Nithari case: SC dismisses 14 appeals challenging acquittal of Surendra Koli
2006 Nithari serial killings
case.
A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and K Vinod Chandran said that there was "no perversity" in the findings of the
Allahabad High Court
acquitting Koli.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Finance
Healthcare
Public Policy
PGDM
Cybersecurity
Data Science
Data Analytics
Digital Marketing
Management
Data Science
healthcare
Leadership
others
Artificial Intelligence
CXO
Operations Management
Technology
Design Thinking
Product Management
MBA
MCA
Others
Degree
Project Management
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
9 Months
IIM Calcutta
SEPO - IIMC CFO India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
7 Months
S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Referring to Section 27 of the Evidence Act, the CJI said the recovery of skulls and other belongings of the victims from an open drain was not made following the statement of Koli before the police.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Dubai villas | search ads
Get Deals
The bench said any recovery made without recording the statement of the accused by the police is not admissible as evidence under the Evidence law.
It said only those recoveries, which are made from a place accessible to the accused only, can be admitted as evidence in a case primarily hinging on circumstantial evidence.
Live Events
The top court last year agreed to examine separate pleas, including those filed by the CBI and the Uttar Pradesh government, challenging the Allahabad High Court's decision acquitting Koli on October 16, 2023.
One of the pleas was filed by the father of one of the victims challenging the high court's verdict.
Moninder Singh Pandher
and his domestic help Koli were accused of rape and murder of people, mostly children from their neighbourhood in Nithari in Uttar Pradesh.
Koli was awarded the death penalty on September 28, 2010 by the trial court.
The high court acquitted Pandher and Koli in the death penalty case, holding the prosecution's failure to prove their guilt "beyond reasonable doubt" and called it a "botched up" investigation.
Reversing the death sentence given to Koli in 12 cases and Pandher in two cases, the high court said the probe was "nothing short of a betrayal of public trust by responsible agencies".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
SBK Singh appointed Delhi police commissioner after Sanjay Arora's retirement
NEW DELHI: Senior IPS officer SBK Singh from the 1988 batch was on Thursday given additional charge as Delhi Police commissioner following the retirement of Sanjay Arora. Singh is currently serving as the chief of the Home Guards. The youngest officer of the 1988 IPS batch, Singh is expected to retire in February 2026. He previously served as Special commissioner (Technology & Project Implementation) in Delhi police and played a key role in developing the 'Lost Report' mobile app and the 'Police Clearance Certificate' web application. Singh has been awarded the President's Police Medal for distinguished service and served in the United Nations Peacekeeping Mission in Kosovo, where he received a UN Peacekeeping Medal. Known for his discipline and tech-focused policing, he held several senior positions in Delhi Police, R&AW, and Arunachal Pradesh. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi His career includes important roles such as ACP Karol Bagh, Additional DCP South, DCP North-East, and DCP Central. He also led the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) and served as Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime) and Special Commissioner of Police (Intelligence and Security). In his most recent role as Special commissioner, Law and Order, he oversaw 85 police stations across seven districts of Delhi. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Chile: New Senior Apartments (Prices May Surprise You) Senior Apartments | Search Ads Search Now Undo One of his key assignments was overseeing security for Republic Day 2015, during the visit of US President Barack Obama . He also led the arrangements for the Indo-Africa Forum Summit in October 2015, attended by delegates from 54 countries. Singh has handled several high-profile investigations, including the Uphaar cinema fire tragedy, the Ponty Chadha murder case, and multiple land scam cases. His work in Arunachal Pradesh, Pondicherry, and a seven-year tenure in R&AW reflect his diverse experience. He has also received the Police Medal for Meritorious Service and has been recognised for his innovative contributions to policing. Outside his official duties, Singh is known as a thoughtful and spiritual individual. He maintains a blog called 'Spiritual Policeman', where he shares his personal reflections and professional experiences.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC upholds order quashing recovery from Class III employees; directs state to refund with interest
