![[Newsmaker] Justice Moon Hyung-bae's humble life draws public admiration](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F04%2F08%2Fnews-p.v1.20250408.41df4d5634ac42f2ad33b34cd4669e25_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Newsmaker] Justice Moon Hyung-bae's humble life draws public admiration
Moon Hyung-bae, acting Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court of Korea, who read aloud the ruling upholding the impeachment of former President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday, has come into the public spotlight not only for his role in the historic ruling, but also for his life story which recently resurfaced and resonated with many people.
Born into a family in a small farming village in Hadong-gun, South Gyeongsang Province, in 1965, Moon grew up in poverty. He graduated from Jinju Daea High School and earned his Bachelor's degree in law from Seoul National University before passing the bar exam in 1986.
'I was the eldest son of a poor farmer. I only made it through middle school because I had relatives who handed down old uniforms and textbooks to me,' Moon recalled during his 2019 confirmation hearing before being appointed as a Constitutional Court justice.
An major turning point in his life came during his first year of high school, when he received a scholarship from Kim Jang-ha, a local Korean traditional medicine practitioner and philanthropist in Jinju, South Gyeongsang Province. This scholarship allowed him to continue his education through university.
Moon has often spoken of Kim's impact in his life, saying he could 'never have become a justice without him.' Kim, whose life story came to wider public attention through the 2023 MBC documentary 'A Man Who Heals the City,' is known to have devoted his earnings to the education and welfare of others. He has awarded scholarships to over 1,000 students — including Moon — and supported shelters for domestic violence survivors.
In South Korea, where public officials are frequently scrutinized for their wealth, Moon stands out. At his confirmation hearing in 2019, he disclosed that his total assets were 675 million won ($458,412), with his personal assets less than 400 million — significantly below the average for his peer judges, which at the time was 2 billion won.
'When I got married, I promised myself I would never stray from the life of an average person. I've recently realized my assets slightly exceed the national average of about 300 million won per household, and I'm genuinely sorry about that,' Moon told lawmakers.
Moon, also an active blogger who shares his thoughts via platform Tistory on books he has read and cases he has covered, has posted over 1,500 posts reflecting on law, society and literature.
One of them reads: 'I know how easily poverty can upend a person's life," he wrote, adding that society should move toward reducing the impact poverty has on individuals.
Following the court's historic recent impeachment ruling, hundreds of comments flooded his blog, thanking him for his service and integrity.
While Moon is set to step down from the Constitutional Court on April 18 after completing his six-year term, he has already made clear that he has no plans to open a private law practice, but will remain committed to public service.
'Even after becoming a justice, I have never forgotten that my duty is to repay society for the support I received,' he said in 2019.
The 60-year-old justice's judicial career has been also defined by a blend of compassion and firmness.
While serving as the chief judge of Changwon District Court from 2004 to 2007, he oversaw criminal appeal and corruption cases that drew attention for their principled, human-centered rulings.
In one case in 2007, Moon presided over a man who attempted suicide by setting fire to a motel room due to credit card debt. Instead of a jail term, Moon sentenced him to probation and urged him to reconsider life's value.
'Say the world 'suicide' ("jasal" in Korean) 10 times. To us, what you just said sounds like 'let's live' ("salja" in Korean). Think again about why you must live,' Moon told him, giving him a book titled, '49 Things You Must Do While Alive.'
In contrast, Moon has been strict when it comes to corruption cases. During the 2006 local elections, he handed down tough penalties, saying that even the smallest bribery case should face the consequence of leading to the annulment of the election results. Citing 'Admonitions on Governing the People,' (1820) by reformist philosopher, poet and scholar-official Dasan Jeong Yak-yong, Moon emphasized that 'integrity is the root of all virtue.'
When Moon presided over the historic ruling that removed Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday, he read, 'By deploying the military and police to undermine the authority of the National Assembly and other constitutional institutions and violate the fundamental human rights of the people, the defendant failed in his duty to protect the Constitution and seriously betrayed the trust of the South Korean people, the sovereigns of the Republic of Korea.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Court orders foreign ministry to drop lawsuit against MBC over Yoon's hot mic
A court on Wednesday ordered the foreign ministry to drop a lawsuit against broadcaster MBC over former President Yoon Suk Yeol's controversial remarks caught on a hot mic during his visit to the United States in 2022. Under the compulsory mediation, or "decision in lieu of conciliation," the Seoul High Court ordered the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to withdraw the lawsuit and instructed MBC to consent to the decision. Under South Korean law, a compulsory mediation can be ordered by a court when no settlement is reached during a mediation process in a civil lawsuit. It becomes final if neither party files an objection within two weeks. The former president's remarks, which experts say are difficult to discern due to background noise, were subtitled by MBC to make it sound like the president used vulgar language when mentioning then US President Joe Biden. Yoon's office later argued there was no mention of Biden and claimed the word he used was in reference to the South Korean National Assembly. "Considering the nature of the remarks, the freedom of the press and expression along with the social costs and side effects of the dispute, it is desirable that the issue be settled amicably by withdrawing the lawsuit," the court said in a statement. The court added the evidence provided by the foreign ministry was not sufficient to prove the news report was false. In January 2024, a lower court ordered broadcaster MBC to correct its report, with the broadcaster challenging the decision. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Westinghouse deal tensions loom over Korea-US summit
