‘Evil' man jailed for at least 28 years for murder of ex-fiancee at luxury hotel
The body of Samantha Mickleburgh, 54, described by her loved ones as their 'champagne girl' who lit up every room she walked in, was found at the five-star Pennyhill Park Hotel in Bagshot on April 14 last year.
James Cartwright was unanimously convicted last month, after one afternoon of jury deliberation, of raping and murdering the mother-of-two during their stay at the hotel.
Cartwright, 61, was acquitted of a further charge of controlling and coercive behaviour, but prosecutor Louise Oakley argued that during his and Ms Mickleburgh's relationship, Cartwright's conduct was 'cruel, repressive and overbearing'.
Sentencing the defendant at Guildford Crown Court on Friday, Mr Justice Murray told him: 'Collectively (Ms Mickleburgh's family) described Samantha's wonderful qualities as a daughter, as a mother and as a sister – caring, thoughtful, fun, well-organised, generous to a fault and devoted to her family.
'Samantha's family suffer a grief that those who have not experienced it cannot imagine. It lies beyond words to fully describe.'
Six members of Ms Mickleburgh's family gave victim impact statements in which they warmly remembered their loved one and addressed Cartwright over his attack.
Tracey Carter, one of Ms Mickleburgh's sisters, said: 'Our family welcomed you into our homes and hearts and you violated that trust and kindness. You spent Christmas and other special occasions with (the family).
'I will never understand why you thought you had the right to do the horrific things that you did to Sam.'
'I wish she had never met you,' Ms Carter continued.
'Did you feel proud of yourself when you lied to my father, saying that Sam had died in her sleep knowing full well the horror that you had put her through?
'Do you take some kind of sadistic enjoyment in your lies? You have caused an indescribable amount of pain and suffering to our family but know this: we are strong and you cannot break us, you cannot take Sam from us.
'We now know that you have a history of controlling behaviour towards women that you have relationships with. We know you would stalk Sam and this made her fear for her safety. I hope you are never free to harm anyone again.
'I believe you are a monster – an evil, controlling, manipulative predator who really thought you were clever enough to get away with murder, my sister's murder.'
Ms Mickleburgh, from Axminster in Devon, 'honoured' a commitment she had made before she and Cartwright separated to spend his 60th birthday together on April 13 last year, booking a twin room with separate beds and a six-course Michelin star dinner at the Surrey hotel, the court heard.
After the second course, Ms Mickleburgh became tired and unwell, with restaurant staff saying she struggled to stand when Cartwright walked her out.
They returned to the room where 'at some point' she suffered a skull fracture, and Cartwright raped her and strangled her to death with his hands.
Between killing her and calling an ambulance at about 8.30am the next morning, when he would claim he had discovered Ms Mickleburgh dead beside him in bed, the prosecution said Cartwright placed an engagement ring on her left ring finger to 'support this assertion that they had become re-engaged the night before' and 'staged the hotel room' to make it look as though they had consensual sex.
Mr Justice Murray said that while he could not say whether Cartwright is a 'compulsive or a pathological liar in the clinical sense', he told a number of lies throughout the trial some which have been admitted and others which have not.
The court heard Cartwright was subject to a conditional caution for harassing a former partner, with Ms Oakley saying there is a 'history of controlling and coercive behaviour in terms of his behaviour towards women'.
Martin Rutherford KC, defending, told the court Cartwright had no previous convictions and had recently received a provisional diagnosis of cancer.
Cartwright and Ms Mickleburgh met and got to know each other on a dating app in 2021 after which they lost contact for a while before striking up a friendship and later an intimate relationship the following year.
In 2023, he moved into a property she had bought and got engaged on holiday in Antigua in September that year after which the relationship was said to have deteriorated.
'You had always been a bit obsessive and clingy with her,' the judge said, 'but these traits worsened over the following weeks and months to the point where Samantha found your presence suffocating.'
