Coalition discuss NDP review spending allocations
The plan, due to be announced on Tuesday, will contain spending of €97bn between 2026 and 2030.
That includes an additional €20bn of new funding which has been financed by the sale of AIB shares and back-tax paid by iPhone-maker Apple.
The meeting last night was attended by Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris, Minister for State Sean Canney, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers and Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe.
The review will contain spending on housing, water, energy and transport.
Next week Minister Chambers will tell Cabinet colleagues that there is uncertainty around global trade and that the threat of tariffs by US President Donald Trump poses "significant risk".
He will say that the best way to safeguard the economy and increase competitiveness is to address the country's infrastructure deficits.
Uisce Éireann has said it needs an additional €2bn on top of €10.3bn already allocated for capital spending.
ESB Networks says it needs an additional €1bn in equity as part of its €13.4bn spending plan.
It is understood there will also be funding for Eirgird, the body which operates the electricity grid.
Tuesday's publication will set out departmental capital ceilings up to 2030 and overall capital investment until 2035.
Government Ministers will outline the specific programmes and investment they will prioritise as part of Budget 2026 in October.
The publication of the review follows weeks of bilateral meetings and engagements between different Government departments and Minister Chambers' Department of Public Expenditure, as well as a public consultation.
Ministers will also be briefed on work being progressed to reform the country's delivery systems so that project life cycles can be reduced and better value for money can be achieved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Coalition warned against diluting contentious Occupied Territories Bill
The Government will be warned not to allow the potential for legal challenges to be used as an excuse to water down the legislation known as the Occupied Territories Bill . The Oireachtas foreign affairs committee will this week publish its report on a proposal to ban trade with illegally occupied territories in Palestine. The report, finalised on Friday, is understood to recommend widening the legislation to include a ban on services as well as goods. There have been stark warnings from business lobby groups that such a measure could damage the Republic's trading relationship with the US and cause economic harm to Irish businesses and households. The Occupied Territories Bill is now undergoing pre-legislative scrutiny Listen | 41:13 The committee will tell the Government to model the ban on trade with illegal settlements in Palestine on 2014 trade restrictions with Russia regarding illegally occupied territories in Ukraine. The committee, chaired by Fianna Fáil TD John Lahart , which did not have statistics on the volume of trade in services between the State and illegally occupied territories, will call on Minister for Trade Simon Harris to collate and publish such information. It will also tell Mr Harris to establish what kind of backlash the State would face in terms of trade and diplomacy should it ban trade with the occupied Palestinian territories. [ Republic joins 25 states urging end to Gaza war Opens in new window ] Ministers will also be advised to consider what defences could be available to a business charged with an offence under the proposed law. . It is understood that the committee believes further work is required from the Government before the law could be enacted. And it will ask that Attorney General Rossa Fanning's advice on the complex Bill is 'expedited' so it can move forward as a matter of urgency. During meetings before the Dáil rose for the summer recess, Mr Lahart was critical of 'misinformation' about the Bill and the State's motivation for passing it – much of which was repeated by senior US political figures. Chairwoman of US House Republicans Lisa McClaine described the Bill as a type of 'extreme anti-Semitic hate'. [ How life in the West Bank is deteriorating for Palestinians Opens in new window ] It is understood that the committee's report will call on the Government to explain the motivation behind the Bill to European Union and international colleagues, while also lobbying Brussels for further collective EU action against Israel. The committee will propose a Government-funded public communications campaign for domestic and international audiences to explain the facts of the Bill and to challenge misinformation spread about it.
