Housing affordability is a major problem. Elizabeth Warren is helping lead a sweeping bipartisan effort to address it.
'This is a moment to say enough with being shocked about the rising price of housing, let's actually do something it,' Warren told The Boston Globe about the legislation, whose shorthand tile is the ROAD to Housing Act. 'That's what this bill is all about.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
One of Warren's contributions to the bill is an innovation fund of $1 billion over five years to provide competitive grants to build infrastructure, such as new schools and other uses, to communities that are constructing more housing or changing their land-use rules to make it easier to do.
A much larger innovation fund — $10 billion — was a pillar of
Advertisement
There is no cost estimate yet for the Senate Banking Committee's bipartisan legislation, but its goals are more modest. Still, it's an effort that's desperately needed as housing construction has failed to keep up with demand, causing homes to become more and more unaffordable.
'We have a real problem here in Massachusetts that we simply don't have enough housing,' Warren said, noting that the state is about 200,000 units short of what's needed. 'The federal government has stood on the sidelines for decades while the supply has gotten tighter relative to growth in population. And now is the time to step up and use the tools that are available only at the federal level to start pushing for more housing growth.'
'Not every idea works in every place,' Warren said. 'But creating a menu of ideas so that different cities can pick out the pieces that will permit them to reduce the cost of building is one way that we can get more housing built in America — and we need it.'
Advertisement
During last year's campaign,
'Housing affordability is a major concern for millions of Americans, and there seems to be a bipartisan appetite, particularly around . . . the need for more affordable housing supply, that Congress wants to be responsive to,' said Dennis C. Shea, chair of the J. Ronald Terwilliger Center for Housing Policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center think tank. 'It seems like housing is having its moment in Congress.'
The bill's expected strong support in the Senate Banking Committee stems from every member of the panel contributing to it.
'This is a collaborative effort that includes the work of my colleagues across the committee, and I look forward to advancing these solutions to the full Senate,' Scott said in a statement Friday announcing the legislation along with Warren.
Advertisement
He took over as chair in January and has made addressing the housing affordability crisis a top priority. That dovetails with a major goal of Warren, who became the panel's top Democrat this year. Scott, who is close to Trump, also could be key in getting the administration's support, Warren said.
'We've got a ways to go before we can get this to the president's desk, but Senator Scott is strongly motivated to get a bill passed,' she said. 'Not to get a bill that we can just talk about, but to actually get something done.'
A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Warren hopes a strong bipartisan vote from the committee Tuesday will give the legislation momentum.
The legislation has the backing of 37 housing organizations, a diverse collection that includes the National Association of Realtors, the National Low Income Housing Coalition, and the National Association of Homebuilders.
'Addressing this crisis demands bold, bipartisan action,' the organizations said in a joint statement of support for the legislation. 'We look forward to its consideration by the full Senate, and hope this momentum continues in the House.'
'If we don't start building more housing here in Massachusetts and all across the country, the housing crisis will continue to intensify,' she said. 'This is a supply problem . . . and it's got a lot of root causes, but that means it takes a lot of pieces to help unlock faster, less-expensive housing construction.'
Advertisement
Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump fired America's economic data collector. History shows the perils.
