Tesla shares fall as growing Trump-Musk spat rattles investors
Agencies
New York
Cracks in the relationship between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, his self-proclaimed 'First Buddy', are scaring Tesla shareholders as the two fired salvos at each other in increasingly heated rhetoric on Thursday.
Shares fell more than 8 percent on Thursday on a day otherwise devoid of news for the electric automaker, as traders dumped the stock in heavy trading after Musk stepped up his criticism of the president's tax bill.
Trump fired back, alleging Musk was upset because the bill takes away tax benefits for electric vehicle purchases, while investors feared their souring relationship could hurt Musk's sprawling business empire.
'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. 'He said the most beautiful things about me. And he hasn't said bad about me personally. That'll be next. But I'm very disappointed.'
Musk, the world's richest man and a key figure in the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) cost-cutting plan for several months, has blasted the bill, after he decided to spend less time in the White House and instead focus on his companies.
On his social media platform X, Musk has called on Congress members to kill the legislation, calling it a 'disgusting abomination'.
'It more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team at great personal cost and risk,' Musk, the largest Republican donor in the 2024 election campaign, said on X on Tuesday.
Musk's leadership of DOGE and his alignment with the Trump administration had put off some Tesla buyers. Sales of his EVs slumped in Europe, China and key US markets like California, even as overall electric vehicle purchases continue to grow.
Musk has slowly started to separate himself from the White House in recent weeks, stung in part by the wave of protests against Tesla.
'Elon's politics continue to harm the stock. First he aligned himself with Trump which upset many potential Democratic buyers. Now he has turned on the Trump administration,' said Tesla shareholder Dennis Dick, chief strategist at Stock Trader Network.
The ECB cut its deposit rate from 2.25 percent to 2 percent.
Musk's other businesses, SpaceX and Starlink, dominate their respective markets, but have also come under scrutiny due to Musk's relationship with Trump.
Those two businesses often serve as the default choice for commercial launches and satellite internet deployment, and foreign governments have increasingly looked to Starlink, with regulatory approvals smoothed by Musk's ties.
Tesla shares are down 12 percent since May 27, roughly coinciding with his decision to pull back from Washington activities. Losses accelerated on Thursday as 100 million shares changed hands, roughly the daily volume over the last 100 days.
The stock has been on a roller-coaster ever since Musk endorsed Trump in mid-July 2024 in his re-election bid, gaining 169% from that point through mid-December. That was followed by a 54 percent slide through early April as a 'Tesla Takedown' protest intensified.
The House of Representatives version of the budget bill proposes largely ending the popular $7,500 EV subsidy by the end of 2025. Tesla and other automakers have relied on incentives for years to drum up demand, but Trump promised during the transition to end the subsidy.
Tesla could face a $1.2 billion hit to its annual profit, along with an additional $2 billion setback to regulatory credit sales due to separate Senate legislation targeting California's EV sales mandates, according to JP Morgan analysts.
'The budget bill contains bad stuff for Tesla with the end of the EV credits, and just generally his falling out with Trump has risks for Tesla and Elon's other companies,' said Jed Ellerbroek, portfolio manager at Argent Capital Management.
Musk's public attacks have upset potential Republican Tesla buyers as well, Dennis Dick said. One White House official on Wednesday called the Tesla CEO's moves 'infuriating.'
The billionaire joined Senate Republican deficit hawks this week to argue that the House bill does not go far enough in reducing spending.
Overall, Tesla shares are down 22 percent this year, including Thursday's losses. But the company is still the most valuable automaker worldwide by a long shot - carrying a market value of $1 trillion, way above Toyota Motor's nearly $290 billion.
