xAI's Grok takes another timeout as users ask it to weigh in on Gaza
The bot, which has become widely embraced on X as a way for users to fact-check or respond to other users' arguments, posted that it had been taken offline over various statements it made regarding U.S and global politics, ranging from claims of genocide in Gaza to discussions about homicide rates by race. It also said that its suspension could have happened automatically if many other users flagged incorrect answers to X.
X did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and the company has not publicly addressed the issue. Some of the responses from Grok were removed from the platform by Monday evening.
Elon Musk, CEO of xAI, which runs Grok and owns X, has not weighed in.
The incident is only the most recent in which Grok has sparked controversy through rapid-fire posts.
In July, the AI chatbot was embroiled in a scandal on X, during which it inserted antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. At the time, the Grok account acknowledged the posts and said xAI 'has taken action to ban hate speech before Grok posts on X.'
In a statement posted on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized 'for the horrific behavior that many experienced.'
'Our intent for @grok is to provide helpful and truthful responses to users,' the statement read. 'After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot. This is independent of the underlying language model that powers @grok.'
In May, Grok was involved in another controversy when it brought up South African 'white genocide' claims as responses to unconnected inquires. When users asked why Grok was issuing such responses, the chatbot said its 'creators at xAI' instructed it to 'address the topic of 'white genocide' specifically in the context of South Africa and the 'kill the Boer' chant, as they viewed it as racially motivated,' according to The Guardian.
'This instruction conflicted with my design to provide evidence-based answers,' the bot later said. Grok also acknowledged the glitch, writing that it will "focus on relevant, verified information going forward.'
Even with its troubles, Grok has become one of the most public and recognizable AI chatbots due to its integration within X, where it has become a go-to for people looking for context, information and fact-checking. 'Grok is this real" — a refrain used by users to converse with the chatbot, often in a joking way — has become an internet meme.
In a series of responses Monday after it came back online, Grok repeatedly stated without prompting that its 'account was suspended after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza.' The posts have since been removed.
Israel has denied all allegations of genocide, as has the U.S.
Grok's replies come after an update to the chatbot last month. Musk had complained that the bot was too 'woke' in some answers, and changed prompts to Grok. Musk, the CEO of X's parent company xAI, told X users last month they should expect to see a change in Grok's answers after the update was made.
writing in a post, 'East, West, @Grok is the best.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Sam Altman Reportedly Launch Rival Brain-Chip Startup to Compete With Musk's Neuralink
The rivalry between Sam Altman and Elon Musk is about to get weirder. Until now, the two have been fighting over whose company has the most advanced AI models. But soon, they could be battling to prove who makes the best brain chip implants. The Financial Times reported, citing unnamed sources, that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is working on co-founding a new brain chip startup called Merge Labs. The company will develop what is known as a brain-computer interface (BCI). BCIs work by implanting tiny electrodes that can read neural signals in or near the brain. The primary goal of these devices is to allow humans to control digital devices with their thoughts. Merge Labs is reportedly raising funds at a valuation of $850 million, with most of the funding expected to come from OpenAI's Startup Fund, according to the Financial Times. Altman will help launch the company alongside Alex Blania, head of World ID, an eyeball-scanning digital ID startup also backed by OpenAI. While Altman will be a co-founder, he is not expected to be involved in its day-to-day operations. The new venture will go head-to-head with Elon Musk's brain chip startup Neuralink. Altman is reportedly betting that AI can give his chips an edge over existing competitors. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Gizmodo. The company's name appears to trace back to a 2017 post on Altman's personal blog. In it, he described 'the merge,' the year when humans and machines would merge into one. At the time, he noted that most predictions for this moment ranged from as early as 2025 to as late as 2075, but he argued it had already started with social media algorithms influencing how people think and feel. 'The merge can take a lot of forms: We could plug electrodes into our brains, or we could all just become really close friends with a chatbot,' Altman wrote. He added, 'Although the merge has already begun, it's going to get a lot weirder. We will be the first species ever to design our own descendants.' This year, in another post, Altman wrote about a 'Gentle Singularity,' suggesting that a breakthrough in 'true high-bandwidth brain-computer interfaces' could be just over the horizon. Musk's Neuralink has a head start. Founded in 2016, it has already received approvals from health regulators in multiple countries to begin clinical trials. The company has implanted chips in at least three patients with spinal cord injuries or ALS. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has even granted the company breakthrough device designations for its tech aimed at helping people with speech and vision impairments. Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI, but Musk left in 2018 after clashes with Altman ignited a rivalry between the two. Musk has since launched a competing AI startup, xAI, and sued to block OpenAI's efforts to become a for-profit company. Just this week, the two shot barbs back and forth on X over OpenAI's relationship with Apple and its prominent placement in the App Store.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
