A Powerful Trip to Poland
Last month, Kennedy and her friends Guy Benson, host of The Guy Benson Show, and Emily Compagno, host of the FOX True Crime podcast, traveled to Poland with the Maccabee Foundation. The trio discusses what it was like to visit significant Holocaust sites and to encounter anti-Semitic protestors.
Follow Kennedy on Twitter: @KennedyNation
Kennedy Now Available on YouTube: https://link.chtbl.com/kennedyytp
Follow on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kennedy_foxnews
Join Kennedy for Happy Hour on Fridays! https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWlNiiSXX4BNUbXM5X8KkYbDepFgUIVZj
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From inflatable crocodiles to the celebrity guest list: What we know — and don't know — about Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's Venice wedding
It might be the most anticipated, and controversial, wedding of the year: Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez are getting married this week in a multiday event that is set to bring Hollywood stars and power players to Venice, Italy. At the same time, the billionaire Amazon founder and the former journalist's wedding has brought out protestors from different activist groups, some of whom are using the moment to hit back against Bezos's politics and environmental impact, as well as issues that arise with mass tourism. With the couple already arriving in Venice for the event, there's still much we don't know about the celebration, including when the pair will actually tie the knot. Here's what we've been able to figure out from news reports, and what we still don't know. So far, all we know is that Bezos and Sánchez will likely tie the knot some time between Thursday and Sunday — and that it will not be held at the Venice City Hall, per the New York Times, due to Venice's rules around marriage rites. (George and Amal Clooney got married at the venue in 2014.) Outside of Venice, it's not clear where the actual 'I dos' will take place. Luca Zuin, spokesperson for Venice Mayor Luigi Brugnaro, suggested the ceremony would be held on Bezos's superyacht, per CNN, while some outlets have reported that the two will marry on the private island of San Giorgio Maggiore. We also don't know whether Bezos and Sánchez have signed a prenup. Experts told Yahoo this week that it's a good idea for the ultra-wealthy couple, who both have kids from previous relationships, to do so. Mayor Brugnaro confirmed that the couple was hosting their event in the floating city in a statement back in March. In the statement, a translation of which was made available by Good Morning America, Brugnaro shot down critics, saying that the wedding would be a manageable affair with only 200 guests and insisted there would be no 'disruption whatsoever to the city, its residents and visitors.' Those 200 guests, per People, will include Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, who reportedly arrived in Venice on Tuesday. Jared's brother Josh Kushner and his wife, Karlie Kloss, are also reportedly on the guest list. Designer Diane von Fürstenberg, who previously threw the couple an engagement party in 2023, was also spotted arriving in Venice, seemingly to attend the festivities. While details of who else is invited are scarce, there has been some speculation based on the couple's social circle. For example, Sánchez recently took a high-profile, all-women Blue Origin space trip with Katy Perry, Gayle King, Aisha Bowe, Amanda Nguyễn and Kerianne Flynn, so they could potentially be on the guest list. Sánchez is also friends with Kris Jenner and Kim Kardashian, both of whom attended her Paris bachelorette party in May, so they may make the cut as well. Others who were in attendance for the bachelorette party include actress Eva Longoria, as well as Lydia Kives, who is married to Hollywood power broker Michael Kives; Veronica Grazer, wife of Oscar-winning producer Brian Grazer; and October Gonzalez, who is married to former NFL star Tony Gonzalez — who also happens to be the father of Sánchez's son, Nikko. Tony himself is also expected to attend, per People. In addition, Leonardo DiCaprio's name is also floating around as a potential guest of the high-profile couple. TMZ reported that the wedding guests will stay at the swanky Aman Hotel in Venice, which ranges from $2,000 to more than $10,000 per night. Bezos and Sánchez may be staying there as well: On Wednesday, they were seen arriving in Venice on a helicopter and, later in the day, made their way to the Aman Hotel. Multiple groups are protesting the Venice wedding, each with a shared frustration over billionaire excess and its impact on the city. No Space for Bezos, a local coalition of housing advocates, student groups and anti-cruise activists, argues that the wedding symbolizes how Venice is being turned into a playground for the ultrarich while the city's residents face a housing crisis. Meanwhile, environmental group Greenpeace Italy teamed up with Everyone Hates Elon, a U.K.-based activist collective, to stage a demonstration in St. Mark's Square on June 23 with a massive banner that read: 'If you can rent Venice for your wedding you can pay more tax.' Together, these groups are using the wedding to spotlight broader issues like over-tourism, inequality and climate injustice, and to call for more taxation for billionaires like Bezos. Some protesters have even threatened to use inflatable crocodiles in an effort to disrupt the nuptials, forcing the couple to rearrange some of their plans for the event, per reporting from the Guardian. According to protest group No Space for Bezos, Venice residents stated they planned to throw the blow-up reptiles into the canals to block celebrity guests from arriving by gondola or water taxi for the wedding. Out of caution, the Guardian reports, the couple moved the wedding reception from Scuola Grande della Misericordia to Arsenale, a complex of shipyards surrounded by fortified walls. As the Guardian notes, local press reports have also cited security concerns due to the current conflict between Iran and Israel as a reason for the change of venue, particularly in light of the fact that President Trump's daughter, Ivanka, is among the expected guests. Still, local activists are taking it as a win. 