Commentary: Trump's tariff deal with the Philippines was all praise, little gain
In the end, all that President Marcos Jr got from what appeared to be a robust and warm exchange with Trump was a 1 percentage point reduction in tariffs imposed on the country by the US. This suggests that Manila, which has sought to diversify its security relations beyond Washington, should do likewise for its economic ties.
In a social media post, Trump announced that Marcos' White House visit was 'beautiful', and that he was a 'very tough negotiator'.
But Trump also announced that the Philippines hardly budged in trade negotiations. As a result, it will pay a 19 per cent tariff, just 1 percentage point lower than the 20 per cent indicated in a letter sent to Marcos Jr on Jul 9. This was higher than the 17 per cent tariff stipulated in April.
The turn of events does not speak well of the Trump 2.0 administration's overall appreciation of Philippines-US relations. Marcos was able to secure continued cooperation on defence and strategic matters, including the building of an ammunition facility in Subic, a former US naval base. Renewed US commitments to the ironclad alliance between the two countries were not reflected in the tariff reduction of just 1 percentage point.
LACK OF RECIPROCITY IN TRUMP'S TARIFFS
Trump also announced (in his inimitable capitalisation style, or lack thereof) that 'The Philippines is going OPEN MARKET with the United States, and ZERO Tariffs'. Marcos clarified that this applies to automobiles imported from the US, so that automobiles imported by the Philippines from the US will now have zero tariffs. It remains unclear whether this applies to other products as well.
On the one hand, this might benefit Filipinos because some things they import from the US will be possibly cheaper. But this highlights the yawning lack of reciprocity in Trump's tariffs. If the Philippines is not imposing tariffs on US goods, the US should also reduce most tariffs on Philippine exports to the US.
Then again, Trump has a totally warped notion of tariffs to begin with. Back in April, economists noted that the original tariff rates were not even related to the true extent of effective tariff rates set by various countries in the US.
The Philippines, for example, imposed in 2024 an average Most Favoured Nation tariff on US imports of 6 per cent: 9.5 per cent for agricultural goods and 5.4 per cent for non-agricultural goods. Trump's tariff rate on the Philippines of 17 per cent (now 19 per cent) is not commensurate.
Trump still fails to realise that tariffs are paid not by other countries but by American consumers. Consequently, Americans should brace for higher inflation. While April and May inflation remained muted, economists warn that inflation will skyrocket once Trump's tariffs are pushed through.
Another round of US inflation spikes (similar to what happened in 2022) does not bode well for the Philippine economy and the rest of ASEAN. This will likely result in an increase in interest rates. This is exactly what ASEAN central banks did between 2022 and 2023. More worryingly, another round of interest rate hikes, sooner or later, will dampen already weak regional economic growth.
WHAT'S NEXT FOR THE PHILIPPINES
So, what now for the Philippines? The 19 per cent tariff rate is still lower than what other neighbouring ASEAN economies got. Vietnam got 20 per cent and Indonesia 19 per cent. Both rates are significantly lower than the April rates of 40 per cent and 32 per cent, respectively. The two countries, which are not formal military allies of Washington, fared better in their negotiations with the US compared to the Philippines, a formal US treaty ally.
Nevertheless, the US remains the biggest destination of Philippine exports (about 17 per cent of total exports), and the semiconductor industry is likely to be hit significantly. It would have been better if Marcos Jr had been able to secure a tariff exemption on Philippine semiconductors. Still, other vulnerable sectors include garments, food, and agricultural products – as suggested by the experience during the trade war during the first Trump administration.
Looking for a silver lining, the Philippine government hopes that some trade from higher-tariffed countries may be diverted to the Philippines because of the country's relatively lower tariff rate. But this is unlikely given the country's lack of competitiveness.
This is due to ongoing deficits in the country's logistics and transportation infrastructure, overreliance on low value-added parts of global value chains, and worrying gaps in human capital. During the previous Trump administration's trade war, these constraints did not help the Philippines become an alternative trade partner and investment destination.
On Monday (Jul 28), Marcos Jr will deliver his fourth State of the Nation Address, and he is likely to brag about the profuse praise he got from Trump as well as the new tariff rate. With the Philippines ending up with an even higher tariff than in April, that hardly points to Marcos being a 'very good, very tough' negotiator.
The outcome of the US trip should serve as a powerful signal to the Marcos Jr administration. As it started to diversify its security relations beyond the US alliance by deepening cooperation with middle powers such as Japan and Australia, it must do the same to promote its economic interests. Under Trump 2.0, it might be wise for the Philippines not to put all its economic eggs in the US basket.
