logo
Trade war tougher test for EMs than Covid crisis: IMF

Trade war tougher test for EMs than Covid crisis: IMF

Qatar Tribune2 days ago

Agencies
The trade war fed by US President Donald Trump presents an even tougher challenge for emerging market policymakers than the COVID-19 crisis five years ago, a top official at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned.
The shock from the trade war brings 'differential effects' for central banks in emerging markets, in contrast with the COVID-19 pandemic, when they could quickly ease monetary policy, the IMF's Gita Gopinath said, according to an interview published on Thursday.
In an interview with the Financial Times (FT) newspaper, the fund's first deputy managing director said the unpredictable impact of tariffs on developing economies and global markets would make the task of their central bankers harder.
'This time the challenge is going to be greater for them, compared to the pandemic,' she said.
Federal Reserve (Fed) policymakers have been signalling they are not ready to lower interest rates until they are sure tariffs will not further stoke inflation.
Some estimates predict the inflation in the U.S. could go up in the short term due to the impact of Trump's tariffs, which are expected to make goods, from shoes to phones, more expensive for ordinary Americans.
Elsewhere, the Bank of England (BoE) and the European Central Bank (ECB) have pivoted to easing monetary policy as inflation slowed down from the peaks observed in 2022 and due to widely stagnating or low growth.
However, in emerging markets, which are also facing higher US trade barriers, the situation looks 'more like a demand shock,' said Gopinath, which means slower inflation and growth.
The situation contrasts with the onset of the pandemic, when most central banks around the world slashed interest rates.
'When we have this kind of a divergence, you could end up with tightening global financial conditions, and emerging markets are particularly sensitive to such changes in global markets,' Gopinath told the FT.
Emerging market currencies and stocks have largely rebounded in the two months since Trump announced his sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs, as investors bet that central banks will be largely free to stimulate their economies despite the risk that higher rates in developed countries will draw capital away.
However, a report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) warned that 'the risk of disruptive capital flows has risen in emerging market economies.' Still, Gopinath noted that 'emerging market central banks have built up credibility over time, and several have moved to inflation-targeting frameworks,' which she said was very positive.
She said, 'Global factors are still bigger drivers for them compared to advanced economies, and so when we're entering this environment where we are seeing major shifts in global economic policy, along with the uncertainty, this will present a challenge to them.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Qatar Central Bank's foreign exchange reserves rise by 3.60%
Qatar Central Bank's foreign exchange reserves rise by 3.60%

Qatar Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Qatar Central Bank's foreign exchange reserves rise by 3.60%

DOHA: Qatar Central Bank's (QCB) international reserves and foreign currency liquidity rose by 3.60 percent year-on-year in May, reaching R 258.135 billion, compared to QR249.165 billion in the same period last year. Figures released by the Qatar Central Bank showed that its official international reserves rose by 4.57 percent, or QR8.706 billion, to QR198.912 billion at the end of May, compared to the same period in 2024. Meanwhile, the central bank's holdings of foreign bonds and treasury bills declined by approximately QR6.044 billion, to QR132.904 billion in May, compared to the same month of the previous year. Official reserves consist of the following main components: foreign treasury bonds and bills, cash balances held in foreign banks, gold holdings, special drawing rights deposits, and Qatar's share in the International Monetary Fund. In addition to official reserves, other liquid assets (foreign currency deposits) form what is known as total international reserves. In the same context, data showed that gold stocks rose by approximately QR16.012 billion to QR44.339 billion by the end of May 2024, compared to QR28.327 billion in May 2024. Qatar's Special Drawing Rights (SDR) deposits at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) also increased by QR67 million at the end of May, compared to May 2024, reaching QR5.253 billion. Separately, balances held with foreign banks declined by approximately QR1.328 billion, reaching QR16.416 billion by the end of May, compared to the same month in 2024.

The US has checked out. Can Europe stop Putin alone?
The US has checked out. Can Europe stop Putin alone?

Al Jazeera

time2 days ago

  • Al Jazeera

The US has checked out. Can Europe stop Putin alone?