The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
Jobseekers are avoiding part-time roles in fear of losing other social welfare
JOBSEEKERS ARE DETERRED from taking up part-time employment in case they lose out on other social welfare entitlements, a specialist expert group has told the government ahead of Budget 2026. In order to ensure unemployed people are motivated to get a job again in the future, the government has been told to increase means-tested social welfare allowance thresholds so that they are in line with the national minimum wage or a recipient's earnings. It comes as Fine Gael leader and Tánaiste Simon Harris floats the possibility that the jobseekers' allowance would be removed from the overall increases to social welfare, in favour of higher increases to pensioners. The Tax Strategy Group, an expert advisory panel at the Department of Finance, said this week that 'inconsistencies' have appeared in Ireland's social welfare system as it has evolved since the late 1800s. It explained, in its annual reports to government ahead of the budget this year, that jobseekers are disincentivised from picking up shifts in part-time roles in case they impact the specific thresholds of income which are disregarded from social welfare payments. A portion of a person's income is not taken into account when assessing how much they are entitled to from a social welfare payment. This means that you can earn a certain amount of money, without it affecting your entitlements. Advertisement In some cases, the threshold of income that is disregarded from the means test, which will later determine the value of the total payment, is surpassed when jobseekers take up part-time roles, leaving them with not enough money to rely on each week. It can also impact any other means-tested social welfare payments that they may be receiving, the tax experts' report said. 'This is a penal approach that acts to disincentive an unemployed person from taking up part-time work,' the report from the Tax Strategy Group said this year . It has recommended that a system should be agreed whereby the values of these thresholds increase annually, 'whether aligned with the National Minimum Wage or earnings', to make sure that jobseekers find work. It added that this change would avoid situations where a person's social welfare entitlements are impacted or reduced, and that it should be done in order to achieve Ireland's policy aims for social welfare. The report later questioned if there was indeed a 'policy rationale for creating this deviation' – in which case, the state should disregard the advice, it said. Speaking earlier this month, Tánaiste Harris said he was not convinced that dole increases should be in line with other social welfare payments, such as pensions and disability payments. 'When there are other supports out there for very many people who can't work for very many good reasons. That's my opinion. We'll thrash it out all that out at the time of budget,' he told reporters. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
9 hours ago
- RTÉ News
First kite of pre-budget season flew over Leinster House
Bird watchers sometimes herald the sighting of the first swallow of the year as the start of spring. And, not to be outdone, political anoraks have a similar phrase too. The first kite of the pre-budget season flew high and mighty over a quieter than usual Leinster House this week, as the beginning of the Dáil's summer recess was interrupted by a potentially serious political row gliding into view. Not for the first time, it involved a once cast-iron pre-election promise whose carefully choreographed landing now risks becoming a victim of some not exactly unexpected post-election economic turbulence. And, not for the last time, the planned flight trajectory could yet be replaced by an all too public nose dive as the Coalition checks its political radar for signs of how to navigate its way between two competing financial priorities. Hospitality tax cut The reason for the situation is a Programme for Government promise which is now at real risk of being delayed. In the January document, which outlines what Government intends to do in power, the Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael-Independents Coalition confirmed that the existing 13.5% hospitality VAT rate would be reduced. That commitment, which was one of Fine Gael's key commitments in last November's General Election, was widely seen as indicating but did not explicitly point to this October's Budget as the moment the 13.5% rate would be cut to 9%. Such a move would support struggling restaurants, bars, cafes, pubs and hotels, and therefore help protect jobs. "Our Budget decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in." But its near €1 billion price tag would mean less financial space for cost of living supports for the wider pubic, an issue that was made crystal clear as Government outlined its immediate economic plans this week. During a press conference at Government Buildings on Tuesday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers announced the Coalition's National Development Plan and Summer Economic Statement. The former outlined a €275bn capital projects war chest for the coming decade, including aspirational promises and dazzling numbers like €36bn for housing, €22bn for transport infrastructure such as the long-delayed Dublin Metro, and almost €10bn for health. But the latter was more pragmatic, detailing in practical terms how much money Government actually has to play with in its coffers right now - and, specifically, space for €1.5bn worth of tax cuts in Budget 2026. The figure may seem like a lot, and it is, but it still does not pay for everything voters want. And, inevitably, that means difficult choices for the coalition to make, including when it comes to promises previously given. Despite both Mr Martin and Mr Harris saying in recent months that the cut will happen, Mr Donohoe told reporters that the expected hospital VAT reduction from 13.5% to 9% was not as certain as previously indicated. Rarely one to misspeak, Minister Donohoe explained that if the hospitality VAT rate is reduced it is important "to be open" about the fact "trade offs" with other sections of society may be necessary. "I have always made clear my intention with regard to that [the hospitality VAT cut]," he said. His use of the word "intention" rather than anything stronger peaked the interest of attending reporters. "But I have also said there are trade offs, and there are consequences to that," he said. "And there are therefore other things that we are not going to be able to do. "If you were to bring forward a tax package that was to fund a full year measure that was in relation to the VAT, the cost of that would be nearly a €1bn." "And then if I was to add to that other measures we've done in the past, we would have a tax package that is far bigger than what I believe would be safe," he said. He added: "Our Budget decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in." A pre-budget kite, in other words. And one that has caused if not a split, then certainly some friction, within the Coalition as competing political priorities have emerged. Internal Coalition friction While Minister Donohoe's comments were likely designed to point out the reality of the dilemma for Government rather than specifically rule out the hospitality tax cuts this year, they did open the door to the prospect within at least some sections of the coalition. By Wednesday, several Government sources had indicated privately that the cut should be delayed until July 2026, with Fianna Fáil members - including the wily long-time Limerick City TD Willie O'Dea - among those to publicly nudge forward the argument. Speaking on Friday on RTÉ's Morning Ireland programme, Deputy O'Dea said given the limited scope for tax reductions in the upcoming budget, he would "like to see it [the €1.5bn in available tax cuts] more equitably divided", with "an increase in tax credits and tax bands in line with inflation" his priority. Asked if this is because it would be difficult to convince voters to support helping the hospitality sector first, given a disputed reputation for price gouging by some businesses in that sector, Deputy O'Dea said: "It's not just a question of would it be hard to sell to the public, it's would it be good for the economy." Responding to suggestions of friction in the Coalition over the situation, he added: "I wouldn't describe it as friction, people have different views and that's what Coalition government is about." "I don't understand what kind of kites the Government are flying in relation to this cut for the hospitality industry, the Government are sewing massive seeds of confusion on this yet again." Deputy O'Dea's view was echoed privately by numerous Fianna Fáil TDs, and a smaller number of Fine Gael colleagues, who questioned how prioritising help for businesses instead of cost of living supports for the wider public might play out. And senior Government sources did little to kill off the suggestion when asked. But Fine Gael TD and Minister for Enterprise and Tourism Peter Burke - the politician responsible for the sector - had a different view during a hastily organised press briefing at Government Buildings on Thursday. Asked if he would acknowledge the hospitality VAT tax rate cut will now be delayed until next summer, Minister Burke responded: "Absolutely not acknowledging that, any negotiations will form part of the budget. "We're now still in July and it's very important to note the Budget will consider all options in every different sector." Opposition criticism The opposition, it is fair to say, were less than impressed over the apparent confusion over whether the hospitality tax cut would still go ahead on 1 January or be delayed until at least next July. Labour TD Duncan Smith said bluntly: "I don't understand what kind of kites the Government are flying in relation to this cut for the hospitality industry, the Government are sewing massive seeds of confusion on this yet again." That view was shared by other opposition TDs, including Sinn Féin's Donnchadh O'Laoghaire who said the Coalition needs to find a way to help both the hospitality sector and the wider public through cost of living supports. And it was echoed too by non-political groups representing those in the sector, which became locked in a war of words over what should happen next. Responding to the watering down of the previous tax cut promise, Restaurants Association of Ireland Chief Executive Adrian Cummins said: "If the VAT rate doesn't reduce to 9% from January 1, you'll see more and more closures" and resulting job losses, noting more than 200 restaurants have already closed this year. However, the view was countered by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions general secretary Owen Reidy. "The proposal to cut the VAT rate at a time of huge economic uncertainty flies in the face of all available evidence, and would amount to nothing less than economic vandalism," he said. "The Government has identified many laudable priorities as part of its programme for Government: housing, reductions in child poverty, and investment in disability services. "Given that ministers have been giving serious warnings about economic uncertainty, why would they prioritise a corporate handout costing almost €1bn?" Government dilemma That latter point goes to the heart of the difficulty now facing Government, and in part helps to explain the early nature of this week's at times contradictory pre-budget kite flying. While there is a strong argument for the need to protect businesses, and therefore jobs, in the hospitality sector during a period of intense global financial uncertainty, few politicians would want to be seen to be doing so at the expense of supports for households during that same economic turbulence. In that context a calculated delay to the hospitality VAT rate cut plans makes some sense, as it would allow Government to continue to argue it will - eventually - keep its promise while giving itself more short-term financial space to protect the wider public. That plan, however, comes with a significant catch, in that the hospitality sector is insistent a delay to the tax cut will see people lose their jobs. But, more than one Government TD has privately noted this week, not delaying the tax cut in order to have more space for wider public cost of living supports would put households at risk and give opposition parties an obvious line of attack the coalition could do without. The first kite of the pre-budget season has now soared into view. Depending on which way the economic and public wind blows, it could yet lead to an unexpectedly bumpy political ride.
