Trader Joe's leaves LA customers seeing double after opening another store directly across the street
The popular grocery store opened its second Sherman Oaks location, directly across the street from another outpost on Riverside Avenue, on June 6, according to the chain's website.
The California-based supermarket's newest location, nicknamed 'Sherman Oaks too,' sits in a busy mixed-use building just minutes from the hectic US Highway 101 in the San Fernando Valley, about 15 miles northwest of Los Angeles. The original location, opened in 1973, occupies a quieter, stand-alone building, SFGate reported.
Despite obvious upgrades given the fresh space, Trader Joe's first Sherman Oaks location can be reached within a minute of the new location - and the company plans to keep the old one open.
'We've had a great relationship with our customers in Sherman Oaks for 52 years, and we plan to keep both stores open,' Trader Joe's spokesperson Naika Rohde said. 'Both stores offer the same great products and delightful customer experience, but each has a different layout and parking lot.'
While both locations offer the same beloved specialty snacks and products, SFGate noted the newer location features a vibrant exterior mural, underground parking and a less-cramped shopping experience.
The newer storefront has wider aisles to better accommodate shopping carts, as well as higher ceilings than the original, according to the report.
Trader Joe's latest addition, while confusing to customers, seems to be part of an upward trend for the company, as they plan to open at least a dozen new stores across the country this year alone.
'Since Trader Joe's began in 1967, we have been in growth mode. Some years, we grow more than others, and our goal is always to bring delicious products at great values to as many people as we can,' Rohde said. ' The best way to do that is to open more stores.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The AI Boom Is Creating Housing Costs in the Bay Area That You'll Think You Must Be Hallucinating
Akin to a rapacious maw, the AI boom has swallowed up untold amounts of water, energy, and jobs lost to automation. Now add the rapidly dwindling housing stock in the Bay Area as even more tech workers crowd in, lured by the possibility of enriching themselves in this massive AI gold rush, according to reporting from The San Francisco Standard. Housing costs are already notoriously high in the San Fran area, but the AI boom has ratcheted up numbers to eye-watering figures while startup workers are forced to bunk up in small but costly rooms that are the spendy equivalent of flophouses, the publication reports. In an eye-opening example, tech bro Akshyae Singh is living in what sounds like a postage-size room and has to share the bathroom with 12 other folks. And he's paying — get this — a ridiculous $2,300 a month for the privilege. "My professional life is great," Singh told the Standard, "but my living situation is, like, the total opposite." It's so bad that people are snatching up apartments unseen while open house events are attracting droves of would-be renters. Some people have resorted to putting together "tenant résumés" to get a leg up on the competition. Leasing agent Brian Brown told the news outlet that he now has only a handful of listings — in contrast to 80 units at the height of the COVID pandemic. "It's the AI boom," realtor Van den Eikhof told the Standard. "Everybody knows that. Also, I think a lot of people got good deals during COVID and are staying put. It's putting a strain on inventory." The numbers are bonkers. Two-bedroom abodes have increased by 16 percent, reaching $4,621 on average, according to Zumper, which the news outlet cited. Median rent is $3,461. Certain neighborhoods like North Beach have jumped an astonishing 79 percent in the past year, topping out at an average of $5,475 per month for a two-bedroom. One agent told the Standard that she recently listed a two-bedroom unit for $12,000 per month, but it got snapped up in a single day for $14,500. You might wonder how regular non-tech folks are faring. For starters, the city has a terrible homeless problem, with people living rough outside or sleeping in RVs. Service workers, the people who clean and cook after these tech bros, often have to commute in from extraordinary distances. Even with recent progress on affordable housing in the Bay Area, ordinary people are undoubtedly shut out if you look at the numbers. The moving company PODS reported earlier this year that Los Angeles and the Bay Area are the top two locales with the "Highest Number of Move-Outs Ranked." And as the AI boom swallows up resources and attention, it's all only going to get worse. More on AI and costs: AI Data Centers Accused of Creating Major Problems for Local Water Systems Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US migrant raids spark boom for private detention providers
Donald Trump's promise to carry out the largest deportation operation in US history has appalled some Americans. But others are cashing in on the boom in demand for private detention centers. Migrants captured by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents need to be temporarily housed in places like the facility being readied in California City, prior to deportation. "When you talk to the majority of residents here, they have a favorable perspective on it," said Marquette Hawkins, mayor of the hardscrabble settlement of 15,000 people, 100 miles (160 kilometres) north of Los Angeles. "They look at the economic impact, right?" California City is to be home to a sprawling detention center that will be operated by CoreCivic, one of the largest companies in the private detention sector. The company, which declined AFP requests for an interview, says the facility would generate around 500 jobs, and funnel $2 million in tax revenue to the city. "Many of our residents have already been hired out there to work in that facility," Hawkins told AFP. "Any revenue source that is going to assist the town in rebuilding itself, rebranding itself, is going to be seen as a plus," he said. - Boom - Trump's ramped-up immigration arrests, like those that provoked protests in Los Angeles, saw a record 60,000 people in detention in June, according to ICE figures. Those same figures show the vast majority have no conviction, despite the president's election campaign promises to go after hardened criminals. More than 80 percent of detainees are in facilities run by the private sector, according to the TRAC project at Syracuse University. And with Washington's directive to triple the number of daily arrests -- and $45 billion earmarked for new detention centers -- the sector is looking at an unprecedented boom. "Never in our 42-year company history have we had so much activity and demand for our services as we are seeing right now," Damon Hininger, executive director of CoreCivic, said in a May call with investors. When Trump took office in January, some 107 centers were operating. The number now hovers around 