Cartwright, of no fixed address, was jailed for nine years for raping Ms Mickleburgh – a sentence which will run concurrent to his sentence for murder.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
4 minutes ago
- Times
Charity cyclist's widow ‘will always hate' twins who left him to die
The widow of a charity cyclist who was killed by a drink driver has spoken for the first time to condemn the 'callous' twin brothers who hid his body in a shallow grave. Alexander McKellar was speeding when he hit Tony Parsons, 63, and left him to die on the A82 near Bridge of Orchy, Argyll, in September 2017. In an attempt to cover up the crime, he and his brother Robert retrieved the body and dumped it in a 'dead hole', which was used to dispose of animal carcasses on a remote estate where they worked. Parsons, a father of two from Tillicoultry in Clackmannanshire, who had served in the Royal Navy, had gone missing during a 104-mile charity bike ride from Fort William back to his home town. His body remained undiscovered for more than three years until January 2021, after Alexander McKellar led his former girlfriend, Caroline Muirhead, to the burial site and she tipped off police. Parsons's widow, Margaret, 68, has told of her devastation at his death and her hatred for the twins for leaving her with a 'life sentence'. In the BBC documentary Murder Case: The Vanishing Cyclist, she said: 'When they get out of jail they are going to go back to life as if nothing's happened. They are going to get on with it, they're going to enjoy themselves. 'I can't do that. I can't do that because Tony is not here. They are not the ones that are left with a life sentence — I am — because that is what they've done. 'They just wanted to protect themselves. They could have phoned for somebody. They could have phoned an ambulance, they could have phoned the police — they could have even done it anonymously — but they didn't. 'They took Tony, they buried him, they left me and my kids and grandkids for three and a half years not knowing where Tony was. There has been no remorse, absolutely nothing from them at all. To be honest I hate the both of them, I really do and I am still angry. It won't go away. 'I loved Tony because he was kind, he made me happy. He looked after me all these years and I'm lost without Tony.' Alexander McKellar, now 33, admitted a charge of culpable homicide at the High Court in Glasgow in 2023 and was jailed for 12 years. He and his brother, who was sentenced to five years and three months in jail, also admitted attempting to defeat the ends of justice. Their actions were described in court as 'callous and cowardly'. Parsons's son, Mike Parsons, a police officer, told the documentary that he considered what happened to his father to be murder despite the twins' pleas to the lesser charges. He said: 'The outcome of what would have happened — how long it would have taken an ambulance to get there — is irrelevant. If you know that you have hit somebody and you can see they are still alive, any basic human instinct says you need to try and get help. 'To willingly go down a course of action whereby you are letting somebody die, that to me is murder. Our opinion will always be the same — they have murdered my dad and they have taken him away from us.' The filmmakers were given unprecedented access to the police investigation and the court proceedings for the two-part documentary. Cameras were allowed into the High Court in Glasgow to film the hearings where the McKellars entered their guilty pleas and were sentenced. Murder Case: The Vanishing Cyclist will be available on BBC iPlayer from Tuesday and will also be shown on the BBC Scotland channel.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed, after 58 years... What Mick Jagger told police about Marianne Faithfull on night that sparked 'Mars bar' myth
It is one of the most famous rock scandals of all time. In February 1967, police stormed the Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards ' country house in West Sussex and arrested Richards and Mick Jagger for drug possession, leading to the pair spending several hours in jail. Now a newly unearthed statement made by the Stones' lead singer while he was on bail reveals extraordinary details about the circumstances of the Redlands raid – including that Jagger believed he was under state surveillance at the time, and that the phone line to his flat in London 'was being tapped'. The 14 pages of typed statement – described by Rolling Stones biographer Philip Norman as 'highly significant' – reveal Jagger believed his calls were 'not being monitored but being taped' and that the authority for this had been given 'from quite high up'. He also believed his flat was being watched. In the statement, taken shortly after the raid, he says: 'I am sure I was being watched at my flat. The method of observation was either from a florists' van or a removal van. 'Apart from my own observation, I was being told by two sources that I was being watched [including] Keith Richards' chauffeur.' Jagger, then 24, also said his phone was 'always going wrong and people were getting through with wrong numbers'. The 14 pages of typed statement (pictured) – described by Rolling Stones biographer Philip Norman as 'highly significant' – reveal Jagger believed his calls were 'not being monitored but being taped' and that the authority for this had been given 'from quite high up' He added: 'I was told that the telephone was being tapped by a contact at the GPO [General Post Office]... He told me I should be careful what I said. He said he thought it was being done with authority from quite high up.' The statement was discovered during a London house clearance in the 1980s and was passed to a collector. It has never before been made public. Mr Norman called the statement 'a fascinating addition to one of the great rock scandals of all time'. He said the details of the alleged surveillance support claims that the FBI had plotted to persuade the British establishment to secure drugs charges against the Stones. Such charges would prevent their entry to the US, where authorities feared they could add fuel to the cultural revolution. The incident saw Jagger take responsibility for amphetamines found at Redlands which were said to have belonged to his then-girlfriend Marianne Faithfull, who was not charged. Richards was charged with allowing cannabis to be smoked on the property, and another guest, Robert Fraser, was charged with possessing heroin. Jagger was jailed for