AI or human? Dubai launches world-first labelling system that tells you the difference
And that's why the latest announcement by the Dubai leadership should come as welcome news for anyone who has been duped by AI content.
Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Crown Prince of Dubai and Deputy Prime Minister of the UAE, has announced the world's first Human-Machine Collaboration Icons.
Essentially, these icons have been designed to clearly identify whether content has been made entirely by humans or by artificial intelligence.
Dubai government entities have been directed to start adopting the system in research and knowledge-based endeavours.
And Sheikh Hamdan has called on researchers, publications, creators and institutions to adopt the new labelling system.
Today, we launch the world's first Human–Machine Collaboration Icons: a classification system that brings transparency to how research, publications, and content are created. Developed by @DubaiFuture, the icons reflect Dubai's commitment to open, responsible, and future-ready… pic.twitter.com/LUiTMy2VMC
— Hamdan bin Mohammed (@HamdanMohammed) July 16, 2025
He said: 'Distinguishing between human creativity and artificial intelligence has become a real challenge in light of today's rapid technological advances.
'This calls for a new approach to recognise the growing role of intelligent machines. That's why we launched the world's first Human–Machine Collaboration Icons, a classification system that brings transparency to how research documents, publications, and content are created.
'We invite researchers, writers, publishers, designers, and content creators around the world to adopt this new global classification system and use it responsibly and in ways that benefit people.'
The icons, developed by the Dubai Future Foundation, act as clear indicators of whether content has been entirely made by a human, made with the assistance of AI or entirely by AI.
Creators, publications and researchers who wish to use the icon system can download the icons via the Dubai Future Foundation.
How the Human-Machine Collaboration (HMC) classification system works
What does trust look like in the age of #AI?
As machine and human intelligence become harder to tell apart, authorship becomes harder to trace.
To support transparency, we've launched the 'Human–Machine Collaboration icons' (HMC), a visual system that makes AI involvement in… pic.twitter.com/J2xwzIDcVm
— Dubai Future Foundation (@DubaiFuture) July 16, 2025
The classification system defines 'intelligent machines' as a broad category encompassing various digital technologies, including algorithms, automation tools, generative AI models, and robotics, or any technological system that plays a role in the research or content creation process.
There are three separate labels for AI-assisted content, with one indicating human-produced content enhanced by AI for accuracy, correction or improvement.
In the middle of the five icons is one that's jointly human and machine-led, with no clear leader between the two.
Another label will clearly label that content has been led by AI, with humans only stepping in to verify quality and accuracy.
(Credit: Dubai Future Foundation)
The labels use an arrow system, with the upwards arrow indicating human-led content and a downward arrow signalling machine-led content.
In addition to the five primary icons, the system also includes nine functional icons that indicate where in the process human–machine collaboration occurred.
These cover ideation, literature review, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing, translation, visuals, and design.
The icon system is designed to be flexible and adaptable across sectors, industries, and content formats, including image and video outputs.
While it doesn't assign any percentages or exact weights to the contribution of either side, it does allow creators and researchers to be transparent about the use of AI in their work.
Looking for things to do in Dubai?
All the sports events in Dubai in 2025 to sign up for
Make 2025 the year of your PBs
50 brilliant outdoor activities to try at least once in Dubai
Let's take this outside
The incredible Dubai hotels offering more than just a room
Did someone say freebies?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Schools and counties begin to see payment delays as Pennsylvania's budget stalemate hits a month
Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro 's administration says billions of dollars in aid to Pennsylvania 's schools and human services will be delayed, as he and the politically divided Legislature struggle to end what is now a month-long budget stalemate. State-supported universities, libraries, early-childhood education programs and county health departments also will see delays in payments, Shapiro's administration said in letters sent Tuesday to providers. 'I recognize this information is concerning, and it is equally concerning to both me and the governor,' Budget Secretary Uri Monson said in the letters. 'Our administration continues to work diligently to find agreement between the House and Senate and we will work to support you and your organization as you manage the current situation.' Budget stalemates are also playing out in Michigan and North Carolina, where Democratic governors are sharing power with Republican legislators. Pennsylvania school districts, which received more than $11 billion last year from the state for operations, will see delays on more than $2 billion in payments through August, Shapiro's administration said. District officials have said the poorest districts might have to borrow money if aid is delayed in August. Universities, such as Penn State and state-run system schools, will see delays on more than $200 million in aid and counties will not get on-time payments of $390 million to child welfare agencies, it said. More than $100 million in payments to a range of other agencies, nonprofits and programs will also be delayed, according to the administration's letters. It also said it cannot distribute money to early childhood education providers. Shapiro and top Republican lawmakers have said they are engaged in closed-door discussions to try to find a compromise. Neither the state House nor state Senate have scheduled a voting session for this week. Without the governor's signature on a new spending plan, the state lost some of its spending authority starting July 1. ___