Tesla trades at 140.21 times profit estimates, a steep premium to other Big Tech stocks such as Nvidia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to sensitive Social Security data
The United States Supreme Court has sided with the administration of President Donald Trump in two cases about government records — and who should have access to them. On Friday, the six-member conservative majority overturned a lower court's ruling that limited the kinds of data that Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) could access through the Social Security Administration (SSA). In a separate case, the majority also decided that DOGE was not required to turn over records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), a government transparency law. In both cases, the Supreme Court's three left-leaning justices — Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan — opposed the majority's decision. DOGE has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign to reimagine the federal government and cut down on bureaucratic 'bloat'. Unveiled on November 13, just eight days after Trump's re-election, DOGE was designed to 'dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies'. At first, it was unclear how DOGE would interact with the executive branch: whether it would be an advisory panel, a new department or a nongovernmental entity. But on January 20, when Trump was sworn in for his second term, he announced that the existing US Digital Service — a technology initiative founded by former President Barack Obama — would be reorganised to create DOGE. The government efficiency panel has since led a wide-scale overhaul of the federal government, implementing mass layoffs and seeking to shutter entities like the US Agency for International Development (USAID). It also advertised cost-savings it had achieved or alleged fraud it had uncovered, though many of those claims have been contradicted or questioned by journalists and experts. In addition, DOGE's sweeping changes to the federal government made it the subject of criticism and concern, particularly as it sought greater access to sensitive data and systems. Up until last week, DOGE was led by Elon Musk, a billionaire and tech entrepreneur who had been a prominent backer of Trump's re-election bid. Musk and Trump, however, have had a public rupture following the end of the billionaire's tenure as a 'special government employee' in the White House. That falling-out has left DOGE's future uncertain. One of DOGE's controversial initiatives has been its push to access Social Security data, in the name of rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. Early in Trump's second term, both the president and Musk repeated misleading claims that Social Security payments were being made to millions of people listed as 150 years old or older. But fact-checkers quickly refuted that allegation. Instead, they pointed out that the Social Security Administration has implemented a code to automatically stop payments to anyone listed as alive and more than 115 years old. They also pointed out that the COBOL programming language flags incomplete entries in the Social Security system with birthdates set back 150 years, possibly prompting the Trump administration's confusion. Less than 1 percent of Social Security payments are made erroneously, according to a 2024 inspector general report. Still, Trump officials criticised the Social Security Administration, with Musk dubbing it 'the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time' and calling for its elimination. In March, US District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander blocked DOGE from having unfettered access to Social Security data, citing the sensitive nature of such information. Social Security numbers, for instance, are key to verifying a person's identity in the US, and the release of such numbers could endanger individual privacy. Lipton Hollander ruled that DOGE had 'never identified or articulated even a single reason for which the DOGE Team needs unlimited access to SSA's entire record systems'. She questioned why DOGE had not sought a 'more tailored' approach. 'Instead, the government simply repeats its incantation of a need to modernize the system and uncover fraud,' she wrote in her ruling. 'Its method of doing so is tantamount to hitting a fly with a sledgehammer.' The judge's ruling, however, did allow DOGE to view anonymised data, without personally identifying information. The Trump administration, nevertheless, appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that Judge Lipton Hollander had exceeded her authority in blocking DOGE's access. The Supreme Court granted its emergency petition on Friday, lifting Lipton Hollander's temporary restrictions on the data in an unsigned decision. But Justice Brown Jackson issued a blistering dissent (PDF), suggesting that the Supreme Court was willing to break norms to assist a presidency that was unwilling to let legal challenges play out in lower courts. 'Once again, this Court dons its emergency-responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them,' Brown Jackson wrote. She argued that the Trump administration had not established that any 'irreparable harm' would occur if DOGE were temporarily blocked from accessing Social Security data. But by granting the Trump administration's emergency petition, she said the court was 'jettisoning careful judicial decision-making and creating grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in the process'. The second Supreme Court decision on Friday concerned whether DOGE itself had to surrender documents under federal transparency laws. The question was raised as part of a lawsuit brought by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a government watchdog group. It argued that DOGE's sweeping powers suggested it should be subject to laws like FOIA, just like any other executive agency. But CREW also alleged that the ambiguity surrounding DOGE's structures had kept it insulated from outside probes. 'While publicly available information indicates that DOGE is subject to FOIA, the lack of clarity on DOGE's authority leaves that an open question,' CREW said in a statement. The watchdog group sought to compel DOGE to provide information about its inner workings. While a US district judge had sided with CREW's request for records in April, the Supreme Court on Friday paused that lower court's decision (PDF). It sent the case back to a court of appeals for further consideration, with instructions that the April order be narrowed. 'Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity's ability to persuade,' the Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled. It also said that the courts needed to exercise 'deference and restraint' regarding 'internal' executive communications.
Al Jazeera
19 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What has Musk accused Trump of in relation to the Epstein files?
