Council rejects mobile sauna's trading permit
A plan to operate a mobile sauna next to Lake Dunstan in Cromwell has hit a bureaucratic brick wall.
Businessman and sauna-fanatic John Ryan has failed to get the go-ahead from the Central Otago District Council or Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand (Linz) to periodically park his travelling sauna on public land beside the lake.
Mr Ryan's sauna is 2.5m by 3m, can fit 15 people and sits atop a trailer pulled by his Land Rover.
"One side has a big open window, so you can look out to the lake," Mr Ryan said.
Several weeks ago, Mr Ryan had a trial run of the sauna at Alpha Street Reserve, offering free use of it to members of the public.
"I parked up near the swimming platform there, so people could have a sauna and have a dip," he said.
"Seventeen people turned up and they all loved it."
However, Mr Ryan's application to the district council for a mobile trading permit for the venture has been declined.
"Their excuse was they want to protect the reserve", he said.
He also took his idea to Linz, which administered some of the lakeside land in Cromwell, but staff there "knocked it back".
"I don't think they fully understand what it is or how it runs."
District council parks and recreation manager Gordon Bailey confirmed the reserve-land status of the spots Mr Ryan wished to park at was the reason his application was declined.
The land in question was governed by the council's reserve management plan — which specified what could and could not go on reserves — as well as the Reserve Act 1977, he said.
The commercial rather than recreational nature of Mr Ryan's activity meant it "was not consistent" with the plan, nor the Act.
Meanwhile, although Linz had no official record of a conversation with Mr Ryan, head of Crown property Sonya Wikitera told the Otago Daily Times her staff received many inquiries about the use of Crown land for commercial businesses and were always available to talk through a person's plans before any official application to Linz was made.
"When providing advice or assessing formal applications, Linz considers the potential impact on the Crown land, public use, impact on other businesses already operating in the area, other applications which may have already been made, feedback from other agencies and the public, as well as impacts on existing infrastructure like toilets, rubbish bins and carparking," Ms Wikitera said.
Mr Ryan's sauna is wood-clad, has a chimney out the top and is heated by a "Sweaty Meg" — a custom-built wood burner sold through his other business, Roaring Meg Fires.
"They're like traditional Finnish wood-fire heaters," he said.
On the trial night, Mr Ryan had hand-held lanterns ready outside the sauna for people to take to guide them down to the lake in between stints in the sauna.
He reckoned a one-hour session was about right — 15 minutes in the heat, five minutes for a cool dip, then back to the sauna and repeat times two.
Mr Ryan is a sauna convert.
"They're amazing; good for your health. I've 'sauna-ed' every night for, oh, I don't know how long," he said.
"They help fight cardiovascular disease. They're good for sleep. There's so much research been done on saunas now."
Mr Ryan's case is not the only one where a mobile sauna has faced consenting challenges.
The Marlborough District Council has gone back and forth on its decision to reject a proposal to allow a similar set up on reserve land beside a beach in Picton.
Mr Ryan has launched a petition in an attempt to persuade the Central Otago District Council to reconsider his proposal.