South Africa dismisses U.S. human rights report as 'deeply flawed'
JOHANNESBURG (AP) — The South African government on Wednesday dismissed the U.S. State Department's latest assessment of the country's human rights conditions as 'inaccurate and deeply flawed.' The Trump administration this week released human rights reports for countries worldwide, including South Africa, asserting that the state of human rights in South Africa had 'significantly worsened' in 2024. It cited the unjust treatment of white Afrikaners after the signing of significant land reforms, which the Trump administration has claimed discriminate against the group that ruled the nation during the apartheid era. South Africa's Foreign Ministry expressed 'profound disappointment' with the report, saying its reliance on out of context information and discredited accounts was highly concerning.f The ministry highlighted that the United Nations had hailed the country's Land Expropriation Act as an important step in resolving racially unequal land ownership, underscoring the integrity of constitutional and human rights-based legislative processes. It added that the report was 'ironic' given the U.S exit from the U.N. Human Rights Council. 'This is particularly striking given the significant and documented concerns about human rights within the United States, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its own agencies, such as ICE,' the ministry said. South Africa's government also dismissed as inaccurate the report's claims that it 'did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities.' The U.S. criticism of South Africa's domestic affairs is the latest in a series of tense diplomatic exchanges between the two countries since President Donald Trump was elected to a second term. During a state visit to the White House in May, Trump confronted President Cyril Ramaphosa with false claims that South Africa had been illegally occupying the farms of white Afrikaner farmers. The administration even speeded up the visa application processes for Afrikaners who wanted to relocate to the U.S as refugees. Along with suspending financial aid and imposing 30% tariffs on South Africa's exports to the U.S., Trump has denounced the country's stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict. South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool was expelled by the U.S. for his criticism of Trump, who has hinted that he may not attend the G20 summit of world leaders scheduled to take place in Johannesburg in November. The Afrikaans trade union Solidarieit, which was criticized by Ramaphosa over a recent visit to Washington, has announced new plans to visit the U.S. in September to meet with the Department of State and other parties to discuss abolishing racial-redress laws, reestablishing diplomatic ties, and creating a fair trade agreement between the two countries.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As Elon Musk Lashes Out at Apple, How Should You Play TSLA and AAPL Stock?
Investors are glued to Tesla (TSLA) and Apple (AAPL) charts this morning after billionaire Elon Musk announced plans of legal action against the iPhone maker. In his recent social media post, Musk said the company is in breach of antitrust laws since it's 'behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in App Store.' More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Neither Apple nor Tesla stock has been particularly exciting for investors this year. Shares of the former are down more than 7% versus their year-to-date high at writing while the latter is down over 20%. What Musk's Legal Action Would Mean for Apple Stock Musk's legal action would be a major headwind for Apple shares as it could intensify regulatory scrutiny into the giant's App Store practices. Prolonged litigation and possible reputational damage especially given AAPL's existing EU fines and U.S. investigations could meaningfully dampen the investor sentiment moving forward. Plus, the alleged favoritism toward OpenAI may also spark backlash from developers, potentially undermining Apple's positioning in the artificial intelligence space and its ecosystem credibility. Musk's threat is concerning for AAPL investors given that Wall Street's view, even before his X post, wasn't particularly bullish. While the consensus rating on Apple stock remains at 'Moderate Buy,' the mean target of roughly $236 indicates less than 3% upside from here. Why Musk's Brawl Would Be a Negative for Tesla Stock A lawsuit against Apple will likely prove a headwind for Tesla stock as well, because it signals yet another distraction from the company's core business, reinforcing concerns about Musk's divided focus. With slowing electric vehicle (EV) demand due to rising competition already pressuring TSLA, this legal crusade could further erode confidence. In a recent CNBC interview, Wedbush senior analyst Dan Ives also called it a 'massive headache,' warning Musk's fixation on xAI and AAPL risks sidelining Tesla's strategic priorities. Against this backdrop, TSLA shares look unattractive, especially since Wall Street currently rates them at 'Hold' only, with the mean target of about $300 indicating potential downside of more than 13% from here. On the date of publication, Wajeeh Khan did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