three months in October 1967 and Richards for one year, but the pair spent only one night in prison. Jagger was taken to Brixton Prison and Richards to Wormwood Scrubs, but Jagger's punishment was quickly overturned and Richards' conviction quashed. The case caused an outcry and Times editor William Rees-Mogg criticised their harsh treatment in an essay entitled 'Who Breaks a Butterfly on a Wheel?' The trial, in Chichester, heard lurid details that Ms Faithfull had been naked but for a fur rug, which she was said to have partially dropped in front of police. It also led to unfounded rumours that Jagger had been performing a sex act on her with a Mars bar when the 18 officers burst into the mansion. Convent-educated Ms Faithfull, who died this January, was reportedly traumatised by the allegations. In the statement Jagger – who was knighted in 2003 – says 'there is no truth in the allegation Marianne allowed the rug to drop' and that it covered more of her than the clothes she normally wore. Mr Norman said the remark from Jagger about the rug was important because 'he's never commented about that at all'. The fascinating pages were discovered in a brown envelope rescued during the house clearance by an alarm fitter, who passed them to a Rolling Stones fan. The fan, who declined to comment, is selling the statement alongside other memorabilia. Mr Norman described its contents as significant because Jagger has still, to this day, never publicly commented about being under surveillance or even the raid. 'He's said he can't even remember which prison he was in, which is ridiculous,' Mr Norman said. The author said Jagger's statement 'adds substance' to the idea that the FBI were 'in cahoots' with UK spies to stop the Stones going back to America: 'Police alone wouldn't have watched [Jagger] like that or tapped his phone.' Mr Norman also highlighted the 'clear details' Jagger set out. The statement reveals how he recalled Ms Faithfull wearing 'black velvet trousers, white bra, white blouse and black coat' and 'mauve boots' before she went to bed for a brief nap. She then reappeared in the lounge not long before police turned up at 8pm 'wearing only a large fur rug'. Mr Norman said: 'He has always just said he can't remember anything about anything. Yet there's this spot-on memory of what Marianne took off before [wearing] the rug.' He added that Jagger's statement 'adds fresh detail to the scandal which [Redlands] was'. Mr Norman branded the authorities 'disgraceful' for targeting 'musicians doing nothing terrible other than making rather louche singles'. The statement details what everyone did on the day and the drugs taken – but potentially incriminating comments are crossed out. The party was said to be the first time Jagger took hallucinogen LSD. Surrey auctioneers Ewbank's, who are selling the statement on August 21 with other Stones memorabilia from the same fan, described it as a 'significant historic document'. The company's specialist John Silke said: '[Jagger's] testimony is the most extraordinary document.'
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man's anger over number plate mix-up parking penalty
A man was wrongly issued with a parking charge after his car was mixed up with another vehicle with a nearly identical number Lynn said that on 18 March 2024, he paid £1.70 to park for about 30 minutes in Rushton's Yard car park in Ashby, Leicestershire, but later received a demand for £165 from solicitors representing private firm Horizon 53-year-old said photographic evidence, provided by the company, showed his Hyundai entering the car park - but a Kia with an identical number plate bar one letter leaving nine hours Parking said it wrote to Mr Lynn on 25 July to say the issue was rectified, but he said he had not received confirmation of this. Reflecting on the situation, Mr Lynn said: "It's ridiculous. They have clearly different cars with similar but different plates but they just haven't checked properly."The result of this is that I received a pretty nasty letter, threatening me with legal action if I didn't pay a fine I should not have been issued with in the first place."On 25 March 2024, Mr Lynn was sent a letter demanding £85 - £51 if he paid within 14 he said he only became aware of the matter in July this year - when he received a letter from solicitors acting on behalf of Horizon Parking demanding £ Lynn said he moved house in December 2022 but said he had, in error, not notified the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) of his change of address until some time in "early 2024".He said his address had subsequently been updated, but believed earlier correspondence could have been sent to his old Parking said it originally wrote to Mr Lynn, to the address provided by the DVLA, on 25 March 2024, then sent reminder letters on 24 April and 24 May last year. 'I'm pretty angry' Mr Lynn added: "The fact remains none of those letters should have been sent in the first place."There has been no humanity in the way this has been dealt with, either in terms of having a person look at those number plates and spot the mistake - or in the aggressive letter they sent."I almost paid them to make them go away, but I pushed back because it was a clear mistake."All they had was ANPR [automatic number plate recognition] evidence and they had not spotted the plates - while alike - were different. It beggars belief nobody checked."My fear is that lots of errors like this get made but that most people just pay up because they are scared about being dragged to court and having to pay huge legal fees even if they haven't committed the offence."I'm pretty angry about the whole thing." A Horizon Parking spokesperson told the BBC the matter had been rectified when it was brought to their BBC asked the firm to clarify if that meant the charge had been cancelled, and that potential legal proceedings had been halted, but it declined to said it had written to Mr Lynn, from Ashby, to inform him, but he said he had not received a letter from the company. "We do make every effort with our processes to issue correct parking charges," a statement from Horizon Parking said."We'll investigate to see how we can improve, but would encourage drivers to appeal in circumstances where the parking charge may be incorrect, to enable the matter to be resolved at an early stage."Unfortunately, we didn't receive an appeal and the parking charge therefore proceeded via our recovery methods. "Once the matter was brought to our attention, it was rectified."