JC Punongbayan is an assistant professor at the University of the Philippines School of Economics and Aries A Arugay is Visiting Senior Fellow and Coordinator of the Philippine Studies Programme at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. This commentary first appeared on ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute's blog, Fulcrum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
4 minutes ago
- CNA
Prepaid losses for beauty consumers jump nearly six-fold in first half of 2025
SINGAPORE: Beauty industry consumers lost over S$108,000 (US$83,842) in the first half of this year after paying in advance for services that were never delivered. This represents a 464 per cent increase - or a near six-fold rise - from S$19,000 in prepayment losses during the same period last year, the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) said on Tuesday (Aug 5). CASE noted that the beauty sector topped prepayment-related losses, with aggressive or misleading sales tactics being a key consumer complaint. Such tactics accounted for about 28 per cent of all complaints during this period. Many of these cases involved consumers being pressured into signing high-value packages under unclear or exaggerated promises, CASE said. But there was a 19 per cent decrease in overall consumer complaints, with 6,253 cases lodged in the first half of 2025 compared with 7,721 in the corresponding period. CASE noted that there were a few high-profile incidents in 2024, including the botched Sky Lantern Festival, which led to more than 400 complaints in the first half of last year. Cars, electrical and electronic products, beauty services, renovation contractors, and telecommunications made up the top five categories of consumer complaints in the first half of 2025. BREAKDOWN OF COMPLAINTS The motorcar industry remained the top complaint category with 573 cases in the first half of this year - a 16 per cent decrease from 681 complaints in in the corresponding period. About 28 per cent of the complaints in 1H2025 involved vehicles that were either defective or did not conform to contract terms. The electrical and electronics industry rose to become the second-highest complaint category, registering 571 cases. This represented a decrease of about 4 per cent from 1H2024. Around 47 per cent of these complaints were related to defective products or those that failed to meet contract terms. They comprised both small electronic devices purchased online and larger household appliances bought from physical retail outlets like televisions and washing machines, Telecommunications-related complaints also increased from 319 in 1H2024 to 353 in 1H2025. Of these, about 24 per cent were due to customer dissatisfaction with services they had paid for. BEAUTY, CARS, E-COMMERCE CASE noted that the beauty sector recorded the highest prepayment-related losses in the first half of 2025, despite a decline in complaint numbers from 600 in the corresponding period last year to 558. It cited a high-profile case involving a contract worth over S$370,000, in which the consumer alleged that the business used aggressive, high-pressure sales tactics, made false promises, offered misleading discounts, and ultimately overcharged. "Despite a slight drop in complaint numbers, the beauty industry remains a concern due to the sharp increase in prepayment-related losses," said CASE president Melvin Yong. "CASE encourages consumers to patronise CaseTrust-accredited spas and beauty salons, which offer a five-day cooling-off period, refunds for unutilised packages, and stress-free treatments without sales pressure." In 1H2025, complaints related to the motorcar industry fell by about 16 per cent, from 681 cases in 1H2024 to 573. Complaints involving car-sharing services also dipped slightly from 109 to 97, though consumers continued to raise concerns about poor vehicle maintenance, billing issues, high insurance excess, and unreliable service. There was a 42 per cent increase in complaints related to electric vehicles (EVs), rising from 33 in 1H2024 to 47 in 1H2025. Defective components, such as batteries, and problems related to EV charging were among the common complaints raised. Said Mr Yong: "As more EVs take to Singapore's roads, CASE expects to see EV-related complaints increase in tandem. Consumers seeking to purchase an EV should be mindful of issues related to charging and battery lifespan. Car-sharing services also remain a popular choice among consumers and there needs to be stronger standards for the shared mobility space. "CASE is working with car-sharing operators to develop a CaseTrust accreditation scheme for the sector. This will allow consumers to patronise operators who have committed to consumer-friendly policies and provide an efficient dispute resolution mechanism." Complaints related to e-commerce fell by 32 per cent in 1H2025, dropping from 2,611 cases in 1H2024 to 1,769. This was largely due to an 85 per cent decline in entertainment-related complaints, which had spiked the previous year due to the failed Sky Lantern Festival. However, CASE observed an increase in complaints against online travel agencies, with 139 cases reported. Such complaints rose by around 40 per cent, it said. They involved a range of issues, including misleading descriptions of hotel accommodations, website glitches that led to duplicate or inflated charges, and confirmed bookings that were not honoured. Consumers had approached these agencies to book flights, hotels, and land tours, but encountered problems that disrupted their travel plans and caused financial stress. 'To better protect consumers and raise industry standards, CASE is looking to drive wider adoption of our CaseTrust scheme for e-businesses," said Mr Yong. "As part of its review to enhance consumer protection in Singapore, the Consumer Protection Review Panel is looking at unfair practices commonly used by online merchants, with the aim of recommending enhancements to our consumer protection regime to better protect consumers in the age of e-commerce.' With the continued rise in online transactions, Mr Yong also stressed the need to strengthen consumer protection in the e-commerce space. They include mandating merchant verification, setting up escrow accounts for online transactions, and implementing a clear dispute resolution framework to help consumers seek recourse. CASE also highlighted concerns over the increasing transaction values involved in disputes, noting that the cost of home renovation contracts often exceeds S$20,000. It urged the government to review the current S$20,000 jurisdictional limit of the Small Claims Tribunals, in order to ensure consumers continue to have access to affordable dispute resolution options.
