logo
'Visitor levy in Glasgow could grow city's tourism offer'

'Visitor levy in Glasgow could grow city's tourism offer'

Glasgow Times4 hours ago

If it gets the go-ahead, the visitor levy will increase the cost of an overnight stay in the city by a small percentage.
But in doing so it can raise millions of pounds, which will be reinvested in improving the Glasgow experience for visitors and residents alike.
We reckon that if we add 5% to an accommodation bill – that's an average of just under £5 per night – then we could raise around £16 million extra income annually.
Given the unprecedented pressures on public finances, that's a decent amount of money to help improve our city and its tourism offer.
Visitor levies are common across much of the world.
Cities such as Barcelona, Lisbon, Berlin, Hamburg and Paris have all introduced similar schemes in recent years and all have had an increase in visitor numbers.
Closer to home, after a few years of preparatory work, Edinburgh's visitor levy will come into force next summer.
So, there's an opportunity to learn from our colleagues across the M8 as their scheme is implemented.
And I know that most major cities south of the border are also exploring the introduction of visitor levies, so it's important that Glasgow isn't left behind.
As you would expect with something as significant as the introduction of new local taxation, the opinions expressed within the 1300-plus consultation responses were many and varied.
But what came through was a strong agreement that if we go ahead with Glasgow's visitor levy then it has the potential to grow the city's tourism offer, that we can use the extra finances to ensure our culture and events remain world class, and that the levy can support the promotion and visibility of our city across the world.
Ultimately all of this adds up to better supporting employment and opportunities in an extremely important sector of our economy.
If the paper which I'm taking to Thursday's City Administration Committee is accepted by colleagues, then Glasgow's visitor levy would be in place from the start of 2027, with the first finances collected by April of that year.
Councillors from across the political spectrum have long made the case for new powers that can help us better deliver for our communities and for our city.
Now that the Government has given us some of those powers, it's time we put them to good use.
The visitor levy is no silver bullet to our financial challenges.
But those financial challenges aren't going away any time soon.
And with the levy we can deliver for our visitors, our businesses and our communities without the onus falling on Glaswegians.
Child poverty remains the most acute challenge currently facing Glasgow.
If we're to meet these inequalities head-on then we need a collective effort across all levels of government in partnership with our colleagues in the Third Sector.
Of course, the UK Government has always had the powers and resources to make the biggest impact.
Scrapping the Two Child Cap, for example, would lift nearly half a million children across the UK out of poverty.
I'm delighted that colleagues in the Scottish Government will scrap the cap in early 2026.
And that alongside the Scottish Child Payment, we're making real inroads into tackling this scourge here in Scotland.
The council has its role to play and tomorrow I'll bring a paper to the City Administration Committee asking for approval to release £510,000 to support those families, households and communities who are most vulnerable to the effects of child poverty.
The money means we can continue to fund our pioneering financial inclusion officers who are based in schools across Glasgow.
These officers provide face-to-face advice on benefits and money to parents of school-age children, as well as guiding them to additional support via the new Glasgow Helps service.
And some of the resource will also fund a project that refers people in need to local social enterprise partners so they can access pre-loved clothing, including school uniforms.
It can be disheartening that here in 2025 we continue to have to confront the long-standing consequences of inequalities on our city.
But the SNP here in Glasgow and across Scotland will not shirk our responsibility in standing up for our poorest and most vulnerable.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033
HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033

Powys County Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033

The opening of HS2 will be delayed beyond the planned date of 2033, the Government will confirm. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to tell Parliament on Wednesday afternoon there is 'no reasonable way to deliver' the high-speed railway on schedule and within budget. The project has already suffered repeated delays and soaring costs despite being scaled back. Ms Alexander will tell the Commons she is drawing a 'line in the sand' over the beleaguered rail project, as the Government attempts to reset how the UK delivers major infrastructure. The Government intends to learn from the mistakes of HS2 so that they do a better job when it comes to projects like Northern Powerhouse Rail and the Lower Thames Crossing, it is understood. Housing and planning minister Matthew Pennycook said there were 'serious problems' with HS2 'in terms of accountability, project overruns, costs'. He told LBC the Planning and Infrastructure Bill includes a number of changes that will 'speed up the consenting process for nationally significant infrastructure'. He said: 'Frankly, when it comes to HS2, in some ways we're a bit of a laughing stock around the world in terms of how we handle infrastructure. 'As a Government, we're absolutely determined to turn that around.' The result of two reviews into HS2 are expected to be announced alongside the Transport Secretary's statement. The first of these is an interim report by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2 Ltd, who was appointed late last year. He will assess the construction of the project from London to Birmingham. A second, wider review into the governance and accountability of HS2 Ltd, led by James Stewart, will also report back. This is expected to set out what has gone wrong with the project, and what ministers can learn for future infrastructure projects. The Transport Secretary is also expected to address allegations of fraud by contractors to HS2 Ltd which have emerged recently. Earlier this week, it emerged HS2 Ltd reported a sub-contractor working on the rail line to HMRC following an internal probe. During the statement, Ms Alexander is set to announce a new chair of HS2 Ltd. The current chair, Sir Jon Thompson, previously announced he would stand down in the spring of this year. His replacement will be Mike Brown, according to The Daily Telegraph newspaper. Mr Brown is the former commissioner for Transport for London, who helped to oversee the delivery of Crossrail, the transport project which became London's Elizabeth line. HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs. The first phase was initially planned to open by the end of 2026, but this was pushed back to between 2029 and 2033. In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham. In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion. Concerns about the costs of the stunted project have persisted.