Time Out Dubai
2 days ago
- Time Out Dubai
Dubai Reef project reveals incredible results
If you thought Dubai was pretty on land, wait until you see what's now living in the waters around it. Launching the Dubai Reef project in 2024, the city has now shown the incredible marine life that has grown as a result of it. One of the largest reef development projects in the world, the mega project was designed to encourage fish populations and a healthy marine environment. Aiming to lay 20,000 marine modules into the water by 2027, the materials cause reef to be formed which attracts a range of sea life. After completing the first phase of the project, the Dubai Media Office shared some incredible footage of what is now living in Dubai's waters. DUBAI REEF, a pioneering purpose-built reef development and one of the largest in the world, demonstrates significant progress in enhancing marine ecosystems within Dubai's waters, with abundant fish populations and habitats developing around the reef modules. — Dubai Media Office (@DXBMediaOffice) July 28, 2025 According to surveys, there are now 15 native species of fish in the reef of 3,660 modules, including snappers, groupers and barracuda, with a potential ten percent increase in marine biodiversity. By 2027, over 600 square kilometres will be covered with the modules, with the hope that ecosystems will continue to thrive for years. Launched under the directive of His Highness Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, when the project was founded, he explained: (Credit: Dubai Media Office) 'Dubai is strongly dedicated to making substantial contributions to global efforts to mitigate the impact of climate change through initiatives that promote the sustainability of our natural environment, with particular emphasis on coral reefs. 'We will continue to pursue these strategic goals to ensure a more sustainable future for generations to come. We are committed to generating impactful solutions by initiating innovative projects to overcome challenges emerging from climate change. 'Dubai is dedicated to playing a positive role in global environmental preservation and supporting the UAE's goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050. We appreciate every contribution to our strategic objectives in this vital field.' In other Dubai news Malls in Dubai to be turned into huge running tracks this week On your marks… New Emirates flights from Dubai for 2025 Will you be jetting off soon? 5 Dubai changes coming in August that you need to know about From sporty surprises to the final days of sales
Geeky Gadgets
23-07-2025
- Geeky Gadgets
Qwen 3 vs Kimi K2 : Which AI Model is Better? Precision vs Versatility
What makes an AI model truly exceptional—specialized precision or versatile adaptability? In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence, this question lies at the heart of the debate between Qwen 3 vs Kimi K2, two innovative systems that represent starkly different approaches to AI development. On one side, Qwen 3's dual-model architecture prioritizes efficiency in non-reasoning tasks, delivering unparalleled results in areas like data processing and pattern recognition. On the other, Kimi K2 champions versatility, excelling in coding, simulations, and creative problem-solving. Yet, neither model is without its limitations, and their contrasting strengths provoke a deeper conversation about the trade-offs inherent in AI design. In this exploration, Prompt Engineering delve into the unique capabilities and shortcomings of Qwen 3 vs Kimi K2, uncovering how their distinct architectures shape their performance across critical domains. From Qwen 3's dominance in structured problem-solving to Kimi K2's prowess in physics-based simulations, you'll gain insights into how these models push the boundaries of what AI can achieve—and where they fall short. More importantly, this comparison offers a glimpse into the future of AI: will specialization or versatility define the next generation of intelligent systems? The answers may surprise you, challenging conventional wisdom about what it takes to build truly fantastic AI. Qwen 3 vs Kimi K2 Qwen 3: Optimized for Specialized Performance Qwen 3 employs a dual-model architecture that separates reasoning and non-reasoning tasks into distinct systems. This design enables it to excel in non-reasoning tasks, using its 22 billion active parameters to deliver state-of-the-art results. For example, Qwen 3 achieves an impressive RKGI score of 41.8%, outperforming competitors like Kimi K2 and Opus 4 in non-reasoning benchmarks. This makes it particularly effective in areas such as data processing, structured problem-solving, and pattern recognition, where precision and efficiency are critical. However, this specialization comes with notable trade-offs. Qwen 3 struggles with tasks requiring reasoning and spatial understanding, such as