
Senior Seoul official notes possibility of USFK role change due to 'various factors'
WASHINGTON (Yonhap) -- A senior South Korean official made a rare mention Thursday of a possible change in the role of the US Forces Korea (USFK), amid speculation that US President Donald Trump's administration may seek to shift the focus of its mission to deterring China rather than countering North Korean threats.
The official made the remarks in a meeting with South Korean correspondents in Washington as the Trump administration is seeking to "modernize" the South Korea-US alliance to make it "strategically sustainable" in the midst of an intensifying Sino-US rivalry.
"I think there can be a change in the role and character of the USFK due to various factors," he said.
The official pointed to the evolving international security environment, technological shifts and a "growing strategic role" of China, as he enumerated the factors that could drive a possible shift in the role of the 28,500-strong USFK.
However, he cautioned against misconstruing his remarks, saying his talk of a possible change in the USFK role does not mean he concurs on the US view in support of the change.
"Allies cannot see eye to eye perfectly with each other on everything," he said.
As the Pentagon is working on crafting its National Defense Strategy to prioritize deterring China, speculation has persisted that the Trump administration might pursue greater "strategic flexibility" of the USFK to use it for a wider range of security operations beyond the Korean Peninsula.
Opponents of a shift in the USFK role argue that it could lead to a weakening of efforts by Seoul and Washington to deter North Korea's advancing nuclear and missile threats, and that the potential use of the USFK for a mission against China would needlessly put Seoul in a geopolitically challenging position.
US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby has advocated for a shift in the USFK mission, saying American troops in South Korea should not be "held hostage to dealing with the North Korean problem."
The future direction of USFK operations is likely to be a key agenda item as South Korea and the US are expected to have earnest discussions on a shared understanding of where their longstanding alliance should be headed for.
The official's remarks came after Foreign Minister Cho Hyun held his first talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio since the launch of President Lee Jae Myung's administration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
9 hours ago
- Korea Herald
India accuses EU, US of double standard over Russian trade
NEW DELHI -- India has sharply criticised the United States and the European Union, saying it is being unfairly singled out by them over its Russian oil purchases when they both trade extensively with Moscow despite the war in Ukraine. India's criticism followed a renewed threat by US. President Donald Trump on Monday to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, deepening the trade rift between the two countries. In a rare show of unity, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party and the main opposition Congress on Tuesday condemned Trump's repeated criticism of New Delhi. India's Foreign Ministry said in a statement issued late on Monday that "it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia". "It is unjustified to single out India," the ministry said. It said the EU conducted 67.5 billion euros ($78.02 billion) in trade with Russia in 2024, including record imports of liquefied natural gas reaching 16.5 million metric tons. The US, the statement said, continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilisers and chemicals. It did not give a source for the export information. The US embassy and the EU's delegation in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both the United States and EU have sharply scaled back their trade ties with Russia since it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In 2021, Russia was the EU's fifth-largest trading partner, with goods exchange worth 258 billion euros, according to the EU executive European Commission. Sudden rift The sudden rift between India and the US has been deepening since July 31, when Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods being shipped to the USand for the first time threatened unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil. India is one of the biggest buyers of crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day from January to June this year, up 1 percent from a year ago. Indian refiner Nayara Energy, a major buyer of Russian oil which is majority owned by Russian entities including oil major Rosneft, was subjected to European Union sanctions targeting Russia's oil and energy industry in July. India has said it does not support "unilateral sanctions" by the EU. Trade experts say Trump's tariff could badly hurt India's economy. Ajay Srivastava of the New Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative said he expected Indian goods exports to the US to fall 30 percent in the current fiscal year ending March 31, to $60.6 billion from $86.5 billion in the 2025 fiscal year. India's equity benchmarks fell after Trump's renewed threat of harsh tariffs on goods from India. Manish Tewari, a member of parliament and Congress leader, said Trump's "disparaging remarks hurt the dignity and self-respect of Indians". "The time has come to call out this constant bullying and hectoring," he added. BJP Vice President Baijayant Jay Panda quoted Henry Kissinger - the most powerful USdiplomat of the Cold War era - in a post on X: "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal." (Reuters)


Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee offers condolences to Korean atomic bomb victims ahead of 80th anniversary of Hiroshima bombing
President Lee Jae Myung on Tuesday offered his condolences to the Korean nuclear bomb victims, a day before Japan's Hiroshima marks the 80th anniversary of the devastating 1945 atomic bombing of the city. In a Facebook post, Lee wrote, "I express my deepest condolences and sympathy to the victims of the atomic bombing and their families who were caught in the tumult of history and suffered unimaginable pain in a place that was not their homeland but in a foreign land. "The two atomic bombs that dropped on Japan 80 years ago claimed countless lives in an instant," he said. "Our fellow Koreans in Japan also endured immense suffering, and the victims and their bereaved families have been suffering for a long time." He noted that a special law enacted in 2017 to support the Korean victims laid the foundation for practical assistance but acknowledged that much remains to be done. The government will continue efforts to "heal the scars left by the atomic bombings," Lee said. Around 50,000 Koreans fell victim to the atomic bombing, including 30,000 killed, after many were brought to Japan to work as forced laborers during its 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula, according to the Korea Atomic Bombs Victim Association. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Korea eyes 'K-Steel Act' to rescue industry from tariffs, China glut
Bipartisan bill aims to create presidential committee for master planning, offer financial support for next-gen steelmaking tech Korea is launching an aggressive policy push to rescue its steel industry from mounting global pressure, unveiling a bipartisan bill aimed at helping domestic producers hit hard by a 50 percent US tariff and a surge of low-cost Chinese products. Announced Monday by 106 lawmakers from both ruling and opposition parties, the proposed "K-Steel Act" outlines a long-term industrial strategy that frames steel as a vital base for national security and economic resilience. 'Korea's steel industry has grown rapidly since 1970. But today, it faces an unprecedented crisis, caught between the global push for carbon neutrality, a flood of cheap Chinese imports and steep tariffs from key trading partners,' lawmakers said in explaining the purpose of the bill. They warn that failure to act would leave Korea exposed on multiple fronts. A shrinking domestic steel base could ripple across its broader industrial ecosystem, threatening other sectors from shipbuilding to electric vehicle development. 'This bill is about both survival and transformation,' said Rep. Eoh Kiy-ku of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea and co-chair of the National Assembly Steel Forum. 'With bipartisan support, we plan to pass this quickly and follow up with additional legislation if needed.' Steel remains a pillar of Korea's manufacturing economy, accounting for 4.8 percent of national output and supporting more than 430,000 jobs. But that foundation is under threat. Despite a recent Korea-US tariff deal lowering duties on most goods to 15 percent, the US will maintain a 50 percent tariff on Korean steel. At the same time, the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, set to launch next year, will impose extra costs on Korean steelmakers exporting to the EU unless they decarbonize fast. Korea's push comes as other major economies, including the US, EU and Japan, have already begun ramping up public support for their own steel sectors. From the US Inflation Reduction Act to EU climate subsidies, governments are blending industrial policy with climate action in a bid to secure supply chains while hitting net-zero targets. What's in the bill? The K-Steel Act lays out a comprehensive policy framework that would give the government a more direct role in shaping the industry's future. Central to the proposal is the creation of a presidential committee tasked with crafting five-year master plans and annual action roadmaps to steer the steel sector through economic and environmental challenges. To support the industry's green transition, the bill includes a wide range of financial incentives. These include subsidies, low-interest loans, tax breaks and production cost support for companies investing in hydrogen-based and other low-emission technologies. It also introduces 'green steel zones' -- designated areas where permitting and regulatory processes would be streamlined to encourage investment and innovation. The legislation also strengthens Korea's defensive trade measures. It calls for tighter rules of origin, curbs on low-quality steel imports and expanded authority for the government to counter unfair trade practices. In cases where market-driven restructuring proves insufficient, the government would be authorized to step in with financial and regulatory support, including temporary exemptions from antitrust laws for mergers deemed necessary to stabilize the industry.