Trump marks first 100 days of second term
In AFP interviews, multiple political analysts said Democrats have become a rudderless, divided party struggling to decide what it stands for. "If I were giving them a letter grade, it would be a C-, below average.
They don't understand yet why they lost to Donald Trump," said veteran political strategist Matt Klink.
"The party continues to focus on issues that are unpopular with the American public -- men playing in women's sports, support for illegal immigration and fighting cuts, any cuts, to the federal bureaucracy." What's more, "most voters (are) not listening or caring" to Democrats' allegations that Trump is a dictator or authoritarian, Klink said.
Booted out of the White House and reduced to a minority in Congress, Democrats' opportunities to make their mark in Trump's Washington are threadbare.
But most analysts interviewed by AFP said the party could have better articulated a coherent message, unified around priorities and tactics, and figured out how and when to oppose Trump.
"Broadly speaking, I think most Americans would regard congressional Democrats as failing to meet the moment," said Flavio Hickel, a politics professor at Washington College.
Central to the frustration is the disconnect between their dire warnings of the threat Trump poses to democracy and their enthusiasm for being seen cooperating with his administration.
In a whirlwind first three months in office, Trump has unleashed a trade war, stoked allies' fears that America has switched sides in the Russia-Ukraine war, and unleashed tech billionaire Elon Musk to dismantle much of the federal bureaucracy.
Meanwhile, Democratic senators have voted to confirm Trump cabinet appointees, doing little to slow down his breakneck agenda and even voting with Republicans to pass immigration legislation.
- Resistance - "We're not going to go after every single issue," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told the New York Times in February.
"We are picking the most important fights and lying down on the train tracks on those fights." But Schumer -- and potential 2028 presidential contenders like governors Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer -- have infuriated grassroots activists over various efforts to cooperate with the White House or build bridges with Trump's "MAGA" movement.
Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers have been mocked on social media for ineffective gestures such as silently waving paddles bearing protest slogans during Trump's speech to Congress.
Rare glimpses of a fightback have included victory in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race, and a hugely popular "Fighting Oligarchy" tour by progressive lawmakers Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Popular New Jersey senator Cory Booker provided a possible roadmap for eye-catching opposition, say analysts, with a blockbuster 25-hour Senate speech that made headlines for days. But Madeline Summerville, a former communications advisor and speechwriter for Democratic state senators, said Booker's actual message had been lost in the noise.
"The Dems struggle with messaging. They don't understand that you need a rallying cry -- a slogan -- to motivate the masses. And that slogan needs to be clear, concise, and inspiring," she said. "They're calling on people to 'fight oligarchy' but they're not telling us how -- nor is that a very catchy slogan."
Andrew Koneschusky, a former communications aide to Schumer, said that he would give Democrats in Congress a D grade, noting that while individual lawmakers were making a splash, "no one seems to be conducting the orchestra."
But he was more optimistic about grassroots opposition, which he awarded a B grade, pointing to lawsuits that have had some success in reining Trump in.
"After a deafening silence, we're also seeing more visible signs of resistance such as the recent marches in Washington, DC and across the country that drew hundreds of thousands of people," he said. "It feels like Democrats are finally emerging from their post-election funk."
Donald Trump's first 100 days back in the US presidency have showcased his unique ability to shock -- and sometimes entertain -- with outrageous remarks that pull no punches.
From stroking his ego to berating American allies, here are some of Trump's most memorable quotes since he returned to the White House: -- "I was saved by God to make America great again" Trump cast himself as a messianic-like figure on his first day back in office, as he recounted to US lawmakers how he survived an assassination attempt at a campaign event in Pennsylvania last year. -- "A Dictator without Elections" The president's extraordinary verdict on Volodymyr Zelensky marked a major shift in previously friendly US relations toward the Ukrainian leader, who accused Trump of succumbing to Russian "disinformation."
Trump later walked back the comment made in February on his Truth Social platform, asking a journalist, "Did I say that?" -- "These countries are calling us up, kissing my ass" This mocking remark about world leaders made at a Republican conference in April came as countries desperately sought to temper Trump's sweeping tariffs, which upended global markets before he announced a 90-day pause.
-- "The Riviera of the Middle East" Trump's startling vision for a US-led takeover and transformation of war-torn Gaza into a luxury resort drew audible gasps at a February news conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. -- "Canada should become our Cherished 51st State."