Representative Image RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh high court on Wednesday dismissed a writ appeal filed by the State, upholding a single-judge bench's order that had quashed a recovery notice issued to 26 Class III employees for alleged excess payment during their service tenure. The High Court also directed the State to refund the recovered amount with 6% interest per annum if the refund was delayed beyond three months from the original order date. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru heard the appeal filed by the State of Chhattisgarh and other police authorities against the order passed by a single-judge bench on 29 January 2025. The case involves 26 Class III employees, including Divya Kumar Sahu, Neeran Lal, and others, all residing at the STF Headquarter in Baghera, Durg. They had challenged a recovery notice dated 10 October 2019, which sought to recover excess payments made due to incorrect pay fixation. Earlier, on 27 November 2019, the single-judge bench had issued an interim order staying the recovery notice. Despite this, the State proceeded with the recovery of the amount from the employees. On 29 January 2025, the single-judge bench allowed the writ petition and instructed the State to refund the recovered amount within three months, with 6% interest if the deadline was missed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General for the State, argued that while the State was ready to refund the recovered amount, the payment of interest would impose a significant financial burden. Abhishek Pandey, counsel for the employees, submitted that the appellants had recovered the amount despite an interim stay order. He argued that the employees were entitled to the recovered amount along with 6% interest as ordered by the single-judge bench. After reviewing the arguments and documents, the High Court observed that the petitioners were Class III employees and that, as per a Supreme Court decision in State of Punjab & Ors Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) & Ors, recovery from such employees is not permissible. The bench found no illegality or infirmity in the single-judge's order. It noted that the State had recovered the amount despite an interim stay and had not refunded it within the stipulated three-month period. The writ appeal was therefore dismissed, with no order on costs.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Malegaon blast verdict: Who is Lt Col. Prasad Purohit? The army officer who faced terror charges and walked free after court's acquittal
NEW DELHI: Lt Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit is an Indian Army officer who became a central figure in one of the most controversial terror cases in the country's recent history the 2008 Malegaon blast case. At the time of his arrest, he was serving as a Lieutenant Colonel in military intelligence. On September 29, 2008, a bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near a mosque in Malegaon, Maharashtra, killing six people and injuring over 100. The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) arrested Lt Col. Purohit in November 2008 for allegedly being part of the conspiracy that led to the blast. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai His arrest marked the first time a serving army officer had been implicated in a terrorism-related case in the country. Purohit spent nearly nine years in custody before being granted bail by the Supreme Court in September 2017. The case against him and others became politically and socially contentious, especially after the term 'Hindu terror' entered the public discourse. Purohit himself claims this phrase was first used shortly before the blast by a political party leader, suggesting a narrative was being framed even before the event. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Unforgettable Cars from the Past Undo In his final statement before a special NIA court, Purohit denied all charges, calling the entire case a fabrication. He alleged that senior officers of the ATS tortured him physically and mentally during his illegal detention in Khandala, where he claims he was treated 'worse than a prisoner of war.' He also alleged that he was pressured to name prominent leaders from right-wing organisations like the RSS and VHP, including now-Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath. Purohit claimed that false evidence, including RDX, was planted to implicate him. According to his court statement, witnesses were coerced, threatened at gunpoint, and tortured into giving statements dictated by the ATS to align with a political agenda. He accused investigating officers of having orchestrated extra-judicial killings of other suspects and fabricating evidence to fit a pre-decided narrative. He further argued that his work in military intelligence which included reports on fugitive underworld don Dawood Ibrahim's alleged links to Maoist groups and an intelligence brief on Zakir Naik's funding activities may have made him a target. He believes these reports, which also named certain politicians, could have contributed to his framing. Despite the years-long legal ordeal, Lt Col. Purohit was reinstated in the Army pending trial and continued to serve. 'Even after coming out on bail, my conviction never changed,' he said on Thursday, expressing gratitude for the opportunity to keep serving the nation. A special court acquitted all seven accused, including him, in the Malegaon blast case, stating there was 'no reliable and cogent evidence' against them. The court underscored that terrorism has no religion and that convictions cannot be based on mere perception. Reflecting on his long battle, Purohit remarked, 'No investigating agency is wrong; it is the people serving in these agencies who are wrong. This nation is great. We must take care that wrong people do not rise and make people like us suffer.'