The United States was once Ukraine's most important ally – supplying arms, funding and political cover as Kyiv fought for its sovereignty. But today, Washington is losing interest. President Donald Trump, more at home on the golf course than in a war room, is pulling away from a conflict he no longer seems to care to understand. Trump has not hidden his disdain. He has echoed Kremlin narratives, questioned NATO's relevance and reduced Ukraine's defence to a punchline. Even his recent comment that Russian President Vladimir Putin has 'gone absolutely crazy' does little to undo years of indulgence and indifference. He has not become a credible peace broker or a consistent supporter of Ukraine. His words now carry little weight – and Kyiv is paying the price. Just last week, Ukraine launched what it called Operation Spiderweb, a coordinated series of drone strikes deep inside Russian territory. Dozens of aircraft were destroyed at airfields, and key military infrastructure was disrupted. The White House swiftly denied any US involvement. Trump responded by again threatening to 'walk away' from the war. Shortly afterwards, a second round of peace talks in Istanbul collapsed. The only agreement reached was a sombre one: the exchange of the remains of 6,000 fallen soldiers. That may help bring closure to grieving families – but it has done nothing to alter the course of the war. Trump's belated proposal – relayed by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt – that he supports direct talks between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Putin sounded more like political theatre than diplomacy. The moment had already passed. It is Trump – not Zelenskyy – who now lacks leverage. And with the US pulling back from its traditional security leadership, the burden is shifting decisively to Europe. Despite the brutality of Russia's invasion in 2022, American officials have frequently treated Kyiv as the side to pressure and Moscow as the side to appease. European leaders pushed back – but mostly with words. They posted pledges of 'unwavering support' yet hesitated to take full ownership of Europe's defence. Now, as US military aid slows and Trump continues to distance himself from the war, Europe faces a historic reckoning. For the first time in nearly 80 years, the continent stands alone. The future of NATO – the alliance created after World War II to ensure collective defence – is in question. Ukraine's ability to resist Russian aggression increasingly depends on European guarantees. Can Europe meet the moment? Can a loose coalition of willing nations evolve into a durable security bloc? And can it do so without the US? As of early 2025, Ukraine was meeting roughly 40 percent of its own military needs, according to the Centre for Security and Cooperation in Kyiv. Europe provided 30 percent and the US the remaining 30 percent. To sustain the fight, Europe must now do more – quickly. The alternative would be disastrous. The Kiel Institute for the World Economy has estimated that if Russia were to occupy Ukraine, it could cost Germany alone 10 to 20 times more than maintaining current levels of support – due to refugee flows, energy instability, economic disruptions and defence risks. One of Ukraine's most urgent needs is ammunition – particularly artillery shells. Until recently, the US was the main supplier. As American deliveries decline, Ukraine is burning through its reserves. Europe is now scrambling to fill the gap. The problem is scale. Europe's arms industry has long been underdeveloped. It is only now beginning to respond. According to European Union Commissioner for Defence and Space Andrius Kubilius, the bloc aims to produce 2 million artillery shells annually by the end of 2025. This would just meet Ukraine's minimum battlefield requirements. A particularly ambitious initiative is a Czech-led plan to procure and deliver up to 1.8 million shells to Ukraine by the end of next year. Confirmed by Czech President Petr Pavel in May and backed by Canada, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark and other countries, the effort is one of the few on track to make a meaningful impact – if it arrives on time. Germany has also moved beyond donations. In late May, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius signed an agreement with his Ukrainian counterpart, Rustem Umerov, to cofinance the production of long-range weapons inside Ukraine, tapping into local industrial and engineering capacity. The United Kingdom remains one of Kyiv's most dependable allies. On Wednesday, London announced a new 350-million-pound ($476m) drone package – part of a broader 4.5-billion-pound ($6.1bn) support pledge. It includes 100,000 drones by 2026, a substantial increase on previous commitments. But war is not waged with weapons alone. Financial and economic power matter too. Trump recently told Fox News that US taxpayer money was being 'pissed away' in Ukraine. The remark was not only crude – it was also misleading. Since 2022, the US has provided about $128bn in aid to Ukraine, including $66.5bn in military assistance. Meanwhile, the EU and its member states have contributed about 135 billion euros ($155bn), including 50 billion euros ($57bn) in military support, 67 billion euros ($77bn) in financial and humanitarian aid, and 17 billion euros ($19.5bn) for refugee programmes. The UK has added another 12.8 billion pounds ($17.4 billion). These are not gifts. They are strategic investments – meant to prevent far higher costs if Russia succeeds in its imperial project. Europe has also led on sanctions. Since 2014 – and with renewed urgency since 2022 – it has imposed 17 successive rounds of measures targeting Russia's economy. None has ended the war, but each has taken a toll. On May 20, one day after a reportedly warm call between Trump and Putin, the EU and UK unveiled their most sweeping sanctions package yet. It included nearly 200 vessels from Russia's so-called shadow fleet, used to smuggle oil and circumvent global price caps. Some estimates, including AI-assisted modelling, suggest the sanctions could cost Russia $10bn to $20bn per year if loopholes are closed and enforcement holds. Even partial implementation would disrupt Moscow's wartime revenue. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas was clear: 'The longer Russia wages war, the tougher our response.' Europe is beginning to back that promise with action. From drones to shells, sanctions to weapons production, the continent is finally moving from statements to strategy – slowly but steadily building the foundations of Ukrainian resilience and Russian defeat. But this momentum cannot stall. This is no longer just Ukraine's war. The US has stepped aside. Europe is no longer the backup plan. It is the last line of defence. If it fails, so does Ukraine – and with it, the idea of a secure, sovereign Europe. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