America's northern neighbor was furious about this Truth Social post by Trump in February, which sparked real concerns among some Canadians of a looming US annexation attempt.
-- "The European Union was formed to screw the United States" Trump set the tone for hostile trade relations with the EU at his first cabinet meeting in February, reversing course on a decades-long record of US backing for the 27-nation economic and political bloc. -- "This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED" Trump, the first convicted felon to be elected president, drew a rare public rebuke from the Supreme Court chief justice after he called for the impeachment of Judge James Boasberg in a Truth Social post in March. Boasberg was one of several judges to curtail Trump's executive power -- in this case over migrant deportation flights -- due to concerns about the legality of his administration's actions.
Donald Trump promised to broker a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia within "24 hours" of returning to the White House. Three months in and despite a brief Easter truce announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin, the war is still raging, with the prospect of a ceasefire more uncertain than ever.
The US president has failed to extract any major concessions from Moscow, despite repeated talks between his administration and Russian officials, and publicly accused Ukraine's wartime leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, of being a "dictator".
He has meanwhile embarked on a quest to warm ties with Putin that has alienated Kyiv and driven a wedge between Washington and Europe. Many in Russia are jubilant at the prospect of closer ties with the White House.
While in Ukraine, the idea of long-term peace has faded. "Nothing is happening. In real terms, people hear sirens every day, see bombs, and people get killed," the head of the Kyiv School of Economics, Tymofiy Mylovanov, told AFP.
"Putin is taking everyone for a ride," he said. Since Trump's inauguration in January, US officials have held several rounds of talks with Russian and Ukrainian delegations in an attempt to reach a truce. In the meantime, Russia has kept up strikes on Ukraine unabated, killing dozens of people in ballistic missile attacks in the past two weeks alone.
Ukraine's army has also lost its grip on territory in Russia's western Kursk region, its only notable bargaining chip. "So far, there have been no changes, actually, in our city, it has only gotten worse," Anna Klyshkina, a 29-year-old photographer from Ukraine's Sumy, said of Trump.
On Sunday, two Russian ballistic missiles slammed into her city, killing 35 people and wounding more than 100 others in one of the deadliest attacks in months.
- 'He's a showman' - There has been little tangible progress on a ceasefire despite Trump's push.
Putin rejected a joint US-Ukrainian proposal for an unconditional and full ceasefire put to him in March. Both sides agreed to halt strikes on energy targets, though no formal agreement was ever put in place; both accused the other of violating it, and Russia said Friday that the order had "expired".
Moscow's army has continued its grinding advance across the battlefield in eastern Ukraine, albeit at a slower pace than at the end of last year.
It has also pushed Kyiv's troops almost completely out of the Kursk region and advanced into the frontier areas of Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region.
Ukrainian soldier Oleksandr said he always had a "negative" opinion of Trump. "And it remains so," the 22-year-old told AFP, sitting on a bench in Sumy on his break. "He's not a politician, he's a showman," he said.
The Trump administration briefly cut military aid to Ukraine in March, dealing a major blow to Kyiv. The decision was a stunning reversal of Joe Biden's policy of doing "whatever it takes, as long as it takes" to support Ukraine.
Trump has also repeatedly echoed Russian talking points, calling at one point for new elections to replace Zelensky, whom he falsely claimed had a "four percent approval rating".
Tensions between the two came to a head in February, when Trump berated Zelensky in a televised meeting at the Oval Office and told him he was being "disrespectful", shocking Washington's allies. Days after Russia's deadly attack on Sumy, Trump renewed his criticism of Zelensky and Ukraine. "You don't start a war against somebody that's 20 times your size," he said, referring to Zelensky. Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022.
- 'What is missing is peace' - Trump has also lashed out at Russia, ordering it to "get moving" on securing a deal and telling NBC News last month that he was "pissed off" with Putin. But the tone remains more conciliatory than before.