kim.bowden@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
The Regulatory Standards Bill: Neoliberal Shackles Disguised As 'Good Law"
When the New Zealand Parliament debates "better law-making," most people yawn. It sounds procedural, technocratic — even boring. But beneath the jargon of 'clarity,' 'predictability,' and 'transparency,' lurks a political agenda. The Regulatory Standards Bill (RSB), first introduced in 2011 by ACT Party founder Roger Douglas's disciple Rodney Hide and continuously revived in various guises since, represents a stealth weapon in the arsenal of neoliberal capitalism. It is a Trojan horse for embedding pro-market ideology into the very machinery of the state — making it harder for any future government, let alone a radical movement, to challenge the dominance of capital. We argue that the bill is not about making regulation 'better' or 'fairer,' but about handcuffing future lawmakers to an ideology that privileges private property, contract law, and the capitalist 'right to profit.' Its passage would mark a dangerous deepening of bourgeois legalism, constraining any collective attempts to democratise the economy or dismantle capitalist structures through parliamentary reform — let alone revolutionary means. The Origins: ACT's Neoliberal Dream To understand the Regulatory Standards Bill, we must start with ACT. Founded in the 1990s as the ideological successor to Roger Douglas's Rogernomics project, the ACT Party exists to finish what the Fourth Labour Government started: the total commodification of public life. With its roots in Chicago School economics, ACT idolises the free market, loathes the state (except when protecting capital), and views regulation as an obstacle to "freedom" — defined narrowly as consumer and investor liberty. In 2009, the National-ACT confidence and supply agreement commissioned a taskforce led by arch-neoliberal Graham Scott to look into 'regulatory responsibility.' Its conclusion: regulation should conform to a strict set of principles designed to prevent the state from interfering too much with market activity. This taskforce gave birth to the Regulatory Standards Bill. Rodney Hide introduced the first version in 2011. It was met with scepticism, even from centrist legal scholars, who warned that the bill would judicialise politics and constitutionalise neoliberalism. While the bill didn't pass, its zombie-like persistence over the years shows how committed the New Zealand right remains to embedding capitalist ideology in law. What the Bill Proposes: Rights for Capital, Not People At first glance, the RSB reads like a list of nice-sounding principles: laws should not be retrospective, should respect property rights, should avoid creating unnecessary costs, and should be clear and accessible. But a closer look reveals its insidiousness. 1. "Property Rights" as Sacred One of the central tenets of the bill is that laws should not 'take or impair property' unless justified. This may sound reasonable, but in practice, it elevates private property above public interest. It would give courts — not the people — the power to decide whether environmental protections, housing controls, or land use laws unduly infringe on property rights. It shifts power from democratically accountable institutions to unelected judges, many of whom are steeped in commercial law and capitalist ideology. This is a direct threat to mana whenua struggles for land justice. Imagine if land reform legislation, urban rent controls, or even a future law to nationalise fossil fuel companies were struck down because they infringed on 'property rights.' The bill constitutionalises the most reactionary legal principle of all: that the right to own and profit from land or capital is inviolable. 2. 'No More Than Necessary' Another clause says that regulation should not impose 'obligations, costs, or risks' that are more than 'reasonably necessary.' But who decides what's 'necessary'? Under capitalism, this often means what's necessary for profit. Environmental laws, workplace protections, or rent freezes could all be challenged for being 'too costly' to business. The bill invites judicial activism — not in the progressive sense, but as a means of protecting capitalist interests from redistributive policies. 3. Parliamentary Veto in Disguise The bill would require that every new law be accompanied by a "certification" that it complies with these principles. If it doesn't, it must be justified — and could be challenged in court. This sets up a system where legislation is no longer judged on its social merit, but on how well it conforms to market logic. In essence, it's a regulatory veto wrapped in legal procedure. The aim is to make it politically and legally risky for any future government to pass redistributive or transformative laws. Embedding Capitalist Ideology into Law What makes the RSB especially dangerous is not just its content, but its method. It doesn't ban socialism outright. Instead, it sets up legal roadblocks that make any move toward economic democracy more difficult, expensive, or outright unconstitutional. This is classic capitalist strategy: not just win political battles, but rig the rules. It's the same logic behind investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) clauses in trade agreements, which allow corporations to sue states for regulating in the public interest. It's the logic behind independent central banks, which remove monetary policy from democratic control. And it's the logic behind 'fiscal responsibility' laws that force governments to prioritise debt repayment over social investment. The RSB is part of this neoliberal constitutionalism. It transforms what should be political questions - Who owns the land? Should rent be controlled? Should fossil fuels be nationalised? - into legal technicalities. It makes revolution, or even reform, illegal by stealth. Aotearoa's Class War by Other Means The Regulatory Standards Bill must be understood in the context of Aotearoa's broader class structure. We live in a settler-colonial capitalist state where wealth is concentrated among a small elite - disproportionately Pākehā - while working-class, Māori, and Pasifika communities struggle under the weight of exploitation, housing precarity, and intergenerational poverty. In such a context, regulation is one of the few remaining tools communities have to fight back. Whether it's tenant protections, limits on corporate land use, environmental regulations, or worker rights, regulation is one of the few levers available within capitalist democracy to redistribute power and resources. The RSB seeks to destroy that lever. It cloaks itself in legal neutrality, but in reality, it is a ruling class weapon designed to foreclose collective action. It represents the judicialisation of class war. One where the capitalist class doesn't need tanks or cops to crush resistance, just well-written legislation and friendly judges. The Limits of Parliamentary Critique It's important to note that opposition to the RSB has come not just from the left, but from mainstream legal figures and centrists worried about the erosion of parliamentary sovereignty. The New Zealand Law Society, in a rare political statement, warned that the bill would shift power from Parliament to the judiciary, undermining democratic accountability. But for anarcho-communists, the issue goes deeper than defending Parliament. Parliamentary democracy in a capitalist state is already limited, corrupt, and structurally skewed toward the ruling class. Our concern is not that the RSB undermines Parliament per se, but that it further consolidates capitalist power within the state, making radical transformation through any legal means even harder. In this sense, the RSB is not an aberration but a logical outcome of a capitalist democracy reaching its authoritarian phase. As global inequality deepens and ecological collapse accelerates, capitalist states are preemptively locking in protections for the wealthy - insulating themselves from the possibility of revolt. A Vision Beyond the Bill Anarcho-communists reject the premise of the RSB because we reject the premise of capitalist law itself. We do not believe the protection of property is a neutral good. We do not believe 'regulatory efficiency' should be the measure of political action. And we do not accept a legal framework that privileges capital over collective well-being. Instead, we fight for a society based on direct democracy, collective ownership, and ecological harmony. We envision a world where land is returned to tangata whenua, where housing is a right not a commodity, and where communities make decisions together, without the distortions of profit or property law. In such a world, the RSB would be unthinkable — not just because it's unjust, but because its very logic would no longer apply. There would be no 'regulators' because there would be no corporations to regulate. No 'property rights' because the land would belong to all. No 'cost-benefit analyses' because human need, not market efficiency, would guide our choices. What Is to Be Done? The Regulatory Standards Bill has not yet passed — but it remains a live threat. ACT and National are eager to revive it, and a future coalition could easily slip it through under the radar. We must oppose it not just with legal submissions or op-eds, but with direct action and radical education. We must expose it for what it is: a blueprint for capitalist entrenchment, not a neutral law reform. And we must prepare ourselves intellectually, and organisationally for the broader authoritarian turn it signals. This means: Popular education in unions, hapū, and community groups about the bill's implications. Legal support for those resisting unjust property laws and regulations. Resisting co-optation by parliamentary parties who offer weak, technocratic opposition. The battle over the Regulatory Standards Bill is a battle over who controls the future: the people, or capital. Let's make sure it's us.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Council rejects mobile sauna's trading permit
A plan to operate a mobile sauna next to Lake Dunstan in Cromwell has hit a bureaucratic brick wall. Businessman and sauna-fanatic John Ryan has failed to get the go-ahead from the Central Otago District Council or Toitū Te Whenua Land Information New Zealand (Linz) to periodically park his travelling sauna on public land beside the lake. Mr Ryan's sauna is 2.5m by 3m, can fit 15 people and sits atop a trailer pulled by his Land Rover. "One side has a big open window, so you can look out to the lake," Mr Ryan said. Several weeks ago, Mr Ryan had a trial run of the sauna at Alpha Street Reserve, offering free use of it to members of the public. "I parked up near the swimming platform there, so people could have a sauna and have a dip," he said. "Seventeen people turned up and they all loved it." However, Mr Ryan's application to the district council for a mobile trading permit for the venture has been declined. "Their excuse was they want to protect the reserve", he said. He also took his idea to Linz, which administered some of the lakeside land in Cromwell, but staff there "knocked it back". "I don't think they fully understand what it is or how it runs." District council parks and recreation manager Gordon Bailey confirmed the reserve-land status of the spots Mr Ryan wished to park at was the reason his application