
Opinion 100 days of Trump: US-India ties remain on an even keel within an otherwise turbulent global order
On April 29, Donald Trump completed 100 days as US president. How has India navigated these first three months, given the high stakes with respect to multiple issues like tariffs, immigration and defence?
On February 12 this year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Washington, DC. He was one of the first national leaders of any consequence to visit the United States, barely a month after Trump's triumphant return to office. Even before he visited Washington, DC, he had dispatched his Minister of External Affairs, S Jaishankar, to meet with his counterpart, Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State. Jaishankar, as a senior cabinet official, no doubt enjoys Modi's confidence and probably prepared the ground for the prime minister's visit.
Modi's alacrity in visiting the United States was hardly accidental. Despite their apparent personal bonhomie, Trump had referred to India as the 'tariff king' and had made it abundantly clear that he planned to impose significant tariffs on India as part of his trade strategy. Through an early visit to the US, Modi had, no doubt, sought to curry favour with Trump to ward off the punishing tariffs.
Such a strategy had much to recommend it. Trump, who fancies himself a deft negotiator, has many of the attributes of a schoolyard bully. Those who seek to propitiate him can often win favour in his universe. More to the point, even before he visited Washington, DC, Modi had already signalled a willingness to address Trump's obsession with tariffs. To that end, he had reduced tariffs on a range of American products, including the iconic Harley-Davidson motorcycle, a symbol of American manufacturing. During his visit, likely at Trump's prodding, Modi also made a tentative offer to purchase an unspecified number of F-35 fighter aircraft for the Indian Air Force — an extraordinary expense that India will incur if it proceeds with this acquisition.
The Modi government had also accepted a host of Indian illegal immigrants whom the Trump administration had deported. Even as some members of the Opposition expressed reservations about the treatment of these deportees, including reports of them being shackled on the flights from the United States, Modi maintained a studious silence on the matter. All these acts of commission and omission were clearly designed to avoid a fracas with the second Trump administration.
Since his visit, Trump's new Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, visited India in late March. Her trip included a meeting with Prime Minister Modi and an address to the annual Raisina Dialogue that the Ministry of External Affairs takes part in. During her visit, she highlighted the Trump administration's interest in working with India on matters ranging from intelligence sharing to counterterrorism — both issues of considerable significance to New Delhi. These visits and gestures all indicated that despite the fraught and contentious issues of tariffs, the relationship was now multi-faceted and that, despite a change in administrations, India enjoyed bipartisan support in the US.
On 'liberation day', April 2, Trump imposed a sweeping set of tariffs on a global basis, not even sparing traditional American allies across Europe. On India, he imposed an overall tariff of 27 per cent. Barely a week later, for complex reasons including significant global backlash, he paused them for the next ninety days. This has provided India with an important reprieve, and the Modi government has made a concerted effort to try to arrive at a trade pact with the United States before the three-month moratorium ends.
Meanwhile, in late April, Vice-President J D Vance and his wife, Usha, who is of Indian heritage, along with their three children, visited India. The visit clearly had both personal and professional components. Quite apart from the obligatory visit to the Taj Mahal, Vance also met with Prime Minister Modi, where he sought to boost two of President Trump's key goals in the bilateral relationship. The first, of course, was to boost US-India trade and to induce India to reduce a range of tariff barriers. Second, Vance also raised the matter of India purchasing more defence equipment from the United States.
From a strictly bilateral standpoint, the optics of the visit were quite positive. Tragically, a brutal and unprecedented attack on Indian tourists in Kashmir — reportedly carried out by the Resistance Front, an offshoot of the vicious, Pakistan-based terrorist organisation Lashkar-e-Taiba — cast a pall over the vice-president's maiden visit to the country.