The Kremlin said in March that Trump's dramatic shift in foreign policy largely aligned with its vision, after Washington sided with Moscow twice at the United Nations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
2 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Trump invested over $100 million in bonds since taking office, financial disclosures reveal
Washington DC: Financial disclosures released by the US Office of Government Ethics on Wednesday show that President Donald Trump has purchased more than $100 million worth of corporate and municipal bonds since returning to the White House, Al Jazeera reported. The documents provide insight into how the former businessman-turned-president is managing his wealth while in office. According to Al Jazeera, the filings cover the period from Trump's inauguration on January 21 to August 1, listing nearly 700 separate purchases of bonds. These include investments in major financial institutions such as Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley, as well as in major corporations like Meta, T-Mobile, UnitedHealth, and The Home Depot. Trump's bond investments also extend to a wide range of municipal projects across numerous US states, including New York, Florida, and Texas, Al Jazeera reported. The bonds support public infrastructure initiatives, including hospitals, schools, airports, ports, and gas development projects. While the documents do not provide exact amounts for each purchase, they categorise the investments into broad ranges, for example, USD 100,001 to USD 250,000 or USD 1 million to USD 5 million. Notably, the filings did not list any asset sales during the same period. Bonds, a common fixed-income investment, represent loans made to corporations or public authorities in exchange for interest payments over time. The White House has not issued a statement on the disclosure. However, US media outlets have reported that Trump and his family were not directly involved in the financial transactions, as reported by Al Jazeera. As per Al Jazeera, under the 1978 Ethics in Government Act, passed following the Watergate scandal, US Presidents must publicly report their finances, but there is no legal requirement for them to divest from assets that could pose a conflict of interest. Previous US presidents since 1978 have either placed their holdings in blind trusts or limited investments to diversified mutual funds to avoid ethical concerns.
Observer
18 hours ago
- Observer
Serbia protesters accuse police of abuse, warn of 'spiral of violence'
BELGRADE: Serbian anti-government protesters accused police on Tuesday of beating and threatening detained activists, fuelling fears of a spiralling crackdown after a week of violent clashes. Almost daily protests have gripped Serbia since November, sparked by the collapse of a railway station roof that killed 16 people. The tragedy became a symbol of deep-rooted corruption in the Balkan nation, with demands for a transparent investigation morphing into calls for early elections. But in the past week, the mostly peaceful demonstrations have erupted into street violence over several nights, with loyalists of President Aleksandar Vucic attacking protesters. Nikolina Sindjelic, a student activist, said she was dragged along with another student and several other protesters into a government garage in central Belgrade by officers in a special police unit on Thursday night. "The commander of the unit brutally beat both him and me," the 22-year-old political science student said. The Ministry of Internal Affairs "strongly denied" the allegations. It said Sindjelic was arrested for being part of a group that had attacked government buildings and police. "Throughout the entire procedure, no means of coercion, handcuffing, insults, or any form of mistreatment were applied," it said. Hundreds gathered in front of the accused commander's police building in Belgrade on Tuesday to support Sindjelic and decry widespread reports of police brutality. While the protests have so far led to the resignation of the prime minister and the collapse of the government, Vucic has remained defiant. He has repeatedly rejected calls for early elections and recently threatened a "strong response" to the demonstrations. "This is an attempt at a foreign-funded colour revolution, in which no means are spared, and violence is used in a bid to seize power," he said on Monday night. He has frequently decried the movement as a "colour revolution" — a term favoured by the Kremlin and its allies to smear protest movements as illegitimate. — AFP
Observer
20 hours ago
- Observer
Negotiation vs extortion
As anyone who caught even a bit of the day's news knows, President Donald Trump, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and the leaders of Nato, the European Union, Britain and several European countries spent Monday at the White House negotiating a possible land swap and security guarantees that could end the Russian-Ukrainian war. But did they really? Let's think about the word 'negotiating'. All wars end with it, according to the popular saying, but rarely does the aggressor come to the table demanding territory that it doesn't actually control. Usually, the belligerents discuss which military gains should be formalised and which should be reversed. Vladimir Putin, however, has consistently demanded more land than his military has been able to bring under its control in the three and a half years since Russia's full-scale war began. During his summit with Trump in Alaska on Friday, Putin appears to have made a small concession: He is still demanding more land than he has occupied, but not as much as he used to demand. But less is still