How Welsh MPs voted on decriminalising abortion in Wales and England
How Welsh MPs voted on decriminalising abortion in Wales and England

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

How Welsh MPs voted on decriminalising abortion in Wales and England

How Welsh MPs voted on decriminalising abortion in Wales and England 28 of Wales' 32 MPs took part in the vote - you can see how your MP voted at the end of the article MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales (Image: Getty Images ) MPs have voted to change the law to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales, making the most profound change to abortion law in almost 60 years. With a majority of 242, MPs voted in favour of decriminalising women terminating their own pregnancies. Labour MP for Gower, Tonia Antoniazzi, brought the amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill in front of the Commons, adding that she had been moved to advocate for a change in the law having seen women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. ‌ Ms Antoniazzi said it would remove the threat of "investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment" of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. ‌ The Commons voted 379 to 137 to back the amendment. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here During the Bill's report stage, Ms Antoniazzi assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain, abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors, and that healthcare professionals "acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now". She also told MPs: "This is the right change at the right time. I implore colleagues who want to protect women and girls and abortion services to vote for new clause one. Let's ensure that not a single desperate woman ever again is subject to traumatic, criminal investigation at the worst moments in their lives." Article continues below On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. Justice minister and Pontypridd MP Alex Davies-Jones indicated that the Government was neutral on decriminalisation and that it was an issue for Parliament to decide upon. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several high-profile Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment, including Energy secretary Ed Miliband, Work and Pensions secretary Liz Kendall, Transport secretary Heidi Alexander and Wales secretary Jo Stevens Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. ‌ Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of 19th century law, the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. The measures to decriminalise abortion still need to complete their legislative journey through both the Commons and the Lords before they can become law. The step was welcomed by the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS). Heidi Stewart, chief executive of the charity, said: "This is a landmark moment for women's rights in this country. ‌ "There will be no more women investigated after enduring a miscarriage, no more women dragged from their hospital beds to the back of a police van, no more women separated from their children because of our archaic abortion law." The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said it was "horrified" by the vote. Wales has 32 MPs with 28 representing Labour, three for Plaid Cymru and one Lib Dem. Article continues below How all Welsh MPs voted on the amendment to decriminalise abortion in Wales and England:

HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033
HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

HS2 opening to be delayed beyond 2033

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is expected to tell Parliament on Wednesday afternoon there is 'no reasonable way to deliver' the high-speed railway on schedule and within budget. The project has already suffered repeated delays and soaring costs despite being scaled back. Ms Alexander will tell the Commons she is drawing a 'line in the sand' over the beleaguered rail project, as the Government attempts to reset how the UK delivers major infrastructure. The Government intends to learn from the mistakes of HS2 so that they do a better job when it comes to projects like Northern Powerhouse Rail and the Lower Thames Crossing, it is understood. Housing and planning minister Matthew Pennycook said there were 'serious problems' with HS2 'in terms of accountability, project overruns, costs'. He told LBC the Planning and Infrastructure Bill includes a number of changes that will 'speed up the consenting process for nationally significant infrastructure'. He said: 'Frankly, when it comes to HS2, in some ways we're a bit of a laughing stock around the world in terms of how we handle infrastructure. 'As a Government, we're absolutely determined to turn that around.' The result of two reviews into HS2 are expected to be announced alongside the Transport Secretary's statement. The first of these is an interim report by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2 Ltd, who was appointed late last year. He will assess the construction of the project from London to Birmingham. A second, wider review into the governance and accountability of HS2 Ltd, led by James Stewart, will also report back. This is expected to set out what has gone wrong with the project, and what ministers can learn for future infrastructure projects. The Transport Secretary is also expected to address allegations of fraud by contractors to HS2 Ltd which have emerged recently. Earlier this week, it emerged HS2 Ltd reported a sub-contractor working on the rail line to HMRC following an internal probe. During the statement, Ms Alexander is set to announce a new chair of HS2 Ltd. The current chair, Sir Jon Thompson, previously announced he would stand down in the spring of this year. His replacement will be Mike Brown, according to The Daily Telegraph newspaper. Mr Brown is the former commissioner for Transport for London, who helped to oversee the delivery of Crossrail, the transport project which became London's Elizabeth line. HS2 was originally due to run between London and Birmingham, then onto Manchester and Leeds, but the project was severely curtailed by the Conservatives in power because of spiralling costs. The first phase was initially planned to open by the end of 2026, but this was pushed back to between 2029 and 2033. In 2013, HS2 was estimated to cost £37.5 billion (at 2009 prices) for the entire planned network, including the now-scrapped extensions from Birmingham. In June last year, HS2 Ltd assessed the cost for the line between London and Birmingham would be up to £66 billion. Concerns about the costs of the stunted project have persisted. Revelations in November last year that HS2 Ltd spent £100 million on a bat tunnel aimed at mitigating the railway's environmental impact stunned Westminster, and were singled out by Sir Keir Starmer for criticism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store