200. For Democratic politicians, this proliferation is intentional. "Private prison companies are profiting from human suffering, and Republicans are allowing them to get away with it," Congresswoman Norma Torres told reporters outside a detention center in the southern California city of Adelanto. At the start of the year, there were three people detained there; there are now hundreds, each one of them attracting a daily stipend of taxpayer cash for the operator. Torres was refused permission to visit the facility, run by the privately owned GEO Group, because she had not given seven days' notice, she said. "Denying members of Congress access to private detention facilities like Adelanto isn't just disrespectful, it is dangerous, it is illegal, and it is a desperate attempt to hide the abuse happening behind these walls," she said. "We've heard the horrifying stories of detainees being violently arrested, denied basic medical care, isolated for days, and left injured without treatment," she added. Kristen Hunsberger, a staff attorney at the Law Center for Immigrant Advocates, said one client complained of having to wait "six or seven hours to get clean water." It is "not sanitary and certainly not... in compliance with just basic human rights." Hunsberger, who spends hours on the road going from one center to another to locate her clients, says many have been denied access to legal counsel, a constitutional right in the United States. Both GEO and ICE have denied allegations of mistreatment at the detention centers. "Claims there is overcrowding or subprime conditions in ICE facilities are categorically FALSE," said Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security. "All detainees are provided with proper meals, medical treatment and have opportunities to communicate with their family members and lawyers." - 'Strategy' - But some relatives of detainees tell a different story. Alejandra Morales, an American citizen, said her undocumented husband was detained incommunicado for five days in Los Angeles before being transferred to Adelanto. In the Los Angeles facility, "they don't even let them brush their teeth, they don't let them bathe, nothing. They have them all sleeping on the floor, in a cell, all together," she said. Hunsberger said that for detainees and their relatives, the treatment appears to be deliberate. "They're starting to feel that this is a strategy to wear people down, to have them in these inhumane conditions, and then pressure them to sign something where they could then agree to being deported," she said. pr/hg/ksb
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
If You Had Invested in Elon Musk's Companies 10 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
You might be wondering just how rich they could be if they'd invested in Elon Musk's companies a decade ago, when he was still just a rich guy and not the richest man alive, according to Forbes. After all, he must have made smart investments to get so rich, right? So why couldn't you be just as rich if you'd invested in the same way? Or at least super rich? So, let's take a look at the companies Musk founded and how they've helped him grow his wealth, as well as how rich you'd be if you'd invested 10 years ago. Check Out: For You: Musk's Companies Musk has indeed grown rich as a result of founding and then selling companies that went on to become very successful. His first company, Zip2, is now long gone, having been absorbed by another company. But it is where he made his first millions when he sold it and made $22 million, according to Forbes. He then took that money and invested in PayPal and that's where our story begins. See Next: PayPal Musk founded PayPal with his friend and business partner at the time, Peter Thiel. Though the application, aimed at allowing businesses to pay each other digitally, didn't get off to a great start, it has since done very well. PayPal is now one of the most used applications for the transfer of funds between parties. Musk is no longer involved with PayPal. In fact, he was removed from the company as CEO and replaced by Thiel by the board. Like with Zip2, the board found Musk to be a less-than-ideal leader. But that doesn't mean his initial idea wasn't great. Indeed, if you invested in PayPal back in 2015, when the company split from eBay to become its own entity, your stock growth would be about 200%. It's not rocket growth, of course, but it's still not bad. As of July 2015, PayPal stock was worth $38 per share, according to Nasdaq. As of June 2025, it's worth $74. So, if you'd invested $10,000 in PayPal 10 years ago, today, you'd have $19,500. Not bad. SpaceX SpaceX is one of the companies Musk is most well-known for. It has helped contribute to better telecommunications via its Starlink offshoot and it is heavily funded by government programs to explore space. Since 2008, the United States taxpayers have paid SpaceX more than $20 billion in government contracts, according to Fox Business. Musk's 42% stake today is valued at $147 billion, according to Forbes. SpaceX is not publicly traded, but you can buy it with a tool like EquityZen. Tesla Tesla is perhaps the other most well-known of Musk's companies. In 2004, two men, Martin Eberhard and Marc Terpenning, founded the car company after the inventor Nikola Tesla to create electric vehicles for eco-conscious drivers. Though Musk invested in Tesla early on and was chairman of the board, he took over as CEO in 2008, after ousting Eberhard. The company continued to do well, but it was not the phenomenon it is today. In 2015, the average closing price of Tesla stock was $16 per share, according to Macrotrends. As of June 2025, Tesla stock, even down from its height, is trading for $317 per share. That's a growth of more than 1,900%. In short, if you invested $10,000 in Tesla stock 10 years ago, you'd have approximately $304,000 today. OpenAI Many people still don't know about OpenAI, Musk's nonprofit, which he co-founded in 2015. The purpose of this company is to research friendly AI that supports humanity. He has since resigned from the board due to Tesla AI conflicts. And because it is a non-profit, privately owned company, investors cannot buy shares, so you would not have been able to make any money here, either. To Invest or Not To Invest? In the end, you can't know for sure what will do well and what won't, but understanding patterns is helpful. This is why it's worth looking back at how investors make their money. It's also helpful to understand that Musk made his first billion not from investing in companies but from buying and selling them, which is a huge difference. If you're going to invest, it might be a good idea to look at index funds and diversified funds, rather than putting all your eggs in one or two baskets. Unless you've got the capital to invest in a startup and the mind to foresee its success. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on If You Had Invested in Elon Musk's Companies 10 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