Tesla shares fall as growing Trump-Musk spat rattles investors
Tesla shares fall as growing Trump-Musk spat rattles investors

Qatar Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Tesla shares fall as growing Trump-Musk spat rattles investors

Agencies New York Cracks in the relationship between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, his self-proclaimed 'First Buddy', are scaring Tesla shareholders as the two fired salvos at each other in increasingly heated rhetoric on Thursday. Shares fell more than 8 percent on Thursday on a day otherwise devoid of news for the electric automaker, as traders dumped the stock in heavy trading after Musk stepped up his criticism of the president's tax bill. Trump fired back, alleging Musk was upset because the bill takes away tax benefits for electric vehicle purchases, while investors feared their souring relationship could hurt Musk's sprawling business empire. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. 'He said the most beautiful things about me. And he hasn't said bad about me personally. That'll be next. But I'm very disappointed.' Musk, the world's richest man and a key figure in the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) cost-cutting plan for several months, has blasted the bill, after he decided to spend less time in the White House and instead focus on his companies. On his social media platform X, Musk has called on Congress members to kill the legislation, calling it a 'disgusting abomination'. 'It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team at great personal cost and risk,' Musk, the largest Republican donor in the 2024 election campaign, said on X on Tuesday. Musk's leadership of DOGE and his alignment with the Trump administration had put off some Tesla buyers. Sales of his EVs slumped in Europe, China and key US markets like California, even as overall electric vehicle purchases continue to grow. Musk has slowly started to separate himself from the White House in recent weeks, stung in part by the wave of protests against Tesla. 'Elon's politics continue to harm the stock. First he aligned himself with Trump which upset many potential Democratic buyers. Now he has turned on the Trump administration,' said Tesla shareholder Dennis Dick, chief strategist at Stock Trader Network. The ECB cut its deposit rate from 2.25 percent to 2 percent. Musk's other businesses, SpaceX and Starlink, dominate their respective markets, but have also come under scrutiny due to Musk's relationship with Trump. Those two businesses often serve as the default choice for commercial launches and satellite internet deployment, and foreign governments have increasingly looked to Starlink, with regulatory approvals smoothed by Musk's ties. Tesla shares are down 12 percent since May 27, roughly coinciding with his decision to pull back from Washington activities. Losses accelerated on Thursday as 100 million shares changed hands, roughly the daily volume over the last 100 days. The stock has been on a roller-coaster ever since Musk endorsed Trump in mid-July 2024 in his re-election bid, gaining 169% from that point through mid-December. That was followed by a 54 percent slide through early April as a 'Tesla Takedown' protest intensified. The House of Representatives version of the budget bill proposes largely ending the popular $7,500 EV subsidy by the end of 2025. Tesla and other automakers have relied on incentives for years to drum up demand, but Trump promised during the transition to end the subsidy. Tesla could face a $1.2 billion hit to its annual profit, along with an additional $2 billion setback to regulatory credit sales due to separate Senate legislation targeting California's EV sales mandates, according to JP Morgan analysts. 'The budget bill contains bad stuff for Tesla with the end of the EV credits, and just generally his falling out with Trump has risks for Tesla and Elon's other companies,' said Jed Ellerbroek, portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management. Musk's public attacks have upset potential Republican Tesla buyers as well, Dennis Dick said. One White House official on Wednesday called the Tesla CEO's moves 'infuriating.' The billionaire joined Senate Republican deficit hawks this week to argue that the House bill does not go far enough in reducing spending. Overall, Tesla shares are down 22 percent this year, including Thursday's losses. But the company is still the most valuable automaker worldwide by a long shot - carrying a market value of $1 trillion, way above Toyota Motor's nearly $290 billion. Tesla trades at 140.21 times profit estimates, a steep premium to other Big Tech stocks such as Nvidia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store