Controversial KHNP agreement faces backlash at home as leaders prepare to discuss nuclear energy cooperation Escalating tensions over a deal between South Korea's state-run energy firms and US company Westinghouse are complicating the agenda for the upcoming Korea-US summit, where nuclear energy cooperation is expected to take center stage. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in Washington next Monday for their summit, with officials saying nuclear partnership will be high on the agenda. According to a local media report on Wednesday, state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and Westinghouse, the two companies at the heart of the controversy, are preparing to form a joint venture to enter the US nuclear reactor market on the occasion of the upcoming summit. The report explained that since KHNP cannot independently access the US market, it plans to enter through a partnership with the American firm while handling most of the construction work. Nuclear energy's inclusion on the summit agenda was widely expected, given that the sector was part of South Korea's $200 billion investment pledge in the US under the tariff deal announced last month. President Trump has vowed to expand US nuclear energy capacity from 97 gigawatts to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Achieving this target would require constructing approximately 300 new 1,000-megawatt reactors. Industry observers view the US as eyeing Korean companies' technological expertise and construction capabilities to meet this goal. The plan comes amid controversy over a separate agreement that KHNP and Korea Electric Power Corp. struck with Westinghouse in January, sparking worries about potential summit implications. The settlement resolved Westinghouse's claims that KHNP had violated its intellectual property rights by using licensed Westinghouse technology in the development of its APR 1000 and 1400 nuclear reactor designs. The deal cleared the way for a KHNP-led consortium to sign an estimated 26 trillion won ($18.58 billion) contract in June to build two nuclear reactors in the Czech Republic. But after details of the settlement came to light on Monday following another local media report, the state-run company came under fire for agreeing to lopsided conditions to reach a swift deal, while burdening itself with hefty financial commitments. According to the agreement, KHNP agreed to sign contracts for goods and services worth $650 million with Westinghouse for each export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay an additional $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. The 50-year deal also contains a provision requiring Westinghouse to verify the technical independence of Korean companies before they can bid on overseas nuclear reactor projects, including small modular reactors. It also restricted KHNP to pursuing nuclear projects in only 12 designated countries -- including the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa -- while barring it from new deals in North America, Britain, Japan, Ukraine and the EU, except for the Czech Republic. Lawmakers blamed KHNP for bowing to US pressure to secure the Czech deal. 'It has been confirmed that the Yoon Suk Yeol government signed an unfair contract with Westinghouse to break the deadlock in the Czech project,' said Rep. Han Jeong-ae of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea at the National Assembly on Tuesday. Amid the controversy, KHNP CEO Whang Joo-ho on Tuesday said the deal terms remain within acceptable limits, but he declined to provide detailed answers, citing confidentiality obligations. 'While I cannot say (Westinghouse's demands) are justified, they are something tolerable enough for us to endure and still generate profit,' Whang said at the National Assembly. Meanwhile, opposition People Power Party lawmakers also stressed that just before the Korea-US summit, it may not serve the national interest for the parliament to directly confront the Westinghouse issue. 'Westinghouse may hold the original technology, but it lacks the construction capacity to independently build reactors, which means Korean companies are likely to handle the construction,' said an industry insider on condition of anonymity. 'Even if the deal is viewed as unfavorable, I believe it was inevitable if Korean companies are going to expand their overseas nuclear businesses.' Amid growing backlash, South Korea's presidential office has ordered the Industry Ministry to investigate the deal to verify that the negotiations and contract process were carried out based on laws and regulations and in accordance with principles and procedures.
Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Do Koreans support child benefits for foreign children?
Most S. Koreans back child benefits for long-term foreign residents — but not for all migrants Eight in 10 South Koreans support granting child benefits to foreign children if their parents hold permanent residency, a survey showed Wednesday. The findings, published in a July report by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, analyzed public attitudes toward immigrant rights and welfare policy, revealing a broad public consensus on the issue of child benefits for long-term residents. Support levels varied depending on immigrant status. Nearly 80 percent approved of granting the 100,000 won monthly child benefit to children of permanent residents, and 74.2 percent agreed to the same for children of marriage immigrants. Currently, the child benefit program, giving 100,000 won per month for children under 8 years old, is limited to Korean nationals, with exceptions for recognized refugees and certain special contributors. But less than half of respondents said they were supportive of granting the benefit to children of migrant workers and overseas Koreans, which stood at 45.3 percent and 45.4 percent, respectively. Some 32 percent agreed to offering the state support to children of international students. A similar pattern emerged when respondents were asked about extending access to the basic living allowance, a program that provides cash support for food, clothing, heating and other essential daily needs under the National Basic Living Security Act. While 72.5 percent supported granting these benefits to permanent residents and 60.9 percent supported it for marriage immigrants, agreement dropped to the 20-30 percent range for overseas Koreans, migrant workers and international students. Currently, foreign residents in Korea are not entitled to the basic living allowance, except in limited cases, such as being married to a Korean or raising a Korean child. Eligibility under the program is otherwise restricted to Korean citizens whose household income falls below the government's minimum subsistence standard, and who lack family members capable of providing support. Research fellow Kim Ki-tae noted this may be because 'the influx of immigrants performing low-wage labor can be perceived as a threat to vulnerable domestic groups,' in the report. When asked about the rights of foreign nationals living in Korea, respondents generally recognized them as "not so respected" and 'only somewhat respected.' Perceptions were most positive about foreign residents' right to health, followed by basic human rights, housing rights, labor rights and access to welfare benefits. As for when immigrants should receive the same social welfare rights as Korean citizens, 49.2 percent answered 'after working and paying taxes for at least a year.' Another 32.6 percent supported granting access 'immediately after acquiring citizenship,' while smaller shares supported access a year after arrival regardless of employment (9.7 percent) or immediately upon entry (3.6 percent). Income and education levels also influenced opinions. Higher-income, higher-educated respondents were more supportive, while lower-income groups tended to view welfare rights for foreign residents more cautiously. While Kim cautioned against indiscriminate welfare expansion, he stressed that policies should not be shaped by prejudice. 'For genuine social integration, it is necessary to increase contact between native and immigrant communities, strengthen protections for vulnerable Koreans, and improve perceptions about equitable welfare,' he said.
