO of Renew Home. His company, formed by the merger of Google Nest's smart-thermostat energy-shifting service Nest Renew and residential demand-response startup OhmConnect, has set its sights on establishing gigawatts of virtual power plant capacity with existing and new customers across the country. It has an undisclosed number of customers participating in DSGS. It's more difficult to measure the reduction in energy use from thermostats that dial down air conditioning than to measure the amount of power that batteries inject back onto the grid. But Renew Home has 15 years of experience in utility and energy market programs that Nest has run across the country, and has confidence that it can deliver on the grid relief it has pledged to the DSGS program, Brown said. Still, it takes time for demand-side programs like these to become a reliable part of the grid resource mix, he said. They must both entice customers to participate and then use financial incentives to encourage them to stick around. 'You can't just have a program stand up and be able to operate that at scale overnight,' Brown said. 'Having certainty over the next five years is pretty important when you're talking about subsidizing technology.' Financial certainty is particularly key to getting a new form of carbon-free grid resource up and running, DSGS backers say. But to date, fossil-fueled alternatives have gotten most of the money from the multi-billion-dollar emergency backup programs created after the state's rolling blackouts in 2020 and close brush with similar blackouts in 2022. As of last spring, California had spent about $426 million on 'emergency and temporary' power generators that burn fossil gas or diesel fuel, according to the state Department of Water Resources, which administers that program. It has also promised about $1.2 billion to keep fossil-gas-fired 'peaker' plants in Southern California open until 2026, well past their scheduled 2020 closure date — a decision that runs counter to the state's environmental and climate policies. DSGS, by contrast, relies on resources that don't emit carbon or toxic air pollution. What's more, the smart thermostats, solar-charged batteries, smart EV chargers, and other devices involved are being installed and paid for by California residents for their own purposes. Customer-owned resources could significantly lower energy bills for Californians. A 2024 report from The Brattle Group, a consultancy, found that virtual power plants could provide more than 15% of the state's peak grid demand by 2035 and save California consumers about $550 million per year by then. Most of that money would go to the owners of the devices being tapped. But utility customers at large would save about $50 million, compared to what they'd otherwise have to pay for utility-scale resources to fill in where virtual power plant capacity had failed to emerge, the report found. That's an important consideration in a state where utility electricity rates have risen to roughly double the U.S. average and are set to keep climbing in coming years. Not everyone is confident that virtual power plants are a truly reliable alternative to more traditional options. California utility regulators and grid operators have critiqued the performance of demand-side programs during past grid emergencies, saying they haven't delivered what was promised. Nor is California's grid as vulnerable to summer heat waves as it was in 2020 and 2022 when these emergency grid relief programs were created. In the intervening years, the state has added gigawatts of energy storage to absorb its still-growing share of solar power for use after the sun goes down, relieving the evening 'net-peak' challenges of previous years. In a May assessment, the California Energy Commission noted that 'rapid clean energy deployment, expansion of battery storage, and strategic efforts to build up emergency reserves' have put the state on solid footing for this summer. But the commission is also striving to dramatically expand the state's capacity for getting customers to help the grid, with a goal of 7 gigawatts of demand flexibility resources by 2030. 'Innovative programs like DSGS provide a critical buffer for ensuring the reliability of California's electrical grid while reducing emissions,' California Energy Commission Vice Chair Siva Gunda said in an October press release issued after the program surpassed 500 megawatts of enrolled capacity. Anne Hoskins, senior vice president of policy and market development at Generac Power Systems, highlighted the risks that programs like DSGS insure against. Generac, one of the country's biggest manufacturers of backup generators, has expanded into grid services, solar-charged battery backup systems, and smart thermostats via its 2021 acquisition of startup ecobee. Back in 2022, when Gov. Newsom's office sent out emergency text alerts to Californians to turn down power in the face of a potential grid overload, Generac tapped into ecobee's automated grid-response capabilities to help meet the call, Hoskins said. 'With this DSGS funding, we can provide that in a more efficient way,' she said. The costs to the state of keeping DSGS healthy in future years pale compared to the economic risks of leaving California open to future grid emergencies, Hoskins added. She cited a 2023 study from Gridwell Consulting, a Sacramento, California-based energy market analysis firm, that found that the state's four days of emergency grid conditions in September 2022 added more than $1 billion in energy costs to utility customers that 'would have been avoided if there were additional capacity online to meet the increased demand.' 'You're looking at potentially multi-billion-dollar impacts that could be avoided by calling on these distributed resources,' Hoskins said. 'We recognize that California is in a challenging situation' with its budget. But before state lawmakers take away DSGS money, she'd like to see an analysis of 'the alternative costs for this program going away if the money isn't there for customers.'
