'I'm £9,000 a year better off thanks to work scheme - more people should use it'
Salary sacrifice allows you to exchange some of your salary for a non-cash benefit, such as pension contributions - and it can actually increase your take-home pay as it reduces how much tax you pay
One man has explained how he has boosted his pension pot by around £9,000 a year by opting into a workplace scheme.
Caleb uses salary sacrifice to exchange some of his salary for pension contributions. As well as increasing your retirement pot, salary sacrifice also reduces your tax bill, as the deduction is taken from your gross salary.
This means you may find your take-home pay actually goes up. However, you should be aware of the potential impactions of salary sacrifice if you are taking out credit.
For example, mortgage lenders often calculate your affordability based on your gross salary, so a lower salary might reduce the amount you can borrow.
Caleb said: 'I've opted into a salary exchange scheme primarily for the pension tax benefits and National Insurance savings. It's been a smart move financially, and I've noticed the long-term gains in my pension contributions without affecting my take-home pay much.
'The opt-in process was fairly straightforward. My employer had clear steps laid out, and the HR system made it easy to enroll. There were no major complications.
'Our HR team provided a simple guide explaining how salary exchange works and the benefits. They were also available for any questions, which helped clarify the impact on payslips and pension growth.'
New figures from Scottish Widows show workers could boost their pension pots by £41,200 by opting into salary sacrifice. Someone with an average salary of £37,430 would increase their pension pot by £528 a year.
For a worker aged 30 and retiring at age 67, and assuming 5% investment growth, this would add £41,200 to their pension savings by the time they retire.
Susan Hope, Scottish Widows Retirement Expert, commented: 'Questions loom over the future of salary exchange, despite it being the best way to maximise workers' retirement savings.
'Cutting or abolishing it completely would ignore the long-term boost it delivers to people's finances. Our data shows not only the positive impact on people's take home pay, and pension wealth, but also the halo effect it has on people's financial confidence.
'The term 'salary sacrifice' is a red herring because neither the employer nor employee has to give anything up when they take advantage of this scheme. It's truly a win win.
'The key to unlocking additional savings into pensions is awareness, and this needs improving so schemes like salary exchange can positively impact more people's finances. We should be empowering our workforce's future and salary exchange is one way to do this.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Speedy Hire profits fall as government puts off rail improvements
Speedy Hire has reported lower profits amid delays in government spending on major infrastructure projects. The equipment rental business posted adjusted pre-tax profits of £8.7million in the year ending March, compared to £14.7million in the previous 12 months. Speedy Hire said the economic environment had remained 'challenging' over the past year owing to delays in government spending on major infrastructure projects. These include Network Rail's plan to invest £45.4billion on improving the UK's railway infrastructure between 2024 and 2029. Hire-related revenues also increased by just £1.4million to £255million, which the firm blamed on its trade and retail segment expanding at a slower-than-anticipated pace. Earnings were somewhat impacted by the early shutdown of contracts in Kazakhstan, where it operates a joint venture. Speedy Hire's overall turnover slipped by 1.2 per cent to £416.6million, due to lower wholesale fuel prices driving its total service sales down by 2.8 per cent to £158million. However, the Merseyside-based company continues to invest in its 'velocity' growth strategy, with £57.5million going towards its hire fleet during the year to support recent contract gains. As part of the strategy, Speedy Hire has also closed eight depots and made some staff redundant in response to the government's hikes in National Insurance contributions and the National Living Wage. Dan Evans, chief executive of Speedy Hire, said: 'We are focused on what we can control, and we will continue to manage our cost base and balance our investment decisions through the economic cycle. We are well-positioned to capitalise on end-market recovery. 'We anticipate seeing the benefit from a promising pipeline of growth opportunities with new and existing customers, alongside increased commitment and clarity on government spending.' Headquartered in Newton-le-Willows, Speedy Hire provides equipment, including air conditioning units, power tools, and rubbish chutes, to the construction sector. It ended the last financial year with net debt £11.8million higher at £113.1million. Since then, the firm has finalised a £225million refinancing of its borrowing facilities. Mark Crouch, market analyst at eToro, said the company 'is stuck in a classic catch-22.' He added: 'To win new contracts, it needs to ramp up capital expenditure, fuelled by debt. 'But with the economy on shaky ground and delays in government spending weighing on major projects, taking on more debt could end up fixing one problem while wrenching open another.' Speedy Hire shares were 0.4 per cent down at 26p on Wednesday afternoon and have slumped by around 57 per cent in the past five years.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
The £1bn cost of the National Insurance raid that Reeves ignored