'We feel as if we scored a victory,' one activist, who chose to remain anonymous, told the Guardian. 'The crocodile initiative would have given a bad impression of the city — this is why the venue was changed, even if the authorities might try to claim it was because of the war.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Deploying': Aus steps up action on Russia
Australia is deploying a surveillance plane and some 100 defence personnel to Poland in a major pledge to NATO allies. The move comes amid growing fears Russia's war in Ukraine could spill over the border and trigger a much broader conflict in Europe. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles announced the deployment from the NATO Summit in the Netherlands overnight. 'We just concluded a really successful summit here at the NATO gathering in The Hague,' Mr Marles told reporters. 'We have been able to announce that we will be deploying an E-7 Wedgetail to Poland in August for a three-month rotation, which will help support Ukraine in its struggle and defiance against Russia. 'There will be about 100 Australian personnel who come with that asset.' Mr Marles, who is also defence minister, said Australia slapped further 'financial and travel sanctions on 37 individuals and seven entities' related to Russia's 'defence, energy and … other critical sectors'. The commitment builds on an agreement signed at the summit to deepen defence industry co-ordination as Australia and NATO countries scramble to ramp up production and procurement. Mr Marles said it would help both parties spend smarter – somewhat of a mantra for the Albanese government as it resists US calls to boost Australia's defence budget. He said the summit 'reaffirmed the connection that exists between the Indo Pacific on the one hand and the North Atlantic on the other'. 'We are obviously focused on the Indo Pacific in terms of our own strategic landscape, but what's happening here in Europe is having an influence on the strategic landscape in the Indo Pacific,' Mr Marles said. 'And as we seek to focus on the Indo Pacific, we really need to have an eye on what's occurring here, which is why this meeting has been so important and has grown importance over the last few years. And I see it as being very important as we go into the future.' Still no Trump meet Among the summit's attendees was Donald Trump. Neither Anthony Albanese nor any of his senior ministers have had an in-person meeting with the US President since his inauguration in January, driving concerns about the Prime Minister's management of the Australia-US alliance. Mr Marles was close to meeting Mr Trump as part of talks with the Indo Pacific Four (IP4), but a last-minute schedule change dashed chances of a face-to-face. Mr Marles said it was a 'really important meeting with the (NATO) Secretary General' all the same, stressing that fellow IP4 countries Japan, Korea and New Zealand 'are deeply important in terms of Australia's strategic interests'. 'In respect of all of them, we really are at a high point of our bilateral relationship, and we are working increasingly as a team,' he said. He added that having 'the best lines of communication possible with NATO, to be working as closely as possible with NATO is very much in the advantage of the four of us in terms of how we jointly assert our national interests within the Indo Pacific'. 'And it was a very important meeting in respect of that,' Mr Marles said. He also said he did not get to meet US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. They last met on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore earlier this month. Mr Hegseth used the meeting to call on the Albanese government to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, igniting a major debate in Canberra and fuelling criticisms that Australia is ill-prepared to defend itself against an increasingly aggressive China. Mr Marles said it was not disappointing he did not get to meet his US counterpart. 'I'm in contact with Pete,' he said. 'We met in Singapore just a few weeks ago, and I met him literally a few months before that.' He said there would 'be opportunities to be able to further the conversations that need to be had with Pete Hegseth in the future'. No budge on budget NATO members agreeing to boost defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP was the key outcome of this week's summit. The collective commitment is a major win for Mr Trump, who has threatened to drop US military support for Europe it did not spend more. Mr Marles said it was 'obviously a very significant decision has been made here in relation to European defence spending', but noted it was 'fundamentally a matter for NATO'. 'We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape, assessing the threats that exist there, and the kind of defence force we need to build in order to meet those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and then to resource that,' he said. 'And what that has seen is the biggest peacetime increase in Australian defence spending that we have seen in our history.' Mr Marles said the Albanese government's position was 'understood' by NATO. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher echoed the position when fronting media on Thursday, saying Labor had 'put billions of dollars into defence'. 'But I would again say in the last three years we put $11bn across the forward estimates and $57bn into defence over the medium term,' she told the ABC. 'We've been able to do that at a time we have put increases into health, and other important social programs. 'So … it is a balancing act. But the government's job is to make sure that all areas of government are funded properly, including defence.' While the Albanese government has committed record cash for the defence budget, much of it would not kick in until after 2029. With the Australia itself predicting a major global conflict by 2034 and some analysts warning of a US-China conflict before 2030, critics have argued the money is not flowing fast enough and instead tied up in longer-term projects at the cost of combat-readiness.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Europe's LNG Gamble Exposed by Middle East War
Oil and the security of its supply have stolen the media spotlight in the context of the new Middle East war, and with good reason. Ever since Israel first bombed Iran, diesel prices have soared, jet fuel prices have soared, and importers have been troubled. For Europe, the situation is even worse due to natural gas. Europe has been hurt more than others by the diesel price surge because it has boosted its imports considerably over the past years. About 20% of the diesel Europe consumes comes from imports, and a lot of these imports come from the Middle East. The situation is not much different in jet fuel. Europe depends on imports and a solid chunk of these imports comes from the Middle East. What's true of these essential fuels is doubly true of natural gas—even though direct imports of gas from the Middle East constitute a modest 10% of total imports. Yet they constitute a substantial portion of global gas exports, so any suggestion of disrupted supply affects gas prices in exactly the same way it has affected oil prices—and makes a vital commodity less affordable for Europeans. The latest import figures from the European Commission, for 2024, show that Norway was the EU's biggest supplier of natural gas via pipeline, and the United States was its biggest supplier of liquefied natural gas. Other large suppliers of LNG included—awkwardly—Russia, with 17.5% of the total inflows of LNG, and Algeria, with 10.7%. Qatar's share in EU LNG imports stood at 10.4%, largely because Qatar prefers to deal in long-term contracts, and European Union planners don' it is not these 10.4% that matter. It is the fact that around 20% of global LNG trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz and Iran threatened to close the waterway in response to Israeli and U.S. attacks. This prompted a jump in European natural gas prices by a fitting 20% per the Financial Times, which highlighted the dangers of import dependence in energy commodities. To be fair, the European leadership is aware of these dangers. They are one reason for many European leaders' near-obsession with the energy transition, on the assumption that wind and solar would be able to provide local energy—which is true—and that this energy can replace that provided by gas—which is not true. The latter was proven rather conclusively by the April 28 events in Spain, although it will be a while before the facts become accepted. In the meantime, Europe is in for more suffering, even if Iran doesn't close the Strait of Hormuz, which for the time being seems to have been taken off the table amid ceasefire efforts. The reason is that Europe needs to refill its gas storage caverns for next winter. Even if it cancels the 90% refill rate requirement, it still needs to buy a lot of gas, most of it on the spot market because of that aversion to long-term gas commitments it believes is part and parcel of the transition effort. And geopolitics has made LNG costlier—which will add billions to the refill bill. Earlier this year, it became clear that Europe's bill for natural gas would be higher this year than last because the winter of 2024-25 was colder and storage levels fell lower than in the previous two years. So, this year, Europe needs to buy more gas, adding some $11.2 billion to its total tab. But that was before the latest Middle Eastern war broke out. Now, the tab has gone further up—and Europe is already struggling with high energy costs, not least because of its dependence on LNG imports. Once again, then, Europe would need to rely on luck. If it is lucky, demand for liquefied natural gas from Asia will remain tepid, as it has been over the first half of the year. If it is lucky, the war between Israel and Iran will be over within the month, removing the supply disruption premium from LNG prices. If it is lucky, finally, winter 2025-26 will be as mild as winter 2023-24 and gas demand will be lower. Even if Europe gets lucky on all three, however, the cost of its energy will remain elevated compared to places such as China and the United States—its main business rivals. The reason is as simple as it is unpalatable for European political decision-makers: local supply. Both the U.S. and China are putting their local natural gas resources to good use. Europe isn't, although in all fairness, it doesn't have as much of an easily accessible gas resource abundance as either the U.S. or even China. The staunch refusal to develop any hydrocarbon resources locally, however, is as counterproductive as the refusal to make long-term LNG supply commitments. It is a refusal to acknowledge the reality of energy demand and supply. The sooner Europe gets over this, the better for energy supply security. By Irina Slav for More Top Reads From this article on
