logo
Middle East: 100 aid groups urge 'decisive action' in Gaza – DW – 07/23/2025

Middle East: 100 aid groups urge 'decisive action' in Gaza – DW – 07/23/2025

DW8 hours ago
Aid groups such as Doctors Without Borders and Save the Children urged lifting restrictions, opening land crossings and other measures, as they say "mass starvation" is spreading in Gaza. DW has the latest. Over 100 aid groups and human rights watchdogs have condemned the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, laying blame on Israel and the Israeli government-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) for the dire situation there.
The Gaza Strip has a population of nearly 2 million people and faces a shortage of food, water, medicine and other essential goods.
"Exactly two months since the Israeli government-controlled scheme, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, began operating, 109 organizations are sounding the alarm, urging governments to act: open all land crossings; restore the full flow of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items and fuel through a principled, UN-led mechanism; end the siege, and agree to a ceasefire now," the aid groups said in a joint statement signed by organizations such as Doctors without Borders (MSF), Save the Children International, Oxfam and the Norwegian Refugee Council.
US President Donald Trump's administration also backs the GHF, which other humanitarian groups have criticized for politicizing aid in Gaza.
Moreover, there have been near-daily reports of Palestinians being shot at and/or killed while trying to receive aid at GHF distribution centers in Gaza. The civil defense agency in Gaza has blamed the shootings on Israeli forces, whereas Israel has claimed that Hamas has been opening fire on Palestinians.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"Palestinians are trapped in a cycle of hope and heartbreak, waiting for assistance and ceasefires, only to wake up to worsening conditions," the statement said. "It is not just physical torment, but psychological. Survival is dangled like a mirage. The humanitarian system cannot run on false promises. Humanitarians cannot operate on shifting timelines or wait for political commitments that fail to deliver access," the statement from the aid groups added.
The statement from the aid groups comes after UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres a day earlier called Gaza a "horror show" where "starvation is knocking on every door."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Although the aid organizations have criticized Israel's siege on Gaza, the Israeli government has contended that its restrictions on Gaza's borders are necessary for security reasons. Israel launched a military operation in Gaza after Hamas, the militant group which controls the Gaza Strip, led terror attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023.
The Israeli military is currently conducting a ground incursion into the central Gaza city of Deir al-Balah, with the World Health Organization on Monday saying a building housing WHO staff was attacked there. The incursion raises further humanitarian risks for Gaza as the city serves as a refuge for Palestinians displaced amid Israeli strikes in Gaza.
Welcome to DW's coverage of Gaza, Israeland the wider Middle East on Wednesday, July 23, 2025.
As aid groups sound the alarm over extreme hunger in Gaza, a US envoy is traveling to Europe to discuss a possible ceasefire.
This blog will feature not only the latest news from the region but also analysis, multimedia content and on-the-ground reporting from DW correspondents.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Germany moves to fast-track weapons purchases  – DW – 07/23/2025
Germany moves to fast-track weapons purchases  – DW – 07/23/2025

DW

time44 minutes ago

  • DW

Germany moves to fast-track weapons purchases – DW – 07/23/2025

Berlin wants to speed up the rate at which it can buy weapons, bypassing lengthy tender processes for military contracts. Critics warn that it could open a path to the unfair awarding of contracts and corrupt practices. Germany's cabinet has approved a draft law to accelerate arms procurement for the military, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said Wednesday, calling it a "quantum leap" for national security. The bill is designed to cut red tape and allow the Bundeswehr to buy weapons and equipment faster and with fewer bureaucratic hurdles. The proposed legislation cites Russia as "the most immediate threat to peace and security" and stresses Germany's need to boost NATO defense capacity. Officials say there is no indication Moscow is willing to end the war in Ukraine and that Russia's war goals "go beyond Ukraine." "We want to speed up procurement to make Germany safer," Pistorius told a press conference in Berlin. "If the tank is full but the fuel line is clogged, then it won't help us much." Economy Minister Katherina Reiche said the changes would give arms producers planning certainty and help scale production. "We need more weapons and we need them faster," she said. To achieve defense capability, Germany is taking on significant new debt, Reiche said. "We must invest this money in new technologies for air defense, satellite capabilities, drones, autonomous systems, and AI capabilities." The draft law proposes higher so-called value limits so that the Bundeswehr can award contracts directly more quickly, rather then putting them out to tender. Currently, this value limit is generally €15,000 ($17,600), but it should be increased to €50,000, Reiche said. For contracts that strengthen defense capabilities, the new value limit would be €443,000 while the construction threshold would rise to €1 million. Procurement would also be accelerated for barracks construction and repair. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The federal government also wants to facilitate cooperation with start-ups developing innovative defense technology. These young companies could receive advance payments for contracts "on a much larger scale" in the future, Pistorius said. This is because they often lack the financial means "to be able to ramp up production quickly." To support the increased military spending, Germany has loosened its constitutional debt limits. NATO recently adopted a target for members to spend 5%, including related infrastructure, of GDP on defense by 2035 — a Cold War-level figure. The Green Party criticized the plans as inadequate with "far too little" being done. Green Party parliamentary group deputy Agnieszka Brugger told the newspaper it would be necessary to increase production capacities and solve supply chain problems. An example of how this could be achieved, she said, was through more joint European procurement projects. The Left Party accused the coalition of giving "priority" to "war preparation" with the law and allowing it to override contract standards. Left Party lawmaker Pascal Meiser said the bill opened up a doorway to wasteful spending and corruption. "The federal government's plans to accelerate awarding contracts threaten to become a gateway for the inefficient use of taxpayer money and crony capitalism," he said. The German Confederation of Skilled Crafts also urged safeguards to ensure fair competition and participation for small regional businesses.