more. So let's talk about 'land swap'. This phrase seems to refer to Putin's offer to take a piece of Ukraine in exchange for not threatening an even bigger piece of Ukraine. This is not what we normally think of as a swap. It's what we think of as extortion. Let's also talk about the word 'land', or 'territory', which the leaders gathered at the White House on Monday used a lot. Zelensky referred to a map Trump apparently provided to facilitate discussion of 'territory'. Trump promised to get him a copy. But 'territory' is not an outline on a map. It's cities and towns and villages where people still live — even near the front line, even now. Before the full-scale war, the populations of Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, the two Ukrainian cities on land Putin is demanding, were 200,000 and 100,000, respectively. We don't know how many people live there now — some people surely fled, some came from occupied territories, some died — but the number is almost certainly tens and possibly hundreds of thousands of people. To propose to cede the land to Russia is to propose either subjecting those residents to Russian occupation — which in other cities has involved summary executions, detentions and torture — or displacing them forcibly. Either would be a crime — a crime in which Trump is asking Zelensky to become an accomplice. This kind of negotiation-through-extortion is not unprecedented. In February 1945, the leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States and Britain met in Yalta — then a city in Soviet Ukraine, now a city in Russian-occupied Crimea — to negotiate the end of World War II. Among other things, Josef Stalin wanted the Kuril Islands, which stretched from Soviet Kamchatka to the coast of Japan. Franklin D Roosevelt and Winston Churchill agreed to let the Soviets have the Kurils. The islands weren't theirs to give — the Kurils belonged to Japan — but they were theirs to take. Six months later, Soviet troops, with significant support from the US military, took control of the islands and deported the Japanese residents. The Soviet troops had gone to Alaska to train for the operation. That military operation began on August 18, 1945, exactly 80 years before Trump met with Zelensky at the White House. Putin, who is a history buff and, more important, has for years been floating the idea of a second Yalta Conference, is certainly mindful of the date and the historical rhyme. More than 80 years after Yalta, no peace treaty exists between Japan and Russia. World War II never officially ended for these two countries, because Japan never ceded the Kuril Islands. All wars may end in negotiations, but not all negotiations end wars. The 20th century offers another example of extorting land. In 1938, Adolf Hitler demanded Sudetenland, a part of Czechoslovakia where ethnic Germans made up a significant percentage of the population. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain negotiated the surrender of the land, without involving Czechoslovakia. The higher purpose of those negotiations was security and peace for the rest of Europe. Less than a year after Czechoslovakia was forced to cede Sudetenland, however, Hitler attacked Poland and World War II began. That was the last war of aggression on the European continent until Putin attacked Ukraine. Hitler claimed that he, too, was fighting for peace and this was why he had no choice but to annex Sudetenland: 'I have made these tremendous efforts to further the peace, but I am not willing to stand any more attacks by Czechoslovakia'. In 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea, Putin effectively reprised a speech Hitler made before annexing Sudetenland, saying that his hand, too, was forced and 'Most importantly, we want peace and harmony to reign in Ukraine'. Which brings me to the subject of security guarantees. The last time Zelensky mentioned those in the White House, he got thrown out. This time, Trump acknowledged that any peace agreement must include security guarantees for Ukraine; during the Monday meeting, he even claimed that Putin agreed that such guarantees were necessary. But what could those be? Putin has said that Ukraine is a historical mistake, that there is no such thing as a Ukrainian nation or a Ukrainian language. How could anyone guarantee Ukraine's safety against a nuclear-armed neighbour who thinks Ukraine shouldn't exist? The only plausible answer would be membership in Nato or its equivalent — an agreement that would obligate the Western alliance, or whatever is left of it, to defend Ukraine to the full extent of its abilities. Putin has consistently cited the very possibility of such an agreement as the 'root cause' of his war against Ukraine. It is a safe bet that Putin will reject any agreement that involves a real promise of security for Ukraine. And that brings me to the number 'six' — something Trump kept invoking on Monday, when he claimed that he had resolved that many wars in his first seven months in office. The conflicts he is taking credit for resolving seem to be the ones between Congo and Rwanda (little evidence that it's over); Egypt and Ethiopia (ditto); India and Pakistan (there is evidence of very little US involvement); Kosovo and Serbia (same); Armenia and Azerbaijan (ditto, but the sides did go to the White House to sign an agreement); Cambodia and Thailand (US-backed talks resulted in a ceasefire, not necessarily an end to the conflict); Israel and Iran (Trump claims to have prevented a nuclear war by dropping bunker-busting bombs). That's actually seven. But also, none. — The New York Times Masha GessennThe author is a Russian and American journalist, author and translator
