‘Dark cloud': Parents of children face agonising wait for results of STD test after arrest of childcare worker and accused predator Joshua Brown
Almost two weeks after police revealed Brown was behind bars as he awaits trial for allegedly abusing young children in his care, many mums and dads are still in an agonising limbo.
One mum told news.com.au that even if the test results come back negative for her daughter, 'the damage is done' emotionally and her family will have 'a lot of work to do mentally' to put the ordeal behind them.
'The uncertainty and anxiety will always linger now,' the devastated mum said, revealing her test results are due back any day.
'Even when the urine tests come back negative, which I'm hoping and praying they do, this will always be a dark cloud hanging over our heads and we will never have complete peace of mind or certainty over what exposure Joshua Brown had with our kids,' she said.
Brown, 26, is due to appear in court in September to face more than 70 charges, including sexually penetrating a child under 12, attempting to sexually penetrate a child under 12, sexually assaulting a child under 16, and producing child abuse material.
The charges relate to alleged incidents at the G8 Education owned Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook in Victoria where Mr Brown, 26, allegedly abused eight children between April 2022 and January 2023.
Brown is also charged with contaminating food with bodily fluids.
He was working in the kitchen at a Melbourne childcare centre days before his arrest - assisting in the kitchen at Papilio Early Learning Centre in Essendon, supporting meal preparations while centre chefs were absent.
From the day police announced Brown was in custody, parents have been scrambling to understand whether their children at centres across Victoria have come into contact with him.
While Victoria Police published a list of 20 centres, other centres came to light in following days. Some remain off the list but centres have confirmed Brown was on staff.
A mother from a Milestones centre contacted news.com.au after learning Brown was at the centre her children attended on December 5, 2024, thanks to Storypark, the platform used for parents to see updates from the centre on their child's day.
'Our kids were there that day too. I feel so sick and upset, that's two days we now know of,' she said.
'Will there be more days discovered and who will tell us? Or do we have to investigate with the news to be our people who find the truth?
'It's sad to think parents are finding out this stuff themselves with the support of the news people, rather than the centre being proactive in telling us.
'I have had other parents speak to me worried sick wanting to know exact dates this person was present at the child care centre. Surely they can tell us - pay slips or records surely.'
A father told news.com.au he was piecing together his own child's visits and trying to match up the dates, 'but also trying to tell ourselves nothing happened but it is becoming sickening'.
Another mum said 'I can't sleep at night due to the uncertainty. My heart goes out to the families and children who have been identified and directly affected.
'I feel for all the families and kids, it is such an uncertain time and my main feeling is a mix of confusion, helplessness and fear'
All parents spoken to by news.com.au agreed that 'more needs to be done' to stop child predators from working in the industry.
'A working with children check can be done online in a few minutes. All it really proves is that the child predator has never been identified or caught,' one mother said.
'I feel stronger measures need to be set in place that are systemic overhauls and changes from the centres all having CCTV cameras in every room, locked kitchen areas, no men changing nappies, phones taken off staff and stored in an area where they can only access if on break and away from children, minimum two people in room at all times whether the kids are inside having a nap or playing outside.
'I think the owners of these centres have to take more ownership and accountability for hiring staff. The state and federal governments need to ensure security is tighter at these places than it is up at Parliament House' to avoid 'wolves in sheep's clothing' getting in.
The sector has welcomed the government's moves to strengthen protections, with widespread recognition that additional safeguards are needed to restore trust and give parents confidence.
The three largest operators – Goodstart, G8 and Affinity – have each moved swiftly to announce and implement measures that go beyond the government's immediate requirements. Together, these providers account for more than 30 per cent of the long day care sector nationally.