CNA
4 minutes ago
- CNA
Malaysia seeks $330 million for palm oil replanting over next 5 years
KUALA LUMPUR :Malaysia's commodities ministry said on Tuesday it would seek to boost the allocation for palm oil replanting to 1.4 billion ringgit ($331 million) under a new five-year economic plan. The funds, from 2026 to 2030, will help increase the replanting rate, especially among smallholders, Plantation and Commodities Minister Johari Abdul Ghani told parliament. This year the government is providing a matching grant with an allocation of 100 million ringgit ($24 million) for smallholders. Replanting averaged about 2 per cent last year, falling short of the government's target of 4 per cent, Johari said. "When replanting is not being taken care of, it will affect our future exports," he said, with production also being hit.
International Business Times
23 minutes ago
- International Business Times
Texas Governor Greg Abbott Orders Arrest of Democrats Who Fled State in Private Jet to Block Redistricting Vote
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered law enforcement to arrest dozens of Democratic lawmakers from the state who fled to block a Republican plan to redraw congressional districts in Donald Trump's favor. Fifty-seven Democratic legislators fled the state, flying to Illinois and New York in a dramatic bid to block the Republican plan to pass a new electoral map that could give the GOP up to five more congressional seats in Texas, strengthening Trump's hold on Congress in the upcoming midterm elections. Abbott set a deadline of 3 p.m. Monday for the Democrats to come back to Austin, warning that they could face arrest and may even lose their seats. Abbott's Final Warning Greg Abbott X When none of the Democrats returned, Republican officials authorized law enforcement to arrest them using "any means necessary." "The sergeant‑at‑arms and any appointed officers are directed to send for all absentees whose attendance is not excused, and to secure and maintain their attendance under warrant of arrest if necessary," House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican from Lubbock, announced. By leaving the state, the Democrats effectively broke quorum in the Texas legislature, stopping Republicans from moving forward with legislative proceedings. Democrats from Texas seen at a press conference in Chicago after fleeing the sstate to avoid a redistricting vote X They have labeled the redistricting proposal a clear attempt to seize power and told the Daily Mail they are ready for a showdown with the GOP. "When we have the President of the United States looking for five Congressional seats, this can eventually impact the entire United States, so to say that we are doing this to grand stand is bullshit, with all due respect," Texas Rep. Linda Garcia told the Daily Mail on Monday afternoon. Among the Democrats who fled, two House members are accompanied by their children—a nine-year-old and a five-year-old. Greg Abbott X Garcia chose to bring her nine-year-old son along due to limited childcare options and the possibility of staying in Chicago until August 19, when the current special legislative session ends. "What I want him to understand is that sometimes we have to make very big sacrifices in order to generate change," the Mesquite (a Dallas suburb) Democrat shared in a phone interview from Chicago. Arrest Is the First Punishment On Monday afternoon, Abbott doubled down by ordering Texas state troopers to detain all the rogue Democratic lawmakers. Meanwhile, Garcia's young son, who is in elementary school, has bonded with the five-year-old grandson of another representative, who also had to bring the child along. Texas House Democrats State Rep. Gene Wu at a press conference in Chicago after fleeing the state alongw ith dozens of others X "This is going to be one of the greatest lessons he could learn. I would hope that in the future he would recall the courage that as a mother this requires," she said, her voice cracking with emotion. The lawmakers have been consulting attorneys who warned them that arrests were a strong possibility. Still, the Texas Democrats see this as a key moment on a national scale, especially since the congressional redistricting proposed by the GOP would significantly affect Black and Hispanic communities in the state. "You're going to steal the power and the voices of black and brown communities-- we're not just going roll over and just allow you to do that," Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons added. "The message that I'm receiving from my community is that we need to stand up and hold the line."