was declined. The land in question was governed by the council's reserve management plan — which specified what could and could not go on reserves — as well as the Reserve Act 1977, he said. The commercial rather than recreational nature of Mr Ryan's activity meant it "was not consistent" with the plan, nor the Act. Meanwhile, although Linz had no official record of a conversation with Mr Ryan, head of Crown property Sonya Wikitera told the Otago Daily Times her staff received many inquiries about the use of Crown land for commercial businesses and were always available to talk through a person's plans before any official application to Linz was made. "When providing advice or assessing formal applications, Linz considers the potential impact on the Crown land, public use, impact on other businesses already operating in the area, other applications which may have already been made, feedback from other agencies and the public, as well as impacts on existing infrastructure like toilets, rubbish bins and carparking," Ms Wikitera said. Mr Ryan's sauna is wood-clad, has a chimney out the top and is heated by a "Sweaty Meg" — a custom-built wood burner sold through his other business, Roaring Meg Fires. "They're like traditional Finnish wood-fire heaters," he said. On the trial night, Mr Ryan had hand-held lanterns ready outside the sauna for people to take to guide them down to the lake in between stints in the sauna. He reckoned a one-hour session was about right — 15 minutes in the heat, five minutes for a cool dip, then back to the sauna and repeat times two. Mr Ryan is a sauna convert. "They're amazing; good for your health. I've 'sauna-ed' every night for, oh, I don't know how long," he said. "They help fight cardiovascular disease. They're good for sleep. There's so much research been done on saunas now." Mr Ryan's case is not the only one where a mobile sauna has faced consenting challenges. The Marlborough District Council has gone back and forth on its decision to reject a proposal to allow a similar set up on reserve land beside a beach in Picton. Mr Ryan has launched a petition in an attempt to persuade the Central Otago District Council to reconsider his proposal.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Another Milestone For Industry-Led Open Banking In Aotearoa New Zealand
Press Release – Payments NZ Open banking in Aotearoa New Zealand is taking a major leap forward, with the four largest banks, ANZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac NZ, implementing another key industry standard that enables payments service providers and fintechs to offer new, more flexible payment options to their customers. Version 2.3 of the Payment Initiation API standard for open banking, developed by Payments NZ's API Centre, is due for implementation today, marking the third milestone under the industry's minimum open banking implementation plan. The most significant upgrade in this standard is the introduction of mandatory support for enduring payment consent – a critical function sought by the industry. Enduring payment consent allows customers to make repeat payments automatically from their own account through third-party services, authorised through their online banking app or portal. Customers can authorise payments to happen automatically under a set limit. If a charge comes through above the limit, a notification alerts the customer to review and approve the payment before it goes through. The API Centre is currently working with the four banks to confirm final implementation. Kiwibank is also on track to implement the standard ahead of a separate milestone date, at the end of May 2026. Phil Cass, Payments NZ's API Centre Manager, says the new standard is a 'game changer' that puts Aotearoa ahead of international peers in open banking. 'Having this latest version of the standard across our four biggest banks is a big step forward for industry participants who want to offer new and improved payments experiences for customers,' Cass says. 'We are proud of the API Centre's work and seeing the industry collaborate to deliver the latest payments initiation standard which reflects global best practice while being tailored to meet the needs of Aotearoa. 'This is a significant step forward that supports new innovation and makes world-class open banking a reality for New Zealanders,' Cass adds. The implementation milestone comes as MBIE prepares regulations for open banking under the Customer and Product Data Act, passed earlier this year. 'We see the Act as a positive step forward, and we're committed to working with MBIE to achieve a sustainable open banking ecosystem that finds the right balance between regulation and industry led ,' Cass says. 'Open banking is here, and customers are using it. We look forward to continuing to champion industry-led developments and building on the results it's delivering for Aotearoa.' The implementation milestone will feature in a broader API Centre celebration event in Auckland mid June, reflecting on six years of progress and highlighting what's next for open banking in Aotearoa under the emerging CPD framework. The event will also see the launch of Ngā Tohu Ārahi, the API Centre's Data Handling Guidelines – developed in partnership with Māori data experts and grounded in Māori Data Governance framework and principles. 'This is about more than a standard – it's about the evolution of an ecosystem,' says Cass. 