Affinity's national rollout of CCTV and secure lock boxes across all its centres, is expected to cost around $10 million and is implemented immediately.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Elon Musk's X Corp loses Aussie legal fight against eSafety Commissioner
Elon Musk's X Corp, previously known as Twitter, has lost a second legal bid to overturn a penalty imposed by Australia's online watchdog two years ago. The US-based social media giant was handed a transparency notice by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant seeking information about the measures the company was taking to address the proliferation of child sexual exploitation material on its platform. The reporting notice required Twitter Inc to prepare a report on its compliance with basic online safety expectations between January 2022 and January 2023, with a response required by March 29, 2023. X Corp did respond, however the commission argued the reply was inadequate and incomplete, later imposing a $610,500 penalty in September that year. The company challenged the penalty in the Federal Court of Australia arguing the compliance notice was issued to Twitter a month before that company ceased to exist, when Musk acquired the platform for $44 billion, and therefore was not obliged to respond. The argument was struck down in October last year by Justice Michael Wheelahan who found the company failed to show that it was not required to respond. However the case returned before a full bench of the Federal Court in March as the company appealed against Justice Wheelahan's judgment. X Corp's barrister Bret Walker SC argued the Judge made a mistake in ruling the obligation to respond adequately to the notice continued after the merger of Twitter Inc and X Corp. He argued Justice Wheelahan had erred by not finding that at the time of the merger Twitter Inc 'ceased to exist' and the eSafety Commissioner would have been required to issue a new notice. The case returned to court on Thursday as Justice Bernard Murphy delivered a judgment against the social media company. Justice Murphy dismissed the appeal and ordered X Corp to pay the eSafety Commissioner's costs. The full judgment is expected to be published online. After Justice Wheelahan's initial ruling last year, Commissioner Julie Inman Grant welcomed the Court's decision. 'Early last year, we asked some of the world's biggest technology companies, including Twitter, to report on steps they were taking to comply with the Australian Government's Basic Online Safety Expectations in relation to child sexual exploitation and abuse material on their platforms,' she said. 'Had X Corp's argument been accepted by the Court it could have set the concerning precedent that a foreign company's merger with another foreign company might enable it to avoid regulatory obligations in Australia.'

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Queensland Police Union doubles down on 'historic' pay deal despite online backlash
The head of Queensland's police union has doubled down on his support for a "historic" pay offer for the service, despite the backlash he's received from some members. Queensland Police Union (QPU) president Shane Prior has, however, conceded he should have been more up-front with members with the details of the deal earlier this week. On Tuesday, Mr Prior stood alongside Premier David Crisafulli as the pair announced both sides had reached in-principle agreement on a new pay offer following wage negotiations. That offer included a minimum pay rise of 3 per cent from July 1 this year, followed by a 2.5 per cent hike in July next year, and a 2.5 per cent rise in July 2027. It also included an $8,000 retention bonus to be paid to general duty officers, including constables, senior constables, sergeants, and senior sergeants. Mr Prior has described the offer, which he said was worth $540 million, as the "largest ever" secured for the Queensland Police Service. He said that was $163 million more than the government's "insulting" initial offer, thanks to extra incentives including boosts to shift allowances he and his negotiating team had secured. Since the announcement earlier this week, Mr Prior has been subjected to online criticism. He's characterised some of that backlash as "really hurtful" to him and his family. "I have every faith that once officers see what this agreement is going to deliver for [them] ... I absolutely think that most of our officers will turn around and see that this is a very reasonable deal," he said. While doubling down on the merits of the offer, Mr Prior did apologise to union members for not having immediately provided them with "the appropriate information" about the pay offer until an email sent on Wednesday night. "We're looking to remedy that straight away." Mr Prior has said his next task is to travel around the state and speak to "every single member possible to explain the benefits of the deal". Speaking on Thursday, Mr Prior said the negotiating team had been forced to pivot to securing incentives once it became aware the state government was not going to budge from the 3 per cent, 2.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent pay boost per year. He has always been highly critical of that wages offer, which he has called "insulting" to police and all other frontline workers. Mr Prior said the in-principle deal had the unanimous support of the QPU executive, including the endorsement of all regional representatives. If the deal is voted down by union members in September, bargaining may be taken to the Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) for arbitration. Mr Prior said the union was a democracy and members would have the ultimate say. The state government wage negotiations with both the state's nurses and the state's teachers have been ordered before the IRC. Next week, teachers will strike at state schools for the first time in 16 years, while the nurses' union criticised what they described as a "swift" pay deal for the police.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