There is the case of China, where earlier this century local authorities manipulated data to hit growth targets mandated by Beijing, forcing analysts and policymakers to turn to alternative measures to gauge the state of the country's economy. Advertisement Perhaps most famously, there is the case of Argentina, which in the 2000s and 2010s systematically understated inflation figures to such a degree that the international community eventually stopped relying on the government's data. That loss of faith drove up the country's borrowing costs, worsening a debt crisis that ultimately led to it defaulting on its international obligations. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It is too soon to know whether the United States is on a similar path. But economists and other experts said that Trump's decision Friday to fire Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was a troubling step in that direction. Janet Yellen, the former Treasury secretary and chair of the Federal Reserve, said the firing was not what is expected from the most advanced economy in the world. Advertisement 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic,' Yellen said. Essential data The Bureau of Labor Statistics is officially part of the Labor Department, whose secretary is a member of the president's Cabinet. But the agency operates independently, producing detailed, nonpartisan data on employment, prices, wages and other topics. Economists say that reliable, independently produced statistics are critical to good decision making in both the public and private sector. Officials at the Federal Reserve rely on government-collected data on inflation and unemployment to decide how to set interest rates, which affect how much Americans must pay to get a mortgage or a car loan. 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector,' Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, said at a recent news conference. 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years,' he added, 'and we really need to continue that in my view.' Experts on government statistics say data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other agencies is unlikely to deteriorate dramatically overnight. The acting commissioner named to replace McEntarfer on a temporary basis, William J. Wiatrowski, is a longtime employee of the agency who is widely respected by experts inside and outside government. The career employees who collect and analyze the data remain in place, using the same methods and procedures they used before McEntarfer was pushed out. But experts who just days ago were defending the integrity of the statistical agencies now find themselves asking uncomfortable questions about the trajectory of economic data in the United States. Advertisement 'If the poverty numbers come in and look great, is the director of the Census going to get a raise?' said Amy O'Hara, a former Census Bureau official who is now a professor at Georgetown University. 'If the household income numbers don't look great what happens then? What about GDP? What about CPI?' Andreas Georgiou knows the challenges of standing up to such political pressure. After he took over Greece's statistical agency in 2010, he found that the country has been severely understating its budget deficits. Those findings ran afoul of Greek authorities, who spent years trying to prosecute him on a variety of charges related to his work, despite independent reviews that supported his conclusions. (He fared better, though, than Olimpiy Kvitkin, a Soviet census official who was arrested and executed when his population count came in lower than Josef Stalin had announced.) Georgiou refused to bend. Reliable statistics are important for policymaking, he said. But they are also essential to democracy. 'Official statistics, government statistics are a mirror that society holds up to itself,' he said. If that mirror is distorted, or broken entirely, then the accountability that is central to a democratic system cannot work. 'If society cannot see itself clearly, then it cannot identify its problems,' he said. 'If it cannot identify its problems, then it cannot find the right solutions. It cannot find the right persons to solve these problems.' Data integrity at risk Trump said he fired McEntarfer because the numbers produced by her agency were 'rigged' to hurt him politically. Experts on the government statistics, including former commissioners in both Democratic and Republican administrations, have called foul on that accusation. The commissioner, who is the bureau's sole political appointee, does not control the numbers that the agency publishes, or even see them until they have been finalized by a staff of career technocrats whose careers typically span multiple presidential administrations. Advertisement Erica Groshen, who led the bureau under President Barack Obama, recalled getting resistance from the agency's staff when she tried to liven up the language of the monthly jobs reports. The bureau's staff insisted that the agency's job wasn't to say whether the glass was half-full or half-empty, only to report that, 'It is an eight-ounce container with four ounces of liquid.' Groshen relented. That is not to say political interference would be impossible. Government statistics rely on hundreds of methodological decisions, many of them judgment calls with no obviously correct answer. A sufficiently sophisticated agency head might, over time, be able to nudge the data in a politically advantageous direction, without any single decision being so egregious that it led to a mass resignation of career employees. 'I could imagine a new commissioner coming in and trying to make changes to those methods and procedures that try to move those numbers one way or the other,' said Katharine G. Abraham, who led the bureau during the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. 'They would have to know a lot in terms of where to put the finger on the scale.' Private alternatives There are also blunter approaches. In Argentina in 2007, the government of then-President Néstor Kirchner pushed out the mathematician in charge of the country's consumer price data, then released an inflation figure that was dramatically lower than the one the mathematician had calculated. The public wasn't fooled. Nor were international bond investors, who ultimately turned to alternative sources of inflation data, calculated by researchers outside the government. Advertisement But such alternative sources are inherently limited, said Alberto Cavallo, a Harvard University economist who developed one of the most widely used private inflation indexes in Argentina. 