The timing of this horrific incident notwithstanding — and one which the DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, has unequivocally condemned — it appears that US-India relations remain on an even keel in an otherwise turbulent and uncertain world. The key issue, which hangs like a sword of Damocles over the relationship, is the question of tariffs. If New Delhi manages to demonstrate some dexterity in tackling this vexed issue, then a bilateral relationship that has gathered much steam since the end of the Cold War may not lose its momentum.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
New normal amid a new cold war
The effect of Donald Trump's return to the White House is being felt in capitals all over the world. At the recently-concluded Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the spectre of a new cold war rose once again to dominate discussions. In his ASEAN chairman's statement, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim categorically asserted the return of a cold war to systemic interstate relations. The reference does not augur well for the ASEAN, which has been trying to build resilience within while maintaining a degree of balance between the US and China. The second important aspect of this year's dialogue has been the tough stand India has placed on its recent military stand-off with Pakistan following the devastating terror attack at Pahalgam. The subsequent Indian political and military action against Pakistan has highlighted what the political leadership is calling the 'new normal', signalling that tolerance has its limits. Both these indicated a changed environment at the Shangri-La Dialogue, especially as they implied certain defining shifts. First, the very definition of the term 'cold war' and how this period will be different from the earlier cold war. Second, the Trump administration's impact on the wider Indo-Pacific and what it expects from the region vis-á-vis the US-China rivalry. Third, the choices for ASEAN states, particularly in light of the extending US-China rivalry. And finally, how this affects the role India plays within multilateral forums and how India's definition of the new normal affects the region. First, the reference to a new cold war is not new. Even during the first Trump term, a National Security Strategy paper released by the administration in November 2017 clearly reiterated that the foremost threats to American interests and leadership in the global order were from China and Russia, articulating the tensions at systemic levels.


Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Elon Musk's Trump clash backfires; Tesla CEO's net worth takes massive hit, federal contracts under risk
Elon Musk's clash with President Donald Trump appears to have backfired on him. The 53-year-old, who accused the president of being ungrateful, lost $15 billion on Thursday, and his company Tesla's shares tumbled as much as 9% during trading hours. According to Forbes' real-time billionaires list, Musk is worth $399.5 billion, down 3.63%. Tesla slumped 8.9% amid Musk's criticism of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'. This comes after the president lashed out at his former ally on Thursday, saying he was 'disappointed' by the billionaire's opposition to the sweeping tax-cut and spending bill that is at the heart of his administration's agenda. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm, I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' he said. Meanwhile, Musk unleashed a series of responses on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: 'Such ingratitude': Elon Musk claims Trump would've lost election without him "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," he wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' The Tesla CEO also used the president's own words against him. He retweeted the 78-year-old's part criticisms about raising the debt ceiling. In a 2013 tweet, Trump wrote, " I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!" "Wise words," Musk commented on the post. Read More: 'Disgusting': Why Elon Musk attacked Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful' bill In his latest attack on Musk, Trump said that he is terminating the tech billionaire's subsidies and contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' he added.


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump ally Laura Loomer says Republican law makers wondering if they should side with President Trump or Elon Musk; Tesla CEO responds: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I ...
The escalating feud between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk has reached a critical juncture, with Republican lawmakers now questioning their loyalties as the two most powerful figures in conservative politics engage in an unprecedented public battle over Trump's signature domestic policy bill. Trump ally Laura Loomer reported Thursday that GOP legislators are actively debating whether to support the president or the Tesla CEO. "I know lawmakers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon," Loomer posted on social media. "I've been on the hill all day and it's all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world." Musk's response was characteristically provocative, telling Loomer: "One thing's for sure, it ain't boring!" He then delivered what appears to be a veiled threat to Republican politicians weighing their options: "Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years." Musk claims credit for Trump's Presidential election victory The public rupture intensified Thursday when Musk explicitly took credit for Trump's 2024 election victory after the president expressed disappointment in his former adviser. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote on X. "Such ingratitude." Trump had earlier told reporters during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that he was "very disappointed in Elon" and that he had "helped Elon a lot." The president accused Musk of opposing the legislation only after Republicans removed electric vehicle subsidies that would benefit Tesla. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem. And he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars," Trump said. Battle over 'Big Beautiful Bill' escalates The conflict centers on Trump's massive domestic policy bill, which Musk has repeatedly attacked as a "disgusting abomination" that will increase the federal deficit. Musk has urged Americans to "KILL THE BILL," arguing it doesn't cut government spending deeply enough despite projections it will remove health coverage from millions. Trump disputed Musk's claim that he wasn't consulted on the legislation, stating: "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill, better than almost anybody sitting here." Musk fired back on X: "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" The president also mocked Musk's appearance, referencing the billionaire's recent black eye and suggesting he might be developing "Trump Derangement Syndrome." Trump compared Musk to other former advisers who "become hostile" after leaving his administration, noting that "some of them actually become hostile" when "the glamour's gone." AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now