NT Youth Justice Act changes pass parliament, including reinstatement of spit hoods in youth detention
A suite of changes to the Youth Justice Act, including a proposal to reinstate the use of spit hoods in youth detention centres almost eight years after the practice was banned, have passed Northern Territory parliament on Thursday evening. Warning: This story contains references to injuries and self-harm. The official list of amendments — which also includes the removal of the principle of detention as a last resort and more powers for youth justice officers to use reasonable force — were introduced to NT parliament on Wednesday and debated on Thursday, after being announced earlier in the week. The changes have been strongly criticised by youth justice advocates, including the NT children's commissioner. During debate on Thursday, Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro said the government had been working on the new legislation "all year". "It is part of our election commitments that we took to Territorians in August last year [at the NT election] and it is part of our plan to reduce crime right across the Northern Territory," she said. She said the bill included "practical reforms" that would "stop" detainees from assaulting youth justice workers and other young people in detention. The proposed law's explanatory statement says it will allows courts to consider a youth's full criminal history when sentencing for adult offences, and introduces clear authorisation" for the use of spit hoods and waist restraints on youth detainees. "You cannot run a correctional facility and expect your staff to have zero powers to protect themselves or others," Ms Finocchiaro said. "We're going to continue on our path ... to make sure we are putting the rights of people to be safe above all else and [that] our laws are contemporary and meet community expectation, because that is the job of a parliament." Opposition Leader Selena Uibo criticised the government's proposed changes for ignoring the recommendations of the 2017 Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory and the advice of experts. She also criticised the government for not being up-front during its briefing about all elements included the bill, such as giving correctional officers the new ability to use a security dog against a youth detainee. "Almost every one of these measures ... spit hoods, dog control, mechanical restraints, were either explicitly condemned or ruled out by the royal commission," Ms Uibo said. Greens MLA Kat McNamara said when members of the crossbench were briefed, they were told the amendments would lead to "at least 100 more children aged as young as 10 in prison each year". "Children do not belong in prisons and yet this government is shamelessly rushing through these changes without any evidence that they will effectively reduce crime or keep community members safe," she said during debate. "In fact, they know that this goes against the evidence, but they don't care. "This is action for the sake of action, but worse than that, it is cruel, punitive and evidence shows it will only increase rates of recidivism and violent offending." Amendments to the NT's Youth Justice Regulations 2006 also passed, which will see more crimes classified as "serious", making young people who commit them ineligible for youth diversion. Ms Finocchiaro said the government planned to introduce a second set of changes to the Youth Justice Act in coming months, including "to enhance the diversion process and options and provide community service choices for youth boot camps". In a letter sent to the chief minister on Wednesday, signed by 45 NT paediatricians, the medical professionals urged the government to reconsider its approach to young offenders. "There is no evidence that criminalising a child's behaviour deters an individual from offending, this in fact does the opposite and entrenches criminal behaviour for that young person," the letter reads. Speaking to the ABC, Anna Lithgow and Catherine Boyd who have both worked as paediatricians in the NT for almost two decades, said the suggested changes posed significant health risks. "We know that these mesh [spit] hoods, when placed upon children's heads, impact on their breathing and can lead to asphyxiation, seizures, stroke, disability and death," said Dr Lithgow. "Increasing rates of incarceration of young people can only result in increasing psychological trauma, potentially increasing rates of suicidality, self-harm [and] emergency department presentations," added Dr Boyd. Justice Initiative Reform executive director Mindy Sotiri said at their core, the proposed changes failed to understand the way in which young people thought about crime. "To suggest that children are rationally weighing up the consequences of their actions and deciding not to commit crime, because, you know, there's a change to the diversionary options available, or because there's a harsher penalty, it's just really naive," she told ABC Radio Darwin. "That's just not the way that crime is committed." She said programs that offered bail and post-release support or First Nations place-based support were some examples of changes proven to help reduce recidivism. The chair of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service (NATSIL), Karly Warner, said in a statement the government was ignoring a large body of research in the area. 'There is a mountain of local, national and international evidence that shows prevention, and intensive, trauma-informed, community-led support is what actually works. These proposed amendments to legislation do exactly the opposite," she said.