World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025
World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

World's top court says healthy environment is a human right – DW – 07/23/2025

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued its ruling on States' legal obligations in relation to climate change. In an watershed advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague has said a "clean, healthy and sustainable environment" is a human right, and that the climate must be protected for "present and future generations." Outlining the obligations of states to protect the human rights of citizens being impacted by climate change, the UN's highest court said "greenhouse gas emissions are unequivocally caused by human activities and have crossborder effects."Reading the ruling, ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa said "the consequences of climate change are severe and far-reaching," adding that they affect both natural ecosystems and human populations. "These consequences underscore the urgent and existential threat posed by climate change." He said countries have a duty to cooperate on preventing harm caused by climate change and must make sure their national climate targets represent the highest possible ambition. The case began after students from Pacific Island countries lobbied governments into calling for the legal clarification. The state of Vanuatu requested the ICJ to rule on the obligations of states under international law to protect the climate and environment from greenhouse gas emissions. And by extension present and future generations. In December, the court heard testimonies from almost 100 countries and 12 international organizations. Speaking at the time, Gaston Browne, Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda, told judges that sea level rise driven by "unchecked emissions" was eroding island coastlines and "swallowing land that is vital to our country." The Caribbean archipelago is being eroded by rising sea levels and faces more intense storms as a result of the impacts of a warming world. Also speaking as part of the December hearings, high-emitting nations, like the United States, said existing UN treaties — primarily the 2015 Paris Agreement — already provide legal obligations on action towards slowing climate change. President Donald Trump has since announced his country's withdrawal from the landmark accord that saw 195 nations agree to reduce carbon emissions and pursue efforts to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit). But experts say the Paris Agreement was never intended to define all laws around climate change. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Joie Chowdhury, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) says because rising temperatures affect "almost every possible dimension of our lives," there is scope for a lot of different laws. She also points to existing international regulations on human rights, international law and legislation around state responsibility as potential tools to enforce climate action. "The climate treaties remain very important, they're just not the only game in town," she told DW. In bringing the case to the court, Vanuatu also asked for clarification on the legal consequences for countries that failed to meet their obligations on slowing their emissions. Some experts say countries that have emitted most CO2 cumulatively — including the United States, China, Russia, and the European Union — carry the most responsibility for global warming. "Past emissions matter," Chowdhury told DW, adding that harm has already been done. "That must be recognized and repaired." Poorer countries have long been calling for richer nations to pay for damage caused by extreme weather linked to the emissions that are heating the planet. Many of these less wealthy states are experiencing the worst impacts of climate change, despite having done the least to contribute to the ICJ advisory warned that "adverse impacts and loss and damage will escalate with every increment of global warming". A loss and damage fund was established at UN climate negotiations two years ago in Dubai, but has only received around $700 million in pledges. That is far lower than the hundreds of billions of dollars experts say climate change could cost in damages by 2030. "At its heart, this case is about accountability. It's a signal to end the era of empty pledges," Chowdhury added. The ICJ advisory opinion is one of three that have been delivered in past months outlining state obligations around climate action. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion asserting countries' obligations to protect citizens' human rights by ensuring a healthy environment and stable climate. The opinion also highlighted states' responsibility in relation to disinformation and misinformation, adding that authorities should not obstruct the population's access to "reliable, truthful, and complete information" needed to address risks to human rights occurring through the climate emergency. And in May last year, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea was the first to issue its advisory opinion recognizing greenhouse gases as a form of marine pollution. Although advisory opinions are not legally binding, they hold significant legal weight and moral authority. Speaking ahead of Wednesday's ruling, Chowdhury said the advisory opinion could have far-reaching consequences for the November COP30 climate negotiations in Brazil. It could mean "not everything is up for negotiation' because some things have been clearly legally defined. "We hope very much that this clarity will provide a very clear legal blueprint which would allow states and those most affected on the front lines to hold polluters accountable for climate disruptive conduct and to secure remedy and reparations," she said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Germany seeks US guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine
Germany seeks US guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine

Local Germany

time4 hours ago

  • Local Germany

Germany seeks US guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine

In comments to Der Spiegel news magazine, Pistorius said European NATO members needed "watertight" guarantees that any American-made Patriot air-defence systems sent to Ukraine would be replaced within about six to eight months. US President Donald Trump last week announced a deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte for European alliance members to buy US weaponry -- particularly Patriot systems -- for Kyiv to help it in its war against Russia. The move marked a pivot for Trump as his patience has worn thin with Russia's President Vladimir Putin for frustrating efforts to halt the war in Ukraine. Germany has offered to finance two of the Patriot systems, while several other NATO allies have expressed willingness to pay for three more. But concern has grown as Washington wants European allies to first send Patriot systems from their own stocks to Ukraine and then wait for replacements from the United States. Pistorius told Der Spiegel it was important that "the countries transferring systems can continue to meet their NATO requirements and that no security gaps arise for NATO". Countries including Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands had declared their willingness to finance Patriot systems, but Pistorius said that "no decision has been made as to which country could supply Patriot systems to Ukraine". Advertisement Speaking later at a Berlin news conference, he said talks were ongoing on the question of "which countries in Europe and beyond currently have Patriots, and in what quantities are they willing to hand them over?" He added: "There is money for these Patriots. Now we just need the Patriots." READ ALSO: German military sees Russia as 'existential risk' to Germany and Europe, report Germany formerly had 12 Patriot systems but has sent three to Ukraine and two to Poland. Another Patriot battery is dedicated to training, leaving Germany with six active units.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store