physics-based simulations and interpreting visual prompts like shadow rendering. While it demonstrates some reasoning capabilities, these remain underdeveloped, highlighting areas for future improvement. Its focus on non-reasoning tasks, while advantageous in specific domains, limits its versatility in handling more complex challenges. Kimi K2: A Versatile Tool for Coding and Simulations Kimi K2 takes a different approach, excelling in tasks that demand creativity, technical execution, and adaptability. Its ability to generate functional code for applications such as website development and simulate complex physical phenomena makes it a valuable tool for developers and researchers. For instance, Kimi K2 performs exceptionally well in physics-based simulations, accurately modeling planetary systems and rendering shadows with high fidelity. Despite its strengths, Kimi K2 falls short in non-reasoning benchmarks, where Qwen 3 dominates. This contrast underscores the inherent trade-offs in AI model design: optimizing for one set of tasks often limits performance in others. Kimi K2's versatility in coding and simulations is impressive, but its relative weakness in non-reasoning tasks highlights the challenges of creating a truly all-encompassing AI system. Qwen 3 and Kimi K2 AI Models Compared Watch this video on YouTube. Stay informed about the latest in AI model comparison by exploring our other resources and articles. Shared Challenges in Complex Problem-Solving Both Qwen 3 and Kimi K2 encounter significant challenges when addressing complex problem-solving tasks. These tasks often require a combination of reasoning, adaptability, and creativity, areas where both models show room for improvement. Qwen 3: While its non-reasoning focus allows it to approach reasoning-like tasks, it struggles to deliver accurate solutions for intricate problems such as navigating mazes or solving multifaceted puzzles. While its non-reasoning focus allows it to approach reasoning-like tasks, it struggles to deliver accurate solutions for intricate problems such as navigating mazes or solving multifaceted puzzles. Kimi K2: Its strengths in coding and simulations do not translate into strong performance in tasks requiring deep logical reasoning, limiting its effectiveness in broader problem-solving scenarios. These shared limitations highlight the broader challenges faced by AI systems in achieving a balance between specialization and versatility. Addressing these challenges will require advancements in training methodologies, data quality, and model architecture. Tool Integration and Strategic Design Tool integration represents another key area of divergence between Qwen 3 and Kimi K2. Kimi K2 incorporates code execution capabilities, enhancing its adaptability for real-world applications such as coding and simulations. This feature makes it a more versatile option for developers and researchers seeking practical solutions. In contrast, Qwen 3 lacks integrated tool capabilities, which limits its effectiveness in solving complex, real-world challenges. Its dual-model strategy, which separates reasoning and non-reasoning tasks, represents a departure from the industry trend of hybrid models. While this approach allows for specialization, it also introduces limitations. To remain competitive, Qwen 3 will need to focus on retraining with higher-quality data, using reinforcement learning, and enhancing its reasoning capabilities. Implications for the Future of AI The contrasting strategies of Qwen 3 and Kimi K2 offer valuable insights into the future of AI development. Qwen 3's dual-model architecture challenges the prevailing notion that a single, hybrid model can excel across all tasks. By focusing on specialization, it opens new possibilities for creating highly efficient systems tailored to specific domains. However, its success will depend on continued advancements in training techniques, data quality, and user feedback. Kimi K2, with its emphasis on versatility, demonstrates the potential of integrated solutions that combine creativity and technical execution. Its ability to handle coding and simulations positions it as a powerful tool for developers and researchers, but its limitations in non-reasoning tasks highlight the need for further refinement. As these models evolve, their strengths and limitations will shape the trajectory of artificial intelligence. Whether through specialized systems like Qwen 3 or integrated solutions like Kimi K2, the ultimate goal remains the same: to develop AI capable of solving increasingly complex problems with precision, efficiency, and adaptability. Key Takeaways Qwen 3: Excels in non-reasoning tasks with a dual-model architecture but struggles with reasoning and tool integration. Excels in non-reasoning tasks with a dual-model architecture but struggles with reasoning and tool integration. Kimi K2: Strong in coding and physics-based simulations but less effective in non-reasoning benchmarks. Strong in coding and physics-based simulations but less effective in non-reasoning benchmarks. Shared Challenges: Both models face limitations in complex problem-solving and logical reasoning tasks. Both models face limitations in complex problem-solving and logical reasoning tasks. Future Directions: Qwen 3's specialization strategy and Kimi K2's versatility highlight different paths for AI development. The ongoing advancements in AI models like Qwen 3 and Kimi K2 will continue to drive innovation, expanding the possibilities of artificial intelligence and shaping its role in addressing real-world challenges. Media Credit: Prompt Engineering Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