The tech billionaire and owner of Tesla and Starlink, Elon Musk, has accused United States President Donald Trump of being one of the names in the still-sealed Epstein files, and claims that this is the real reason key documents are still being withheld from the public. In January 2024, many of the so-called 'Epstein files' compiled by US federal investigators were released to the public. However, some remained sealed. Trump's presidency began with a strong boost from Musk, who donated large sums to Trump's presidential campaign and was appointed to lead a newly formed federal agency aimed at streamlining government operations, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But that relationship fractured after Musk resigned from the role in May 2025, following mounting public backlash over fiscal policies and a sharp decline in Tesla's stock. Since then, Musk has become increasingly vocal in his criticism of Trump, calling his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt and eliminating electric vehicle subsidies, and, now, accusing him of links to Epstein. Here's what we know about the Epstein files and Musk's accusations. The 'Epstein files' are a collection of documents compiled by US federal authorities during investigations into the activities of Jeffrey Epstein, the now-deceased financier and convicted sex offender. These files include flight logs, contact lists, court records and other materials documenting his activities and associations with high-profile individuals. The first major release of the documents took place in January 2024, when a federal judge ordered the unsealing of records from a 2015 defamation lawsuit against Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. In February 2025, the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) followed up with an official declassification of additional documents, many of which had already leaked, featuring redacted flight logs and contact books. However, many documents remain sealed or heavily redacted, prompting public calls for full disclosure. US Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated that the FBI is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, with further releases pending necessary redactions to protect victims and ongoing investigations. On Thursday, Musk publicly accused President Donald Trump of being named in the unreleased Epstein files. In a post on his social media platform X, Musk wrote: '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He did not provide any evidence to support this has not directly addressed Musk's claim regarding the Epstein files. However, during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House on Thursday, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Musk's criticism of the fiscal bill and suggested that Musk's opposition was down to the elimination of electric vehicle subsidies. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday. Trump also threatened to terminate federal contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies, including Tesla and SpaceX, stating that this would save the US government billions of dollars. Trump and Epstein were acquaintances in the 1980s and 1990s, often seen at social occasions together in New York and Palm Beach, Florida. Their appearances together were documented in news coverage and social pages at the time, while US media reported the two became close during the 1990s when Epstein bought a mansion near Trump's Mar-a-Lago compound in Palm Beach. A 1992 video published by NBC News shows Trump and Epstein socialising and watching dancers at a party hosted at Mar-a-Lago. In a 2002 profile of Epstein by New York Magazine, Trump was quoted describing Epstein as a 'terrific guy' who enjoyed the company of beautiful women 'on the younger side'. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump said. Flight logs released during court proceedings against Maxwell show that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet at least seven times between 1993 and 1997, occasionally with family members. Epstein's 'Black Book' – a contact directory obtained in 2015 by Gawker, a now-defunct US blog that covered celebrities and media – was later submitted as court evidence and listed multiple phone numbers and addresses for Trump, including his office, home and Mar-a-Lago. Once allies, Musk's relationship with Trump has deteriorated significantly since his criticism of Trump's fiscal policy and subsequent allegations about the Epstein files. Trump's threats to cut federal contracts with Musk's companies led to a 14 percent drop in Tesla's stock value. Musk has since called for Trump's impeachment and replacement with US Vice President JD Vance. This public spat has also drawn attention from political figures, with some Democrats demanding the release of the full Epstein files and questioning whether they are being withheld due to potential implications for Trump.