'Private alternatives can complement official statistics, but they are not a substitute,' Cavallo wrote in an email. 'Government agencies have the resources and scale to conduct nationwide surveys -- something no private initiative can fully replicate.' Recently, Cavallo has been publishing data on consumer prices in the United States, which has shown the impact of Trump's tariffs more quickly than the government's data. But while such real-time sources are valuable, they don't carry the 'institutional credibility' of government data. The trouble is that once that credibility is eroded, it is hard to repair -- particularly at a time when partisans on both sides of the political aisle are skeptical of numbers put out by members of the opposing party. Nancy Potok, a former Census official who served as chief statistician of the United States during the first Trump administration, said that in the past there had been strong bipartisan support for the statistical system in Congress and the business community. But partisanship seems to have eroded that support at a moment when a combination of political pressures and long-standing budget challenges are making it most necessary. 'There were some people who really understood the value of the economic data, and now that's not the conversation and those champions aren't there that were there in the past,' she said. 'There's no one leading the charge to make these kind of investments.' This article originally appeared in Advertisement
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Oklahoma Governor Details Steps to Secure State Against CCP Influence
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt said China has been trying to exert influence at the state level across the United States, which he has rejected while also creating his own international strategy to avoid reliance on China-made imports. 'They're going to the states now because Congress is so dysfunctional. It's so political. It's so partisan that they're literally coming directly to the states,' Stitt said in an interview with ' American Thought Leaders ' that aired on Aug. 1.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey has blunt words on Medicare, Medicaid
As Americans prepare for retirement, they often weigh a variety of financial factors - ranging from Social Security benefits to income sources such as 401(k) plans and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). One crucial area that deserves attention is health care planning. For many, this means navigating the complex systems of Medicare and Medicaid. In an effort to make these topics more approachable, personal finance expert Dave Ramsey offers guidance that breaks down the basics of Medicare and Medicaid, helping individuals build a solid understanding of how these programs work. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Ramsey acknowledges that the details around Medicare and Medicaid are complicated. "Have you seen that meme with the lady's face covered in math equations looking confused?" he asked. "We're willing to bet that might sum up how you feel right now - because that's how pretty much everyone feels after looking into Medicare." "But it's not hopeless," Ramsey added. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare Understanding Medicare is essential for anyone approaching retirement, Ramsey emphasizes. Medicare is a federal health insurance program for people 65 and older, or younger individuals with certain disabilities or diseases. It's divided into several parts: Medicare Part A covers hospital Part B covers medical C (Medicare Advantage) combines A, B, and often D through private Part D covers prescription drugs. Parts A and B together form Original Medicare, which offers more flexibility. Many people either choose Original Medicare with Part D and a Medigap policy, or go with a Medicare Advantage Plan, which limits provider networks. Ramsey also stresses the importance of knowing the Medicare enrollment periods. There are five: The Initial Enrollment Period (IEP) begins three months before one's 65th birthday and lasts seven months. One can enroll in Parts A and B, then add Part D or Medicare Special Enrollment Period (SEP) applies if a person had coverage through work, lived abroad, or experienced other qualifying General Enrollment Period (GEP) runs Jan. 1 to March 31. If the IEP or SEP is missed, one can enroll here, but lifetime penalties are to be Annual Enrollment Period (AEP) is from Oct. 15 to Dec. 7. This is for making changes to existing coverage, not first-time Medigap Open Enrollment Period starts the month one enrolls in Part B and lasts six months. Ramsey advises buying during this window to avoid denial or higher costs due to preexisting conditions. Ramsey advises Americans not to procrastinate and to talk with experts about the best Medicare options depending on a person's individual circumstances. More on personal finance: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social SecurityJean Chatzky sends strong message on major 401(k) changesFinance expert has blunt words for car buyers Related: Secretary Bessent's Social Security remarks spark AARP outcry Dave Ramsey explains that Medicaid is a joint federal and state assistance program designed to help Americans with limited income afford essential health care. Unlike Medicare, Medicaid isn't insurance, Ramsey clarified. It's more of a support system that helps cover costs such as nursing home care, personal assistance, and even Medicare premiums for those who qualify. Because states help administer Medicaid, the program varies depending on where one lives. Eligibility requirements differ by state, though they're always based on income. Ramsey notes that while the Affordable Care Act aimed to expand eligibility to anyone earning below 138% of the federal poverty level, states still have the choice to opt in or out of that expansion. To ensure consistency, the federal government mandates a minimum set of benefits that all states must provide. These include hospital services, physician visits, lab work, nursing facility care, and transportation to medical appointments. States can also offer optional benefits such as dental, vision, physical therapy, and hospice care. Ramsey emphasizes that Medicaid typically doesn't require premiums, but some states do impose small copayments for certain services. Eligibility is determined by income and assets, including wages, pensions, Social Security, veterans' benefits, and withdrawals from retirement accounts. Each state sets its own thresholds, so Ramsey emphasizes the fact that it's important to check one's local guidelines. Related: Dave Ramsey has blunt words for Americans buying a car The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