'Together with banks, the wider industry, regulators and Māori data experts, we're helping shape the future of payments and data sharing in a way that reflects the values and priorities of Aotearoa.' For more information on open banking and the API Standards, please visit the API Centre website here. Note: What is open banking? Open banking is a system that lets customers safely share their financial data – like account balances and transaction history – with trusted third parties such as fintechs. It also enables customers to make payments directly from their bank accounts through these services. This is made possible through standardised Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), which act like secure digital bridges between banks and third parties. APIs allow different systems to talk to each other and exchange information in real time, within a safe, controlled environment. API standards are the backbone of open banking. They ensure that data is shared securely and transparently, with clear rules around customer consent, authentication, and privacy protection – putting customers in control of who can access their information and for what purpose. What is the payment initiation API standard? Jointly developed by the API Centre in collaboration with industry, the Payment Initiation API standard allows consumers to set up and make electronic payments by connecting directly and safely through a third party app or service to an API Provider, such as a bank. Instead of sharing login credentials, customers connect securely to their bank via an API – keeping their data private and the transaction protected. The four largest banks in Aotearoa – ANZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac NZ – implemented version 2.1 of the standard ahead of an industry milestone set by Payments NZ in May last year, marking a major step forward in open banking readiness. What's new in the upgraded standard? Version 2.3 of the Payment Initiation API standard introduces several important upgrades that strengthen open banking capability and consistency across the ecosystem. For the first time, API Providers (banks) are required to support key functions that were previously optional – giving data requestors confidence that these features will be reliably available when integrating with banks. One of the most significant changes is the introduction of mandatory support for enduring payment consent. This allows customers to authorise repeat payments from their bank account to a third party under agreed limits – a potential modern alternative to direct debit, with greater transparency and control. Another major enhancement is mandatory support for decoupled authentication. This lets customers initiate an action on one device (like a laptop) and securely complete the payment authorisation on another (such as their banking app on a mobile phone), improving convenience and user experience. An overview of the v2.2 and v2.3 standards can be found here. Which third parties are using the payment initiation API? Five fintechs – BlinkPay, Qippay, Volley, Wych and Worldline – currently have contracts in place with one or more banks using either v2.1 or v2.3 of the standardised Payment Initiation API. There are a further 22 third parties registered with the API Centre who will be able to approach all four of the implementing banks to begin partnering discussions based on the v2.3 standard from 30 May onwards. What is the API Centre? Working with the industry (from banks to startups), Payments NZ's API Centre is co-designing the open banking future of Aotearoa, by creating the framework that will ensure fast, secure, user-friendly data sharing – for all New Zealanders. There are many open banking models around the world. Our framework creates a world-class foundation for businesses to provide leading, cost-effective products and services and give consumers confidence in how their data is accessed and shared. The API Centre is governed by an API Council made up of representatives from across the industry. The API Council fosters a self-governing API standards service, and all Council members are required to act in the best interests of the API Centre. What is the implementation plan? The API Centre first published its minimum open banking implementation plan in May 2023, and updated it in October 2024. It sets out timelines for the country's largest banks to be operationally and technically ready to partner using the API Centre's open banking standards. The Payments NZ Board and the API Council set the implementation plan after extensive industry consultation. Under the plan, ANZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac NZ implemented the Payment Initiation v2.1 standard and Account Information v2.1 standard before deadlines in May and November 2024. These four banks have now implemented v2.3 of the Payment Initiation standard, and are due to implement v2.3 of the Account Information standard by 30 November this year. Kiwibank is also included in the plan, and has an implementation timeline to be live with the Payment Initiation and Account Information v2.3 standards in May and November 2026. About Payments NZ Payments NZ is the governance organisation at the centre of Aotearoa New Zealand's payments system. Established in 2010 with the endorsement of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand – Te Pūtea Matua, we manage and govern the country's core payments clearing and settlement systems to ensure they remain safe, efficient, interoperable, and fit for the future. We work in close partnership with industry to set the rules and standards that enable seamless payments between financial institutions, support API-enabled innovation through our API Centre, and lead strategic efforts to modernise and strengthen the payments ecosystem. In 2024, our systems processed over $8 trillion in retail and high-value payments. Our focus is on delivering world-class payments that support New Zealanders – today and for generations to come.