Al Jazeera
20 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The magician-in-chief: How Trump makes us miss the real story
Donald Trump is the magician-in-chief. Trump understands better, I reckon, than any US president since Ronald Reagan how to bend and manipulate the squirrel-like attention spans of much of the new and 'legacy' media to his will and advantage. Reagan and his adept advisers relied almost exclusively on choreographing flattering set pieces for television to drive his retrograde plans and stick-handle around a prickly scandal or two. Trump, having established his ubiquitous star via 'reality TV' and countless appearances on ephemeral 'chat' shows, knows full well the ways and means to inculcate himself into the American consciousness courtesy of the 'boob tube'. Still, Trump has skillfully used social media – now mostly Truth Social – to hone his trademark trick: Misdirection. Like any seasoned illusionist, he appreciates how to draw the public's eye and ear away from what demands scrutiny. His aim is twofold: To advance his revolutionary agenda and to obscure the damage that agenda inflicts. When, in early 2020, a new, lethal virus emerged and spread rapidly as the death toll mounted, Trump dismissed the COVID-19 threat, peddled unproven cures such as hydroxychloroquine, and even suggested injecting disinfectant as a possible remedy. Trump's bizarre provocations were deliberate and meant, in large measure, to delay and deflect thorough review of his administration's slow, chaotic response. Trump grasps that in the digital age, outrage is oxygen. By provoking conflict and controversy at a relentless pace, he controls the focus and tempo of public discourse. Armed with a cellphone – likely embossed with the presidential seal – and a glint of inspiration, Trump can instantly shape or reshape the dominant 'news' narrative. He does this by flashing shiny, fleeting baubles that further his parochial interests, while more consequential matters drift by like a passing cloud, unnoticed – leaving the hard, complex stuff to fade into neglect. Trump is the human equivalent of a 24/7 cable news outlet pumping out intriguing content that the real cable news channels are happily addicted to – admitted or not. So, in the disconcerting face of the sudden, caustic split with Elon Musk and a festering revolt in the Senate over his signature 'big, beautiful' budget, Trump pulled out of his top hat a fantastical 'channel-changer' that provoked awe and disbelief. According to NBC News, the president of the United States 'reposted a baseless claim on Truth Social that former President Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced with clones or robots'. Given that the president of the United States shared the 'conspiracy theory' with his 10 million followers, and, by extension, the rest of us, an NBC correspondent was required to contact the White House to determine the following: First, whether America's head of state 'believed' that Biden was executed in 2020. Second, why did America's head of state amplify a post claiming an executed Biden had been replaced by a clone? Let me help NBC News and the dozens of reporters who were compelled to ask the White House the same absurd questions in the pursuit of 'clarity'. Despite his, ah, bluster and eccentricities, I can confidently suggest that Trump does not 'believe' that Biden was executed in 2020. Trump trumpeted this nonsense to get NBC News and other scribes fixated on the latest shiny bauble instead of exploring how his 'big, beautiful' bill will strip millions of Americans of their health insurance and dilate the US deficit. To dismiss Trump's expert ability to train the world's gaze where he wants it as a 'distraction' is, I think, too easy and simplistic since, by now, we ought to have become wise to the ruse. What Trump wields is far more practised and pernicious. He doesn't just distract – he rewrites the story in real time, making the serious seem trivial, and the trivial seem epochal. Oh, and he figured out long ago that most political observers are far more captivated by personality than policy. Trump also recognises that the presidency isn't only about power. It's about stagecraft. He is not preoccupied by nuance or accountability. He revels in spectacle. And the spectacle always wins out. As such, Trump continues to beguile and enthral with his studied performances grounded, as they are, in the gravitational pull and intoxicating prestige of occupying the Oval Office. The Beltway press is conditioned to look where the president points – again and again. On reliable cue, Trump announced, by presidential decree, that the White House counsel and attorney general would probe allegations that Biden's aides may have 'covered up' his 'cognitive decline' and used an autopen to sign off on major policies without his knowledge or consent. For his agitated part, Biden issued a statement on Thursday calling Trump's calculated gambit a 'distraction', while insisting that he made the 'decisions during my presidency'. The 'investigation' comes on the convenient heels of a book, co-authored by CNN host Jake Tapper, detailing Biden's alleged waning mental acuity while in office. The book's detractors have accused Tapper of revising the record as a sop to right-wing personalities since, they insist, he and CNN previously poo-pooed reports of Biden's faltering mind and body. Meanwhile, the manufactured brouhaha and deepening, vitriolic rupture of the Trump-Musk bromance, have reduced the resurrection of Trump's racially tinged travel ban to an afterthought. Once the subject of fierce legal and moral opposition, it has returned with barely a whisper of resistance – another example of how Trump's theatrics serve to smother the dangerous intent beneath the enticing din. What to do? A responsible newsroom must avoid as best it can serving as marionettes to Trump's cynical schemes. That translates into ignoring the impulse to treat every incendiary outburst, insult, or incitement as urgent or newsworthy. Editors and producers should ask: Whose interests are being served by this coverage? If the answer is Trump's, pause or take a refreshing pass. Journalists should redirect the lens towards substance, not stunts. That involves patience and the discipline to pose another important question: What is being hidden behind the colourful camouflage? The antidote to manipulation is not detachment – it's sharp, vigilant coverage of the profound, human consequences of the president's actions, not his antics. In its exhausting dance with Donald Trump, the fourth estate can and must stop mistaking the fireworks for the fire. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