Rachel Reeves's National Insurance tax grab has left councils facing a seven-figure shortfall with more at risk of bankruptcy, MPs have warned. The Chancellor raised employer contributions to 15pc during her Budget, but a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report on Wednesday said ministers had failed to properly assess another £1.1bn of potential costs. MPs said the Government had not carried out an assessment of the true costs, and demanded it review the short- and long-term impact on providing services. Councils are now facing the risk of private providers passing on their increased costs and handing back social care contracts they can no longer afford to deliver, it said. The report added that local government finance was in a 'perilous state', with budget deficits putting many councils at risk of effectively going bankrupt. The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils, has already warned that more than half of councils are on course for insolvency next year. The National Insurance contribution rate for employers rose from 13.8pc to 15pc in April following changes in October's Budget. The salary threshold also dropped from £9,100 to £5,000, as the Government tried to raise tax for public spending. Ministers set aside £4.7bn to support the public sector, including £502m for councils to cover increases in their direct employment costs. However, the LGA calculated the actual cost to be £637m. It also warned of £1.1bn in extra costs for councils passed on by service providers they had commissioned. The PAC report said: 'Some local authorities may be able to provide financial support to service providers for these increases in costs, but it is unacceptable that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and HM Treasury have not assessed how much impact this could have on local authorities.' It added: 'Spending on special educational needs and disabilities (Send) has outstripped the money available from the Department for Education to pay for it. Local authority deficits from these overspends are expected to be between £2.9bn and £3.9bn a year by the end of 2027–28. 'The mechanism which allows local authorities to keep these deficits off their books is due to run out in March 2026, and without it, many local authorities are at risk of effectively going bankrupt.' The charity, Mencap, which supports more than 4,000 people with learning difficulties, also told the committee it could be forced to hand back social care contracts after a potential £18m annual increase in costs due to National Insurance and national living wage rises. It comes as council tax is expected to rise again to fund major commitments announced earlier this month in Ms Reeves's first spending review. Rates are already at record levels, with nine in 10 areas across England enduring the maximum 4.99pc council tax rise this year, and parts of Scotland and Wales slapped with even higher increases. A spokesman for the County Councils Network, which represents local authorities, said the Government's compensation covered less than half of the increased costs in National Insurance. He said: 'This year, county and unitary councils are having to make an unprecedented £1.2bn in savings due to rising demand for services, compounded by recent government decisions. One of those was the decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions, which has adversely impacted on councils. 'Our recent survey found that the Government's compensation covered just 40pc of the costs of this policy for county and unitary councils this year, meaning they will have to make up the shortfall through service reductions and other efficiencies.' Councillor Louise Gittins, chairman of the LGA, said the spending review had left councils under continued financial pressure. She said: 'Many will continue to have to increase council tax bills to try and protect services, but still need to make further cutbacks. While the Government faced tough choices, future funding for adult social care is good news but a lack of significant extra government money needed to meet immediate pressures is worrying.' Jim McMahon, of the Ministry of Housing, said the PAC's claims were not supported by the evidence. He said: 'The spending review provided over £5bn of new grant funding for local services, and that's on top of the £69bn we have already injected this year to boost council finances. 'The results speak for themselves. Over 95pc of audited accounts were submitted for the deadline we set, no S114 were issued by councils as a result of financial distress, and claims against Exceptional Financial Support were £1bn less than the previous year.'
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I'm £9,000 a year better off thanks to work scheme - more people should use it'
Salary sacrifice allows you to exchange some of your salary for a non-cash benefit, such as pension contributions - and it can actually increase your take-home pay as it reduces how much tax you pay One man has explained how he has boosted his pension pot by around £9,000 a year by opting into a workplace scheme. Caleb uses salary sacrifice to exchange some of his salary for pension contributions. As well as increasing your retirement pot, salary sacrifice also reduces your tax bill, as the deduction is taken from your gross salary. This means you may find your take-home pay actually goes up. However, you should be aware of the potential impactions of salary sacrifice if you are taking out credit. For example, mortgage lenders often calculate your affordability based on your gross salary, so a lower salary might reduce the amount you can borrow. Caleb said: 'I've opted into a salary exchange scheme primarily for the pension tax benefits and National Insurance savings. It's been a smart move financially, and I've noticed the long-term gains in my pension contributions without affecting my take-home pay much. 'The opt-in process was fairly straightforward. My employer had clear steps laid out, and the HR system made it easy to enroll. There were no major complications. 'Our HR team provided a simple guide explaining how salary exchange works and the benefits. They were also available for any questions, which helped clarify the impact on payslips and pension growth.' New figures from Scottish Widows show workers could boost their pension pots by £41,200 by opting into salary sacrifice. Someone with an average salary of £37,430 would increase their pension pot by £528 a year. For a worker aged 30 and retiring at age 67, and assuming 5% investment growth, this would add £41,200 to their pension savings by the time they retire. Susan Hope, Scottish Widows Retirement Expert, commented: 'Questions loom over the future of salary exchange, despite it being the best way to maximise workers' retirement savings. 'Cutting or abolishing it completely would ignore the long-term boost it delivers to people's finances. Our data shows not only the positive impact on people's take home pay, and pension wealth, but also the halo effect it has on people's financial confidence. 'The term 'salary sacrifice' is a red herring because neither the employer nor employee has to give anything up when they take advantage of this scheme. It's truly a win win. 'The key to unlocking additional savings into pensions is awareness, and this needs improving so schemes like salary exchange can positively impact more people's finances. We should be empowering our workforce's future and salary exchange is one way to do this.'
